NOAHQA: Numerical Reasoning with Interpretable Graph Question Answering Dataset

Question-answering (QA) models find answers to a given question. The necessity of automatically finding answers is increasing because it is very important and challenging from the large-scale QA data sets. In this paper, we deal with the QA pair matching approach in QA models, which finds the most relevant question and its recommended answer for a given question. Existing studies for the approach performed on the entire dataset or datasets within a category that the question writer manually specifies. In contrast, we aim to automatically find the category to which the question belongs by employing the text classification model and to find the answer corresponding to the question within the category. Due to the text classification model, we can effectively reduce the search space for finding the answers to a given question. Therefore, the proposed model improves the accuracy of the QA matching model and significantly reduces the model inference time. Furthermore, to improve the performance of finding similar sentences in each category, we present an ensemble embedding model for sentences, improving the performance compared to the individual embedding models. Using real-world QA data sets, we evaluate the performance of the proposed QA matching model. As a result, the accuracy of our final ensemble embedding model based on the text classification model is 81.18%, which outperforms the existing models by 9.81%∼14.16% point. Moreover, in terms of the model inference speed, our model is faster than the existing models by 2.61∼5.07 times due to the effective reduction of search spaces by the text classification model.

In addition to the traditional task of machines answering questions, question answering (QA) research creates interesting, challenging questions that help systems how to answer questions and reveal the best systems. We argue that creating a QA dataset—and the ubiquitous leaderboard that goes with it—closely resembles running a trivia tournament: you write questions, have agents (either humans or machines) answer the questions, and declare a winner. However, the research community has ignored the hard-learned lessons from decades of the trivia community creating vibrant, fair, and effective question answering competitions. After detailing problems with existing QA datasets, we outline the key lessons—removing ambiguity, discriminating skill, and adjudicating disputes---that can transfer to QA research and how they might be implemented.

As readers of scientific articles often read to answer specific questions, the task of Question-Answering (QA) in academic papers was proposed to evaluate the ability of intelligent systems to answer questions in long scientific documents. Due to the large contexts in the questions, this task poses many challenges to state-of-the-art QA models. This paper explores the retriever-reader approaches widely used in open-domain QA and their impact when adapting to QA on long scientific documents. By treating one scientific article as the corpus for retrieval, we propose a retriever-reader method to extract the answer from the relevant parts of the document and an effective sliding window technique that improves the pipeline by splitting the articles into disjoint text blocks of fixed size. Experiments on QASPER, a dataset for QA in Natural Language Processing papers, showed that our method outperforms all state-of-the-art models and establishes a new state-of-the-art in the extractive questions subset with 30.43% F1\(^{1}\)The code and processed data are available at https://github.com/lekhang4497/qasper-retriever-reader.KeywordsQuestion-answeringRetriever-readerLong sequences

Question answering (QA) systems are now available through numerous commercial applications for a wide variety of domains, serving millions of users that interact with them via speech interfaces. However, current benchmarks in QA research do not account for the errors that speech recognition models might introduce, nor do they consider the language variations (dialects) of the users. To address this gap, we augment an existing QA dataset to construct a multi-dialect, spoken QA benchmark on five languages (Arabic, Bengali, English, Kiswahili, Korean) with more than 68k audio prompts in 24 dialects from 255 speakers. We provide baseline results showcasing the real-world performance of QA systems and analyze the effect of language variety and other sensitive speaker attributes on downstream performance. Last, we study the fairness of the ASR and QA models with respect to the underlying user populations.

BackgroundExtractive methods for machine reading comprehension (MRC) tasks have achieved comparable or better accuracy than human performance on benchmark data sets. However, such models are not as successful when adapted to complex domains such as health care. One of the main reasons is that the context that the MRC model needs to process when operating in a complex domain can be much larger compared with an average open-domain context. This causes the MRC model to make less accurate and slower predictions. A potential solution to this problem is to reduce the input context of the MRC model by extracting only the necessary parts from the original context.ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a method for extracting useful contexts from long articles as an additional component to the question answering task, enabling the MRC model to work more efficiently and accurately.MethodsExisting approaches to context extraction in MRC are based on sentence selection strategies, in which the models are trained to find the sentences containing the answer. We found that using only the sentences containing the answer was insufficient for the MRC model to predict correctly. We conducted a series of empirical studies and observed a strong relationship between the usefulness of the context and the confidence score output of the MRC model. Our investigation showed that a precise input context can boost the prediction correctness of the MRC and greatly reduce inference time. We proposed a method to estimate the utility of each sentence in a context in answering the question and then extract a new, shorter context according to these estimations. We generated a data set to train 2 models for estimating sentence utility, based on which we selected more precise contexts that improved the MRC model’s performance.ResultsWe demonstrated our approach on the Question Answering Data Set for COVID-19 and Biomedical Semantic Indexing and Question Answering data sets and showed that the approach benefits the downstream MRC model. First, the method substantially reduced the inference time of the entire question answering system by 6 to 7 times. Second, our approach helped the MRC model predict the answer more correctly compared with using the original context (F1-score increased from 0.724 to 0.744 for the Question Answering Data Set for COVID-19 and from 0.651 to 0.704 for the Biomedical Semantic Indexing and Question Answering). We also found a potential problem where extractive transformer MRC models predict poorly despite being given a more precise context in some cases.ConclusionsThe proposed context extraction method allows the MRC model to achieve improved prediction correctness and a significantly reduced MRC inference time. This approach works technically with any MRC model and has potential in tasks involving processing long texts.

