Nephrology literature watch

Donald A Molony

doi:10.1002/dat.20605

Home
Search
Nephrology literature watch

https://doi.org/10.1002/dat.20605

Nephrology literature watch

Aug 1, 2011
Dialysis & Transplantation
Donald A Molony

Listen

Abstract
Literature Map
References
Similar Papers

Abstract

This month, I review three recent studies from the literature addressing issues important to the care of the peritoneal dialysis (PD) patient. A number of core questions related to modality choice center on whether PD offers specific patient-centered outcomes benefits or whether specific PD prescriptions might result in improved hard (non-surrogate) patient-centered outcomes. When considering whether an intervention results in changes in outcomes, the randomized controlled trial (RCT) has been considered the “holy grail,” as when it is performed rigorously the opportunity for the introduction of bias or confounding is minimized. However, the challenges of conducting RCTs with dialysis modality choice are well documented.1 In this literature watch, I review an RCT that highlights additional limitations that might arise from a well-designed RCT of the small size typical of many RCTs in nephrology. Specifically, I consider what might happen if the baseline risk of individuals randomly assigned to the experimental and control treatments differ significantly. Bias is reduced by randomization if sufficient numbers of patients are included in the study such that by chance alone all important baseline prognostic (known and unknown) factors that might influence the outcome are distributed equally to both groups, and that the groups differ only in the intervention under investigation. In small RCTs the equivalence of prognostic characteristics in each arm of the study cannot be assumed.2, 3 Additionally, when addressing the issue of whether a particular clinical finding might predict poorer outcomes or even result in harm, the RCT is not the ideal study design. To identify a factor as potentially harmful and likely to be causal of an adverse outcome, observational findings evaluated in the context of the Bradford-Hill considerations are preferred. In addition to the ethical constraints on conducting an RCT on a question of causation or harm, well-designed observational/epidemiological studies may be most informative because they are conducted under real-world conditions and may include patients expressing the full spectrum of baseline risk. Here too the size of the study population is likely to matter. In this literature watch I review two recent observational studies that interrogate patient databases to provide evidence about potential harm related to a clinical feature or the lack thereof. The first study evaluates the use of PD for initiation of unplanned dialysis compared with an initiation with hemodialysis (HD). In the second observational study, a study exploiting a very large observational database, the authors investigate whether depressed serum albumin levels are similarly associated with mortality in HD and PD patients. Citation: Takatori Y, Akagi S, Sugiyama H, et al. Icodextrin increases technique survival rates in peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy by improving body fluid management: A randomized controlled trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:1337–1344. Analysis: Takatori and colleagues report the results of an RCT evaluating whether use of icodextrin as the osmotic agent in PD fluid results in preservation of the PD technique in patients with newly diagnosed end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and diabetes. They define technique preservation largely around the ability of the PD to adequately remove fluid.4, 5 As a secondary outcome, they evaluated preservation of renal function and peritoneal membrane function. It has been established in multiple clinical trails that use of icodextrin in place of dextrose solutions (2.5%) results in improved net ultrafiltration and control of volume. The novel finding in this study is that these previously reported findings extend to incident dialysis patients with diabetes. The study was pre-registered in the Japanese clinical trials registry (JPRN registry WMIN00001040) with the control of volume as the primary outcome and with the intended enrollment of 100 patients. The primary finding of this study was that icodextrin resulted in preservation of function defined as the ability to achieve adequate volume removal when compared with standard PD with 2.5% Dianeal. Validity and threats to validity: The optimal study design to assess a question regarding a therapeutic intervention remains the RCT or a systematic review of high-quality RCTs. When well conducted, an RCT can reduce the risk of bias. There are significant limitations to RCTs when performed less than optimally that may distort the findings reported. Some of these are widely recognized and include non-masking of group assignment, non-blinding leading to secondary interventions impacting outcomes, misclassification of outcomes, and so on. Recently, M.W. Walsh and colleagues have attempted to quantify the risk of important imbalances in baseline prognostic characteristics that might occur by chance in RCTs that are too small to ensure that a balance has occurred as a result of random