• Home
  • Search
  • Mass transfer with chemical reaction in liquid foam reactors
  • Cite Icon20
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690300607Copy DOI Icon

Mass transfer with chemical reaction in liquid foam reactors

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Mass transfer studies were conducted in a stable liquid foam reactor under various operating conditions to evaluate gas holdup, effective interfacial area, liquid‐phase mass transfer coefficient and a modified interfacial mass transfer coefficient to include the surface‐active agents employed. Gas holdup and effective interfacial area were evaluated experimentally. The interfacial mass transfer coefficient was evaluated semitheoretically, by considering the interfacial region as a separate phase and using the experimental data developed for mass transfer accompanied by a fast first‐order chemical reaction. The liquid‐phase mass transfer coefficient was also evaluated semitheoretically, using Danckwert's theory for the liquid phase and the experimental data on mass transfer accompanied by a slow pseudofirst‐order chemical reaction.An experimental unit was set up to provide a stable flowing foam column, simulating the foam reactor. Mass transfer rates were studied for superfacial gas velocities in the range from 1.5 × 10−2 m/s to 5 × 10−2 m/s, giving gas residence times in the range from 20 to 55 seconds. A cationic and nonionic surface‐active agent and three different wire mesh sizes, giving bubble size distributions in the range from 2.2 to 5.4 mm Sauter mean diameters, were employed.It is observed that gas holdup is insensitive to the type of surface‐active agent; it is however, dependent on wire mesh size and gas velocity. The bubble diameter and, hence, the interfacial area are found to be insensitive to gas velocity in the range studied; they are, however, strong functions of wire mesh size. The liquid‐phase mass transfer coefficient increases with increase in gas velocity. The surface‐active agent introduces additional resistance to mass transfer in both reaction cases, this being the controlling one in the case of the fast reaction. A comparison with conventional packed bed contactors indicates the mass transfer rates to be about 8 times lower for the foam reactor, for the fast reaction case; for slow reactions, the foam reactor has mass transfer rates approximately 2‐4 times higher than those for conventional packed bed contactors.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations24

HYDRODYNAMICS AND MASS TRANSFER IN DOWNFLOW BUBBLE COLUMN

  • Dec 01, 1983
  • Chemical Engineering Communications
  • Amol Kulkarni +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations46

Mass transfer studies in shallow bubble column reactors

  • Oct 16, 2012
  • Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification
  • Raymond Lau +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Measurement of local specific interfacial area in bubble columns via a non-isokinetic withdrawal method coupled to electro-optical detector

  • Nov 12, 2007
  • Chemical Engineering Science
  • Sergio García-Salas +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Gas Holdup and Gas-Liquid Mass Transfer Investigations in an Oscillatory Flow in a Baffled Column

  • Oct 20, 2008
  • ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering
  • Taslim Taslim +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Gas-solid flow behavior and heat transfer in a spiral-based reactor for calcium-based thermochemical energy storage

  • Aug 24, 2024
  • Journal of Energy Storage
  • Liujuan Zhu +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Multi-scale analysis of the influence of physicochemical parameters on the hydrodynamic and gas–liquid mass transfer in gas/liquid/solid reactors

  • Jun 14, 2013
  • Chemical Engineering Science
  • A Kherbeche +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

MULTIPHASE HYDRODYNAMICS AND SOLID-LIQUID MASS TRANSPORT IN AN EXTERNAL-LOOP AIRLIFT REACTOR—A COMPARATIVE STUDY

  • Mar 01, 1992
  • Chemical Engineering Communications
  • Helen Huihua Mao +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations96

Bubble size distribution and gas–liquid mass transfer in airlift contactors

  • Sep 26, 2002
  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • Porntip Wongsuchoto
  • Research Article
  • Citations63

New systems and methods for the measurement of effective interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients in gas—liquid contactors

  • Jan 01, 1976
  • Chemical Engineering Science
  • K Sridharan +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

Effect of the radical scavenger t-butanol on gas–liquid mass transfer

  • Jul 18, 2009
  • Chemical Engineering Science
  • C Tizaoui +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Effect of Tween 80 on Bubble Size and Mass Transfer in a Bubble Contactor

  • Oct 06, 2011
  • Chemical Engineering & Technology
  • I Belo +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Bubble Diameter and Effective Interfacial Area in a Novel Hybrid Rotating and Reciprocating Perforated Plate Bubble Column

  • Feb 23, 2012
  • International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering
  • Dhanasekaran S +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

The Influence of Draft Tubes on the Mass Transfer and Mixing Performance of a Pilot-Scale Internal-Loop Airlift Reactor

  • Sep 29, 2023
  • Processes
  • Zongliang Wang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

CFD-PBM simulations on hydrodynamics and gas-liquid mass transfer in a gas-liquid-solid circulating fluidized bed

  • Nov 23, 2019
  • Powder Technology
  • Xiuhong Zhou +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

Gas‐Liquid Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer in Aqueous Alcohol Solutions in a Split‐Cylinder Airlift Reactor

  • Feb 25, 2011
  • Chemical Engineering & Technology
  • M K Moraveji +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.