• Home
  • Search
  • Multiresolution Wavelet Analysis for Improved Reservoir Description
  • Cite Icon97
  • https://doi.org/10.2118/87820-paCopy DOI Icon

Multiresolution Wavelet Analysis for Improved Reservoir Description

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

SummaryIt is well documented that history matching is a problem with possibly nonunique solutions. In the past few years, several automated or semiautomated history-matching algorithms have been proposed. Depending on the algorithm used, it is possible that the final estimated reservoir-property distribution that allows for a good history match may not be geologically realistic. Therefore, there is a need to include other constraints to generate multiple, geologically realistic history-matched realizations. These constraints might, for example, include the variogram, a training image, the distribution of net-to-gross, pore volume, or other geostatistical information about the reservoir. This inclusion is particularly useful because it introduces uncertainty information in the reservoir description when we have limited history from existing wells in the field and intend to drill infill wells or implement a secondary-recovery process.The algorithm proposed in this paper uses multiresolution wavelet analysis to integrate history data with the geostatistical information contained in the variogram proposed for the reservoir. Wavelets allow the representation and manipulation of property distributions at various resolutions at the same time. Using wavelets, information from different sources such as production history and seismic surveys (that would be at different resolutions) can be incorporated directly at the appropriate resolution level. In the first step, we fix the wavelet coefficients sensitive to the history-match data. This has the effect of fixing the field history without fixing individual gridblock properties. In the second step, the remaining free wavelet coefficients are modified to integrate variogram information into the reservoir description. Generating multiple realizations of only the second set of wavelets coefficients results in multiple history-matched, variogram-constrained descriptions of the reservoir. The computational investment is very modest because the history match is done only once.In a number of example cases, different areal Gaussian fields with varying amounts of available production-history data were studied to test the algorithm. It was found that the wavelet coefficients constraining the history can be decoupled from those constraining the variogram. The implication of this observation is that the history data and variogram can be integrated sequentially into the reservoir model—that is, after the initial history match, new information can be added to the model without disturbing the original match to yield multiple history-matched and geostatistically constrained realizations.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

Updating Stochastic Reservoir Models With New Production Data

  • Oct 05, 2003
  • D H Fenwick +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations40

Modeling, History Matching, Forecasting and Analysis of Shale Reservoirs Performance Using Artificial Intelligence

  • Apr 19, 2011
  • Shahab D Mohaghegh +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations31

Modeling and History Matching of Hydrocarbon Production from Marcellus Shale using Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Technologies

  • Oct 03, 2012
  • SPE Eastern Regional Meeting
  • S Esmaili +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

Reservoir Management Challenges of the Terra Nova Offshore Field: Lessons Learned After Five Years of Production

  • Nov 11, 2007
  • E Haugen +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Reservoir Modelling of Complex Geological Systems--A Multiple-Point Perspective

  • Aug 03, 2010
  • Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology
  • Kiomars Eskandari +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations9

Infill Well Portfolio Management under Uncertainty – Application to the 8 TH Reservoir, Austria

  • Jun 12, 2017
  • Martin Sieberer +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations57

Flow-Path Tracking Strategy in a Data-Driven Interwell Numerical Simulation Model for Waterflooding History Matching and Performance Prediction with Infill Wells

  • Dec 31, 2019
  • SPE Journal
  • Hui Zhao +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

A Multiscale Workflow for History Matching in Structured and Unstructured Grid Geometries

  • Jun 27, 2012
  • SPE Journal
  • E Bhark +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

Subsurface Analytics Case Study; Reservoir Simulation and Modeling of Highly Complex Offshore Field in Malaysia, Using Artificial Intelligent and Machine Learning

  • Oct 19, 2020
  • Rahim Masoudi +7
  • Conference Article
  • Citations49

Assisted History Matching Benchmarking: Design of Experiments-based Techniques

  • Oct 27, 2014
  • Eric Bhark +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations8

Building a Robust Reservoir Model through Full Integration Workflow of Static and Dynamic: A Case Study from a Lower Cretaceous Carbonate Reservoir of a Giant Oil Field, Onshore Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Nov 12, 2018
  • Setiyo Pamungkas +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations34

Constructing Reservoir Flow Simulator Proxies Using Genetic Programming for History Matching and Production Forecast Uncertainty Analysis

  • Dec 17, 2007
  • Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications
  • Tina Yu +2
  • Conference Article

Static and Dynamic Uncertainty Management for Probabilistic Production Forecast in Chuchupa field, Colombia

  • May 15, 2006
  • SPE Gas Technology Symposium
  • N Rivera +6
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Applications of Progressive-Recursive Self-Organizing Maps Algorithm in Guiding Reservoir History Matching

  • Sep 24, 2018
  • Ali A Al-Turki +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations13

Tengiz Reservoir Uncertainty Characterization and Modeling

  • Nov 08, 2010
  • W T Peake +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.