group allocation (personal communication, June 2011). Although this study appears to be a randomized trial with concealment of allocation, a number of the features of the current study may be problematic in the interpretation of the results and their application. First, the study is very small; significantly smaller than the size indicated as necessary in the pre-study plan. No formal power calculations are included in the published report. In such a small study, if prognostic characteristics are not balanced the results might deviate significantly from the “truth.” A recalculation of the effect size using non-parametric statistical tests and changing the outcome of one subject in each group would result in a significant change of the primary finding reported. Importantly, the study is underpowered to evaluate the patient-centered outcomes of peritoneal membrane and renal function survival or any major side effects including mortality and infection. It appears that group assignment may not have been masked after the initial randomization, so that the clinicians could have intervened in other ways (e.g., education, diet) that might have influenced volume control independent of the PD fluid interventions under study. Patients in the control arm were not treated with higher percentage glucose solutions as might be the case in the U.S. for patients who failed to achieve adequate net volume removal. Application of the results and the clinical bottom line: This is a randomized controlled trial that demonstrates improvement in volume management using icodextrin to perform PD as compared with glucose-containing solutions. These findings reiterated multiple other RCT and observational trial findings in renal-failure patient populations. This study does not provide any new evidence about whether icodextrin might result in improvements in peritoneal membrane or renal survival. Before the conversion to icodextrin as the PD fluid of choice can be recommended, additional RCTs of sufficient duration and size need to be conducted. These RCTs need to determine if patient-centered outcomes can be improved upon significantly with the substitution of icodextrin for glucose-based PD solutions. Citation: Koch M, Kohnle M, Trapp R, Haastert B, Rump LC, Aker S. Comparable outcome of acute unplanned peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis [published online ahead of print May 28, 2011]. Nephrol Dial Transplant. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfr262. Analysis: The issue of whether patients requiring urgent renal replacement therapy (RRT) can be safely managed with PD has here-to-fore not been rigorously investigated. The current study by Koch and colleagues begins to investigate this question. Ideally, an RCT comparing urgent PD to HD would most unambiguously address this question. The ability to conduct such a study despite equipoise has been restricted, however, by a strong clinical bias in the nephrology community that urgent PD cannot be conducted safely in most clinical circumstances. In such an environment, a well-designed observational study can provide evidence supporting the safety (lack of harm) of PD for urgent initiation of dialysis opening up the possibility for the appropriate RCT. Koch and colleages have exploited their unique clinical environment that allows them to provide PD urgently in a closely observed hospital setting to compare their experience with urgent PD versus urgent HD. Validity and threats to validity: As an observational study, it is impossible to exclude bias that might have influenced the results. The most important of these is a selection bias where healthier patients are systematically more likely to receive one versus the other treatments being compared. In the case of the current study, it appears that patients with more severe cardiac disease were more likely to be encouraged to choose PD as treatment. Such an imbalance would be expected to negatively impact the outcomes (mortality, hospitalization rates, etc.) amongst patients undergoing PD. The absence of an observed difference (possibly even a trend favoring PD) can be attributed to the study being underpowered. Alternatively, the absence of a difference in outcomes might be due to an imbalance in prognostic factors, which would be expected in the case of this study to make a superior treatment option such as PD appear less favorable in comparison. Statistical methods to manage the differences in important prognostic factors between the two groups are imperfect. Application of the results and the clinical bottom line: Importantly, this study may provide the necessary evidence of safety with the use of PD in urgent initiation of RRT and, therefore, open up the possibility of an RCT that will test the use of PD for emergency initiation of dialysis. The study results support the conclusion that urgent PD is safe and can be implemented equally effectively as HD for urgent initiation of RRT. If safe, a potential strategy based on PD for urgent RRT warrants further study as a means of reducing HD catheter-related infections—a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients new to dialysis. Treating a larger fraction of incident ESRD patients with PD might have other favorable consequences on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life yet to be determined. Citation: Mehrotra R, Duong U, Jiwakanon S, et al. Serum albumin as a predictor of mortality in peritoneal dialysis: Comparisons with hemodialysis [published online ahead of print May 19, 2011]. Am J Kidney Dis. