- Research Article
18
- 10.5325/haropintrevi.3.1.0083
Perspectives on Contemporary Irish Theatre: Populating the Stage
- May 30, 2019
- The Harold Pinter Review
- Cathy Ryan
Perspectives on Contemporary Irish Theatre chronicles Irish theater and provides fresh cultural perspectives from Europe. Edited by Anne Etienne (University College Cork) and Thierry Dubost (Université de Caen Normandie), the collected essays feature companies like Corcadorca and playwrights like Martin McDonagh, Marina Carr, and Tom Mac Intyre. Thomas Kilroy introduces the collected essays by saying that reading the book is like “watching the actual activity of theatre-making” (v)—these words initially triggered my interest and drew me to write this review.Although the book has a scholarly orientation and provides less real-time theater-making than I'd hoped for, the study should be lauded for its scope and the amount of “theater life” it manages to stuff into a single volume. Whereas other studies provide in-depth investigations of the evolution of Irish theater,1 this collection of writings by Irish and foreign contributors provides “snapshots” of the Irish stage (3). The book focuses not on the text-centered tradition of the Irish stage but on reinventions, as the editors signal their purpose: “text-centered tradition, while still iconic, has evolved to reveal new modes of expression around emancipated bodies, multidisciplinary experiment, [and] blurred roles, away from conventional venues” (3). Contemporary theater moves faster and embraces more economically efficient forms, including works in progress, short runs, and site-specific performances.Despite blending various approaches (literary, empirical, theoretical) the essays share what Etienne and Dubost call “an image of Irishness” (4). Irishness encompasses national identity as well as an Irish psyche. Understanding what it means to be Irish is no small feat. For example, Etienne and Dubost describe Martin McDonagh as a peripheral maverick in Ireland whose body of plays, nonetheless, established his reputation internationally. Maria Isabel Seguro's “McDonagh's ‘True, Lonesome West’” finds Irish echoes in a Catalan production directed by Pepa Fluvià. Even so, Seguro casts doubt on the “intrinsic Irishness reproduced on the stage” (5) as she extends the scholarly conversation and elaborates on similarities between McDonagh's Lonesome West and Sam Shepherd's True West. Thierry Dubost's “A Dark Rosebud on the Irish Stage: Ailíis Ní Ríain's Tallest Man in the World” explores how characters are defined by their voices (not Irish embodiment) in a production he calls “in your ears” theater (6). Among the more idiosyncratic contributions of the collected essays, Carmac O'Connor's “Looking Back and Forward on Sound Design: Irish Theatre Transformed” charts the technical revolution in sound design that has occurred in the past thirty years on the Irish stage. Contemporary sonic theater is fast-paced and takes place on stage and in site-specific locations across the globe. One of the best of the troupes working in this milieu is the UK's Theatre Re. Premiered at the Edinburgh Showcase 2017, The Nature of Forgetting, Theatre Re's staging of dementia and memory loss helps audiences perceive the nature of the hippocampus—informed by corporeal mime, close collaboration with neuroscientist Kate Jeffery (University College London), and developed in process with musicians, who score the sound in real time and, in so doing, coauthor the stage production every step of the way.2One of the more unique contributions of Perspectives on Contemporary Irish Theatre focuses in part 2 on “putting it together” (v) and contemporary Irish theater (Practitioners' Voices). This was my favorite part of the book. The editors avoid the trap of synthesizing representative trends in Irish theater and give voice to individual artists, such as Geoff Gould (festival director). The chapter on the BrokenCrow Ensemble (“Lightning in a Bottle”) by practitioner Ronan FitzGibbon focuses on his own work and has an alluring informality, for example, “Someone puts their hands up” (“How We Make Shows,” 135) and includes his assertion that he made up the term “Creative Producer” to fit his role with a shifting group of multidisciplinary theater practitioners (“What I Do,” 139). Interviews feature director Bríd Ó Gallchoir (chap. 11), actor Pat Kinevane (chap. 12), playwright and screenwriter Mark O'Rowe (chap. 13), and writer-educators Enda Walsh and Ger FitzGibbon (chap. 14). I enjoyed reading first-person anecdotes about Irish theater practice, tech innovations, and modes of creation and reception.The last part of the book includes investigations into censorship and status of minority groups on the stage. Anne Etienne focuses on script analysis of Ray Scannell's Losing Steam (pp. 193–211) to highlight aspects of creation and reception. I encourage readers to extend Etienne's critical examination of Corcadorca Theatre Company to the group's original productions, such as Caryl Churchill's promenade performance, Far Away (2000), which included a ferry trip from Cobh to Spike Island and back again. Churchill's critiques of patriarchy, imperialism and capitalism often take shape in the theater of the anthropocene, which dramatizes how “our actions have to be thought of in environmental contexts at all times.”3 Virginie Roche-Tiengo's chapter, “Through A Glass Darkly: Priests on the Contemporary Irish Stage,” has growing relevance given the global crisis of the priesthood. The last two chapters of the book were commissioned in the context of the Marriage Referendum in Ireland.Etienne and Dubost extend the critical reach of their collection by asking questions such as, “Where does contemporary Irish theater begin?” Among Irish plays, Etienne and Dubost make a case for the cultural significance of Tom Mac Intyre's The Great Hunger (Abbey Theatre, 1983). An adaptation of Patrick Kavanagh's poem, the play represents a collaboration between Mac Intyre (playwright), Patrick Mason (director), Tom Hickey (actor), and Bronwen Casson (designer): [The Great Hunger] represented a form of theatre animated by physical movement, sound and image rather than scripted language. As such it was taken to be a breakthrough in the Irish stage tradition that had always been dominated by the writer, in which the word was sovereign, [and has become] all the more striking because based on a major literary work. (91) It makes sense that the Irish would adapt poetry for an Abbey Theatre production that takes on cultural significance as a possible starting point for contemporary Irish theater.Beyond the actual activity of theater-making, Thomas Kilroy observes that in theater work “sometimes, you see possibilities of the future opening before your eyes” (v). I recommend Perspectives on Contemporary Irish Theatre as a good read. Readers will learn about contemporary Irish theater and its history and, through the work of editors Anne Etienne and Thierry Dubost, will see into the future and perhaps come to understand why playwrights, actors, directors, and producers discover in staging plays across the globe that they cannot escape fundamental Irishness.
Read more