• Home
  • Search
  • New Criteria for Evaluating Methods of Identifying Hot Spots
  • Cite Icon173
  • https://doi.org/10.3141/2083-09Copy DOI Icon

New Criteria for Evaluating Methods of Identifying Hot Spots

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Identification of hot spots, also known as the sites with promise, black spots, accident-prone locations, or priority investigation locations, is an important and routine activity for improving the overall safety of roadway networks. Extensive literature focuses on methods for hot spot identification (HSID). A subset of this considerable literature is dedicated to conducting performance assessments of various HSID methods. A central issue in comparing HSID methods is the development and selection of quantitative and qualitative performance measures or criteria. The authors contend that currently employed HSID assessment criteria–namely false positives and false negatives–are necessary but not sufficient, and additional criteria are needed to exploit the ordinal nature of site ranking data. With the intent to equip road safety professionals and researchers with more useful tools to compare the performances of various HSID methods and to improve the level of HSID assessments, this paper proposes four quantitative HSID evaluation tests that are, to the authors’ knowledge, new and unique. These tests evaluate different aspects of HSID method performance, including reliability of results, ranking consistency, and false identification consistency and reliability. It is intended that road safety professionals apply these different evaluation tests in addition to existing tests to compare the performances of various HSID methods, and then select the most appropriate HSID method to screen road networks to identify sites that require further analysis. This work demonstrates four new criteria using 3 years of Arizona road section accident data and four commonly applied HSID methods [accident frequency ranking, accident rate ranking, accident reduction potential, and empirical Bayes (EB)]. The EB HSID method reveals itself as the superior method in most of the evaluation tests. In contrast, identifying hot spots using accident rate rankings performs the least well among the tests. The accident frequency and accident reduction potential methods perform similarly, with slight differences explained. The authors believe that the four new evaluation tests offer insight into HSID performance heretofore unavailable to analysts and researchers.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

Comparison of Sichel and Negative Binomial Models in Hot Spot Identification

  • Jan 01, 2014
  • Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
  • Lingtao Wu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations301

Experimental evaluation of hotspot identification methods

  • Jun 15, 2005
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Wen Cheng +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations119

Identification methods and deterministic factors of owl roadkill hotspot locations in Mediterranean landscapes

  • Jul 09, 2008
  • Ecological Research
  • Luís Gomes +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations85

Applying quantile regression for modeling equivalent property damage only crashes to identify accident blackspots

  • Jan 30, 2014
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Simon Washington +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Developing a Clustering-Based Empirical Bayes Analysis Method for Hotspot Identification

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Journal of Advanced Transportation
  • Yajie Zou +6
  • Supplementary Content

Traffic Modeling and Safety Analysis on Motorway Ramps

  • Jun 13, 2018
  • Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)
  • Michael Wang
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Meso-level hotspot identification for suburban arterials

  • Apr 24, 2021
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Xuesong Wang +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations49

Integrating macro- and micro-level safety analyses: a Bayesian approach incorporating spatial interaction

  • May 10, 2018
  • Transportmetrica A: Transport Science
  • Qing Cai +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

Identification of environmental impact hot spots in traditional food production lines

  • Nov 20, 2009
  • Acta agriculturae Slovenica
  • Ilja Gasan Osojnik Črnivec +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

PAS3-HSID: a Dynamic Bio-Inspired Approach for Real-Time Hot Spot Identification in Data Streams

  • Apr 10, 2019
  • Cognitive Computation
  • Rebecca Tickle +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations7

Hotspot identification considering daily variability of traffic flow and crash record: A case study

  • Apr 25, 2019
  • Journal of Transportation Safety & Security
  • Xu Wang +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations105

Enhanced Prediction of Hot Spots at Protein-Protein Interfaces Using Extreme Gradient Boosting

  • Sep 24, 2018
  • Scientific Reports
  • Hao Wang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations56

Relationships between vascularization and proliferation in invasive breast cancer

  • Oct 27, 1999
  • The Journal of Pathology
  • Jeroen A M Beli�N +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations26

Exploring Traffic Conflict-Based Surrogate Approach for Safety Assessment of Highway Facilities

  • Nov 01, 2015
  • Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
  • Jaehyun (Jason) So +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Determining the hot spots and hot moments of soil N2O emissions and mineral N leaching in a mixed landscape under subtropical monsoon climatic conditions

  • Apr 18, 2022
  • Geoderma
  • Zhiwen Zhou +5
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.