Using speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess fetal myocardial deformation: are we there yet? Yes we are!
We read with interest the Opinion of Day and colleagues regarding speckle-tracking assessment of fetal myocardial deformation1 and we would like to share a few comments. First, figure 1 suggests that the strain is computed for the entire myocardium, as represented by the dotted lines on the image of the septal and lateral walls of the left ventricle. It is not clear if this approach has been used to compute the individual endocardial strain (inner dotted line), the myocardial strain (middle dotted line) or the epicardial strain (outer dotted line), or a sum of all three. The authors should clarify if their results represent a composite measurement of the endocardial, myocardial and epicardial strain, or each of these portions separately. Second, the authors state that ‘In the absence of an electrocardiogram signal (as in fetal echocardiography), data transfer using the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format standard occurs at a frame rate of 25–30 fps [frames per second]’. While this may be true for earlier studies, current ultrasound technology allows the DICOM frames to be acquired and exported at a frame rate equal to the frequency of image acquisition2. The authors cite our review of speckle tracking of the fetal heart (their reference 54) in which we provide an illustration (figure 1) of frame rates acquired with ultrasound machines used in obstetric assessment, which demonstrates frame rates ranging between 50 and 218 per second. These frames were exported from the ultrasound machine in DICOM format. Thus, DICOM export of image frames used in speckle-tracking analysis is not limited to between 25 and 30 fps, but rather, it is possible to achieve frame rates that are equivalent to those obtained during image acquisition2. Third, in another study from our group cited by Day et al. (their reference 37), we found that left ventricular longitudinal strain did not change as a function of gestational age and the mean left ventricular global strain was –22.93%3. In the same paper, we compared our results with the mean and SD values of left ventricular global strain reported in 14 other studies (table 4) and found that, in all but five of them, the delta Z-score values were within 2 SD of our findings. All of the reported studies were performed on dedicated cardiovascular ultrasound machines, while our study used an offline program that only required DICOM clips for analysis3. Lastly, we have reported a number of cardiac measurements derived from speckle-tracking analysis of the right and left ventricular endocardium that analyze ventricular size, shape and contractility2-13. This analysis, a relatively new adaptation of speckle-tracking assessment, enables the examiner to obtain numerous cardiac measurements from a single endocardial tracing of each ventricle, which takes less than 3 min, and is now commercially available on ultrasound platforms dedicated primarily to fetal evaluation. In conclusion, we appreciate the insights of Day and colleagues regarding the benefits and limitations of speckle-tracking assessment of fetal myocardial deformation, however, our experience to date suggests that speckle tracking of the fetal heart has great potential, it demonstrates adequate frame rates, it is reproducible and easy to obtain, and can provide simultaneous measurements of ventricular size, shape and contractility.
Read more