• Home
  • Search
  • Ontology Learning from Text: A Survey of Methods
  • Cite Icon170
  • https://doi.org/10.21248/jlcl.20.2005.76Copy DOI Icon

Ontology Learning from Text: A Survey of Methods

  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

After the vision of the Semantic Web was broadcasted at the turn of the millennium, ontology became a synonym for the solution to many problems concerning the fact that computers do not understand human language: if there were an ontology and every document were marked up with it and we had agents that would understand the markup, then computers would finally be able to process our queries in a really sophisticated way. Some years later, the success of Google shows us that the vision has not come true, being hampered by the incredible amount of extra work required for the intellectual encoding of semantic mark-up – as compared to simply uploading an HTML page. To alleviate this acquisition bottleneck, the field of ontology learning has since emerged as an important sub-field of ontology engineering. It is widely accepted that ontologies can facilitate text understanding and automatic processing of textual resources. Moving from words to concepts not only mitigates data sparseness issues, but also promises appealing solutions to polysemy and homonymy by finding non-ambiguous concepts that may map to various realizations in – possibly ambiguous – words. Numerous applications using lexical-semantic databases like WordNet (Miller, 1990) and its non-English counterparts, e.g. EuroWordNet (Vossen, 1997) or CoreNet (Choi and Bae, 2004) demonstrate the utility of semantic resources for natural language processing. Learning semantic resources from text instead of manually creating them might be dangerous in terms of correctness, but has undeniable advantages: Creating resources for text processing from the texts to be processed will fit the semantic component neatly and directly to them, which will never be possible with general-purpose resources. Further, the cost per entry is greatly reduced, giving rise to much larger resources than an advocate of a manual approach could ever afford. On the other hand, none of the methods used today are good enough for creating semantic resources of any kind in a completely unsupervised fashion, albeit automatic methods can facilitate manual construction to a large extent. The term ontology is understood in a variety of ways and has been used in philosophy for many centuries. In contrast, the notion of ontology in the field of computer science is younger – but almost used as inconsistently, when it comes to the details of the definition. The intention of this essay is to give an overview of different methods that learn ontologies or ontology-like structures from unstructured text. Ontology learning from other sources, issues in description languages, ontology editors, ontology merging and ontology evolving transcend the scope of this article. Surveys on ontology learning from text and other sources can be found in Ding and Foo (2002) and Gomez-Perez

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations45

MT for Minority Languages Using Elicitation-Based Learning of Syntactic Transfer Rules

  • Jan 01, 2002
  • Machine Translation
  • Katharina Probst +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Research on domain ontology in different granulations based on concept lattice

  • Sep 29, 2011
  • Knowledge-Based Systems
  • Xiangping Kang +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Arabic ontology extraction model from unstructured text

  • Mar 07, 2022
  • Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences
  • Yasser Mohamed Saber +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article

Automatic generation of nominal phrases for Portuguese and Galician

  • Jun 03, 2024
  • Natural Language Processing
  • María José Domínguez Vázquez +4
  • Research Article

WWDS APIs: Application Programming Interfaces for Efficient Manipulation of World WordNet Database Structure

  • Mar 05, 2016
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Hanumant Redkar +6
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations3

Sports Game Summarization Based on Sub-events and Game-Changing Phrases

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Yuuki Tagawa +1
  • Dataset

A dataset of morphological traits of pierid based on Fauna Sinica

  • Jul 19, 2022
  • Science Data Bank Datasets
  • Li Wenjie Li Wenjie +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations42

Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI)

  • Oct 17, 2024
  • Journal of Biomedical Semantics
  • Sabrina Toro +29
  • Research Article

Axiom Generation for Automated Ontology Construction from Texts Through Schema Mapping

  • Jan 26, 2026
  • Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
  • Tsitsi Zengeya +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations5

Ontologies in Intelligent Learning Systems

  • Jan 01, 2012
  • Boryana Deliyska +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

Natural language dependencies for ontological relation extraction

  • Dec 01, 2014
  • M D S Seneviratne +1
  • Research Article

Automated Taxonomy Induction and its Applications

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
  • Amit Gupta
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations6

Technology of Ontology Building for Knowledge Portals on Humanities

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Yury Zagorulko +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

An Automatic and Clause-Based Approach to Learn Relations for Ontologies

  • Sep 02, 2015
  • The Computer Journal
  • D Thenmozhi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

An ontology for maintenance procedure documentation

  • Aug 10, 2023
  • Applied Ontology
  • Caitlin Woods +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.