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.03.018. Analysis: Mehrotra and colleagues exploit a large observational database to investigate whether depressed serum albumin levels are similarly associated with mortality in HD and PD patients. This study is important for two major reasons: First, if the impact of a low albumin is similar in PD and HD patients, PD patients may be placed in higher risk from excessive peritoneal protein losses and therefore, incentives and quality measures designed to prevent hypoalbuminemia might be warranted; and second, if interventions are to be tested or advocated to correct the hypoalbuminemia, the optimal target for serum albumin in PD versus HD patients should be established. This may be seen as an important precursor to studying interventions to alter albumin and to stratify the study populations according to who is most likely to benefit. In the current study, the authors have used the DaVita dataset containing the clinical parameters and outcomes for all patients receiving RRT by DaVita over a five-year period. They demonstrated a significant adjusted risk of mortality and cardiovascular mortality among all patients receiving RRT who were significantly hypoalbuminemic. Importantly, they demonstrated that the increase risk is not seen in PD patients until their serum albumin levels are observed to be below 3.8 g/dL. In contrast, in HD patients the threshold for increased risk with a depressed albumin begins at values below 4.0 g/dL. Validity and threats to validity: Prior to initiation of RCTs to test interventions to normalize serum albumin levels in patients undergoing RRT, it should be firmly established that there is an increased mortality risk associated with the lower serum albumin and whether this risk is modified by treatment modality. This study provides substantial evidence of this association and that the risk might be different for patients treated with PD versus HD. The power of this study rests in that the observations are made using a very large database representing the full spectrum of patients and their comorbidities. The interrogated database represents a long enough period of observation of sufficient duration that it would be reasonable to expect to observe an impact of hypoalbuminemia on mortality. The study cannot, however, prove a causal relationship between a low albumin and mortality. In particular, despite the large size of the population, the robustness of the data allowing for morbidity adjustments, and the precision of the estimates, confounding cannot be excluded. The authors note these limitations. It is, however, fair to note (as the authors do) that despite the limitations of the evidence, agencies that monitor healthcare quality often chose to measure quality using parameters that arise from such observational studies. The rigor of this observational study and the precision of the estimates of the threshold make the findings from this study most compelling. Application of the results and the clinical bottom line: While it is uncertain whether hypoalbuminemia itself is causal for some of the observed increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in ESRD patients, the current study by Mehrotra and colleageus adds significantly to our current understandings about serum albumin and nutrition in ESRD patients by more precisely describing the impact of a low albumin on different classes of ESRD patients. This study should provide evidence that will help in the design of clinical trials investigating interventions to correct low serum albumin levels in ESRD patients. Since the decision to switch patients from PD to HD is often influenced by the persistence of a lower serum albumin in PD patients, the results of this study might provide rationale—pending confirmation by an RCT—for a strategy that results in fewer patients switching off of PD and moving to HD. At a minimum, this study should raise the possibility that a slightly higher albumin achieved by switching a PD patient to HD might not translate into a significant survival advantage. This hypothesis requires further testing. The two observational studies reviewed above provide significant insights into safety and harm or risk. As such, these observational studies may be informative for clinical practice. Thus, well-conducted observational studies can provide important insights especially related to risk or harm. In contrast, the first study reviewed above highlights some of the limitations presented by RCTs of small size—sizes typical of the nephrology literature. While the RCT is the optimal study design to investigate a therapy, the RCT reviewed here demonstrates that the results of even a well-designed and well-conducted RCT may, at times, need to be interpreted with caution. The plethora of small RCTs in nephrology and the difficulty of conducting larger trials in ESRD patients should not provide justification for our failure to conduct large, sufficiently powered RCTs on many of our current therapies for the complications of ESRD.

