• Home
  • Search
  • Monitoring Affective Trajectories During Complex Learning
  • Cite Icon134
  • https://doi.org/10.1007/springerreference_302615Copy DOI Icon

Monitoring Affective Trajectories During Complex Learning

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Monitoring Affective Trajectories during Complex Learning Sidney D’Mello (sdmello@memphis.edu) Department of Computer Science, University of Memphis Memphis, TN 38152 USA Roger S. Taylor (rstaylor@memphis.edu) Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis Memphis, TN 38152 USA Art Graesser (a-graesser@memphis.edu) Department of Psychology, University of Memphis Memphis, TN 38152 USA A series of studies have recently explored the affective states that occur during complex learning. Studies by Graesser and his colleagues have collected online measures of affect, such as observations by trained judges and emote- aloud protocols, as well as offline judgments of emotions by multiple judges (Craig, et al., 2004; D’Mello et al., 2006; Graesser et al., 2006). These studies have revealed that the basic emotions identified by Ekman and Friesen (1978), namely anger, fear, sadness, joy, disgust, and surprise, typically do not play a significant role in learning (see also Kort Reilly, & Picard, 2001). Instead they documented a set of affective states that typically do play a significant role in learning, at least in the case of college students learning about computer literacy with an intelligent tutoring system. These affective states were boredom, flow (engagement, Csikszentmihalyi, 1990), confusion, and frustration. They also monitored the affective states of delight and surprise, which occurred less frequently. While some of these affective states might be viewed as purely cognitive in nature, our position is that they should be classified as affective states (or emotions) because these states are accompanied by significant changes in physiological arousal compared with a “neutral” state of no apparent emotion or feeling (Barrett, 2006; Meyer & Turner, in press; Stein & Hernandez, in press). Furthermore, affective-cognitive composites are particularly relevant to higher-order learning. The aforementioned set of affective states can be situated within a broader perspective of emotion, in particular Russell’s (2003) Core Affect framework. This perspective holds that an affective state is composed of two integrated components: valence (pleasure to displeasure) and arousal (activation to deactivation). These components can be depicted graphically with valence represented on the X-axis and arousal on the Y-axis. Moving from left to right along the X-axis (valence) would correspond to increasing feelings of pleasure. Moving upward along the Y-axis (arousal) would correspond to increasing feelings of activation and energy (see Figure 1). The affective states of boredom, flow, confusion, and frustration will be the primary focus of this paper. These affective states have been previously correlated with learning Abstract This study investigated the transitions between affective states (i.e., boredom, flow, confusion, frustration, delight, and surprise) during learning while college students were tutored in computer literacy by AutoTutor, an automated tutoring system with natural language dialogue. Videos of participants’ faces and the interaction histories were recorded and then played back for the participants to judge their own affective states. We developed a metric to measure the relative likelihood of transitioning from an affective state at time t i to a subsequent affective state at time t i+1 . Several significant trajectories between affective states were identified. Instructional implications are discussed in the context of an expanded version of a cognitive disequilibrium model. Keywords: Affective states; emotions; affect trajectories, affect sequencing; emotion dynamics; AutoTutor; learning; instruction. Introduction There is ample empirical evidence in the psychological literature that emotions (or affective states) are systematically influenced by the knowledge and goals of the learner, and vice versa (Mandler, 1984; Ortony, Clore, & Collins, 1988; Russell, 2003; Stein & Levine, 1991). As individuals interact in the social and physical world, they attempt to assimilate new information with existing knowledge schemas. When new or discrepant information is detected, a mismatch between input and knowledge occurs. Attention shifts to discrepant information, the autonomic nervous system increases in arousal, and the new information may modify the individual’s goals and knowledge. The learner experiences a variety of possible emotions, depending on the context, the amount of change, and whether important goals are blocked. However, this type of affective arousal that accompanies learning is still not well understood. For example, researchers have yet to narrow down the emotions that accompany deep level learning of conceptual material. The consequential impact of the emotions on knowledge acquisition and transfer is still not well understood.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations634

Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor

  • Oct 01, 2004
  • Journal of Educational Media
  • Scotty Craig +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations195

Emote aloud during learning with AutoTutor: Applying the Facial Action Coding System to cognitive–affective states during learning

  • Aug 01, 2008
  • Cognition and Emotion
  • Scotty D Craig +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations59

Affective State Recognition in Livestock-Artificial Intelligence Approaches.

  • Mar 17, 2022
  • Animals
  • Suresh Neethirajan
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations110

A Systematic Literature Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems With Dialogue in Natural Language

  • Jan 01, 2020
  • IEEE Access
  • Jose Paladines +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Exploring direct learning instruction and external stimuli effects on learner's states and mouse/keystroke behaviours

  • Aug 01, 2016
  • Yee Mei Lim +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations139

Predicting Affective States expressed through an Emote-Aloud Procedure from AutoTutor's Mixed-Initiative Dialogue

  • Jan 01, 2006
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Sidney K D’Mello +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations319

Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues

  • Dec 11, 2007
  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Sidney K D’Mello +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Designing Agents That Recognise and Respond to Players’ Emotions

  • Jan 01, 2012
  • Weiqin Chen
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

Meta-Affective Behaviour within an Intelligent Tutoring System for Mathematics

  • Apr 21, 2021
  • International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Genaro Rebolledo-Mendez +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

On Providing Natural Language Support for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

  • Jan 01, 2022
  • Romina Soledad Albornoz-De Luise +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations132

Evaluating the consequences of affective feedback in intelligent tutoring systems

  • Sep 01, 2009
  • Jennifer Robison +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations48

Sensors Model Student Self Concept in the Classroom

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • David G Cooper +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations188

Affective States and State Tests: Investigating How Affect and Engagement during the School Year Predict End-of-Year Learning Outcomes

  • May 01, 2014
  • Journal of Learning Analytics
  • Zach A Pardos +4
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations42

Politeness in Tutoring Dialogs: “Run the Factory, That’s What I’d Do”

  • Jan 01, 2004
  • W Lewis Johnson +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

DCBITS: Distributed Case Base Intelligent Tutoring System

  • Jan 01, 2008
  • AIP conference proceedings
  • O P Rishi +4
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.