On Correspondence between Selective CPS Transformation and Selective Double Negation Translation

In order to simplify the compilation process, many compilers for higher-order languages use the continuation-passing style (CPS) transformation in a first phase to generate an intermediate representation of the source program. The salient aspect of this intermediate form is that all procedures take an argument that represents the rest of the computation (the “continuation”). Since the nai¨ve CPS transformation considerably increases the size of programs, CPS compilers perform reductions to produce a more compact intermediate representation. Although often implemented as a part of the CPS transformation, this step is conceptually a second phase. Finally, code generators for typical CPS compilers treat continuations specially in order to optimize the interpretation of continuation parameters.

The CPS (continuation-passing style) transformation on typed lambda-terms has an interpretation in many areas of Computer Science, such as programming languages and type theory. Programming intuition suggests that in effect, it is idempotent, but this does not directly hold for all existing CPS transformations (Plotkin, Reynolds, Fischer, etc.).<br /> <br />We rephrase the call-by-value CPS transformation to make it syntactically idempotent, modulo eta-reduction of the newly introduced continuation. Type-wise, iterating the transformation corresponds to refining the polymorphic domain of answers.

We build on Danvy and Nielsen's first-order program transformation into continuation-passing style (CPS) to design a new CPS transformation of flow information that is simpler and more efficient than what has been presented in previous work. The key to simplicity and efficiency is that our CPS transformation constructs the flow information in one go, instead of first computing an intermediate result and then exploiting it to construct the flow information.<br /> <br />More precisely, we show how to compute control-flow information for CPS-transformed programs from control-flow information for direct-style programs and vice-versa. As a corollary, we confirm that CPS transformation has no effect on the control-flow information obtained by constraint-based control-flow analysis. The transformation has immediate applications in assessing the effect of the CPS transformation over other analyses such as, for instance, binding-time analysis.

Plotkin's l-value calculus is sound but incomplete for reasoning about beegr;-transformations on programs in continuation-passing style (CPS). To find a complete extension, we define a new, compactifying CPS transformation and an “inverse”mapping, un-CPS, both of which are interesting in their own right. Using the new CPS transformation, we can determine the precise language of CPS terms closed under b7eegr;-transformations. Using the un-CPS transformation, we can derive a set of axioms such that every equation between source programs is provable if and only if be can prove the corresponding equation between CPS programs. The extended calculus is equivalent to an untyped variant of Moggi's computational l-calculus.

We present a continuation-passing-style (CPS) transformation for some dynamic delimited-control operators, including Felleisen's $\verb|control|$ and $\verb|prompt|$ , that extends a standard call-by-value CPS transformation. Based on this new transformation, we show how Danvy and Filinski's static delimited-control operators $\verb|shift|$ and $\verb|reset|$ simulate dynamic operators, allaying in passing some skepticism in the literature about the existence of such a simulation. The new CPS transformation and simulation use recursive delimited continuations to avoid undelimited control and the overhead it incurs in implementation and reasoning.

This article aims to generate all theorems of a given size in the implicational fragment of propositional intuitionistic linear logic. It was presented at the 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP).

We introduce graph reduction technology that implements functional languages with control, such as Scheme with call/cc, where continuations can be manipulated explicitly as values, and can be optimally reduced in the sense of LEvy. The technology is founded on proofnets for multiplicative-exponential linear logic, extending the techniques originally proposed by Lamping, where we adapt the continuation-passing style transformation to yield a new understanding of sharable values. Confluence is maintained by returning multiple answers to a (shared) continuation. Proofnets provide a concurrent version of linear logic proofs, eliminating structurally irrelevant sequentialization, and ignoring asymmetric distinctions between inputs and outputs--dually, expressions and continuations. While Lamping's graphs and their variants encode an embedding of intuitionistic logic into linear logic, our construction implicitly contains an embedding of classical logic into linear logic. We propose a family of translations, produced uniformly by beginning with a continuation-passing style semantics for the languages, employing standard codings into proofnets using call-by-value, call-by-name--or hybrids of the two--to locate proofnet boxes, and converting the proofnets to direct style. The resulting graphs can be reduced simply (cut elimination for linear logic), have a consistent semantics that is preserved by reduction (geometry of interaction, via the so-called context semantics), and allow shared, incremental evaluation of continuations (optimal reduction).

The control and data flow of a program can be represented using continuations, a concept from denotational semantics that has practical application in real compilers. This book shows how continuation-passing style is used as an intermediate representation on which to perform optimisations and program transformations. Continuations can be used to compile most programming languages. The method is illustrated in a compiler for the programming language Standard ML. However, prior knowledge of ML is not necessary, as the author carefully explains each concept as it arises. This is the first book to show how concepts from the theory of programming languages can be applied to the producton of practical optimising compilers for modern languages like ML. This book will be essential reading for compiler writers in both industry and academe, as well as for students and researchers in programming language theory.