Answering questions related to art pieces (paintings) is a difficult task, as it implies the understanding of not only the visual information that is shown in the picture, but also the contextual knowledge that is acquired through the study of the history of art. In this work, we introduce our first attempt towards building a new dataset, coined AQUA (Art QUestion Answering). The question-answer (QA) pairs are automatically generated using state-of-the-art question generation methods based on paintings and comments provided in an existing art understanding dataset. The QA pairs are cleansed by crowdsourcing workers with respect to their grammatical correctness, answerability, and answers’ correctness. Our dataset inherently consists of visual (painting-based) and knowledge (comment-based) questions. We also present a two-branch model as baseline, where the visual and knowledge questions are handled independently. We extensively compare our baseline model against the state-of-the-art models for question answering, and we provide a comprehensive study about the challenges and potential future directions for visual question answering on art.

We present a graph-based semi-supervised learning for the question-answering (QA) task for ranking candidate sentences. Using textual entailment analysis, we obtain entailment scores between a natural language question posed by the user and the candidate sentences returned from search engine. The textual entailment between two sentences is assessed via features representing high-level attributes of the entailment problem such as sentence structure matching, question-type named-entity matching based on a question-classifier, etc. We implement a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach to demonstrate that utilization of more unlabeled data points can improve the answer-ranking task of QA. We create a graph for labeled and unlabeled data using match-scores of textual entailment features as similarity weights between data points. We apply a summarization method on the graph to make the computations feasible on large datasets. With a new representation of graph-based SSL on QA datasets using only a handful of features, and under limited amounts of labeled data, we show improvement in generalization performance over state-of-the-art QA models.

Question answering (QA) models use retriever and reader systems to answer questions. Reliance on training data by QA systems can amplify or reflect inequity through their responses. Many QA models, such as those for the SQuAD dataset, are trained and tested on a subset of Wikipedia articles which encode their own biases and also reproduce real-world inequality. Understanding how training data affects bias in QA systems can inform methods to mitigate inequity. We develop two sets of questions for closed and open domain questions respectively, which use ambiguous questions to probe QA models for bias. We feed three deep-learning-based QA systems with our question sets and evaluate responses for bias via the metrics. Using our metrics, we find that open-domain QA models amplify biases more than their closed-domain counterparts and propose that biases in the retriever surface more readily due to greater freedom of choice.

We present a semi-automated framework for constructing factoid question answering (QA) datasets, where an array of question characteristics are formalized, including structure complexity, function, commonness, answer cardinality, and paraphrasing. Instead of collecting questions and manually characterizing them, we employ a reverse procedure, first generating a kind of graph-structured logical forms from a knowledge base, and then converting them into questions. Our work is the first to generate questions with explicitly specified characteristics for QA evaluation. We construct a new QA dataset with over 5,000 logical form-question pairs, associated with answers from the knowledge base, and show that datasets constructed in this way enable finegrained analyses of QA systems. The dataset can be found in https://github.com/ ysu1989/GraphQuestions.

Current available question answering (QA) datasets fall short in two aspects - providing comprehensive answers that span over a few sentences and questions being deep or analytical in nature. Though individually these issues are addressed, a dataset that addresses both these issues is still not available. To address this gap, we introduce Deep QA(DQA), i.e., a dataset consisting of 12816 questions broadly classified into 4 types of questions. The generated dataset has been analyzed and compared with a standard QA dataset to prove that it demands higher cognitive skills. To prove the point further, state of art models trained on remembering type factive QA dataset have been pre-trained on the proposed dataset and are shown to perform poorly on the question types generated. Finally, some preliminary investigation using a graph neural model has been done to probe the possibility of an alternative answer generation technique on such a dataset of deeper questions.

