Modified bio‐inspired optimisation algorithm with a centroid decision making approach for solving a multi‐objective optimal power flow problem

This article applies the grey wolf optimizer and differential evolution (DE) algorithms to solve the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. Both algorithms are used to optimize single objective functions sequentially under the system constraints. Then, the DE algorithm is utilized to solve multi-objective OPF problems. The indicator of the static line stability index is incorporated into the OPF problem. The fuzzy-based Pareto front method is tested to find the best compromise point of multi-objective functions. The proposed algorithms are used to determine the optimal values of the continuous and discrete control variables. These algorithms are applied to the standard IEEE 30-bus and 118-bus systems with different scenarios. The simulation results are investigated and analyzed. The achieved results show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms in comparison with the other recent heuristic algorithms in the literature.

The optimal power flow (OPF) problem is one of the most popular and important issues that researchers need to solve in power systems. In this study, a modified weighted teaching-learning-based optimization (WTLBO) algorithm was designed and implemented for the OPF problem, regarding the teaching-learning-based optimization (TLBO) algorithm, which is one of the meta-heuristic algorithms. To demonstrate the effectiveness of TLBO and developed WTLBO algorithms in OPF solutions, six different single/multi-objective functions consisting of targets, such as fuel cost, total active power losses, and voltage deviation were tested on standard IEEE 30 and 57 bus systems. Multi-objective functions were transformed into a single objective function using the weighted sum method. Analysis results were compared with different optimization algorithms used in the literature. When the developed WTLBO algorithm is compared according to the single/multi-objective functions in OPF solutions, it has been proven that it performs better than the original TLBO algorithm and other algorithms in the literature. As a result of the analysis, according to the TLBO algorithm, in the IEEE 30 bus power system, in the proposed WTLBO algorithm, a decrease of 0.05% in the total fuel cost, 2.20% in active power losses, and 13.37% in voltage deviation are observed.

The optimal power flow (OPF) problem minimizes the operating cost of an electric power system. Applications of convex relaxation techniques to the non-convex OPF problem have been of recent interest, including work using the Lasserre hierarchy of "moment" relaxations to globally solve many OPF problems. By preprocessing the network model to eliminate low-impedance lines, this paper demonstrates the capability of the moment relaxations to globally solve large OPF problems that minimize active power losses for portions of several European power systems. Large problems with more general objective functions have thus far been computationally intractable for current formulations of the moment relaxations. To overcome this limitation, this paper proposes the combination of an objective function penalization with the moment relaxations. This combination yields feasible points with objective function values that are close to the global optimum of several large OPF problems. Compared to an existing penalization method, the combination of penalization and the moment relaxations eliminates the need to specify one of the penalty parameters and solves a broader class of problems.

In this paper, a multi-objective hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization (MOHFPSO) was proposed for different multi-objective optimal power flow (MOOPF) problems. Optimal power flow (OPF) was formulated as a non-linear problem with various objectives and constraints. Pareto optimal front was obtained by using non-dominated sorting and crowding distance methods. Finally, an optimal compromised solution was selected from the Pareto optimal set by applying an ideal distance minimization method. The efficiency of the proposed MOHFPSO technique was tested on standard IEEE 30-bus and IEEE 57-bus test systems with various conflicting objectives. Simulation results were also compared with non-dominated sorting based multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) and different optimization algorithms reported in the current literature. The achieved results revealed the potential of the proposed algorithm for MOOPF problems.

The optimal power flow (OPF) problem is a well-known non-convex optimization problem that aims to minimize the cost of electric power generation subject to consumer demand, the physics of power flow, and technological constraints. To find an optimal solution to this problem, local search techniques such as interior point methods are typically used. However, due to the non-convex nature of the problem, these methods are likely to result in a sub-optimal solution. The goal of this paper is to characterize the worst-case performance of local search on the OPF problem. To accomplish this, we formulate the OPF problem as a canonical quadratically-constrained quadratic program (QCQP). Then, we study the problem of finding the worst-case local minimum of this QCQP, which is non-convex and hard to solve in general. We find a relaxation of this problem into a semidefinite program (SDP) and show that it is exact for certain cases. Using some test cases which are known to have multiple local minima, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed relaxation to bound the worst-case local minimum. We compare the obtained upper bound on local minima to the lower bound provided by the standard SDP relaxation of the OPF problem to understand how much SDP outperforms local search for a given problem.