Similar Papers

Research Article
36
10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.06.031

Update on Peritoneal Dialysis: Core Curriculum 2016

Sep 14, 2015
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Joni H Hansson + 1 more +1

Update on Peritoneal Dialysis: Core Curriculum 2016

Discussion
2
10.3747/pdi.2014.00031

Extremes of body mass index and mortality among Asian peritoneal dialysis patients.

Jun 01, 2014
Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
Sharon J Nessim

Extremes of body mass index and mortality among Asian peritoneal dialysis patients.

Research Article
202
10.1186/1471-2369-9-14

Quality of life, mental health and health beliefs in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: Investigating differences in early and later years of current treatment

Nov 14, 2008
BMC Nephrology
M Ginieri-Coccossis + 4 more +4

BackgroundThe study examines differences regarding quality of life (QoL), mental health and illness beliefs between in-centre haemodialysis (HD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/PD) patients. Differences are examined between patients who recently commenced treatment compared to patients on long term treatment.Methods144 End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) patients were recruited from three treatment units, of which 135 provided full data on the variables studied. Patients consisted of: a) 77 in-centre haemodialysis (HD) and 58 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/PD) patients, all currently being treated by dialysis for varied length of time. Patients were compared for differences after being grouped into those who recently commenced treatment (< 4 years) and those on long term treatment (> 4 years). Next, cases were selected as to form two equivalent groups of HD and CAPD/PD patients in terms of length of treatment and sociodemographic variables. The groups consisted of: a) 41 in-centre haemodialysis (HD) and b) 48 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD/PD) patients, fitting the selection criteria of recent commencement of treatment and similar sociodemographic characteristics. Patient-reported assessments included: WHOQOL-BREF, GHQ-28 and the MHLC, which is a health locus of control inventory.ResultsDifferences in mean scores were mainly observed in the HD patients with > 4 years of treatment, providing lower mean scores in the QoL domains of physical health, social relationships and environment, as well as in overall mental health. Differences in CAPD/PD groups, between those in early and those in later years of treatment, were not found to be large and significant. Concerning the analysis on equivalent groups derived from selection of cases, HD patients indicated significantly lower mean scores in the QoL domain of environment and higher scores in the GHQ-28 subscales of anxiety/insomnia and severe depression, indicating more symptoms in these areas of mental health. With regards to illness beliefs, HD patients who recently commenced treatment provided higher mean scores in the dimension of internal health locus of control, while CAPD/PD patients on long term treatment indicated higher mean scores in the dimension of chance. Regarding differences in health beliefs between equivalent groups of HD and CAPD/PD patients, HD patients focused more on the dimension of internal health locus of control.ConclusionThe results provide evidence that patients in HD treatment modality, particularly those with many years of treatment, were experiencing a more compromised QoL in comparison to CAPD/PD patients.

Research Article
19
10.3390/jcm7100343

Association between End-Stage Renal Disease and Incident Diabetes Mellitus—A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Oct 11, 2018
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pin-Pin Wu + 3 more +3

Background: Glucose is one of the constituents in hemodialysates and peritoneal dialysates. How the dialysis associates with the incident diabetes mellitus (DM) remains to be assessed. Methods: The claim data of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who initiated dialysis from and a cohort of matched non-dialysis individuals from 2000 to 2013 were retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to examine the risk of incident DM among patients on hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Predictors of incident DM were determined for HD and PD patients using Fine and Gray models to treat death as a competing event, respectively. Results: A total of 2228 patients on dialysis (2092 HD and 136 PD) and 8912 non-dialysis individuals were the study population. The PD and HD patients had 12 and 97 new-onset of DM (incidence rates of 15.98 and 8.69 per 1000 patient-years, respectively), while the comparison cohort had 869 DM events with the incidence rate of 15.88 per 1000 patient-years. The multivariable-adjusted Cox models of Fine and Gray method showed that the dialysis cohort was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.49 (95% CI 0.39–0.61, p value < 0.0001) for incident DM compared with the comparison cohort. The adjusted HR of incident DM was 0.46 (95% CI 0.37–0.58, p value < 0.0001) for HD and 0.84 (95% CI 0.47–1.51, p value = 0.56) for PD. Conclusions: ESRD patients were associated with a lower risk of incident DM. HD was associated with a lower risk of incident DM, whereas PD was not.

