OpenMDAO: an open-source framework for multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization

The optimal design of multidisciplinary systems under uncertainty involves three types of iterative analyses- multidisciplinary analyses, reliability analyses, and optimization. If these processes are carried out in a nested manner in reliability based multidisciplinary design optimization (RBMDO), the computational expense can be enormous. Computationally efficient simultaneous analysis and design (SAND) or All-AtOnce methods have been developed earlier for deterministic MDO. Single loop RBDO methods have also been developed to integrate reliability analysis and optimization in a single loop. This paper develops a novel formulation of RBMDO problems with both system and component level reliability constraints. The formulation allows for solution with a single design optimization loop by using the KKT optimality conditions of the first-order reliability method (FORM) as constraints in the design optimization along with disciplinary consistency constraints. Alternative solution processes which remove the FORM MPP’s from the decision space and many constraints from the problem are developed. The alternative solution methods are more efficient and more robust than using nonlinear programming to solve the single loop formulation. A numerical example is solved with the two proposed solution algorithms. I. Introduction In the design of multidisciplinary systems it is often necessary to make decisions under uncertainty. This requires that multidisciplinary systems modeling be integrated with uncertainty analysis and optimization. A common example of such an engineering design application would be the design of an aircraft wing under uncertain aerodynamic loading conditions, with multiple structural components with uncertain capacities, such that the entire structural system achieves a prescribed level of reliability. The problem has coupled physics, in that the pressure distribution is dependent upon the deflection, and the deflection is dependent on the pressure distribution. Such designs have been performed using multidisciplinary optimization (MDO). Other examples where MDO may be applied include electronics packaging, in which the disciplines of heat transfer and circuit analysis are coupled, the design of new types of aircraft and integrating them into an existing fleet of aircraft, and even the management of interconnected homeland infrastructures. While MDO has matured with the development of different types of algorithms for various types of problems and design organizations, there has been little work to incorporate reliability analysis into MDO. However, system and component reliabilities are often a major concern in the design of multidisciplinary systems. MDO can be computationally expensive due to the need to achieve consistency across multiple disciplinary analysis codes; each disciplinary analysis code may be computationally expensive to run. Further, the optimal design of multidisciplinary systems under uncertainty involves three types of iterative procedures- multidisciplinary analyses, reliability analyses, and optimization. The integration of these three procedures is referred to in this paper as reliability based multidisciplinary design optimization (RBMDO). If these processes are carried out simultaneously, the computational expense can be enormous. Computational savings can often be achieved with simultaneous analysis and design (SAND) or All-At-Once methods, which allow for the solution of the multidisciplinary analyses and the optimization in one single loop. Single loop RBDO methods allow for the integration of reliability analysis and optimization in a single loop. Applying SAND and single-loop RBDO together may allow for large computational savings when applied to problems in RBMDO. This paper develops a novel formulation of RBMDO problems with both system and component level reliability constraints based on the SAND method for MDO and by use of the KKT conditions of the first order reliability method (FORM). The resulting formulation may be solved as a standard nonlinear programming problem. While the single loop formulation presented in this paper is a solution of the RBMDO problem, robustness and efficiency are improved through two improved algorithms which can remove the MPP’s from the decision space, thereby significantly reducing the optimizer’s workload.

Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) supports the system-level design of complex products effectively. Currently, system design and optimization for complex products are two distinct processes that must be executed using different software or platforms, involving intricate data conversion processes. Applying multidisciplinary optimization to validate system optimization often necessitates remodeling the optimization objects, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and highly error-prone. A critical activity in systems engineering is identifying the optimal design solution for the entire system. Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) and reliability analysis are essential methods for achieving this. This paper proposes a SysML-based multidisciplinary reliability design optimization modeling method. First, by analyzing the definitions and mathematical models of multidisciplinary reliability design optimization, the SysML extension mechanism is employed to represent the optimization model based on SysML. Next, model transformation techniques are used to convert the SysML optimization model generated in the first stage into an XML description model readable by optimization solvers. Finally, the proposed method’s effectiveness is validated through an engineering case study of an in-vehicle environmental control integration system. The results demonstrate that this method fully utilizes SysML to express MDO problems, enhancing the efficiency of design optimization for complex systems. Engineers and system designers working on complex, multidisciplinary projects can particularly benefit from these advancements, as they simplify the integration of design and optimization processes, facilitating more reliable and efficient product development.