Recent years have witnessed the success of employing convex relaxations of the AC optimal power flow (OPF) problem to find global or near-global optimal solutions. The majority of the effort has focused on solving problem formulations where variables live in continuous spaces. Our focus here is in the extension of these results to the co-optimization of network topology and the OPF problem. We employ binary variables to model topology reconfiguration in the standard semidefinite programming (SDP) formulation of the OPF problem. This makes the problem non-convex, not only because the variables are binary, but also because of the presence of bilinear products between the binary and other continuous variables. Our proposed convex relaxation to this problem incorporates the bilinear terms in a novel way that improves over the commonly used McCormick approximation. We also address the exponential complexity associated with the discrete variables by partitioning the network graph in a way that minimizes the impact on the optimal value of the relaxation. As a result, the problem is broken down into several parallel mixed-integer problems, reducing the overall computational complexity. Simulations in the IEEE 118-bus test case demonstrate that our approach converges to solutions which are very close to the lower bound of the mixed-integer OPF problem.

For operating electrical power networks, the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem plays a central role. The problem is nonconvex and NP hard. Therefore, designing efficient solution algorithms is crucial, though their global optimality is not guaranteed. Existing semi-definite programming relaxation based approaches are restricted to OPF problems for which zero duality holds, whereas for non-convex problems there is a lack of solution methods of provable performance. In this paper, an efficient novel method to address the general nonconvex OPF problem is investigated. The proposed method is based on alternating direction method of multipliers combined with sequential convex approximations. The global OPF problem is decomposed into smaller problems associated to each bus of the network, the solutions of which are coordinated via a light communication protocol. Therefore, the proposed method is highly scalable. The convergence properties of the proposed algorithm are mathematically and numerically substantiated.

This study proposes an improved particle swarm optimization method to find optimal power flow by using the power transmission loss as an objective function. In the literature, PSO is a well — known intelligent search method to handle the solution of optimal power flow problem. A novel scheme which is called Improved PSO (IPSO) is defined by modifying the initialization step of PSO algorithm and choosing the load bus voltages, generator active and reactive powers, line flow capacities as penalty functions in the objective function. PSO and IPSO-based optimal power flow solutions are compared with each other on IEEE 118 and 300 bus systems. According to the test results, the power loss obtained by IPSO-based solution has less power loss than PSO-based solution. This proposed method can be used to obtain faster desirable solutions and better power loss results for the optimal power flow problem in case of power loss minimization.

In this paper, we consider the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem which consists in determining the power production at each bus of an electric network by minimizing the production cost. Our contribution is an exact solution algorithm for the OPF problem. It consists in a spatial branch-and-bound algorithm based on a compact quadratically-constrained convex relaxation. It is computed by solving the semidefinite rank relaxation of OPF once at the root node of the algorithm. An important result is that the optimal value of our compact relaxation is equal to the rank relaxation value. Then, at every sub-nodes of our branch-and-bound, the lower bound is obtained by solving a quadratic convex problem instead of an SDP. Another contribution is that we add only O(n+m) variables that model the squares of the initial variables, where n is the number of buses in the power system and m the number of transmission lines, to construct our relaxation. Then, since the relations between the initial and auxiliary variables are non-convex, we relax them to get a quadratic convex relaxation. Finally, in our branch-and-bound algorithm, we only have to force a reduced number of equalities to prove global optimality. This quadratic convex relaxation approach is here tailored to the OPF problem, but it can address any application whose formulation is a quadratic optimization problem subject to quadratic equalities and ring constraints. Our first experiments on instances of the OPF problem show that our new algorithm Compact OPF (COPF) is more efficient than the standard solvers and other quadratic convex relaxation based methods we compare it with.