Effect handlers can be composed by applying them sequentially, each handling some operations and leaving other operations uninterpreted in the syntax tree. However, the semantics of composed handlers can be subtle---it is well known that different orders of composing handlers can lead to drastically different semantics. Determining the correct order of composition is a non-trivial task. To alleviate this problem, this paper presents a systematic way of deriving sufficient conditions on handlers for their composite to correctly handle combinations, such as the sum and the tensor, of the effect theories separately handled. These conditions are solely characterised by the clauses for relevant operations of the handlers, and are derived by fusing two handlers into one using a form of fold/build fusion and continuation-passing style transformation. As case studies, the technique is applied to commutative and distributive interaction of handlers to obtain a series of results about the interaction of common handlers: (a) equations respected by each handler are preserved after handler composition; (b) handling mutable state before any handler gives rise to a semantics in which state operations are commutative with any operations from the latter handler; (c) handling the writer effect and mutable state in either order gives rise to a correct handler of the commutative combination of these two theories.

When designing languages for functional reactive programming (FRP) the main challenge is to provide the user with a simple, flexible interface for writing programs on a high level of abstraction while ensuring that all programs can be implemented efficiently in a low-level language. To meet this challenge, a new family of modal FRP languages has been proposed, in which variants of Nakano's guarded fixed point operator are used for writing recursive programs guaranteeing properties such as causality and productivity. As an apparent extension to this it has also been suggested to use Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) as a language for reactive programming through the Curry-Howard isomorphism, allowing properties such as termination, liveness and fairness to be encoded in types. However, these two ideas are in conflict with each other, since the fixed point operator introduces non-termination into the inductive types that are supposed to provide termination guarantees. In this paper we show that by regarding the modal time step operator of LTL a submodality of the one used for guarded recursion (rather than equating them), one can obtain a modal type system capable of expressing liveness properties while retaining the power of the guarded fixed point operator. We introduce the language Lively RaTT, a modal FRP language with a guarded fixed point operator and an `until' type constructor as in LTL, and show how to program with events and fair streams. Using a step-indexed Kripke logical relation we prove operational properties of Lively RaTT including productivity and causality as well as the termination and liveness properties expected of types from LTL. Finally, we prove that the type system of Lively RaTT guarantees the absence of implicit space leaks.

The last few years have seen a renewed interest in continuations for expressing advanced control structures in programming languages, and new models such as Abstract Continuations have been proposed to capture these dimensions. This article investigates an alternative formulation, exploiting the latent expressive power of the standard continuation-passing style (CPS) instead of introducing yet other new concepts. We build on a single foundation: abstracting control as a hierarchy of continuations, each one modeling a specific language feature as acting on nested evaluation contexts.

Generic programming is likely to become a new challenge for a critical mass of developers. Therefore, it is crucial to refine the support for generic programming in mainstream Object-Oriented languages — both at the design and at the implementation level — as well as to suggest novel ways to exploit the additional degree of expressiveness made available by genericity. This study is meant to provide a contribution towards bringing Java genericity to a more mature stage with respect to mainstream programming practice, by increasing the effectiveness of its implementation, and by revealing its full expressive power in real world scenario. With respect to the current research setting, the main contribution of the thesis is twofold. First, we propose a revised implementation for Java generics that greatly increases the expressiveness of the Java platform by adding reification support for generic types. Secondly, we show how Java genericity can be leveraged in a real world case-study in the context of the multi-paradigm language integration. Several approaches have been proposed in order to overcome the lack of reification of generic types in the Java programming language. Existing approaches tackle the problem of reification of generic types by defining new translation techniques which would allow for a runtime representation of generics and wildcards. Unfortunately most approaches suffer from several problems: heterogeneous translations are known to be problematic when considering reification of generic methods and wildcards. On the other hand, more sophisticated techniques requiring changes in the Java runtime, supports reified generics through a true language extension (where clauses) so that backward compatibility is compromised. In this thesis we develop a sophisticated type-passing technique for addressing the problem of reification of generic types in the Java programming language; this approach — first pioneered by the so called EGO translator — is here turned into a full-blown solution which reifies generic types inside the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) itself, thus overcoming both performance penalties and compatibility issues of the original EGO translator. Java-Prolog integration Integrating Object-Oriented and declarative programming has been the subject of several researches and corresponding technologies. Such proposals come in two flavours, either attempting at joining the two paradigms, or simply providing an interface library for accessing Prolog declarative features from a mainstream Object-Oriented languages such as Java. Both solutions have however drawbacks: in the case of hybrid languages featuring both Object-Oriented and logic traits, such resulting language is typically too complex, thus making mainstream application development an harder task; in the case of library-based integration approaches there is no true language integration, and some “boilerplate code” has to be implemented to fix the paradigm mismatch. In this thesis we develop a framework called PatJ which promotes seamless exploitation of Prolog programming in Java. A sophisticated usage of generics/wildcards allows to define a precise mapping between Object-Oriented and declarative features. PatJ defines a hierarchy of classes where the bidirectional semantics of Prolog terms is modelled directly at the level of the Java generic type-system.

