On the List Decodability of Rank Metric Codes

We construct an explicit family of linear rank-metric codes over any field F that enables efficient list decoding up to a fraction rho of errors in the rank metric with a rate of 1-rho-eps, for any desired rho in (0,1) and eps > 0. Previously, a Monte Carlo construction of such codes was known, but this is in fact the first explicit construction of positive rate rank-metric codes for list decoding beyond the unique decoding radius. Our codes are explicit subcodes of the well-known Gabidulin codes, which encode linearized polynomials of low degree via their values at a collection of linearly independent points. The subcode is picked by restricting the message polynomials to an F-subspace that evades certain structured subspaces over an extension field of F. These structured spaces arise from the linear-algebraic list decoder for Gabidulin codes due to Guruswami and Xing (STOC'13). Our construction is obtained by combining subspace designs constructed by Guruswami and Kopparty (FOCS'13) with subspace-evasive varieties due to Dvir and Lovett (STOC'12). We establish a similar result for subspace codes, which are a collection of subspaces, every pair of which have low-dimensional intersection, and which have received much attention recently in the context of network coding. We also give explicit subcodes of folded Reed-Solomon (RS) codes with small folding order that are list-decodable (in the Hamming metric) with optimal redundancy, motivated by the fact that list decoding RS codes reduces to list decoding such folded RS codes. However, as we only list decode a subcode of these codes, the Johnson radius continues to be the best known error fraction for list decoding RS codes.

.We show new and improved list decoding properties of folded Reed–Solomon (RS) codes and multiplicity codes. Both of these families of codes are based on polynomials over finite fields, and both have been the source of recent advances in coding theory: folded RS codes were the first known explicit construction of capacity-achieving list decodable codes [V. Guruswami and A. Rudra, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 54 (2008), pp. 135–150], and multiplicity codes were the first construction of high-rate locally decodable codes [S. Kopparty, S. Saraf, and S. Yekhanin, J. ACM, 61 (2014), 28]. In this work, we show that folded RS codes and multiplicity codes are in fact better than previously known in the context of list decoding and local list decoding. Our first main result shows that folded RS codes achieve list decoding capacity with constant list sizes, independent of the block length. Prior work with constant list sizes first obtained list sizes that are polynomial in the block length and relied on pre-encoding with subspace evasive sets to reduce the list sizes to a constant [V. Guruswami and C. Wang, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 59 (2013), pp. 3257–3268], [Z. Dvir and S. Lovett, Proc. 44th STOC, ACM, 2012, 351–358]. The list size we obtain is \((1/\varepsilon )^{O(1/\varepsilon )}\) where \(\varepsilon\) is the gap to capacity, which matches the list size obtained by pre-encoding with subspace evasive sets. For our second main result, we observe that univariate multiplicity codes exhibit similar behavior, and we use this, together with additional ideas, to show that multivariate multiplicity codes are locally list decodable up to their minimum distance. By known reductions, this gives, in turn, capacity-achieving locally list decodable codes with query complexity \(\exp ( \tilde O((\log N)^{5/6}))\) . This improves on the tensor-based construction of [B. Hemenway, N. Ron-Zewi, and M. Wootters, SIAM J. Comput., 49 (2019), pp. 157–195], which gave capacity-achieving locally list decodable codes of query complexity \(N^{\tilde O(1/\log \log N)}\) , and is close to the best known query complexity of \(\exp ( \tilde O(\sqrt{\log N}))\) for high-rate locally (uniquely) decodable codes [S. Kopparty et al., J. ACM, 64 (2017), 11].Keywordserror–correcting codeslist decodinglocal decodingfolded Reed–Solomon codesmultiplicity codesMSC codes11T7194B0594B3594B6094B65

This chapter, as well as the next one, explore the relation between the list decoding radius and minimum distance of a code. Understanding the relation between these parameters is useful for two reasons: (a) for several important families of codes like Reed-Solomon codes, we have precise bounds on the distance, and one can use the relation between list decoding radius and distance to understand the list decoding potential of these codes; and (b) this shows that one approach to construct good list decodable codes is to construct large distance codes, and the latter is a relatively well-studied and better understood problem. Also, historically the most significant algorithmic results on list decoding have been fueled by an attempt to decode codes whose good minimum distance highlighted their good combinatorial list decodability properties.

