Minimal Entropy Martingale Measure

Let χ be a family of stochastic processes on a given filtered probability space (Ω, F, (Ft)t∈T, P) with T⊆R+. Under the assumption that the set Me of equivalent martingale measures for χ is not empty, we give sufficient conditions for the existence of a unique equivalent martingale measure that minimizes the relative entropy, with respect to P, in the class of martingale measures. We then provide the characterization of the density of the minimal entropy martingale measure, which suggests the equivalence between the maximization of expected exponential utility and the minimization of the relative entropy.

This paper defines an optimization criterion for the set of all martingale measures for an incomplete market model when the discounted price process is bounded and quasi‐left continuous. This criterion is based on the entropy–Hellinger process for a nonnegative Doléans–Dade exponential local martingale. We develop properties of this process and establish its relationship to the relative entropy “distance.” We prove that the martingale measure, minimizing this entropy–Hellinger process, is unique. Furthermore, it exists and is explicitly determined under some mild conditions of integrability and no arbitrage. Different characterizations for this extremal risk‐neutral measure as well as immediate application to the exponential hedging are given. If the discounted price process is continuous, the minimal entropy–Hellinger martingale measure simply is the minimal martingale measure of Föllmer and Schweizer. Finally, the relationship between the minimal entropy–Hellinger martingale measure (MHM) and the minimal entropy martingale measure (MEM) is provided. We also give an example showing that in contrast to the MHM measure, the MEM measure is not robust with respect to stopping.

The paper studies connections between risk aversion and martingale measures in a discrete‐time incomplete financial market. An investor is considered whose attitude toward risk is specified in terms of the index b of constant proportional risk aversion. Then dynamic portfolios are admissible if the terminal wealth is positive. It is assumed that the return (risk) processes are bounded. Sufficient (and nearly necessary) conditions are given for the existence of an optimal dynamic portfolio which chooses portfolios from the interior of the set of admissible portfolios. This property leads to an equivalent martingale measure defined through the optimal dynamic portfolio and the index 0 < b≤ 1. Moreover, the option pricing formula of Davis is given by this martingale measure. In the case of b= 1; that is, in the case of the log‐utility, the optimal dynamic portfolio defines the numéraire portfolio.

The fundamental theory of asset pricing has been developed under the two main assumptions that markets are frictionless and have no arbitrage opportunities. In this case the market enforces that replicable assets are valued by a linear function of their payoffs, or as the discounted expectation with respect to the so-called risk-neutral probability. Important evidence of the presence of frictions in financial markets has led to study market pricing rules in such a framework. Recently, Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (J Econ Theory 157:730–762, 2015) have extended the Fundamental Theorem of Finance by showing that, with markets frictions, requiring the put–call parity to hold, together with the mild assumption of translation invariance, is equivalent to the market pricing rule being represented as a discounted Choquet expectation with respect to a risk-neutral nonadditive probability. This paper continues this study by characterizing important properties of the (unique) risk-neutral nonadditive probability v_f associated with a Choquet pricing rule f, when it is not assumed to be subadditive. First, we show that the observed violation of the call–put parity, a condition considered by Chateauneuf et al. (Math Financ 6:323–330, 1996) similar to the put–call parity in Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (2015), is consistent with the existence of bid-ask spreads. Second, the balancedness of v_f—or equivalently the non-vacuity of its core—is characterized by an arbitrage-free condition that eliminates all the arbitrage opportunities that can be obtained by splitting payoffs in parts; moreover the (nonempty) core of v_f consists of additive probabilities below v_f whose associated (standard) expectations are all below the Choquet pricing rule f. Third, by strengthening again the previous arbitrage-free condition, we show the existence of a strictly positive risk-neutral probability below v_f, which allows to recover the standard formulation of the Fundamental Theorem of Finance for frictionless markets.

We give a sufficient condition to identify the q-optimal signed and the q-optimal absolutely continuous martingale measures in exponential Levy models. As a consequence, we find that in the one-dimensional case, the q-optimal equivalent martingale measures may exist only if the tails for upward jumps are extraordinarily light. Moreover, we derive the convergence of q-optimal signed, resp. absolutely continuous, martingale measures to the minimal entropy martingale measure as q approaches one. Finally, some implications for portfolio optimization are discussed.

Minimal entropy preserves the Lévy property: how and why

An incomplete financial market model is considered, where the dynamics of the assets price is described by an R d -valued continuous semimartingale. We express the density of the minimal entropy martingale measure in terms of the value process of the related optimization problem and show that this value process is determined as the unique solution of a semimartingale backward equation. We consider some extreme cases when this equation admits an explicit solution.

This paper deals with the characterization problem of the minimal entropy martingale measure (MEMM) for a Markov-modulated exponential Levy model. This model is characterized by the presence of a background process modulating the risky asset price movements between different regimes or market environments. This allows to stress the strong dependence of financial assets price with structural changes in the market conditions. Our main results are obtained from the key idea of working conditionally on the modulator-factor process. This reduces the problem to studying the simpler case of processes with independent increments. Our work generalizes some previous works in the literature dealing with either the exponential Levy case or the exponential-additive case.

