Narrative assessment methods in children: a systematic review

No AccessPerspectives on School-Based IssuesArticle1 Dec 2004Sharpen Your Focus! Using Evidence-Based Practices in Standards-Based Therapy Units Debbie Lozo, and Vicky Carter Debbie Lozo Cobb County School DistrictMarietta, GA Google Scholar More articles by this author and Vicky Carter Cobb County School DistrictMarietta, GA Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sbi5.4.11 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References Anderson, R.G, & NagyW. E. (1992). The vocabulary conundrum,.American Educator, Winter,–14–18, 44–47. Google Scholar Applebee, A. N. (1977). A sense of story..Theory into practice,, 16,342–347. Google Scholar Arwood, E. L., & Mclnroy, J. (1994). Reading: It’s so easy to see-pictured language.Portland, OR: APRICOT. Google Scholar Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Conditions of vocabulary acquisition.. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson, (Eds.), Handbook of reading research II (pp. 789–814). Whiteplains, NY: Longman. Google Scholar Beck, I. L.,Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M.G. (1982). The effects of long term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension..Journal ofEducational Psychology, 74, 506–521. Google Scholar Blackowicz, C. L., & Lee, J. L. (1991). Vocabulary development in the whole literacy classroom..The Reading Teacher, 45,188–195. Google Scholar Blackowicz, C. L., & Fisher, P. (2004). Keeping the “fun” in fundamental.. In J. F. Bauman & D. J. Kame’enui (Eds), Vocabulary to practice (pp. 218–237). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar Butler, K. G. (1999). From oracy to literacy: Changing clinical perspectives..Topics in Language Disorders, 20,14–32. Google Scholar Catts, H. W.,Fey, M. E., & Proctor-Williams, K. (2000). The relationship between language and reading: Preliminary results from a longitudinal investigation..Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology,, 25,3–11. Google Scholar DeThorne, L. S., & Watkins, R. V. (2001). Listeners’ perceptions of language use in children..Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 142–148. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Elley, W. B. (1989). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories..Reading Research Quarterly, 24,174–187. Google Scholar Gillam, R.B. & Carlisle, R. M. (1997). Oral reading and story retelling of students with specific language impairments..Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, ( 28 (1), 30–42. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Gillam R. B. (2002, July). Teaching narration through children’s literature.Paper presented at ASHA Schools 2002 Conference, Nashville, TN. Google Scholar Graves, M. F.,Juel, C., & Graves, B. B. (2001). Teaching reading in the 21st century. .Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar Gummersoll, D. M., &Strong, C. J. (1999). Assessment of complex sentence production in a narrative context..Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 30,152–164. Google Scholar Kaderavek, J., &Sulzby, E. (2000). Narrative production by children with and without specific language impairment: Oral narratives and emergent readings..Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research,, 43, 34–49. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Kaderavek, J., & Justice, L. (2004). Embedded-explicit emergent literacy intervention 2: Goal selection and implementation in the early childhood classroom..Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools.( 35(3), 212–228. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Marzano,R. J. (2003). What works in schools..Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Google Scholar Marzano, R. J.,Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works..Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Google Scholar Merrit, D. D., & Liles, B. Z. (1987). Story grammar ability in children with and without language disorder: Story generation, story retelling and story comprehension.Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, , 30,539–552. Google Scholar McCabe, A., & Rollins, P.R. (1993). Assessment of preschool narrative skills..American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(1), 45–56. Google Scholar Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1984). Limitations ofvocabulary instruction..Rep. No. 326). Urbana, IL:University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading. Google Scholar National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research.literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: NICHD Clearing House. Google Scholar Rogers, S., & Graham, S. (2003). The high performance toolbox..Evergreen, CO: Peak Learning Systems. Google Scholar Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children..Child Development, 61,1728–1743. Google Scholar Scott, J. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2004). Developing word consciousness. In J. F. Bauman & D. J. Kame’enui (Eds), Vocabulary to practice (pp. 201–217). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar Snow, C. E.,Scarborough, H. S., & Burns, M. S. (1999). What speech-language pathologists need to know about early reading..Topics in Language Disorders, 20(1), 48–58. Google Scholar Strong, C. J. (1998). The Strong narrative assessment procedure..Eau Clair, WI: Thinking Publications. Google Scholar Thompson, M., & Thomason, J. (2002). Leadership, achievement, and accountability..Boone, NC: Learning Concepts. Google Scholar Turner, G. Y. (1996). Thematic approaches to learning: Research shows ten clear benefits.In Teacher’s desk reference (pp. 51–58). New York:Scholastic. Google Scholar Wallach, G. P., & Butler, K. G. (1994). Language learning disabilities in school-age children and adolescents: Some principles and applications..Needham Heights, M A:Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar Wiggins, G.,&McTighe,J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 5Issue 4December 2004Pages: 11-16 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Dec 1, 2004 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2004 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...

