• Home
  • Search
  • MHD heliosphere with boundary conditions from a tomographic reconstruction using interplanetary scintillation data
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon30
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/2013ja019755Copy DOI Icon

MHD heliosphere with boundary conditions from a tomographic reconstruction using interplanetary scintillation data

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Observations of interplanetary scintillation (IPS) provide a set of data that is used in estimating the solar wind parameters with reasonably good accuracy. Various tomography techniques have been developed to deconvolve the line‐of‐sight integration effects ingrained in observations of IPS to improve the accuracy of solar wind reconstructions. Among those, the time‐dependent tomography developed at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) is well known for its remarkable accuracy in reproducing the solar wind speed and density at Earth by iteratively fitting a kinematic solar wind model to observations of IPS and near‐Earth spacecraft measurements. However, the kinematic model gradually breaks down as the distance from the Sun increases beyond the orbit of Earth. Therefore, it would be appropriate to use a more sophisticated model, such as a magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) model, to extend the kinematic solar wind reconstruction beyond the Earth's orbit and to the outer heliosphere. To test the suitability of this approach, we use boundary conditions provided by the UCSD time‐dependent tomography to propagate the solar wind outward in a MHD model and compare the simulation results with in situ measurements and also with the corresponding kinematic solution. Interestingly, we find notable differences in proton radial velocity and number density at Earth and various locations in the inner heliosphere between the MHD results and both the in situ data and the kinematic solution. For example, at 1 AU, the MHD velocities are generally larger than the spacecraft data by up to 150 km s−1, and the amplitude of density fluctuations is also markedly larger in the MHD solution. We show that the MHD model can deliver more reasonable results at Earth with an ad hoc adjustment of the inner boundary values. However, we conclude that the MHD model using the inner boundary conditions derived from kinematic simulations has little chance to match IPS and in situ data as well as the kinematic model does unless it too is iteratively fit to the observational data and measurements.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

Modeling of Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections Using Interplanetary Scintillation Data

  • Mar 01, 2019
  • Periasamy K Manoharan
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Interplanetary scintillation observations of the solar wind disappearance event of May 1999

  • Mar 01, 2003
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
  • V Balasubramanian +3
  • Preprint Article

Quantifying CME arrival time uncertainty with mega ensembles

  • Mar 23, 2020
  • Mathew Owens
  • Research Article
  • Citations28

Interplanetary Scintillation Observations of Stream Interaction Regions in the Solar Wind

  • Dec 16, 2009
  • Solar Physics
  • M M Bisi +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Modeling Soft X‐Ray Emissions at the Dayside Magnetopause

  • Aug 01, 2024
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
  • Qiuyu Xu +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

One year in the Earth's magnetosphere: A global MHD simulation and spacecraft measurements

  • May 01, 2016
  • Space Weather
  • G Facskó +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations72

Data‐driven modeling of the solar wind from 1 Rs to 1 AU

  • Dec 01, 2015
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
  • Xueshang Feng +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

In-situ Observations of a Co-rotating Interaction Region at Venus Identified by IPS and STEREO

  • Aug 01, 2010
  • Solar Physics
  • I C Whittaker +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Time-dependent Ionization in a Steady Flow in an MHD Model of the Solar Corona and Wind

  • Nov 14, 2017
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • Chengcai Shen +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

A polytropic model for the solar wind

  • Aug 22, 2011
  • Advances in Space Research
  • C Jacobs +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

How did the solar wind structure change around the solar maximum? From interplanetary scintillation observation

  • Jun 30, 2003
  • Annales Geophysicae
  • K Fujiki +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

Solar wind velocity and normalized scintillation index from single-station IPS observations

  • Feb 01, 1995
  • Solar Physics
  • P K Manoharan +7
  • Preprint Article

How GLOWS will reveal the latitudinal structure of the solar wind

  • Mar 18, 2025
  • Izabela Kowalska-Leszczynska +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations71

Long‐term evolution in the global distribution of solar wind speed and density fluctuations during 1997–2009

  • Jun 01, 2012
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
  • Munetoshi Tokumaru +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Comparison of various cusp models with high- and low-resolution observations

  • Jan 01, 2001
  • Space Science Reviews
  • M Yamauchi +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.