• Home
  • Search
  • Neuro-symbolic Predicate Invention: Learning relational concepts from visual scenes
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.3233/nai-240712Copy DOI Icon

Neuro-symbolic Predicate Invention: Learning relational concepts from visual scenes

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

The predicates used for Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) systems are usually elusive and need to be hand-crafted in advance, which limits the generalization of the system when learning new rules without sufficient background knowledge. Predicate Invention (PI) for ILP is the problem of discovering new concepts that describe hidden relationships in the domain. PI can mitigate the generalization problem for ILP by inferring new concepts, giving the system a better vocabulary to compose logic rules. Although there are several PI approaches for symbolic ILP systems, PI for Neuro-Symbolic-ILP (NeSy-ILP) systems that can handle 3D visual inputs to learn logical rules using differentiable reasoning is still unaddressed. To this end, we propose a neuro-symbolic approach, NeSy- π , to invent predicates from visual scenes for NeSy-ILP systems based on clustering and extension of relational concepts, where π denotes the abbrivation of P redicate I nvention. NeSy- π processes visual scenes as input using deep neural networks for the visual perception and invents new concepts that support the task of classifying complex visual scenes. The invented concepts can be used by any NeSy-ILP system instead of hand-crafted background knowledge. Our experiments show that the NeSy- π is capable of inventing high-level concepts and solving complex visual logic patterns efficiently and accurately in the absence of explicit background knowledge. Moreover, the invented concepts are explainable and interpretable, while also providing competitive results with state-of-the-art NeSy-ILP systems. (github: https://github.com/ml-research/NeSy-PI )

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

FastLAS: Scalable Inductive Logic Programming Incorporating Domain-Specific Optimisation Criteria

  • Apr 03, 2020
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Mark Law +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations52

A Study of Two Sampling Methods for Analyzing Large Datasets with ILP

  • Jan 01, 1999
  • Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
  • Ashwin Srinivasan
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Knowledge acquisition in model driven development transformations: An inductive logic programming approach

  • Oct 01, 2014
  • Hamdi A Al-Jamimi +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations10

An Investigation into the Role of Domain-Knowledge on the Use of Embeddings

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Lovekesh Vig +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations117

Inductive Logic Programming: Issues, results and the challenge of Learning Language in Logic

  • Oct 01, 1999
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Stephen Muggleton
  • Book Chapter

Analysis and Prediction of Heart Diseases Using Inductive Logic and Image Segmentation

  • Jan 01, 2019
  • S Anand Hareendran +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations3

Estimation-Based Search Space Traversal in PILP Environments

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Joana Côrte-Real +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations8

The Generic Rough Set Inductive Logic Programming (gRS—ILP) Model

  • Jan 01, 2002
  • Arul Siromoney +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations4

A Student Agent in a CAI System

  • Sep 19, 2005
  • K Takahashi +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

Inductive Logic Programming through Estimation of Distribution Algorithm

  • Jun 01, 2011
  • Cristiano Grijo Pitangui +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations14

Word Sense Disambiguation Using Inductive Logic Programming

  • Jan 01, 2007
  • Lucia Specia +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

Qualitative Knowledge Driven Approach to Inductive Logic Programming

  • Aug 01, 2006
  • D.D.M Ranasinghe +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations140

Pharmacophore Discovery Using the Inductive Logic Programming System PROGOL

  • Feb 01, 1998
  • Machine Learning
  • Paul Finn +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Induction of Non-Monotonic Logic Programs to Explain Boosted Tree Models Using LIME

  • Jul 17, 2019
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Farhad Shakerin +1
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

ILP :- Just Trie It

  • Jun 19, 2007
  • Rui Camacho +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.