The AC optimal power flow (OPF) problem is essential for the schedule and operation of power systems. Convex relaxation methods have been studied and used extensively to obtain an optimal solution to the OPF problem. When the exactness of convex relaxations is not guaranteed, it is important to recover a feasible solution for the convex relaxation methods. This paper presents an alternative convex optimisation (ACP) approach that can efficiently recover a feasible solution from the result of second‐order cone programming (SOCP) relaxed OPF in mesh networks. The OPF problem is first formulated as a difference‐of‐convex programming (DCP) problem, then efficiently solved by a penalty convex concave procedure (CCP). By using the solution of a tightened SOCP OPF as an initial point, the proposed algorithm is able to find a global or near‐global optimal solution to the AC OPF problem. Numerical tests show that the proposed method outperforms those semi‐definite programming (SDP) and quadratically constrained quadratic programming (QCQP)–based algorithms.

A new hybrid evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow in an integrated WE, PV, and PEV power system

Summary This paper presents a creature-inspired stud krill herd (SKH) algorithm consisting of stud selection and crossover operators, which are augmented in the krill herd algorithm to solve the optimal power flow (OPF) problems in a power system. Due to the nonlinear and nonconvex nature of the OPF problem, it is quite difficult to find optimal solution using conventional optimization algorithms. Here in SKH, a stud-selection operator is introduced in the krill herd algorithm to further enhance the quality of the solution, and crossover operator is embedded to avoid premature convergence. To investigate the performance, the proposed SKH algorithm has been demonstrated on the OPF problems of IEEE 30-bus, Algerian 59-bus, and IEEE 118-bus systems considering various objective functions such as total production cost, L-index, power loss, and emission pollution to be minimized. The OPF results have been compared with those obtained with other methods, and it has been found that SKH algorithm is successful in providing better quality solutions in reasonable execution times.

In this paper, a new method to incorporating FACTS devices in optimal power flow (OPF) problem is presented. This method can provide an enhanced economic solution with the use of controllable FACTS devices. Two types of FACTS devices, thyristor controlled series compensators (TCSC) and thyristor controlled phase shifters (TCPS), are considered in this method. The specified power flow control constraints due to the use of FACTS devices are included in the OPF problem. The proposed method decomposes the solution of such modified OPF problem into two subproblems' iteration. The first subproblem is a power flow control problem and the second subproblem is a conventional OPF problem. The two subproblems are solved iteratively until convergence. Case studies are presented to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

In this chapter the Optimal Power Flow problem solution based in Bio-inspired optimization algorithms with one single function and with multiple and competing objective functions is presented. As a first approach the Modified Flower Pollination Algorithm (MFPA) to show its potential application to solve the OPF problem, then Normal Boundary Intersection (NBI) method are used in a complementary way to determine the Pareto front solution of the Multi-Objective OPF problem.

In this paper, the multi-objective optimal power flow (MOOPF) problem optimization objectives focus on four optimization objectives: generation cost, emission, real power loss and voltage deviation (VD). Three renewable energy sources with successful industrial applications, including wind energy, solar energy, and tidal energy are introduced. Renewable energy supply is uncertain, so Weibull distribution probability, lognormal probability and Gumbel probability are used to calculate the instability and intermittency of wind energy, solar energy and tidal energy, respectively. The inclusion of four energy supplies on the IEEE-30 test system and the consideration of renewable energy reserves and penalty cost calculation improve the realism of the model. In order to obtain the control parameters that minimize the four optimization objectives, a named multi-objective pathfinder algorithm (MOPFA) based on elite dominance and crowding distance was proposed to solve this multi-objective optimization problem. Simulation results show the feasibility of the model, and MOPFA can get more evenly distributed Pareto front and provide more diverse solutions. A compromise solution was selected by the fuzzy decision system. Comparison with the recently published literature also shows that the proposed model can effectively reduce emissions and other indicators. In addition, the statistical test results show that MOPFA's multi-objective optimization performance ranks first. In solving this complex optimization problem, results show the MOPFA is superior to other multi-objective algorithms in optimization accuracy and speed.