Research Article
28
10.1159/000431335

Trends in Anemia Management Practices in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Jun 17, 2015
American Journal of Nephrology
James B Wetmore + 7 more +7

Background/Aims: Recent changes in clinical practice guidelines and reimbursement policies may have affected the use of anemia-related medications and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. We sought to compare patterns of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) and intravenous (IV) iron use, achieved hemoglobin levels, and RBC transfusion use in PD and HD patients. Methods: In quarterly cohorts of prevalent dialysis patients receiving persistent therapy (>3 months), 2007-2011, with Medicare Parts A and B coverage, we assessed ESA and IV iron use and dose, RBC transfusions, and hemoglobin levels. Quarterly transfusion rates were calculated. Results: Observable PD and HD patients numbered 14,958 and 221,866 in Q1/2007 and 17,842 and 256,942 in Q4/2011. Adjusted ESA use was lower in PD (71.4-80.1%) than in HD (86.9-92.0%) patients, decreasing from 80.1% (Q1/2010) to 71.4% (Q4/2011) in PD patients, and from 92.0 to 86.9% in HD patients. The mean adjusted ESA dose decreased by 67.5% in PD and 58.4% in HD patients. IV iron use tended to increase, peaking at 39.3% for PD (Q3/2011) and 80.5% for HD (Q2/2011) patients. Adjusted mean hemoglobin levels fell from 11.7 to 10.6 mg/dl in PD and from 12.0 to 10.7 mg/dl in HD ESA users; adjusted transfusion rates increased from 2.4 to 3.0 per 100 patient-months in PD and from 2.6 to 3.3 in HD patients. Conclusions: In patients receiving persistent dialysis, dose and frequency of ESA administrations decreased during the period 2007-2011. Mean hemoglobin levels decreased by more than 1 g/dl, while transfusion rates increased by approximately 25%.

Research Article
37
10.1007/s11255-013-0438-7

Is residual renal function and better phosphate control in peritoneal dialysis an answer for the lower prevalence of valve calcification compared to hemodialysis patients?

Apr 17, 2013
International Urology and Nephrology
Merita Rroji + 7 more +7

Cardiac valve calcification (CVC) has long been regarded as a consequence of abnormal calcium-phosphate metabolism in uremic patient associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in this population. We evaluated the association between residual renal function (RRF), phosphate level and valve calcification in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. We studied 30 stable PD patients (60 % males; mean age 57 ± 12.36 years) and 34 HD patients (58.8 % males; mean age 50.8 ± 10.4 years) on renal replacement therapy (RRT) from 6 up to 36 months. The presence of CVC was assessed by standard bi-dimensional echocardiography. RRF was calculated by standard technique. Valve calcification was more frequently found in HD compared to PD patients (70.6 vs 29.4 %, p = 0.007). Significantly lower phosphate [1.38 ± 0.41 versus 1.99 ± 0.35 mmol/L (p < 0.0001)], a higher RRF [4.09 ± 2.09 ml/min vs 0.62 ± 0.89 ml/min (p < 0.0001)], and older age [57 ± 12.36 years vs 50.8 ± 10.4 years (p = 0.033)] were observed in PD as compared to HD patients. The logistic regression analysis for the presence of valve calcification when adjusted for age and diabetes, with type of therapy, serum phosphate, RRF, CRP, and serum albumin as variables in the model, revealed significant association between the presence of valve calcification and age and RRF. The correlation between phosphate levels and RRF was even stronger in PD patients than in HD patients (r = -0.704; p = 0.0001) vs (r = -0.502; p = 0.02). Our study shows that the residual renal function in PD patients contributes significantly to the maintenance of phosphate balance and may explain the lower prevalence of valve calcification in PD patients compared with HD patients in the period up to first 3 years under renal replacement therapy.

Research Article
86
10.1371/journal.pone.0166181

Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in ESRD Patients: Complications and Outcomes.

