Micro-invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth.

Compared with CR, there were lower numbers of failures with HT and SE in the primary dentition, and with SE and SW in the permanent dentition. Most studies showed high risk of bias and limited precision of estimates due to small sample size and typically limited numbers of failures, resulting in assessments of low or very low certainty of evidence for most comparisons.

BackgroundInfiltration and sealing are micro-invasive treatments for arresting proximal non-cavitated caries lesions; however, their efficacies under different conditions remain unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the caries-arresting effectiveness of infiltration and sealing and to further analyse their efficacies across different dentition types and caries risk levels.MethodsSix electronic databases were searched for published literature, and references were manually searched. Split-mouth randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effectiveness between infiltration/sealing and non-invasive treatments in proximal lesions were included. The primary outcome was obtained from radiographical readings.ResultsIn total, 1033 citations were identified, and 17 RCTs (22 articles) were included. Infiltration and sealing reduced the odds of lesion progression (infiltration vs. non-invasive: OR = 0.21, 95% CI 0.15–0.30; sealing vs. placebo: OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.42). For both the primary and permanent dentitions, infiltration and sealing were more effective than non-invasive treatments (primary dentition: OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.20–0.45; permanent dentition: OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.14–0.28). The overall effects of infiltration and sealing were significantly different from the control effects based on different caries risk levels (OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.14–0.28). Except for caries risk at moderate levels (moderate risk: OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.01–8.27), there were significant differences between micro-invasive and non-invasive treatments (low risk: OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08–0.72; low to moderate risk: OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.81; moderate to high risk: OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.10–0.29; and high risk: OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.07–0.28). Except for caries risk at moderate levels (moderate risk: OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.01–8.27), infiltration was superior (low risk: OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08–0.72; low to moderate risk: OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.18–0.81; moderate to high risk: OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.10–0.39; and high risk: OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.05–0.37).ConclusionInfiltration and sealing were more efficacious than non-invasive treatments for halting non-cavitated proximal lesions.

ObjectivesInvasive therapy of proximal caries lesions initiates a cascade of re-treatment cycles with increasing loss of dental hard tissue. Non- and micro-invasive treatment aim at delaying this cascade and may thus reduce both the health and economic burden of such lesions. This study compared the costs and effectiveness of alternative treatments of proximal caries lesions.MethodsA Markov-process model was used to simulate the events following the treatment of a proximal posterior lesion (E2/D1) in a 20-year-old patient in Germany. We compared three interventions (non-invasive; micro-invasive using resin infiltration; invasive using composite restoration). We calculated the risk of complications of initial and possible follow-up treatments and modelled time-dependent non-linear transition probabilities. Costs were calculated based on item-fee catalogues in Germany. Monte-Carlo-microsimulations were performed to compare cost-effectiveness of non- versus micro-invasive treatment and to analyse lifetime costs of all three treatments.ResultsMicro-invasive treatment was both more costly and more effective than non-invasive therapy, with ceiling-value-thresholds for willingness-to-pay between 16.73 € for E2 and 1.57 € for D1 lesions. Invasive treatment was the most costly strategy. Calculated costs and effectiveness were sensitive to lesion stage, patient’s age, discounting rate and assumed initial treatment costs.ConclusionsNon- and micro-invasive treatments have lower long-term costs than invasive therapy of proximal lesions. Micro-invasive therapy had the highest cost-effectiveness for treating D1 lesions in young patients. Decision makers with a willingness-to-pay over 16.73 € and 1.57 € for E2 and D1 lesions, respectively, will find micro-invasive treatment more cost-effective than non-invasive therapy.

Effectiveness of different preventive agents on initial occlusal and proximal caries lesions: A follow-up study

The conclusions of this updated review remain the same as those when it was first published. There is moderate quality evidence of a large caries-inhibiting effect of fluoride gel in the permanent dentition. Information concerning the caries-preventive effect of fluoride gel on the primary dentition, which also shows a large effect, is based on low quality evidence from only three placebo-controlled trials. There is little information on adverse effects or on acceptability of treatment. Future trials should include assessment of potential adverse effects.

