Modeling the Leaf Area Index of Inner Mongolia Grassland Based on Machine Learning Regression Algorithms Incorporating Empirical Knowledge

Accurate leaf area index estimation in sorghum using high-resolution UAV data and machine learning models

The aim of this study was to compile the leaf area index (LAI) map of a 3×3 km VALERI test site in Järvselja, Estonia. Canopy transmittance measurements of LAI by LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzers and digital cameras supplied with fisheye converters were carried out on 42 elementary sampling units at ground level and at breast height level. The vegetation LAI was estimated as a sum of the tree canopy true green LAI obtained from the inversion of canopy gap fraction data and of the ground vegetation effective LAI. Red channel from SPOT-4 HRV-IR image and airborne lidar data based canopy transmittance were used for up-scaling. The LAI map was compared with standard LAI products from Terra MODIS and ENVISAT MERIS. We found that lidar data based LAI estimate on up-scaled map saturated at high values (LAI > 4.5) compared to the LAI estimates based on SPOT-4 HRV-IR red channel. Validation of MODIS LAI product revealed substantial underestimates of LAI compared to the up-scaled field measurements and rather large random noise. ENVISAT MERIS LAI product was more similar to up-scaled field measurements; however, rather large unexpected random variations exist in its time series.

Improving estimation of maize leaf area index by combining of UAV-based multispectral and thermal infrared data: The potential of new texture index

Rapid and accurate crop chlorophyll content estimation and the leaf area index (LAI) are both crucial for guiding field management and improving crop yields. This paper proposes an accurate monitoring method for LAI and soil plant analytical development (SPAD) values (which are closely related to leaf chlorophyll content; we use the SPAD instead of chlorophyll relative content) based on the fusion of ground–air multi-source data. Firstly, in 2020 and 2021, we collected unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) multispectral data, ground hyperspectral data, UAV visible-light data, and environmental cumulative temperature data for multiple growth stages of summer maize, respectively. Secondly, the effective plant height (canopy height model (CHM)), effective accumulation temperature (growing degree days (GDD)), canopy vegetation index (mainly spectral vegetation index) and canopy hyperspectral features of maize were extracted, and sensitive features were screened by correlation analysis. Then, based on single-source and multi-source data, multiple linear regression (MLR), partial least-squares regression (PLSR) and random forest (RF) regression were used to construct LAI and SPAD inversion models. Finally, the distribution of LAI and SPAD prescription plots was generated and the trend for the two was analyzed. The results were as follows: (1) The correlations between the position of the hyperspectral red edge and the first-order differential value in the red edge with LAI and SPAD were all greater than 0.5. The correlation between the vegetation index, including a red and near-infrared band, with LAI and SPAD was above 0.75. The correlation between crop height and effective accumulated temperature with LAI and SPAD was above 0.7. (2) The inversion models based on multi-source data were more effective than the models made with single-source data. The RF model with multi-source data fusion achieved the highest accuracy of all models. In the testing set, the LAI and SPAD models’ R2 was 0.9315 and 0.7767; the RMSE was 0.4895 and 2.8387. (3) The absolute error between the extraction result of each model prescription map and the measured value was small. The error between the predicted value and the measured value of the LAI prescription map generated by the RF model was less than 0.4895. The difference between the predicted value and the measured value of the SPAD prescription map was less than 2.8387. The LAI and SPAD of summer maize first increased and then decreased with the advancement of the growth period, which was in line with the actual growth conditions. The research results indicate that the proposed method could effectively monitor maize growth parameters and provide a scientific basis for summer maize field management.

Leaf Area Index (LAI) is essential in ecosystem and agronomic studies, since it measures energy and gas exchanges between vegetation and atmosphere. In the last decades, LAI values have widely been estimated from passive remotely sensed data. Common approaches are based on semi-empirical/statistic techniques or on radiative transfer model inversion. Although the scientific community has been providing several LAI retrieval methods, the estimated results are often affected by noise and measurement uncertainties. The sequential data assimilation theory provides a theoretical framework to combine an imperfect model with incomplete observation data. In this document a data fusion Kalman filter algorithm is proposed in order to estimate the time evolution of LAI by combining MODIS LAI data and PROBA-V surface reflectance data. The reflectance data were linked to LAI by using the Reduced Simple Ratio index. The main working hypotheses were lacking input data necessary for climatic models and canopy reflectance models.