Nov 08, 2016
PloS one
Haijiao Jin + 14 more +14

BackgroundSeveral studies have suggested that urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a feasible alternative to hemodialysis (HD) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but the impact of the dialysis modality on outcome, especially on short-term complications, in urgent-start dialysis has not been directly evaluated. The aim of the current study was to compare the complications and outcomes of PD and HD in urgent-start dialysis ESRD patients.MethodsIn this retrospective study, ESRD patients who initiated dialysis urgently without a pre-established functional vascular access or PD catheter at a single center from January 2013 to December 2014 were included. Patients were grouped according to their dialysis modality (PD and HD). Each patient was followed for at least 30 days after catheter insertion (until January 2016). Dialysis-related complications and patient survival were compared between the two groups.ResultsOur study enrolled 178 patients (56.2% male), of whom 96 and 82 patients were in the PD and HD groups, respectively. Compared with HD patients, PD patients had more cardiovascular disease, less heart failure, higher levels of serum potassium, hemoglobin, serum albumin, serum pre-albumin, and lower levels of brain natriuretic peptide. There were no significant differences in gender, age, use of steroids, early referral to a nephrologist, prevalence of primary renal diseases, prevalence of co-morbidities, and other laboratory characteristics between the groups. The incidence of dialysis-related complications during the first 30 days was significantly higher in HD than PD patients. HD patients had a significantly higher probability of bacteremia compared to PD patients. HD was an independent predictor of short-term (30-day) dialysis-related complications. There was no significant difference between PD and HD patients with respect to patient survival rate.ConclusionIn an experienced center, PD is a safe and feasible dialysis alternative to HD for ESRD patients with an urgent need for dialysis.

Research Article
26
10.1159/000369588

Cardiac, Inflammatory and Metabolic Parameters: Hemodialysis versus Peritoneal Dialysis

Dec 13, 2014
Cardiorenal Medicine
Silvia Lai + 9 more +9

Introduction: Mortality in dialysis patients is higher than in the general population, and cardiovascular disease represents the leading cause of death. Hypertension and volume overload are important risk factors for the development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Other factors are mainly represented by hyperparathyroidism, vascular calcification, arterial stiffness and inflammation. The aim of this study was to compare blood pressure (BP) and metabolic parameters with cardiovascular changes [cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), aortic arch calcification (AAC) and LV mass index (LVMI)] between PD and HD patients. Materials and Methods: 45 patients (23 HD and 22 PD patients) were enrolled. BP measurements, echocardiography and chest X-ray were performed in each patient to determine the LVMI and to evaluate the CTR and AAC. Inflammatory indexes, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and arterial blood gas analysis were also evaluated. Results: LVMI was higher in PD than HD patients (139 ± 19 vs. 104 ± 22; p = 0.04). In PD patients, a significant correlation between iPTH, C-reactive protein and the presence of LVH was observed (r = 0.70, p = 0.04; r = 0.70, p = 0.03, respectively). The CTR was increased in PD patients as compared to HD patients, while no significant differences in cardiac calcifications were determined. Conclusions: Our data indicate that HD patients present more effective BP control than PD patients. Adequate fluid and metabolic control are necessary to assess the adequacy of BP, which is strongly correlated with the increase in LVMI and with the increased CTR in dialysis patients. PD is a home therapy and allows a better quality of life, but PD patients may present a further increased cardiovascular risk if not adequately monitored. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

Research Article
79
10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11370

Gastrointestinal symptoms: a comparison between patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Jan 01, 2014
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Rui Dong

To compare the prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). Two hundred and ninety-four end-stage renal disease patients participated in the study, including 182 HD and 112 PD patients. Dimension scores were calculated from a modified gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) 18-item questionnaire, including items concerning eating dysfunction, and were used for measuring GI symptoms. Information on patient age, condition contributing to end-stage renal disease and the most recent dialysis adequacy assessment (serum Kt/V urea value) was obtained from the follow-up database and by interviewing patients and/or reviewing the medical records. Differences between the HD and PD groups were evaluated using Student's t, Pearson's χ(2) or Fisher's exact tests. The overall prevalence of GI symptoms, defined by a GSRS > 1, in end-stage renal disease patients was 70.7% (208/294), which differed between HD and PD patients (76.4% vs 61.6%, P < 0.01). HD patients had a higher prevalence of constipation, abdominal pain and diarrhea compared to PD patients (36.3% vs 17.9%, 32.4% vs 5.4%, 17.6% vs 4.5%, respectively, P < 0.05). PD patients had a higher prevalence of reflux compared to HD patients (32.1% vs 24.2%, P < 0.05). Additionally, reflux and eating dysfunction were more severe in PD patients (GSRS: 1.71 ± 1.15 vs 1.30 ± 0.67, 1.57 ± 0.84 vs 1.39 ± 0.61, respectively, P < 0.05), whereas HD patients had greater abdominal pain, diarrhea and constipation (GSRS: 1.22 ± 0.39 vs 1.04 ± 0.19, 1.19 ± 0.53 vs 1.07 ± 0.35, 1.51 ± 0.83 vs 1.23 ± 0.58, respectively, P < 0.05). Finally, 14.8% (27/182) of HD patients presented with more than three GI symptoms, compared to 7.2% (8/112) of PD patients (P < 0.01). HD and PD patients differ in prevalence, severity and diversity of GI symptoms.