Equivalence and characterizations of linear rank-metric codes based on invariants

There is an error in the above titled paper [1] . As a result, the main statement of the paper is true for a subset of the Gabidulin codes for which it was initially stated. To be precise, our results on the list decodability still hold for the same parameters of $n$ and $m$ , but the evaluation points have to be of a certain structure.

One of the most important open problems in the theory of error-correcting codes is to determine the tradeoff between the rate $R$ and minimum distance $\delta $ of a binary code. The best known tradeoff is the Gilbert–Varshamov bound, and says that for every $\delta \in (0, 1/2)$ , there are codes with minimum distance $\delta $ and rate $R = {R_{\mathsf {GV}}}(\delta) > 0$ (for a certain simple function ${R_{\mathsf {GV}}}(\cdot)$ ). In this paper, we show that the Gilbert–Varshamov bound can be achieved by codes, which support local error-detection and error-correction algorithms. Specifically, we show the following results. 1) Local testing: for all $\delta \in (0,1/2)$ and all $R , there exist codes with length $n$ , rate $R$ , and minimum distance $\delta $ that are locally testable with $\mathsf {quasipolylog}(n)$ query complexity. 2) Local correction: for all $\epsilon > 0$ , for all $\delta sufficiently large, and all $R , there exist codes with length $n$ , rate $R$ , and minimum distance $\delta $ that are locally correctable from $({\delta }/{2}) - o(1)$ fraction errors with $O(n^{\epsilon })$ query complexity. Furthermore, these codes have an efficient randomized construction, and the local testing and local correction algorithms can be made to run in time polynomial in the query complexity. Our results on locally correctable codes also immediately give locally decodable codes with the same parameters. Our local testing result is obtained by combining Thommesen’s random concatenation technique and the best known locally testable codes by Kopparty et al. Our local correction result, which is significantly more involved, also uses random concatenation, along with a number of further ideas: the Guruswami–Sudan–Indyk list decoding strategy for concatenated codes, Alon–Edmonds–Luby distance amplification, and the local list-decodability, local list-recoverability, and local testability of Reed–Muller codes. Curiously, our final local correction algorithms go via local list-decoding and local testing algorithms; this seems to be the first time local testability is used in the construction of a locally correctable code.

In the previous chapter we presented list decoding algorithms for two widely-studied families of algebraic codes: Reed-Solomon codes and AG-codes. Owing to the importance of these codes, these results can be viewed as providing strong evidence to the general utility of list decoding as an algorithmic notion. Indeed, as we shall see in future chapters, they set the stage for a whole body of results about list decoding.

We present an explicit and efficient algebraic construction of capacity-achieving list decodable codes with both constant alphabet and constant list sizes. More specifically, for any R ∈ (0,1) and є>0, we give an algebraic construction of an infinite family of error-correcting codes of rate R, over an alphabet of size (1/є)O(1/є2), that can be list decoded from a (1−R−є)-fraction of errors with list size at most exp(poly(1/є)). Moreover, the codes can be encoded in time poly(1/є, n), the output list is contained in a linear subspace of dimension at most poly(1/є), and a basis for this subspace can be found in time poly(1/є, n). Thus, both encoding and list decoding can be performed in fully polynomial-time poly(1/є, n), except for pruning the subspace and outputting the final list which takes time exp(poly(1/є)) · poly(n). In contrast, prior explicit and efficient constructions of capacity-achieving list decodable codes either required a much higher complexity in terms of 1/є (and were additionally much less structured), or had super-constant alphabet or list sizes. Our codes are quite natural and structured. Specifically, we use algebraic-geometric (AG) codes with evaluation points restricted to a subfield, and with the message space restricted to a (carefully chosen) linear subspace. Our main observation is that the output list of AG codes with subfield evaluation points is contained in an affine shift of the image of a block-triangular-Toeplitz (BTT) matrix, and that the list size can potentially be reduced to a constant by restricting the message space to a BTT evasive subspace, which is a large subspace that intersects the image of any BTT matrix in a constant number of points. We further show how to explicitly construct such BTT evasive subspaces, based on the explicit subspace designs of Guruswami and Kopparty (Combinatorica, 2016), and composition.