In order to design a vehicle body with high strength and high stiffness, a multi-disciplinary design process should include careful consideration of multi-disciplinary design constraints to properly account for vehicle static stiffness (bending/torsional), durability, Noise/Vibration/Harshness (NVH), crash worthiness, light weight vehicle structure during the early stage of vehicle design process. With this approach, fast development of new vehicle body structures can be achieved with minimal number of iterations to match the conflicting design goals from each discipline. In the current research, a multi-disciplinary design optimization (MDO) based on a meta model is developed and refined to apply for the design of body structure. In an effort to apply the MDO for vehicle body structure, 4 phase procedures were established in the current research. In Phase I, a base model is created. In Phase II, an effect analysis is carried out. In Phase III, a meta model is created. Finally in Phase IV, using the optimization algorithm, the meta model created in Phase III is eventually refined through the process of optimization. In this research, static stiffness (bending / torsional), dynamic stiffness (1st torsion mode) were used for constrained conditions and the mass minimization was the object function for optimization.

Due to increased competition within the aerospace industry, simply meeting t he minimum project requirements for a new design will no longer ensure a project win. In order to achieve mission success, emphasis must be placed on producing an optimum final product through an efficient, lean process. To achieve an optimum final product , Multi Disciplinary Design (MDD), Multi Disciplinary Analysis (MDA), and Multi Disciplinary Optimization (MDO) must be utilized from project inception. Traditionally, MDD, MDA, and MDO have been time intensive activities, whose limited implementation in the prototyping design process has added little benefit. If significant gains are to be made by employing MDD, MDA, and MDO in a prototyping environment, the time associated with their implementation must be reduced such that a sufficient number of trades can be performed to realize these gains. In order to remain an industry leader in an increasing competitive aerospace marketplace the

Research on multidisciplinary fatigue optimization design method in structural design of high speed train

The design of multidiscipli nary systems (such as aircraft, automobiles, and others) often requires an iterative cycle that includes a design initialization, a system analysis, a sensitivity analysis, and design optimization. This design cycle is standard in the field of Multidisciplinary Optimization (MDO) and has often been referred to in literature as the Multiple Discipline-Feasible (MDF) approach. The name stems from the fact that complete multidisciplinary feasibility is maintained each and every design cycle. The drawback of MDF is that it can be a timely and a costly procedure. Numerous researchers have developed alternate means for posing and subsequently solving the multidisciplinary design problem. One such solution procedure has been referred to both as Simultaneous Analysis and Design (SAND) and All-at-Once (AAO), and treats the entire multidisciplinary design cycle as one large optimization problem. Another alternate solution procedure lias been referred to as Individual-Discipline-Feasible (DDF); this procedure exhibits characteristics which lie in between the two extremes exemplified by MDF and AAO. IDF assures that each individual discipline is feasible on every design cycle, while driving the entire system (all disciplines) towards multidisciplinary feasibility. The present work will present a rigorous numerical comparison of these solution strategies over a wide variety of problem sizes and complexities. The multidisciplinary design test problems that are used for these comparisons are generated by a robust simulation tool called CASCADE. * Research Assistant, Student member, AIAA | Associate Professor, Member AIAA Background and Motivation Concurrent engineering is a systematic approach to the integrated, simultaneous design of products and their related processes. Many of the recently developed capabilities to address concurrent engineering have stemmed from the emerging area of Multidiscipli nary Optimization, or MDO. The origins of MDO can be traced back to the early 1980's, where Sobieski14 used a linear decomposition approach to subdivide the design of a large engineering system into a grouping of related and more manageable subsystems. However, such a decomposition often results in a grouping of subsystems which cannot be placed into a definitive top-down hierarchy. The resultant decomposition grouping is typically hybrid-hierarchic in nature as shown in the example decomposition of Figure 1.

Multidisciplinary aircraft design optimization and optimal trajectory analysis are both popular research topics, yet few studies have considered optimal flight-path analysis during the aircraft design process. This paper describes simultaneous aircraft and trajectory design optimization using the Optimizer-Based Decomposition (OBD) architecture for multidisciplinary optimization. The analysis used for this problem would be difficult to develop and run using a traditional unified architecture. The problem is decomposed both by discipline and by stages of the trajectory, creating a matrix of independent subproblems that each consist of a single discipline at one stage of the mission. This study, with high-fidelity analyses and many subproblems, demonstrates OBD as a practical, useful approach to real aerospace design problems.