Research Article
65
10.2215/cjn.05350709

Tissue-Advanced Glycation End Product Concentration in Dialysis Patients

Nov 05, 2009
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Natasha J Mcintyre + 7 more +7

Tissue-advanced glycation end products (AGE) are a measure of cumulative metabolic stress. Assessment of tissue AGE by skin autofluoresence (AF) correlates well with cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study aimed to measure and compare tissue AGE levels in HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and to evaluate the impact of systemic PD glucose exposure. Tissue AGE were measured in 115 established dialysis patients (62 HD and 53 PD) using a cutaneous AF device (AGE Reader; DiagnOptics). Values were compared with an age-matched non-chronic kidney disease database. Review of all previous PD solution delivery/prescription data determined PD glucose exposure. PD patients were similar in age to HD patients but had a shorter dialysis vintage. There were no differences in ischemic heart disease or smoking history, statin or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) use, lipids, biochemistry, or prevalence of diabetes. More than 90% of both groups had met current dialysis adequacy targets. Skin AF values in PD and HD patients were similar and strongly correlated with historical PD glucose exposure. Skin AF correlated with age in both groups but with dialysis vintage only in PD patients Cumulative metabolic stress and transient hyperglycemia results in grossly elevated levels of tissue AGE in dialysis patients. In PD patients, this high level of AGE deposition is associated with historical glucose exposure. This observation provides a previously unappreciated potential link between PD exposure to glucose and systemic cardiovascular disease.

Research Article
130
10.1093/ndt/gfr262

Comparable outcome of acute unplanned peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis

May 28, 2011
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
M Koch + 5 more +5

The impact of dialysis modality on outcome, especially on infection early in the course of dialysis, in unplanned acute dialysis initiation has not been well evaluated. The aim of the study was to compare the rates and causes of mortality and morbidity in incident dialysis patients started unplanned acute peritoneal dialysis (PD) or haemodialysis (HD). In this observational cohort study, incident dialysis patients with initiation of unplanned and acute PD (n = 66) or HD (n = 57) at a single centre from March 2005 to June 2010 were included and followed up for 6 months (0-183 days, mean follow-up time 4.72 months). For PD, surgically placed Tenckhoff catheters were used. All HD patients were dialysed with a central venous catheter (non-tunnelled or tunnelled). There were no significant differences in terms of gender, age and prevalence of diabetes mellitus in either group. The prevalence of heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Stage III-IV] was significantly higher in the PD group (73 versus 46% in HD group, P < 0.01). The population was stratified to PD and HD comparing mortality, infection, bacteraemia and hospitalization. Of the 123 patients who commenced acute and unplanned dialysis, n = 44 (35.8%) died during the follow-up period of 0-183 days. There were no significant difference in half-year mortality in n = 20 PD patients (30.3%) versus n = 24 HD patients (42.1%) (P = 0.19). The cardiovascular mortality in PD and HD patients were 9.1 and 10.5%, respectively (P = 1.00). Overall mortality due to infection was higher in the HD (17.5%) versus in the PD group (9.1%), however, not significant (P = 0.19). HD patients had significantly higher probability of bacteraemia in the first 183 days compared to PD patients (21.1 versus 3.0%, P < 0.01). Group comparison by Poisson regression analyses showed that the relative risk of bacteraemia in the PD group versus HD group was 0.16 (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.57, P = 0.005). The significant difference was not affected by the confounder's patient age at time of dialysis, male sex, heart failure (NYHA III-IV), diabetes, malignancy and peripheral arterial occlusive disease Stage IV. There were high proportions of hospitalization after the initiation of dialysis in both groups (PD 75.0% and HD 67.3%, P = 0.40). Univariate and multiple regression analyses revealed only age at initiation of dialysis to be significantly associated with overall mortality (P < 0.05). Dialysis modality (PD versus HD) in an acute unplanned dialysis setting showed, in our population, no significant influence on survival. HD patients had a significantly higher risk of bacteraemia, perhaps due to central venous dialysis catheter. PD seems to be a safe and efficient, at least comparable, alternative to HD in acute unplanned dialysis settings.