We study the problem of question topic classification using a very large real‐worldCommunityQuestionAnswering (CQA) dataset fromYahoo!Answers. The dataset comprises 3.9 million questions and these questions are organized into more than 1,000 categories in a hierarchy. To the best knowledge, this is the first systematic evaluation of the performance of different classification methods on question topic classification as well as short texts. Specifically, we empirically evaluate the following in classifying questions intoCQAcategories: (a) the usefulness of n‐gram features and bag‐of‐word features; (b) the performance of three standard classification algorithms (naive Bayes, maximum entropy, and support vector machines); (c) the performance of the state‐of‐the‐art hierarchical classification algorithms; (d) the effect of training data size on performance; and (e) the effectiveness of the different components ofCQAdata, including subject, content, asker, and the best answer. The experimental results show what aspects are important for question topic classification in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. We believe that the experimental findings from this study will be useful in real‐world classification problems.

In closed-domain Question Answering (QA), the goal is to retrieve answers to questions within a specific domain. The main challenge of closed-domain QA is to develop a model that only requires small datasets for training since large-scale corpora may not be available. One approach is a flexible QA model that can adapt to different closed domains and train on their corpora. In this paper, we present a novel versatile reading comprehension style approach for closed-domain QA (called CA-AcdQA). The approach is based on pre-trained contextualized language models, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and a self-attention mechanism. The model captures the relevance between the question and context sentences at different levels of granularity by exploring the dependencies between the features extracted by the CNN. Moreover, we include candidate answer identification and question expansion techniques for context reduction and rewriting ambiguous questions. The model can be tuned to different domains with a small training dataset for sentence-level QA. The approach is tested on four publicly-available closed-domain QA datasets: Tesla (person), California (region), EU-law (system), and COVID-QA (biomedical) against nine other QA approaches. Results show that the ALBERT model variant outperforms all approaches on all datasets with a significant increase in Exact Match and F1 score. Furthermore, for the Covid-19 QA in which the text is complicated and specialized, the model is improved considerably with additional biomedical training resources (an F1 increase of 15.9 over the next highest baseline).

With the rapid expansion of the Internet, intelligent question answering for information retrieval has once again gained widespread attention. However, current question answering models mainly focus on the general and common-sense questions in open domains and are incapable to effectively solve more complex professional domain questions. This paper proposed an integrated framework for Chinese intelligent question answering in restricted domains. The proposed model fused convolutional neural network and bidirectional long short-term memory network which performs efficient semantic analysis on the question pairs to extract more effective features of the text. Meanwhile, the coattention mechanism and attention mechanism were combined to obtain the semantic interaction and feature representation of the question pair for providing complete information for subsequent calculations. In addition, we introduced the method of question pair matching to implement the Chinese intelligent question answering in a restricted domain. Experiments were tested and evaluated on the open-source CCKS2018 dataset and our private self-built inverted pendulum control question answering (IPC-QA) dataset for automation control virtual learning environment. Experimental results confirm that the proposed models are efficient and achieve a high precision of 0.86042 and 0.8031 on CCKS2018 and IPC-QA respectively.

Question answering (QA) is a task in the field of natural language processing (NLP) and information retrieval, which has pivotal applications in areas such as online reading comprehension and web search engines. Currently, Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and its biomedical variation (BioBERT) achieve impressive results on the reading comprehension QA datasets and medical-related QA datasets, and so they are widely used for a variety of passage-based QA tasks. However, their performances rapidly deteriorate when encountering passage and context ambiguities. This issue is prevalent and unavoidable in many fields, notably the web-based medical field. In this paper, we introduced a novel approach called the Multiple Synonymous Questions BioBERT (MSQ-BioBERT), which integrates question augmentation, rather than the typical single question used by traditional BioBERT, to elevate BioBERT’s performance on medical QA tasks. In addition, we constructed an ambiguous medical dataset based on the information from Wikipedia web. Experiments with both this web-based constructed medical dataset and open biomedical datasets demonstrate the significant performance gains of the MSQ-BioBERT approach, showcasing a new method for addressing ambiguity in medical QA tasks.

Available and objective clinical documents are important for research of assistant diagnosis, development of algorithms, and education. To facilitate the readability and variability of clinical documents, this paper presents a rule-based approach to develop a question-answer dataset for chest X-rays from a public collection of radiology examinations, including both images and radiologist narrative reports. Our method simplified the complicated reports via hand-selected keywords, generated more than 63 thousand question-answer pairs via hand-written patterns, and augmented the question-answer dataset to more than 130 thousand pairs via rule-based question answering. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first generated question-answer dataset for chest X-rays by rule-based method. The dataset is promising for future researches and applications such as visual question answering, computer-aided diagnosis and so on.