In 1991, Pfenning and Lee studied whether System F could support a typed self-interpreter. They concluded that typed self-representation for System F "seems to be impossible", but were able to represent System F in Fω. Further, they found that the representation of Fω requires kind polymorphism, which is outside Fω. In 2009, Rendel, Ostermann and Hofer conjectured that the representation of kind-polymorphic terms would require another, higher form of polymorphism. Is this a case of infinite regress? We show that it is not and present a typed self-representation for Girard's System U, the first for a λ-calculus with decidable type checking. System U extends System Fω with kind polymorphic terms and types. We show that kind polymorphic types (i.e. types that depend on kinds) are sufficient to "tie the knot" -- they enable representations of kind polymorphic terms without introducing another form of polymorphism. Our self-representation supports operations that iterate over a term, each of which can be applied to a representation of itself. We present three typed self-applicable operations: a self-interpreter that recovers a term from its representation, a predicate that tests the intensional structure of a term, and a typed continuation-passing-style (CPS) transformation -- the first typed self-applicable CPS transformation. Our techniques could have applications from verifiably type-preserving metaprograms, to growable typed languages, to more efficient self-interpreters.

Many modern programming languages support both imperative and functional idioms. However, state-of-the-art imperative intermediate representations (IRs) cannot natively represent crucial functional concepts (like higher-order functions). On the other hand, functional IRs employ an explicit scope nesting, which is cumbersome to maintain across certain transformations. In this paper we present Thorin: a higher-order, functional IR based on continuation-passing style that abandons explicit scope nesting in favor of a dependency graph. This makes Thorin an attractive IR for both imperative as well as functional languages. Furthermore, we present a novel program transformation to eliminate the overhead caused by higher-order functions. The main component of this transformation is lambda mangling: an important transformation primitive in Thorin. We demonstrate that lambda mangling subsumes many classic program transformations like tail-recursion elimination, loop unrolling or (partial) inlining. In our experiments we show that higher-order programs translated with Thorin are consistently as fast as C programs.

Practically all programming languages have some form of control structure or jumping. The more advanced forms of control structure tend to resemble function calls, so much so that they are usually not even described as jumps. Consider for example the library function exit in C. Its use is much like a function, in that it may be called with an argument; but the whole point of exit is of course that its behaviour is utterly non-functional, in that it jumps out of arbitrarily many surrounding blocks and pending function calls. Such a "non-returning function" or "jump with arguments" is an example of a continuation in the sense which we are interested in here.On the other hand, a simple but fundamental idea in compiling is that a function call is broken down into two jumps: one from the caller to the callee for the call itself, and another jump back from the callee to the caller upon returning. (The return statement in C is in fact listed among the "jump statements" [5].) This is most obvious for void-accepting and -returning functions, but it generalizes to other functions as well, if one is willing to understand "jump" in the broader sense of jump with arguments, i.e. continuation.In this view, then, continuations are everywhere. Continuations have been used in many different settings, in which they appear in different guises, ranging from mathematical functions to machine addresses. Rather than confine ourselves to a definition of what a continuation is, we will focus on continuation-passing style (CPS), as it brings out the commonalities. The CPS transform compresses a great deal of insight into three little equations in λ-calculus. Making sense of it intuitively, however, requires some background knowledge and a certain fluency. The purpose of this article, therefore, is to help the reader uncompress the CPS transform by way of a rational reconstruction from jumps.In the sequel, we will attempt to illustrate the correspondence between continuations and jumps (even in the guise of the abhorred goto). The intent is partly historical, to retrace some of the analysis of jumps that led to the discoveries of continuations. At the same time, the language of choice for many researchers during the (pre)history of continuations, ALGOL 60, is not so different from today's mainstream languages (i.e. C); we hope that occasional snippets of C may be more easily accessible to many readers than a functional language would be. So in each of the four sections (Sections 2-5 below) that make up the body of this paper, some C code will be used to give a naive but concrete example of the issue under consideration, before generalizing to a more abstract setting.