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key variable for monitoring crop growth. Compared with traditional measurement methods, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing offers a cost-effective and efficient approach for rapidly obtaining crop LAI. Although there is extensive research on rice LAI estimation, many studies suffer from the limitations of models that are only applicable to specific scenarios with unclear applicability conditions. In this study, we selected commonly used RGB and multispectral (Ms) data sources, which contain three channels of color information and five multi-band information, respectively, combined with five different spatial resolutions of data at intervals of 20–100 m. We evaluated the effectiveness of models using single- and multi-feature variables for LAI estimation in rice. In addition, texture and coverage features other than spectra were introduced to further analyze their effects on the inversion accuracy of the LAI. The results show that the accuracy of the model established with multi-variables under single features is significantly higher than that of the model established with single variables under single features. The best results were obtained using the RFR (random forest regression) model, in which the model’s R2 is 0.675 and RMSE is 0.886 for multi-feature VIs at 40 m. Compared with the analysis results of Ms and RGB data at different heights, the accuracy of Ms data estimation results fluctuates slightly and is less sensitive to spatial resolution, while the accuracy of the results based on RGB data gradually decreases with the increase in height. The estimation accuracies of both Ms and RGB data were improved by adding texture features and coverage features, and their R2 improved by 9.1% and 7.3% on average. The best estimation heights (spatial resolution) of the two data sources were 40 m (2.2 cm) and 20 m (0.4 cm), with R2 of 0.724 and 0.673, and RMSE of 0.810 and 0.881. This study provides an important reference for the estimation of rice LAI based on RGB and Ms data acquired using the UAV platform.

This paper presents an open-source canopy height profile (CHP) toolkit designed for processing small-footprint full-waveform LiDAR data to obtain the estimates of effective leaf area index (LAIe) and CHPs. The use of the toolkit is presented with a case study of LAIe estimation in discontinuous-canopy fruit plantations. The experiments are carried out in two study areas, namely, orange and almond plantations, with different percentages of canopy cover (48% and 40%, respectively). For comparison, two commonly used discrete-point LAIe estimation methods are also tested. The LiDAR LAIe values are first computed for each of the sites and each method as a whole, providing “apparent” site-level LAIe, which disregards the discontinuity of the plantations' canopies. Since the toolkit allows for the calculation of the study area LAIe at different spatial scales, between-tree-level clumping can be easily accounted for and is then used to illustrate the impact of the discontinuity of canopy cover on LAIe retrieval. The LiDAR LAIe estimates are therefore computed at smaller scales as a mean of LAIe in various grid-cell sizes, providing estimates of “actual” site-level LAIe. Subsequently, the LiDAR LAIe results are compared with theoretical models of “apparent” LAIe versus “actual” LAIe, based on known percent canopy cover in each site. The comparison of those models to LiDAR LAIe derived from the smallest grid-cell sizes against the estimates of LAIe for the whole site has shown that the LAIe estimates obtained from the CHP toolkit provided values that are closest to those of theoretical models.

Subtropical region tea tree LAI estimation integrating vegetation indices and texture features derived from UAV multispectral images

Leaf Area Index (LAI) and biomass (BIO) are essential agronomic parameters that reflect the growth of potatoes and are related to their biomass. Their precise estimation is capable of monitoring crop growth, guiding field management, and optimizing planting spatial patterns. Traditional potato leaf area indexing and biomass estimation primarily rely on field sampling surveys. This method is low in efficiency, high in cost, and limited by the number of samples. It cannot accurately reflect potato growth and meet the real-time estimation needs of large areas. Compared to the use of satellite remote sensing data (RSD) for estimating LAI and biomass, research on estimating these two phenotypic parameters using crewless aerial vehicle (UAV) RSD is relatively immature. Research on estimating crop growth index parameters by remote sensing primarily focuses on data obtained from specific types of sensors, targeting specific growth stages to compare and analyze the accuracy of different methods. However, there are few estimates of the impact of optimizing the best data types and optimal growth stage for LAI and biomass estimation by comparing and analyzing different sensor data and different growth stages. Multi-sensor integration technology has made it possible to study different crop phenotype information and estimate the best data type and optimal growth stage in crop phenotypic data estimation, establishing it as a new hot spot in the field. This paper integrates high-definition digital cameras and imaging hyperspectrometers on the UAV platform to obtain digital images and hyperspectral data simultaneously, along with ground-measured potato leaf area index and biomass data. Using the partial least squares regression (PLSR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and backpropagation (BP) neural network methods, we got digital images and hyperspectral data from different stages of growth, put together a digital image index and a vegetation index, and looked at how they related to LAI and BIO. Then, we chose the index that had the strongest correlation. To establish LAI and biomass estimation models at various growth phases, this paper compared and analyzed the estimation impacts of various data types and models at various growth phases. It then selected the best data types for LAI estimation and biomass estimation at different growth stages, as well as the best growth phases for LAI and biomass estimation. The outcomes indicated that when potato LAI was estimated, the mean values of R 2 and RMSE of the four estimation models were 0.75 and 0.30 Kg/mu at the tuber growth stage, respectively, and the estimation effect was the best, indicating that this was the best growth phase for LAI estimation. The average values of R 2 and RMSE in the LAI estimation model using the hyperspectral vegetation index were 0.73 and 0.33 Kg/mu, respectively, indicating that hyperspectral data was the best data type for LAI estimation. When potato biomass was estimated, the mean values of R 2 and RMSE of the four methods were 0.67 and 15.25 Kg/mu, respectively, at the tuber growth stage, which were better than other growth phases, demonstrating that this was the best growth phase for biomass estimation. The average values of R 2 and RMSE of the biomass estimation model using the hyperspectral vegetation index were 0.67 and 20.08 Kg/mu, respectively, indicating that the hyperspectral data was the best data type for biomass estimation. The average values of R 2 of the LAI and biomass estimation model at the maturity stage were only 0.56 and 0.36, both of which indicated poor estimation effects. Our study can serve as a guide to selecting the most effective method for estimating parameters for essential indexes in crop growth monitoring.