Response to the critique of “Keratocystic odontogenic tumor: systematic review with analysis of 72 additional cases from Mumbai, India”

Management of Functional Constipation in Children with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Report from the Standardization Committee of the International Children's Continence Society

Physical Activity and Diabetes.

ASGE guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: summary and recommendations

Additional age-related issues should be considered when managing breast cancer in young women.1 Among them, the potential consequences of anticancer treatments on ovarian function and fertility potential are of particular concern and need to be addressed as early as possible after diagnosis.2,3 Therefore, current guidelines strongly voice the need to provide proper oncofertility counseling with all patients of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer irrespective of its stage.2,3 This is a crucial step to discuss with all young women their disease and prognosis, the required treatments including their potential gonadotoxicity, the need for contraception during and after active systemic therapies, their future desire of conception, likelihood of pregnancy, its safety and outcomes as well as the available strategies to avoid the negative impact of the proposed treatment on ovarian function and fertility.

Further studies are needed to assess the competing therapies for neck pain

Effects of Helicobacter pylori and Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs on Peptic Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review

Born Large for Gestational Age: Bigger Is Not Always Better

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Prehospital or In-Hospital Cannulation?

Cerclage placement in twin pregnancies with short or dilated cervix does not prevent preterm birth: a fragility index assessment

Differential diagnosis of facial pain and guidelines for management

Clinical decision support software (CDSS) has been increasingly implemented to assist improved prescribing practice. Reviews and studies report generally positive results regarding prescribing changes and, to a lesser extent, patient outcomes. Little information is available, however, concerning the use of CDSS in community pharmacy practice. Given the apparent paucity of publications examining this topic, we conducted a review to determine whether CDSS in community pharmacy practice can improve medication use and patient outcomes. A literature search of articles on CDSS relevant to community pharmacy and published between 1 January 2005 and 21 October 2013 was undertaken. Articles were included if the healthcare setting was community pharmacy and the article indicated that pharmacy use of CDSS was part of the study intervention. Eight studies were found which assessed counselling, selected drug interactions, inappropriate prescribing and under-prescribing. One study was halted due to insufficient data collection. Six studies showed statistically significant improvements in the measured outcomes: increased patient counselling, 31% reduced frequency of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), reduced frequency of inappropriate medications in the elderly (2·2-1·8% patients) and in pregnant women (5·5-2·9% patients), and increased pharmacists' interventions for under-prescribed low-dose aspirin (1·74 vs. 0·91 per 100 patients with type 2 diabetes) and over-prescribed high-dose proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) (1·67 vs. 0·17 interventions per 100 high-dose PPI prescriptions). Most studies showed improved prescribing practice, via direct communication between pharmacists and doctors or indirectly via patient education. Factors limiting the impact of improved prescribing included alert fatigue and clinical inertia. No study investigated patient outcomes and little investigation had been undertaken on how CDSS could be best implemented. Few studies have been undertaken in community pharmacy practice, and based on the positive findings reported, further research should be directed in this area, including investigation of patient outcomes.

Underutilization of Paravertebral Block in Thoracic Surgery

Counterpoint: Should Systemic Lytic Therapy Be Used for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism? No