• Home
  • Search
  • Mutation particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving the optimal operation model of thermal power plants
  • Cite Icon11
  • https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4892517Copy DOI Icon

Mutation particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving the optimal operation model of thermal power plants

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

To solve joint optimization scheduling problem of thermal power plants based on the electricity market, the constraints and characteristics of optimal operation of thermal power plants are analyzed. From the perspective of economics and environmental science, we propose and establish an electricity market based joint optimization scheduling model of thermal power plants. Mutation particle swarm optimization algorithm (MPSO) is proposed to solve the model. Using an authentication instance, we compare and analyze the performances of the MPSO method and the mixed integer programming (MIP) method in solving the model. Further, considering a commonly used system, we show the efficiency of the MPSO method in solving the model; we apply two case studies to illustrate the performance of the MPSO method in solving the thermal unit commitment (UC) problem. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the MPSO method in solving the UC problem, we use MPSO method, PSO-LR (Lagrangian relaxation) [H. H. Balci and J. Valenzuela, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 14(3), 411–421 (1989)], improved PSO [B. Zhao et al., Elect. Power Energy Syst. 28, 482–490 (2006)], mimetic algorithm [J. Valenzuela and A. Smith, J. Heuristics 8(2), 173–195 (2002)], adaptive LR [W. Ongsakul and N. Petcharaks, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(1), 620–628 (2004)], stochastic priority list (PL) [T. Senjyu et al., Electr. Power Syst. Res. 76, 283–292 (2006)], PL based evolutionary algorithm [D. Srinivasan and J. Chazelas, in International Conference on Power System Technology (2004), Vol. 90, pp. 1746–1751], enhanced adaptive LR [W. Ongsakul and N. Petcharaks, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 19(1), 620–628 (2004)], mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) [M. Carrin and J. M. Arroyo, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 21(1), 321–332 (2006)], MILP [G. Morales-Espana et al., IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28, 4897 (2013)], NBD [T. Niknam et al., Appl. Energy 86, 1667–1674 (2009)], generalized new benders decomposition approach (NBD) [S. Rahimi et al., World Appl. Sci. J. 6(12), 1665–1672 (2009)], LR and genetic algorithm[C. P. Cheng et al., IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 15(2), 707–714 (2000)], and seeded memetic algorithm (SMA) [J. Valenzuela and A. Smith, J. Heuristics 8(2), 173–195 (2002)] to solve the UC problem, simulation results are compared with the ones obtained by other methods. It is shown that the optimal operation model is right, the MPSO method is better than MIP method in solving the model, and they have universality. The effectiveness of the MPSO method in solving the UC problem is better than other methods. The MPSO method has better solutions in comparison with other methods, especially for systems with a large number of units.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Consumer phase identification in low-voltage distribution network considering vacant users

  • Apr 18, 2020
  • International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
  • Lai Zhou +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Determining [formula omitted]- and [formula omitted]-robustness of digraphs using mixed integer linear programming

  • Oct 04, 2019
  • Automatica
  • James Usevitch +1
  • Book Chapter

Solving Siphons with the Minimal Cardinality for Deadlock Control

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Shaoyong Li
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations2

Convex Model for Global Optimization of Water Distribution System

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Computer Aided Chemical Engineering
  • Yingzong Liang +2
  • Book Chapter

Incremental methods for optimizing partial instantiation

  • Jan 01, 1995
  • Raymond T Ng +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations646

Optimal Transmission Switching

  • Aug 01, 2008
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • E.B Fisher +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

An intelligent simulation platform for train traffic control under disturbance

  • Aug 13, 2018
  • International Journal of Modelling and Simulation
  • Masoud Shakibayifar +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Optimal controlled-islanding with AC power flow constraints: A benders-decomposition approach

  • Mar 01, 2023
  • Electric Power Systems Research
  • Sabah Daniar +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations208

Optimal VAr planning by approximation method for recursive mixed-integer linear programming

  • Jan 01, 1988
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • K Aoki +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations31

A current-based model of the static synchronous series compensator (SSSC) for Newton–Raphson power flow

  • May 09, 2008
  • Electric Power Systems Research
  • Anton Vinkovic +1
  • Book Chapter

A Stochastic Unit Commitment to Enhance Frequency Security of Post-fault Power Systems

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • Chengjin Ye +2
  • Book Chapter

A Multi-state Model for Power System Resilience Enhancement Against Short-Circuit Faults

  • Jan 01, 2023
  • Chengjin Ye +2
  • Research Article

Optimising Ventilation System Preplanning: Duct Sizing and Fan Layout Using Mixed-Integer Programming

  • Oct 01, 2025
  • International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power
  • Julius H P Breuer +1
  • Research Article

Operating Rooms Planning and Scheduling with Mix Integer Programming and Meta-Heuristic Method

  • Jan 17, 2017
  • International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Applications
  • Mehdi Askarizadeh +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Global optimal actuator placement for adaptive structures: New formulation and benchmarking

  • Dec 19, 2024
  • Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
  • Gennaro Senatore +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.