Battery thermal management system (BTMS) is a complex and highly integrated system, which is used to control the battery thermal conditions in electric vehicles (EVs). The BTMS consists of many subsystems that belong to different disciplines, which poses challenges to BTMS optimization using conventional methods. This paper develops a general variable fidelity-based multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) architecture and optimizes the BTMS by considering different systems/disciplines from the systemic perspective. Four subsystems and/or subdisciplines are modeled, including the battery thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, structure, and lifetime model. To perform the variable fidelity-based MDO of the BTMS, two computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models with different levels of fidelity are developed. A low fidelity surrogate model and a tuned low fidelity model are also developed using an automatic surrogate model selection method, the concurrent surrogate model selection (COSMOS). An adaptive model switching (AMS) method is utilized to realize the adaptive switch between variable-fidelity models. The objectives are to maximize the battery lifetime and to minimize the battery volume, the fan's power, and the temperature difference among different cells. The results show that the variable-fidelity MDO can balance the characteristics of the low fidelity mathematical models and the computationally expensive simulations, and find the optimal solutions efficiently and accurately.

This paper presents a study of aircraft featuring truss-braced wing configurations that have been optimized for minimum fuel consumption using multidisciplinary design optimization. The investigation proceeds following an earlier Boeing Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research study, which selected the truss-braced wing concept as the most promising of several concept vehicles. This comes from the fact that a significantly higher-aspect-ratio wing could achieve substantial reductions in induced drag but requires major structural changes to support such a large span. This problem was explored through the use of a multidisciplinary design and analysis environment implemented in ModelCenter®. Optimization was performed using ModelCenter’s Design Explorer and Darwin genetic algorithm optimizers. Using the multidisciplinary environment, a large multidimensional design space, featuring design variables spread across the major aircraft design disciplines, was explored. Configurations featuring a strut-braced wing and truss-braced wings with one and two juries were evaluated for different span limits. Subsequently, different laminar wing design options were investigated in conjunction with lift augmentation system options. The multidisciplinary optimization used for this investigation was able to produce candidate designs with the desired attributes and performance improvements while satisfying all relevant geometric and performance constraints.

A blowout preventer (BOP) is a large valve that encases an oil well on the surface. The valve may be closed while drilling if overpressure from a reservoir causes formation fluids such as oil and natural gas to back up within the wellbore and endanger the rig. A pipe ram is one of the critical components in the BOP system, which is designed to seal around a drill pipe, restricting the flow in the annulus between the outside of the drill pipe and the wellbore. The pipe ram design family, which contains hundreds of pipe ram designs, intends to cover different configurations to suit a variety of dill pipe sizes. To assure their structural integrity under service loads, these pipe rams need to be designed to meet the stress requirements per the American Petroleum Institute (API) Specification 16A and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII, Division 2. With a conventional manual design workflow, it would take a significant amount of time and effort to complete all the designs for the product family with code compliance. Therefore, a scalable solution is highly desirable for delivery of customer-needed ram blocks with much shorter lead time. MDO (Multi-Disciplinary Optimization) involves multi-code integration, CAE (Computer-Aided Engineering) workflow automation, design space exploration, and optimization. MDO-enabled, automated design optimization is becoming increasingly popular in both scientific and engineering communities. In this paper, a methodology for integration of CAD (Computer Aided Design), FEA (Finite Element Analysis), cost, and optimization packages to enable FEA automation and design optimization is presented. A BOP pipe ram is adopted as the use case. The ram block geometry was parameterized before being imported into an FEA package. The FEA workflow was automated such that once a set of geometric parameters are given, the preprocessing, solving, and postprocessing steps can be automatically completed. As part of the FEA postprocessing, stress linearization analysis per the API and ASME BPVC codes has also been automated, which had never been done in the past. A manufacturing cost analysis package can also be used to consume the parameterized geometry for automatic manufacturability assessment and cost predictions. The stress analysis and cost analysis workflows are conducted separately but also orchestrated by an MDO package. Reports that contain the analysis results are sequentially generated for various design permutations. The MDO-enabled automated design and cost analysis approach could substantially enhance efficiency and consistency in performing FEA and cost studies and producing analysis reports. It is also the backbone for automated design optimization, which could significantly improve the product performance and reliability and, meanwhile, minimize the development and product cost.

