Two-phase flow features inherent randomness and discontinuity when observed instantaneously and locally. Such phenomena require averaging over sufficient samples to achieve the deterministic and continuous description commonly adopted in engineering modeling. However, this sampling sufficiency is challenged when flow measurement faces demand in both spatial and temporal resolutions. Specifically, there may not be a window that is (1) wide enough to cover sufficient local samples of interfaces while also (2) narrow enough to resolve a fast transient of interest. Such a dilemma for measurements at one point in time necessitates multiple realizations and ensemble averaging, which are nominally achievable through costly repeating experiments. In practice, when data beyond steady states are of interest, a more affordable alternative is setting up periodic conditions and continuously measuring multiple oscillation cycles. This approach was effectively conducted in a past project where traversable four-sensor probes were able to quantify instability-induced flow oscillations. This paper revisits the data from this past practice and presents more details on uncertainty quantification. An example case study is included to demonstrate the procedure for quantifying random errors from sampling insufficiency, based on estimators whose validity is verifiable through a posterior convergence study. By sharing this experience, the authors intend to inspire their colleague experimentalists with interest in transient two-phase data featuring resolution and precision comparable to those achievable under steady states.