The aim of this in vitro study was to systematically investigate new caries diagnostic tools, including three intraoral scanners, and compare them to established diagnostic methods. For a standardized analysis of occlusal and proximal caries lesions, human permanent and primary teeth (n = 64) were embedded in models and investigated in a phantom head using six different caries diagnostic methods: visual examination, bitewing radiography, Diagnocam (KaVo, Biberach, Germany), Trios 4 (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark), iTero Element 5D (Align Technology, San José, CA, USA), and Planmeca Emerald S (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland). The diagnostic methods were investigated and compared to reference µ-CT for permanent and primary teeth separately. For occlusal caries diagnostics in permanent teeth, the best agreement to the reference (reliability) was obtained for Planmeca Emerald S (ĸ = 0.700), whereas in primary teeth, for visual examination (ĸ = 0.927), followed by Trios 4 (ĸ = 0.579). Regarding proximal caries diagnostics, bitewing radiography, as the gold standard, exhibited the highest agreement for permanent (ĸ = 0.643) and primary teeth (ĸ = 0.871). Concerning the analysis of the diagnostic quality (sensitivity and specificity) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, comparable findings were obtained for area under curve (AUC) values as for reliability. No diagnostic method could be identified that is generally suitable for occlusal and proximal lesions in both dentitions. Overall, caries diagnostics with intraoral scanners seem to be interesting tools that should be further investigated in clinical studies.

Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of pH cycling on the microhardness of the enamel of primary human teeth treated with a conventional brown Sodium Fluoride (5% NaF) Varnish to those treated with a white Fluoride Varnish (5% NaF) enhanced with functionalized tricalcium phosphate (fTCP). Materials and Methods. Ninety extracted caries-free primary incisors were washed in a detergent and divided into three groups; group A received no treatment, teeth in group B were coated with Sodium Fluoride (5% NaF) Varnish, while teeth in group C were coated with 5% NaF varnish enhanced with functionalized tricalcium phosphate (fTCP). After ten days of pH cycling, the surface microhardness of the teeth was measured using a Knoop indenter. Results. The mean Knoop hardness number (KHN) of 5% NaF with fTCP was greater than that of 5% NaF alone while the control group had the lowest mean KHN. Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that the use of an additive such as fTCP to a fluoride varnish significantly improves the protective ability of the varnish on primary teeth in vitro.

include affordability, reliability, and durability, making them a preferred option for interim full-coronal coverage. 5Substantial scientific evidence supports the use of SSCs, especially in young children at high risk for dental caries.However, despite these benefits, some practitioners are hesitant to use them due to drawbacks such as their unaesthetic metallic appearance and longer chairside time. 5n esthetic alternative to SSCs is zirconia crowns.These are more widely adopted by clinicians as zirconia crowns overcome the disadvantages of SSCs.These are more esthetic to the patient and the chairside time is also reduced. 5Zirconia crowns, often IntroductIonDental caries continues to be one of the most widespread diseases affecting young children.In primary teeth, the progression of caries can be soft once it begins.Early childhood caries (ECC) is a major global health concern, occurring 5 times more frequently than asthma and 20 times more often than juvenile diabetes. 1ECC significantly affects the quality of life of both the children suffering from it and their families.Dental caries can affect the primary dentition soon after eruption if adequate hygiene habits and healthy nutrition are not established at an early age.Although preventive care has improved and led to a decline in dental caries among children under the age of 3, research continues to show that caries remains the most prevalent oral health issue among children in many regions worldwide. 2,3Untreated decay in primary teeth can lead to pain, high treatment costs, missed school or work, and future caries risk.Primary teeth are essential for chewing, speech, esthetics, and maintaining space for permanent teeth, making their timely care crucial. 4tainless steel crowns (SSCs) are the most widely used restorations for preserving and restoring severely decayed or damaged primary teeth following endodontic treatment.Introduced to pediatric dentistry in 1947 by Engel and later popularized by Humphrey in 1950, SSCs have consistently outperformed alternatives like amalgam and composite in terms of strength and longevity for over 50 years.Their key advantages

Applying fluoride varnish or resin-based fissure sealants to first permanent molars helps prevent occlusal caries, but it has not been possible in this review to reach reliable conclusions about which one is better to apply. The available studies do not suggest either intervention is superior, but we assessed this evidence as having very low certainty. We found very low-certainty evidence that placing resin-based sealant as well as applying fluoride varnish works better than applying fluoride varnish alone. Fourteen studies are currently ongoing and their findings may allow us to draw firmer conclusions about whether sealants and varnish work equally well or whether one is better than the other.

