• Home
  • Search
  • Modular Prosthetic Limb Control by an Individual with Congenital Upper-Limb Amputation: A Case Report
  • Cite Icon4
  • https://doi.org/10.1097/jpo.0000000000000254Copy DOI Icon

Modular Prosthetic Limb Control by an Individual with Congenital Upper-Limb Amputation: A Case Report

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction This article presents a unique case study of an individual with congenital limb loss and long-time (>56 years) body-powered prosthesis use, who was able to control a sophisticated robotic upper-limb prosthesis using surface electromyography signals and pattern recognition (PR) algorithms. This case demonstrates that individuals with congenital limb amputation are able to learn unique strategies to intuitively control a dexterous prosthetic limb. Materials and Methods After completing four training sessions using a virtual integration environment, a single subject participated in 12 in-laboratory clinical training sessions using the modular prosthetic limb (MPL)—a novel multiple–degree-of-freedom dexterous upper-limb prosthesis prototype. Baseline assessments were made with her body-powered prosthesis, as well as a two-site direct-control myoelectric Bebionic she had recently received. Functional assessments with the MPL were conducted during sessions 6 and 12. Outcome measures included timed box and blocks (BB) test, Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC), Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale, Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), and NASA Task Load Index. Results The subject was able to control two independent wrist degrees of freedom and up to three independent hand grasps of the MPL, using an array of surface electrodes. Improvements in the BB and ACMC were observed, although the total time to complete the JTHFT stayed relatively the same from weeks 6 to 12, using the MPL. While her enpoint perceived funcitonal ability with the MPL was 58% compared with 83% with her personal myoelectric prosthesis (12 hours of use vs 4–5 weeks of use as denoted on the UEFS); the subject reported short length of training, a long-term body-powered prosthetic user with congenital limb loss was able to demonstrate objective improvements in control of a dexterous prosthetic hand over a 12-week period of in-laboratory training, achieving intuitive independent control of a variety of simultaneous individual wrist motions and grasp patterns using PR. Conclusions This case demonstrates that even individuals with congenital amputation may be considered as candidates for upper-limb PR-controlled myoelectric prosthetic devices using surface electrodes.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Training protocol for a powered shoulder prosthesis.

  • Jan 01, 2014
  • Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
  • Linda Resnik +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations193

Demonstration of a semi-autonomous hybrid brain-machine interface using human intracranial EEG, eye tracking, and computer vision to control a robotic upper limb prosthetic.

  • Dec 12, 2013
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
  • David P Mcmullen +12
  • Research Article

Functionality and occupational analysis of a 3D-printed body-powered upper-limb prosthesis prototype for children and adolescents

  • Jul 30, 2025
  • Revista Ocupación Humana
  • Vanessa Wiesner Luna +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Using Serious Games to Measure Upper-Limb Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Prosthesis Control Performance in an At-Home Environment

  • Apr 03, 2024
  • JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
  • Bart Maas +4
  • Book Chapter

Virtual Training System for Mechanical Transhumeral Prostheses

  • Oct 01, 2019
  • Andrea Montero +2
  • PDF
  • Dissertation

Integration of autonomous and pattern recognition controls in hand prostheses

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Mouchoux Jeremy
  • Research Article
  • Citations25

Application of Cognitive Task Performance Modeling for Assessing Usability of Transradial Prostheses

  • Aug 01, 2019
  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
  • Maryam Zahabi +6
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations130

Causes of Performance Degradation in Non-invasive Electromyographic Pattern Recognition in Upper Limb Prostheses.

  • Sep 21, 2018
  • Frontiers in Neurorobotics
  • Iris Kyranou +2
  • Research Article

Prosthetic Arm Controller Based on the sEMG Signal and Deep Learning Network

  • Dec 29, 2025
  • Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika
  • Dinh-Hung Le +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Neuroprosthetic limb control with electrocorticography: approaches and challenges.

  • Aug 01, 2014
  • Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference
  • Nitish V Thakor +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Implementing social and affective touch to enhance user experience in human-robot interaction.

  • Aug 12, 2024
  • Frontiers in robotics and AI
  • M Ege Cansev +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations40

A survey on what Australians with upper limb difference want in a prosthesis: justification for using soft robotics and additive manufacturing for customized prosthetic hands

  • Mar 11, 2019
  • Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
  • Benjamin Stephens-Fripp +3
  • Research Article

Comparison of trauma and diabetes mellitus-induced transtibial amputees in terms of gait parameters and functional capacity

  • Mar 03, 2025
  • Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
  • Neşe Tosun +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations42

A Five-fingered Underactuated Prosthetic Hand Control Scheme

  • Jul 10, 2006
  • Jingdong Zhao +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Compliant Grasp Control Method for the Underactuated Prosthetic Hand Based on the Estimation of Grasping Force and Muscle Stiffness with sEMG.

  • Oct 27, 2024
  • Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)
  • Xiaolei Xu +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.