P-289 Cost effectiveness of routine utilisation of atypically-pronucleated embryos in IVF cycles with preimplantation genetic testing – In for a penny, in for a pound!
Study question Does including embryos from atypically pronucleated zygotes (APZs) in IVF cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) offer a cost-effective advantage for infertility patients? Summary answer Including APZ-derived blastocysts in PGT-A cycles improves live-birth rates, reduces cost per live-birth, and remains cost-effective across various clinical settings based on willingness to pay. What is known already Cost-effectiveness (CE) analyses are an important tool to inform implementation of new technologies in healthcare. Until recently, all embryos derived from zygotes with atypical pronuclear patterns, such as 1PN and ≥3PN, were discarded due to concerns about ploidy abnormalities and viability. However, implementation of modern PGT technologies allowing ploidy assessment, or molecular fertilisation check by genotyping, have shown that all typologies of APZs can develop into viable diploid euploid blastocysts capable of implantation and live birth. While outcomes and clinical safety of utilising APZs have been explored, the financial impact of including them in PGT-A cycles remains undetermined. Study design, size, duration This cost-effectiveness study used a decision tree model to compare the costs and outcomes of including vs. excluding APZs in IVF pathways. The model accounted for up to two IVF cycles if the first failed, with egg donation as an option in 20% of second cycles. Data from 826 IVF cycles with PGT-A at a single private clinic (February2013–December2020) were analyzed. The primary outcome was the financial cost per live birth in both scenarios. Participants/materials, setting, methods Real-world IVF cycle data were integrated into a decision tree model to predict live birth probability after PGT-A and the likelihood of following specific treatment pathways. Live birth rates were determined by maternal age, euploid embryo count, and pronuclear status. APZ typologies were modelled using blastocyst development rates and PGT-based ploidy estimates. Cost-effectiveness was assessed via incremental cost per additional live birth, with ICER calculations and a willingness-to-pay threshold of €450 per incremental LBR point. Main results and the role of chance From the clinical dataset, 110 cycles (13.3%) included at least one APZ that developed to the blastocyst stage, marking the decision point for its inclusion in the PGT-A program. In the model, 60% of non-pregnant couples underwent another IVF cycle (with or without APZs), 30% chose egg donation, and 10% remained childless. The utilization of APZs predicted an increase in LBR from 39% to 44% per IVF cycle and from 59.9% to 66% following the decisional tree pathway, corresponding to 5 and 6 additional live births per 100 PGT-A cycles, respectively. The average financial costs for each couple in the two treatments pathways are €14,051.5 and €14,165 for 2PN and APZ, respectively, with a difference of €113.5 euro. The financial cost per live birth in the APZ-utilized pathway was €21,462, compared to €23,458 in the standard 2PN-only approach, reflecting a cost reduction of €1,996 per live birth. Incorporating APZs resulted in an ICER of €1,861.19, confirming it as a cost-effective strategy for improving IVF outcomes in this patient population when assessed against the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. The cost-effectiveness remains valid up to an ICER of €2,700.00 per completed treatment journey, ensuring financial feasibility across varying clinical and economic scenarios. Limitations, reasons for caution This study analyzes retrospective cycle data and costs from a single center, which may vary based on assumptions and predefined IVF pathways. However, the buffer within the willingness-to-pay threshold supports the broader generalizability of findings and the financial feasibility across a wider infertile patient population. Wider implications of the findings This first-of-its-kind study highlights the economic, reproductive, and ethical advantages of incorporating APZ-derived blastocysts into PGT-A cycles. By maximizing embryo utilization, it supports more efficient resource allocation while reinforcing clinical viability and cost-effectiveness, advocating for its integration into routine IVF practice to improve success rates and accessibility. Trial registration number No
Read more