ABSTRACTBackground:The prevalence of dental caries requires pediatric dentistry to pursue efficient preventive methods to tackle the problem. Multiple research has explored the fluoride varnish effectiveness for remineralization, yet the results show contrasting findings. The proposed research evaluates the effectiveness by which different fluoride varnishes can remineralize primary teeth with demineralized enamel.Materials and Methods:A total of sixty extracted primary teeth received artificial enamel lesions under randomized selection that split them into four groups numbering fifteen specimens each for Groups A and B and C and D. The pH cycling procedure was applied to the samples for 14 days. Metabolic testing of surface microhardness took place using a Vickers hardness tester before initiating treatment and after completion. The research used ANOVA statistical analysis together with posthoc tests while setting the significance threshold at P < 0.05.Results:The application of fluoride varnishes in all test groups produced substantial increases in surface microhardness values than those observed in the control group. The highest level of tooth remineralization occurred in Group A where the restoration increased by 45%, while Group B achieved 38% and Group C gained 30%. The control group experienced inferior dental improvements compared with the experimental groups having only a 5% hard tissue increase. The results demonstrated that Group A obtained superior values compared with other groups, while statistical findings indicated a significant group variation with P < 0.001.Conclusion:The highest level of primary tooth remineralization occurs when using 5% sodium fluoride varnish as an effective preventive treatment. Tricalcium phosphate and amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride varnishes demonstrated strong effectiveness in addition to 5% sodium fluoride varnish. Research findings demonstrate that fluoride varnishes need to be considered a fundamental approach for handling young children’s early enamel lesion management.

Data sources A comprehensive collection of databases were searched from inception to August 2020, such as Cochrane, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of science. Also, references and citations of retrieved records, conference proceedings and leading journals were searched.Study selection All randomised clinical trials on root-canal-treated adult permanent teeth that compared the outcomes of ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) to syringe irrigation (SI) were eligible. The outcomes considered were post-operative pain, pain intensity, periapical healing after 12 months, the incidence of microbial presence, microbial quantification, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) quantification and lipoteichoic acid quantification. Studies with insufficient data for risk of bias assessment or other outcomes were excluded.Data extraction and synthesis The two independent reviewers did the screening process in title, abstract and full-text assessment steps. Also, the data extraction process and risk of bias assessment were done by two independent reviewers. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus or the opinion of a third reviewer. Any missing information was filled in by contacting the authors. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials was used to assess the risk of bias. The following domains were evaluated for risk of bias: randomisation process, deviation from the intended interventions, missing outcome data, outcome measurement and the selection of the reported results. If all domains were rated as 'low risk', judgements would be rated as 'low risk', otherwise, 'high risk'. The risk ratios and mean risk difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as measure effect. The random effects model was used to combine the effects. The heterogeneity is measured by I2 test (I2 test >50% and p <0.1 considered as substantial heterogeneity). The level of certainty of evidence for clinically important outcomes was determined using the guidelines of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group.Results Four studies entered the meta-analysis stage based on pain outcomes. The overall risk of bias for three of them was assessed as high. All of them had examined pain incidence before 24 hours but only two studies have examined the occurrence of pain in the period of 24-72 hours and after 72 hours to 7 days. Considerable heterogeny was among the incidence of pain <24 hours between studies (I2= 83%). Therefore, the incidence of pain in two sub-groups of vital and non-vital pulp has been investigated. In the non-vital pulps, the incidence of pain by UAI was half of the incidence of SI pain (relative risk= 0.50; 95% CI 0.35-0.71; I2 = 0%; 308 teeth). But no significant difference was seen in vital pulps. Also, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of pain after 72 hours between the two methods. Two studies assessed the intensity of pain in three periods: <24 hours, 72-24 hours, more than 72 hours and less than 7 days. The combined results based on vital and non-vital groups resulted in no significant difference in any period. Pooled data of pain outcomes were assessed with very low or low confidence of evidence.Five studies with microbiology-related outcomes entered the final analysis stage. The overall risk of bias for two of them was high. Three studies evaluated the effect of the irrigation method on microbial presence as an outcome. High heterogeneity was among the results of the studies (I2= 72%). However, with and without subgroup analysis, meta-analysis results showed no significant difference between these two methods. A lower microbial count was found with UAI than SI in a meta-analysis of four studies (standardised mean difference-pooled - 0.40; 95% CI [-0.78, -0.02]; I2 = 0%; 126 teeth). Two studies measured LPs. The meta-analysis showed lower values of LPS with UAI compared to SI (34, 37) (mean difference pooled - 0.06; 95% CI [-0.11, -0.01]; 61 root canals; I2 = 29%). One study measured lipoteichoic acid and found no significant difference between the irrigation methods.Three studies with treatment-success-related outcomes entered the meta-analysis stage with an overall high risk of bias. Two studies' pooled data revealed no significant difference between the irrigation methods regarding treatment failure. One study assessed periapical-lesion volume after treatment and found no significant difference between the irrigation methods.Conclusions According to limited data, UAI may reduce the risk of post-operative pain during the first 24 hours and reduce microbial counts, particularly cultivable germs in cases of apical periodontitis. However, most meta-analyses are conducted on a small number of studies and have an overall 'very low' to 'low' certainty of evidence; as a result, the evidence is deemed insufficient to either support or disprove UAI efficacy when compared to SI.

