For Meyer type optimal control problems the principle of optimality states that every subarc of an optimal solution that extends to the final time furnishes again a solution to the same optimal control problem, only with different initial conditions. Through a simple counter example it is shown in this paper that this principle is not satisfied, in general, for solutions obtained from a standard collocation approach. Introduction The principle of optimality [1] is one of the most intuitive and yet most fundamental theorems in the theory of optimal control. Its basic statement is that for Meyer type optimal control problems every subarc of an optimal solution that extends to the final time furnishes again a solution to the same optimal control problem, only with different initial conditions. This theorem has significant implications. For example, it is the starting point for the derivation of the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations [2] and it is the underlying principle in Bellman's dynamic programming approach [1], [3]. The present paper shows that the principle of optimality is not satisfied, in general, for solutions obtained from a standard collocation approach[4]. For a simple example whose collocation solution can be generated analytically it is shown that further improvements are possible along an optimal collocation solution if the design parameters along a number of leading nodes are frozen and the remainder of the trajectory is re-optimized. I. Continuous Optimal Control Problem In this section of the paper we introduce a simple class of optimal control problems without state and control constraints. In Section 1.2 we present the associated necessary conditions for optimality [2], [5]. For ease of notation we assume that the right-hand side of the 'Supervising Engineer, Member AIAA, t Senior Engineer, Member AIAA, *17 Research Drive, Hampton, VA 23666. ^Graduate Student, Member AIAA, Department, 304 Town Engineering, Ames, IA 50011 equations of motion does not depend explicitly on time t. This does not represent a loss of generality, as it is always possible to transform explicit time dependence away through the introduction of an additional, timelike state variable. 1. Problem Formulation Let us consider the following class of optimal control problems: min «e(Pwc[*o,*/]), (1) subject to the conditions ±(t) = /(*(*),«(*)), tf.(z(*oMo) = 0, (2)
Read more