The paper studies connections between arbitrage and utility maximization in a discrete-time financial market. The market is incomplete. Thus one has several choices of equivalent martingale measures to price contingent claims. Davis determines a unique price for a contingent claim which is based on an optimal dynamic portfolio by use of a `marginal rate of substitution' argument. Here conditions will be given such that this price is determined by a martingale measure and thus by a consistent price system. The underlying utility function U is defined on the positive half-line. Then dynamic portfolios are admissible if the terminal wealth is positive. In case of the logarithmic utility function, the optimal dynamic portfolio is the numeraire portfolio.

In this paper, we examine the dependence of option prices in a general jump-diffusion model on the choice of martingale pricing measure. Since the model is incomplete, there are many equivalent martingale measures. Each of these measures corresponds to a choice for the market price of diffusion risk and the market price of jump risk. Our main result is to show that for convex payoffs, the option price is increasing in the jump-risk parameter. We apply this result to deduce general inequalities, comparing the prices of contingent claims under various martingale measures, which have been proposed in the literature as candidate pricing measures. Our proofs are based on couplings of stochastic processes. If there is only one possible jump size then we are able to utilize a second coupling to extend our results to include stochastic jump intensities.

We study power utility maximization for exponential Lévy models with portfolio constraints, where utility is obtained from consumption and/or terminal wealth. For convex constraints, an explicit solution in terms of the Lévy triplet is constructed under minimal assumptions by solving the Bellman equation. We use a novel transformation of the model to avoid technical conditions. The consequences for q‐optimal martingale measures are discussed as well as extensions to nonconvex constraints.

This paper presents an overview of information-based asset pricing. In this approach, an asset is defined by its cash-flow structure. The market is assumed to have access to "partial" information about future cash flows. Each cash flow is determined by a collection of independent market factors called X-factors. The market filtration is generated by a set of information processes, each of which carries information about one of the X-factors, and eventually reveals the X-factor. Each information process has two terms, one of which contains a "signal" about the associated X-factor, and the other of which represents "market noise". The price of an asset is given by the expectation of the discounted cash flows in the risk-neutral measure, conditional on the information provided by the market. When the market noise is modelled by a Brownian bridge one is able to construct explicit formulae for asset prices, as well as semi-analytic expressions for the prices and greeks of options and derivatives. In particular, option price data can be used to determine the information flow-rate parameters implicit in the definitions of the information processes. One consequence of the modelling framework is a specific scheme of stochastic volatility and correlation processes. Instead of imposing a volatility and correlation model upon the dynamics of a set of assets, one is able to deduce the dynamics of the volatilities and correlations of the asset price movements from more primitive assumptions involving the associated cash flows. The paper concludes with an examination of situations involving asymmetric information. We present a simple model for informed traders and show how this can be used as a basis for so-called statistical arbitrage. Finally, we consider the problem of price formation in a heterogeneous market with multiple agents.

The minimal relative entropy criterion for the selection of an equivalent martingale measure in an incomplete market seems to still hold some mystique in its financial interpretation. In this paper we work toward this interpretation by suggesting and exploring the idea of relating a martingale measure selection criterion to a CAPM-like pricing scheme. We examine this idea in the case of the minimal relative entropy criterion and we present some preliminary results. We work within a one-period financial market and show that the minimal relative entropy pricing criterion is equivalent to some CAPM-like pricing scheme where the classical beta coefficient formula has been replaced by some “entropic beta” and the market portfolio by some “appropriate” reference portfolio. Furthermore, we show that if the assets involved have returns that are jointly normal, then this “entropic beta” formula coincides with the classical beta coefficient. Additionally and for comparison reasons, we briefly illustrate that if our criterion for the choice of the martingale measure was the minimization of the variance of the Radon–Nikodym derivative, then the resulting martingale pricing and the pricing implied by the classical CAPM scheme would be the same.

Downside Risk Neutral Probabilities

We revisit mean‐risk portfolio selection in a one‐period financial market where risk is quantified by a positively homogeneous risk measure . We first show that under mild assumptions, the set of optimal portfolios for a fixed return is nonempty and compact. However, unlike in classical mean‐variance portfolio selection, it can happen that no efficient portfolios exist. We call this situation ‐arbitrage, and prove that it cannot be excluded—unless is as conservative as the worst‐case risk measure. After providing a primal characterization of ‐arbitrage, we focus our attention on coherent risk measures that admit a dual representation and give a necessary and sufficient dual characterization of ‐arbitrage. We show that the absence of ‐arbitrage is intimately linked to the interplay between the set of equivalent martingale measures (EMMs) for the discounted risky assets and the set of absolutely continuous measures in the dual representation of . A special case of our result shows that the market does not admit ‐arbitrage for Expected Shortfall at level if and only if there exists an EMM such that .