Several cross-sectional studies report that caries in primary teeth is correlated with caries in permanent teeth. This eight-year cohort study sought to determine if caries in the primary dentition can predict caries in the permanent dentition of the same individuals and, if so, with what degree of prediction accuracy. A total of 362 Chinese children, from 3 to 5 years old at the time of the 1992 baseline study, were re-examined in 2000. The study found statistically significant associations between caries prevalence in primary and permanent dentitions (p < 0.01). Children having caries in their primary teeth were three times more likely to develop caries in their permanent teeth (relative ratio = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.4-4.7; p < 0.001). Caries on primary molars had the highest predictive value (85.4%). This study demonstrates that caries status in the primary teeth can be used as a risk indicator for predicting caries in the permanent teeth.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of dental plaque and moisture on performance of a laser fluorescence device in detecting occlusal and proximal caries lesions in primary teeth. Fifty-five occlusal and 58 proximal sites on primary molars were evaluated using a DIAGNOdent pen (LFpen) device. For the drying time study, the evaluations were performed in: (I) moist teeth; (II) teeth dried for 3s, or (III) dried for 15s. For the plaque study, the evaluations were done in sites: (I) without plaque; (II) with plaque, and (III) after cleaning. Evaluation of the teeth sections in stereomicroscope was the reference standard method. LF pen values, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared. The values obtained after 15s of drying were higher than those obtained with moist teeth or dried for 3s at both occlusal and proximal surfaces. However, there was no change in the performance in detecting caries lesions. With regard to the presence of plaque, there was no significant change in the readings of the device, but specificity was decreased in occlusal surfaces with plaque. At proximal surfaces, however, no significant differences were observed. In conclusion, the moisture conditions do not influence significantly the performance of the LFpen, but the presence of plaque can affect its performance in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.

Crowns placed on primary molar teeth with carious lesions, or following pulp treatment, are likely to reduce the risk of major failure or pain in the long term compared to fillings. Crowns fitted using the Hall Technique may reduce discomfort at the time of treatment compared to fillings. The amount and quality of evidence for crowns compared to non-restorative caries, and for metal compared with aesthetic crowns, is very low. There are no RCTs comparing crowns fitted conventionally versus using the Hall Technique.

Dental decay affects many children, especially those from the lower socioeconomic classes. In this cross-sectional study designed to investigate the role played by sociodemographic factors, parental attitudes, and monitoring points, which are an indicator of personal perception of what controls individual health, on the prevalence of tooth decay among 5-year-old pre-school children living in a midsized city in São Paulo, Brazil. The ceo-d index of 426 children was assessed; the parents reported sociodemographic characteristics and completed two questionnaires concerning monitoring points and parental attitudes. The results show that 52.35% of the children had decay; higher levels of severe decay were observed among lower E-F socioeconomic classes. Higher socioeconomic status and low externality appear to be protective factors. Low parental internality emerged as a risk factor for decay in primary teeth, possibly because the mother expects or delegates the action to others, delaying care. Parental perceptions of control over a child's health seem to impact preventive care and, consequently, the level of tooth decay among children.