For a vector space \({\mathbb{F}^n}\) over a field \(\mathbb{F}\), an (η, β)-dimension expander of degree d is a collection of d linear maps \({\Gamma _j}:{\mathbb{F}^n} \rightarrow {\mathbb{F}^n}\) such that for every subspace U of \({\mathbb{F}^n}\) of dimension at most ηn, the image of U under all the maps, ∑ dj=1 Γj(U), has dimension at least α dim(U). Over a finite field, a random collection of d = O(1) maps Γj offers excellent “lossless” expansion whp: β≈d for η ≥ Ω(1/d). When it comes to a family of explicit constructions (for growing n), however, achieving even modest expansion factor β = 1+ ε with constant degree is a non-trivial goal.We present an explicit construction of dimension expanders over finite fields based on linearized polynomials and subspace designs, drawing inspiration from recent progress on list decoding in the rank metric. Our approach yields the following: Lossless expansion over large fields; more precisely β ≥ (1 − ε)d and \(\eta \ge {{1 - \varepsilon} \over d}\) with d = Oε(1), when \(\left| \mathbb{F} \right| \ge \Omega \left(n \right)\). Optimal up to constant factors expansion over fields of arbitrarily small polynomial size; more precisely β ≥ Ω(δd) and η ≥ Ω(1/(δd)) with d = Oδ(1), when \(\left| \mathbb{F} \right| \ge {n^\delta}\). Previously, an approach reducing to monotone expanders (a form of vertex expansion that is highly non-trivial to establish) gave (Ω(1), 1 + Ω(1))-dimension expanders of constant degree over all fields. An approach based on “rank condensing via subspace designs” led to dimension expanders with \(\beta \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel>\over {\smash{\scriptstyle\sim}\vphantom{_x}}$}} \sqrt d \) over large finite fields. Ours is the first construction to achieve lossless dimension expansion, or even expansion proportional to the degree.

For a growing number of applications, such as cellular, peer-to-peer, and sensor networks, efficient error-free transmission of data through a network is essential. Toward this end, Kotter and Kschischang propose the use of subspace codes to provide error correction in the network coding context. The primary construction for subspace codes is the lifting of rank-metric or matrix codes, a process that preserves the structural and distance properties of the underlying code. Thus, to characterize the structure and error-correcting capability of these subspace codes, it is valuable to perform such a characterization of the underlying rank-metric and matrix codes. This paper lays a foundation for this analysis through a framework for classifying rank-metric and matrix codes based on their structure and distance properties. To enable this classification, we extend work by Berger on equivalence for rank-metric codes to define a notion of equivalence for matrix codes, and we characterize the group structure of the collection of maps that preserve such equivalence. We then compare the notions of equivalence for these two related types of codes and show that matrix equivalence is strictly more general than rank-metric equivalence. Finally, we characterize the set of equivalence maps that fix the prominent class of rank-metric codes known as Gabidulin codes. In particular, we give a complete characterization of the rank-metric automorphism group of Gabidulin codes, correcting work by Berger, and give a partial characterization of the matrix-automorphism group of the expanded matrix codes that arise from Gabidulin codes.