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key indicator of vegetation structure and function, and its products have a wide range of applications in vegetation condition assessment and usually act as important input parameters for ecosystem modeling. Grassland plays an important role in regional climate change and the global carbon cycle and numerous studies have focused on the product-based analysis of grassland vegetation changes. However, the performance of various LAI products and their discrepancies across different grassland types in drylands remain unclear. Therefore, it is critical to assess these products prior to application. We evaluated the accuracy of four commonly used LAI products (GEOV2, GLASS, GLOBMAP, and MODIS) using LAI reference maps based on both bridging and cross-validation approaches. Under different grassland types, the GLASS LAI performed better in meadow steppe (R2 = 0.26, RMSE = 0.41 m2/m2) and typical steppe (R2 = 0.32, RMSE = 0.38 m2/m2); the GEOV2 LAI performed better in desert steppe (R2 = 0.39, RMSE = 0.30 m2/m2). When we assessed their spatial and temporal discrepancies during the period from 2010 to 2019, the four LAI products overall showed a high spatial and temporal consistency across the region. Compared with GLASS LAI, the most consistent to least consistent correlations can be ordered by GEOV2 LAI (R2 = 0.94), MODIS LAI (R2 = 0.92), and GLOBMAP LAI (R2 = 0.87). The largest differences in LAI throughout the year occurred in July for all grassland types. Limited by the location and number of sample plots, we mainly focused on spatial and temporal variations. The spatial heterogeneity of land surface is pervasive, especially in vast grassland areas with rich grassland types, and the results of this study can provide a basis for the application of the product in different grassland types. Furthermore, it is essential to develop highly accurate and reliable satellite-based LAI products focused on grassland from the regional to the global scale according to these popular approaches, which is the next step in our work plan.

The modeling and predicting of vegetation Leaf area index (LAI) is an important component of land surface model and assimilation of remote sensing data. The MODIS LAI product (i.e. MOD15A2) is one of the most widely used LAI data sources. However, the time series of MODIS LAI contains some data of low quality. For example, because of the influence of the cloud, aerosol, etc., the MODIS LAI presents the characteristics of the discontinuous in time and space. In fact, the time series of MODIS LAI include both linear and nonlinear components, which cannot be accurately modeled and predicted by either linear method or nonlinear method alone. In this paper, the original LAI time series data were first smoothed with Savitzky-Golay (SG) filtration and linear interpolation; SARIMA, BP neural network and a hybrid method of SARIMA-BP neural network were then used for modeling and predicting MODIS LAI time series. The SARIMA-BP neural network combined both SARIMA and BP neural network, which could model the linear and the nonlinear component of MODIS LAI time series respectively. That is, the final result of SARIMA-BP neural network was the sum of results of the two methods. Experiments showed that the time series of MODIS LAI that were smoothed with the SG filtration and linear interpolation were more smooth than original time series, with a determination coefficient up to 0.981, closer to 1 than that of SARIMA (0.941) and BP neural network (0.884); the correlation coefficient between SARIMA-BP neural network and the observation is 0.991, higher than that of between SARIMA (0.971) or BP neural network (0.942) SARIMA and the observation. Thus, it can be concluded that, the proposed SARIMA-BP neural network method can better adapt to the LAI time series, and it outperforms the SARIMA and BP neural network methods.

