Predicates as a Means of Expressing Objective Epistemic Modality in Popular Science Discourse: Modern Rhetorical Practice
Purpose The purpose of this work is to substantiate the modality of predicates as one of the key means of expressing objective epistemic modality in the aspect of popular science discourse and to describe the epistemic meaning contained in a proposition. Design/methodology/approach The methodology used in this research is based on the research of the category of effectiveness, evaluation, implemented in a specific rhetorical practice in the aspect of scientific, popular science discourse (Annushkin and Shcherbakov in Sci Dialogue 6:9–43, 2020; Balas in Innovative research in life sciences: pathways to scientific impact, public health improvement, and economic progress. Wiley, 2018; Danilevskaya in Bull Perm Univ Russ Foreign Philology 20–28, 2009; Golyshkin in Sci Dialogue 10:94–109, 2019; Golyshkina in Sci Dialogue 5:9–24, 2020); separate basic principles of modal epistemic logic, linguistic semantics of (Klemenova and Kudryashov in Philology, Journalism, 17(6):97–107, 2018; Layonz in Linguistic semantics. Introduction. Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury, Moscow, 2003; Paducheva in Sementic researches. Semantic of time and species in Russian language. Narrative semantics. Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. Moscow, 2010; Paducheva in Egocentric units of language, Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury, 2019). Also, the research is based on the method of continuous sampling in the selection of practical material, the method of quantitative and qualitative analysis. Findings It is shown that the modern multicultural regions need flexible state management of their economy in two directions: migration flows and foreign economic activities. The problem of supporting high flexibility of state management of economy of multicultural regions consists in underdevelopment of the scientific and methodological provision of this management depending on the context and the current needs and capabilities of the region. Originality/value The results of the study showed that the predicates “show”, “concluded”, “according”, “according to/tells”, “found”, etc., by ascertaining the values also enter into epistemic modal component is a predicate intended to reaffirm the objective possibility of approval through the chain of logical conclusions and experimental data. This type of construction is found in the scientific information magazine “in the world of science” 6 times more than in “Science of technology”. In addition, these predicates perform the function of an epistemic obligation, when the epistemic responsibility for what is said “by default” lies with the author of a popular science text, as well as with the translator—correspondent—of this research and this responsibility. This fact confirms the rhetorical persuasiveness of the proposition. In texts complicated by indicators of epistemic modality with problematic confidence, the predicates “show”, “concluded”, “according to data”, “according to words/says”, “found”, etc. they form the epistemic responsibility of the speaker and the broadcaster for the truth of the proposition. Designs with problematic reliability are not typical for the journal “Science and technology”, they are mainly notable for the heading “Aircraft and aircraft construction”.KeywordsObjective epistemic modalityPopular science discourseRhetorical practiceEpistemic responsibilityPredicates with problematic validityPredicates with a stating elementJEL ClassificationL82I29
Read more