• Home
  • Search
  • Multi-Criteria Optimization Manipulator Trajectory Planning
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.5772/9331Copy DOI Icon

Multi-Criteria Optimization Manipulator Trajectory Planning

  • Apr 1, 2010
  • E. J. Solteiro Pires +2 more
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In the last twenty years genetic algorithms (GAs) were applied in a plethora of fields such as: control, system identification, robotics, planning and scheduling, image processing, and pattern and speech recognition (Back et al., 1997). In robotics the problems of trajectory planning, collision avoidance and manipulator structure design considering a single criteria has been solved using several techniques (Alander, 2003). Most engineering applications require the optimization of several criteria simultaneously. Often the problems are complex, include discrete and continuous variables and there is no prior knowledge about the search space. These kind of problems are very more complex, since they consider multiple design criteria simultaneously within the optimization procedure. This is known as a multi-criteria (or multiobjective) optimization, that has been addressed successfully through GAs (Deb, 2001). The overall aim of multi-criteria evolutionary algorithms is to achieve a set of non-dominated optimal solutions known as Pareto front. At the end of the optimization procedure, instead of a single optimal (or near optimal) solution, the decision maker can select a solution from the Pareto front. Some of the key issues in multi-criteria GAs are: i) the number of objectives, ii) to obtain a Pareto front as wide as possible and iii) to achieve a Pareto front uniformly spread. Indeed, multi-objective techniques using GAs have been increasing in relevance as a research area. In 1989, Goldberg suggested the use of a GA to solve multi-objective problems and since then other researchers have been developing new methods, such as the multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) (Fonseca & Fleming, 1995), the non-dominated sorted genetic algorithm (NSGA) (Deb, 2001), and the niched Pareto genetic algorithm (NPGA) (Horn et al., 1994), among several other variants (Coello, 1998). In this work the trajectory planning problem considers: i) robots with 2 and 3 degrees of freedom (dof ), ii) the inclusion of obstacles in the workspace and iii) up to five criteria that are used to qualify the evolving trajectory, namely the: joint traveling distance, joint velocity, end effector / Cartesian distance, end effector / Cartesian velocity and energy involved. These criteria are used to minimize the joint 27

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations69

Derivation of Pareto Front with Genetic Algorithm and Neural Network

  • Jan 01, 2001
  • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
  • Shie-Yui Liong +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations192

The Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm 2 Applied to the Design of Groundwater Remediation Systems

  • Jan 01, 2001
  • Mark Erickson +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations11

A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for finding pareto optimal set in multi-objective optimization

  • Jul 01, 2011
  • Yun Yang +3
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations7

City Planning with a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm and a Pareto Set Scanner

  • Jan 01, 2000
  • Richard J. Balling +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

A MEM Electric Field Sensor Optimization by Multi-Objective Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Procedia Engineering
  • M Roy +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Multi-objective optimization of the shell in autonomous intelligent argo profiling float

  • Jul 09, 2019
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Zhitong Li +5
  • Research Article

Performance Analysis of IoT-based Temperature Monitoring Box Type Solar Cooker: A Multi-objective Optimization Approach

  • Dec 30, 2024
  • Recent Patents on Mechanical Engineering
  • Harshita Swarnkar +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations48

Effects of diversity control in single-objective and multi-objective genetic algorithms

  • Dec 21, 2006
  • Journal of Heuristics
  • Nachol Chaiyaratana +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Comparison between RLS-GA and RLS-PSO for Li-ion battery SOC and SOH estimation: a simulation study

  • Jul 31, 2017
  • Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical Power, and Vehicular Technology
  • Latif Rozaqi +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

A multi-objective genetic algorithm applied to array synthesis at multiple frequencies

  • Jun 01, 2009
  • Digest - IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society. International Symposium
  • Davide Bianchi +2
  • Conference Article

Research on performance evaluation of production vehicle based on multi-objective genetic algorithm

  • Jun 16, 2023
  • Yuan Liu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Multi-Objective Optimization of an Aircraft Position Indicator and Actuation System (PIAS) using GPSIA+DS

  • Feb 19, 2016
  • Recent Patents on Engineering
  • Okafor E Gabriel +2
  • Conference Article

Integrated Aerodynamic/Stealth Design of an Un-round Cross Section Airframe

  • Dec 01, 2009
  • Liang Chu +1
  • Conference Article

A guided multiobjective genetic algorithm for decision making problems

  • Dec 01, 2015
  • Muneendra Ojha +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations92

Multiobjective genetic optimization of diagnostic classifiers with implications for generating receiver operating characteristic curves.

  • Jan 01, 1999
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
  • M.A Kupinski +1
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.