In studying multidisciplinary design optimization method for non-hierarchic system, Multidisciplinary Object Compatibility Design Optimization method based on simulated annealing algorithm is presented. In order to coordinate the independent optimization of subsystems, the compatibility constraint in system level and compatibility objective in subsystem work together. As optimization process continued, the coupling relationship between system level and different subsystems is gradually improved by state accepting function which is embedded in compatibility constraint. In this way, abnormal program termination and premature convergence will be avoided and ideal global optimal solution will be achieved effectually. Then the method is used in the optimization design of TR-B triple-redundancy transmission system. The multidisciplinary object compatibility design optimization model is established and the comprehensive optimal solution is obtained which meets the matching relationship of gear teeth, strength requirement and dynamic requirement, etc

DOI: 10.2514/1.19969 Multidisciplinary designoptimization isanimportant approachfor the conceptualdesignof space planesbecause these planes are characterized by disciplines that interact with one another. A multidisciplinary design optimization problemof asingle-stage-to-orbit space plane isformulated andsolved inthis study.Themodeling andoptimization ofrigidbodycharacteristics,suchastrimandstability,arefocusedonbecauseasingle-stage-to-orbitspaceplanehas a tendency for considerable shift of both the aerodynamic center and the center of gravity. Moreover, the design of the air-breathing engines are integrated with the airframe and its effect on the rigid body characteristics are also modeled in the framework of multidisciplinary design optimization. Using the all-at-once-based multidisciplinary design optimization approach, which incorporates sparse nonlinear programming and metamodeling, the design of the vehicle and its flight trajectory are successfully optimized. Finally, the characteristics of the optimal solution are investigated, especially the relationships among the airframe-engine integration, rigid body characteristics, and payload transportation capability.

An efficient Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization (MDO) framework for an aerospace engineering system should use and integrate distributed resources such as various analysis codes, optimization codes, Computer Aided Design (CAD) tools, Data Base Management Systems (DBMS), etc. in a heterogeneous environment, and need to provide user-friendly graphical user interfaces. In this paper, we propose a systematic approach for determining a reference MDO framework and for evaluating MDO frameworks. The proposed approach incorporates two well-known methods, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD), in order to provide a quantitative analysis of the qualitative criteria of MDO frameworks. Identification and hierarchy of the framework requirements and the corresponding solutions for the reference MDO frameworks, the general one and the aircraft oriented one were carefully investigated. The reference frameworks were also quantitatively identified using AHP and QFD. An assessment of three in-house frameworks was then performed. The results produced clear and useful guidelines for improvement of the in-house MDO frameworks and showed the feasibility of the proposed approach for evaluating an MDO framework without a human interference.

5 - Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization Methods

Design engineers and decision-makers across various fields are constantly working to make optimal design decisions for multidisciplinary engineering systems in an effort to improve performance and reduce costs. The multiple disciplines that decision-makers are forced to consider can range from different physical components of a system, to competing physical phenomena influencing a component (e.g. flow forces and structural strength), to completely separate models of interest to a system (e.g. engineering performance and lifecycle cost). The common element that all these decision-making scenarios share is the presence of couplings between the considered disciplines (or subsystems). How the values for these coupling parameters are determined within a decision-making or optimization framework is the subject of countless research efforts. At present the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) community has settled on a few proven techniques such Collaborative Optimization (CO) and Analytic Target Cascading (ATC). However, current MDO techniques have issues that limit their effectiveness in solving various MDO problems. Many of these strategies require close coordination between subsystem optimization solvers, require significant effort by decision-makers to pose their problems in a suitable format, and/or can have large computational efficiency problems due to the fact that they involve solving nested optimization problems. In an effort to alleviate some of these issues and make MDO easier to implement and more computationally efficient, a new sequential MDO algorithm called Cooperative Design Optimization (CDO) is proposed. The CDO approach functions through a series of subsystem optimizations using a successively smaller cooperation space. The cooperation space is analogous to the design space of a traditional optimization problem, but includes only the coupling parameters that are a factor in multiple subsystems. A single iteration of the approach can be thought of as a negotiation between all of the subsystems regarding the boundaries of the cooperation space. To facilitate this cooperation, each subsystem optimization problem is restructured as a multi-objective optimization problem so that a Pareto set of optimal solutions, or agreeable design alternatives, are produced. As a result, after all subsystem optimizations are accomplished, each subsystem’s obtained Pareto optimal solution sets are compared with respect to the coupling parameters and new bounds in the cooperation space are determined for the next iteration. This process allows each subsystem to be optimized completely independently within the boundaries of the agreed upon cooperation space while coordination is achieved through an analysis of obtained optimal solutions for each subsystem. Iterations, or negotiations, are repeated until an acceptable solution or set of solutions is obtained for all included subsystems through this cooperative process.