Research Article
36
10.1159/000369039

Increasing Hip Fractures in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Nov 26, 2014
American Journal of Nephrology
Anna T Mathew + 7 more +7

Background/Aims: Dialysis patients are at increased risk for hip fractures. Because changes in treatment of metabolic bone disease in this population may have impacted bone fragility, this study aims to analyze the longitudinal risk for fractures in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methods: Using the United States Renal Data System database from 1992 to 2009, the temporal trend in hip fractures requiring hospitalization was analyzed using an overdispersed Poisson regression model. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to assess the adjusted effect of dialysis modality on hip fractures. Results: 842,028 HD and 87,086 PD patients were included. There was a significant temporal increase in hip fractures in both HD and PD with stabilization of rates after 2005. With stratification, the increase in fractures occurred in patients who were white and over 65 years of age. In adjusted analyses, HD patients had 1.6 times greater odds of hip fracture than PD patients (OR 1.60 95% CI 1.52, 1.68, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In contrast to the declining hip fracture rates in the general population, we identified a temporal rise in incidence of hip fractures in HD and PD patients. HD patients were at a higher risk for hip fractures than PD patients after adjustment for recognized bone fragility risk factors. The increase in fracture rate over time was limited to older white patients in both HD and PD, the demographics being consistent with osteoporosis risk. Further research is indicated to better understand the longitudinal trend in hip fractures and the discordance between HD and PD. i 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel

Research Article
10
10.1016/s1051-2276(98)90004-8

Percentage body fat determination in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: A comparison

Jul 01, 1998
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Sharon Stall + 8 more +8

Percentage body fat determination in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients: A comparison

Research Article
1
10.1177/089686080702700116

Sen Virus Infection in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

Jan 01, 2007
Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
Bang-Gee Hsu + 5 more +5

Many reports have demonstrated SEN virus (SEN-V) infection rates in hemodialysis patients, but the SEN-V infection rate in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has never been reported. In this study, we determined the prevalence rate of SEN-V viremia in a PD population. Serum samples from 47 PD patients and a control group of 43 subjects from the general population at their health examination were assayed for SEN-V-D and -H viremia using polymerase chain reaction. The proportions of female gender (p = 0.001), previous transfusion (p < 0.0001), and higher mean serum AST level (p = 0.012) were significantly higher in PD patients. The prevalence rates of SEN-V-D and/or -H viremia were not significantly different between PD patients and controls (27.7% vs 32.6%). SEN-V-D(+) patients had lower mean duration of PD than SEN-V(-) patients. Mean ALT level was significantly lower in SEN-V-H(+) than in SEN-V(-) patients (12.8 +/- 5.8 vs 19.6 +/- 12.1 (IU/L), p = 0.025). None of the SEN-V-infected PD patients had overt clinical or biochemical signs of liver disease. There were no statistically significant differences in prevalence of SEN-V-D and/or -H viremia between automated PD (APD) patients and continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) patients. These results indicate that the SEN-V infection rate is not different between healthy individuals and PD patients. Infection with SEN-V is not associated with evident liver disease in PD patients and SEN-V infection rate is not different between APD patients and CAPD patients.

Research Article
15
10.1016/j.endonu.2016.07.003

Associations of adiponectin and leptin levels with protein-energy wasting, in end stage renal disease patients

Sep 14, 2016
Endocrinología y Nutrición
Anastasia Markaki + 5 more +5

Associations of adiponectin and leptin levels with protein-energy wasting, in end stage renal disease patients