Precise and timely leaf area index (LAI) estimation for winter wheat is crucial for precision agriculture. The emergence of high-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data and machine learning techniques offers a revolutionary approach for fine-scale estimation of wheat LAI at the low cost. While machine learning has proven valuable for LAI estimation, there are still model limitations and variations that impede accurate and efficient LAI inversion. This study explores the potential of classical machine learning models and deep learning model for estimating winter wheat LAI using multispectral images acquired by drones. Initially, the texture features and vegetation indices served as inputs for the partial least squares regression (PLSR) model and random forest (RF) model. Then, the ground-measured LAI data were combined to invert winter wheat LAI. In contrast, this study also employed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model that solely utilizes the cropped original image for LAI estimation. The results show that vegetation indices outperform the texture features in terms of correlation analysis with LAI and estimation accuracy. However, the highest accuracy is achieved by combining both vegetation indices and texture features to invert LAI in both conventional machine learning methods. Among the three models, the CNN approach yielded the highest LAI estimation accuracy (R 2 = 0.83), followed by the RF model (R 2 = 0.82), with the PLSR model exhibited the lowest accuracy (R 2 = 0.78). The spatial distribution and values of the estimated results for the RF and CNN models are similar, whereas the PLSR model differs significantly from the first two models. This study achieves rapid and accurate winter wheat LAI estimation using classical machine learning and deep learning methods. The findings can serve as a reference for real-time wheat growth monitoring and field management practices.

Leaf area index (LAI) is an important parameter of the vegetation canopy, and is used, for instance, to estimate evapotranspiration, an important component of the hydrological cycle. This work analyzed the relationship between LAI, measured in field, and NDVI from four dates (derived from Landsat-7/ETM+ data), and with such vegetation index, to generate and analyze LAI maps of the study area for the diverse dates. LAI data were collected monthly in the field with LAI-2000 equipment in stands of sugar cane, pasture, corn, eucalypt, and riparian forest. The relationships between LAI and NDVI were adjusted by a potential model; 57% to 72% of the NDVI variance were explained by the LAI. LAI maps generated by empirical relationships between LAI and NDVI showed reasonable precision (standard error of LAI estimate ranged from 0.42 to 0.87 m² m-2). The mean LAI value of each monthly LAI map was shown to be related to the total precipitation in the three previous months.

Measuring and monitoring mangrove Leaf Area Index (LAI) is an essential part of monitoring and management of mangrove environments. This study investigated the use of ALOS AVNIR-2 (AVNIR-2) image data for LAI estimation in mangrove environment through semi-empirical analysis, and compared and contrasted the results with different mangrove environmental settings and vegetation structures at sites in tropical Karimunjawa Island (KI, Indonesia) and sub-tropical Moreton Bay (MB, Australia). We used Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) as a proxy to estimate LAI in both sites. The results indicated that the regression analyses showed significant coefficient of determination (R2) values of 0.82 at KI and 0.83 at MB. The range of LAI values for KI from 0.88 to 5.33 (n = 76, mean = 2.98, SD = 1.04) and for MB from 0.26 to 3.23 (n = 120, mean = 1.97, SD = 0.45). In terms of site comparison, we found that the results of LAI estimation from field measurement and remote sensing data varies across sites; the Karimunjawa Island mangroves had a comparatively wider range and variation of LAI values than the Moreton Bay mangroves. This difference was attributed to the difference in stand heterogeneity and species composition. Further investigation shows that mangrove LAI values are independent of the mangrove structural formation (i.e. scrub, low-closed forest, closed forest, etc.). Instead, the LAI value depends on the local spatial variation of mangrove phenological stages and canopy cover. The findings provide an understanding of the spatial variation of mangrove vegetation structure for estimating LAI.

Leaf area index (LAI) is a critical vegetation structural variable and is essential in the feedback of vegetation to the climate system. The advancement of the global Earth Observation has enabled the development of global LAI products and boosted global Earth system modeling studies. This overview provides a comprehensive analysis of LAI field measurements and remote sensing estimation methods, the product validation methods and product uncertainties, and the application of LAI in global studies. First, the paper clarifies some definitions related to LAI and introduces methods to determine LAI from field measurements and remote sensing observations. After introducing some major global LAI products, progresses made in temporal compositing and prospects for future LAI estimation are analyzed. Subsequently, the overview discusses various LAI product validation schemes, uncertainties in global moderate resolution LAI products, and high resolution reference data. Finally, applications of LAI in global vegetation change, land surface modeling, and agricultural studies are presented. It is recommended that (1) continued efforts are taken to advance LAI estimation algorithms and provide high temporal and spatial resolution products from current and forthcoming missions; (2) further validation studies be conducted to address the inadequacy of current validation studies, especially for underrepresented regions and seasons; and (3) new research frontiers, such as machine learning algorithms, light detection and ranging technology, and unmanned aerial vehicles be pursued to broaden the production and application of LAI.