Techniques are presented for computing upper and lower bounds on the number of errors that can be corrected by list decoders for general block codes and, specifically, for Reed--Solomon (RS) codes. The list decoder of Guruswami and Sudan implies such a lower bound (referred to here as the GS bound) for RS codes. It is shown that this lower bound, given by means of the code's length, the minimum Hamming distance, and the maximal allowed list size, in fact applies to all block codes. Ranges of code parameters are identified where the GS bound is tight for worst-case RS codes, in which case the list decoder of Guruswami and Sudan provably corrects the largest possible number of errors. On the other hand, ranges of parameters are provided for which the GS lower bound can be strictly improved. In some cases the improvement applies to all block codes with a given minimum Hamming distance, while in others it applies only to RS codes.

We prove that a random linear code over $\mathbb{F}_q$, with probability arbitrarily close to 1, is list decodable at radius $1-1/q-\epsilon$ with list size $L=O(1/\epsilon^2)$ and rate $R=\Omega_q(\epsilon^2/(\log^3(1/\epsilon)))$. Up to the polylogarithmic factor in $1/\epsilon$ and constant factors depending on $q$, this matches the lower bound $L=\Omega_q(1/\epsilon^2)$ for the list size and upper bound $R=O_q(\epsilon^2)$ for the rate. Previously only existence (and not abundance) of such codes was known for the special case $q=2$ (Guruswami et al., 2002). In order to obtain our result, we employ a relaxed version of the well-known Johnson bound on list decoding that translates the average Hamming distance between codewords to list decoding guarantees. We furthermore prove that the desired average-distance guarantees hold for a code provided that a natural complex matrix encoding the codewords satisfies the restricted isometry property with respect to the Euclidean norm. For the case of random binary...

Traditionally, multi-trial error/erasure decoding of Reed-Solomon (RS) codes is based on Bounded Minimum Distance (BMD) decoders with an erasure option. Such decoders have error/erasure tradeoff factor L=2, which means that an error is twice as expensive as an erasure in terms of the code's minimum distance. The Guruswami-Sudan (GS) list decoder can be considered as state of the art in algebraic decoding of RS codes. Besides an erasure option, it allows to adjust L to values in the range 1<L<=2. Based on previous work, we provide formulae which allow to optimally (in terms of residual codeword error probability) exploit the erasure option of decoders with arbitrary L, if the decoder can be used z>=1 times. We show that BMD decoders with z_BMD decoding trials can result in lower residual codeword error probability than GS decoders with z_GS trials, if z_BMD is only slightly larger than z_GS. This is of practical interest since BMD decoders generally have lower computational complexity than GS decoders.

$A'(n,d,e)$, the smallest $\ell$ for which every binary error-correcting code of length $n$ and minimum distance $d$ is decodable with a list of size $\ell$ up to radius $e$, is determined for all $d\geq 2e-3$. As a result, $A'(n,d,e)$ is determined for all $e\leq 4$, except for 42 values of $n$.

A new family of modified polar codes and a new permutation selection scheme for belief propagation list (BPL) decoding are presented. We first propose a new code construction methodology to interpolate between Reed-Muller (RM) codes and polar codes. By taking advantage of an existing partial order on bit-channels whose corresponding indices share the same Hamming weight, we analyze the complexity of the new construction method. It is shown that we need to compute the reliability of roughly a fraction 1/log <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3/2</sup> N of all the bit-channels contained in the subset. Then, we explore a special family of factor-graph layer permutations called stable permutations (SPs) that preserve a specified information set when the corresponding bit permutations are applied to message bit indices. Simulation results show that the error-rate performance of the new family of codes is better than that of 5G polar codes under successive cancellation list (SCL) decoding. In addition, the SP selection scheme stands out as a preferred one for BPL decoding in terms of error-rate performance, while the average number of iterations per belief propagation (BP) decoder on the permuted factor graph is close to that of the original BP decoder when an early stopping condition is applied.