Opportunistic Early Pipeline Re-steering for Data-dependent Branches

Modern computational workloads demand exceptional performance and efficiency, necessitating the effective utilization of advanced CPU features such as SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data), instruction-level parallelism (ILP), and branch prediction. This paper explores optimization techniques that address inefficiencies at the algorithmic, architectural, and system levels, enabling software to align with hardware capabilities. Key techniques include resolving data dependencies, enhancing memory locality, utilizing compiler intrinsics,applying tail call optimizations, and employing strategies like loop unrolling, blocking, vectorization, and function inlining. Tail call optimization and breaking dependency chains are analyzed to improve parallelism and reduce processing overhead. Both manual and compiler-driven approaches are evaluated, providing insights into their trade-offs and synergies. Experimental results from benchmarks, such as matrix multiplication and particle simulations, demonstrate significant gains, with up to a 3x increase in instructions per cycle (IPC) and a 40% reduction in execution time. These findings highlight the critical role of optimizing software for architectural features like cache hierarchies, pipelining, and vector widths. This study provides techniques to maximize CPU efficiency, bridging the gap between hardware potential and software performance. Future directions include extending these methodologies to hybrid architectures like GPUs and integrating machine learning models for dynamic runtime optimization.

Large register file with multiple ports is a critical component of a high-performance processor. A large number of registers are necessary for processing a larger number of in-flight instructions to exploit higher instruction level parallelism (ILP). Multiple ports for a register file are necessary to support execution of multiple instructions each cycle. These necessities lead to a larger register access time. However, register access time has to be minimal to enable design of high frequency processors. Analysis of lifetime of a logical to physical register mapping reveals that there are long latencies between the times a physical register is allocated, consumed, and released. We propose a dual bank register file organization that exploits such long latencies, resulting in a large bandwidth with a reduced register access time. Implementation of one flavor of the proposed register file organization, as compared to a conventional monolithic register file, in an 8-wide out-of-order issue superscalar processor enhanced instructions per cycle (IPC) throughput up to 6% for Spec2000 applications while inducing register access time up to 22%. Another flavor of the register file organization, with a similar access time as the conventional monolithic register file, enhanced the IPC up to 15%. Thus a trade-off between register access time and ILP exploitation is shown.

Java bytecodes can be executed with the following three methods: a Java interpreter running on a particular machine interprets bytecodes; a Just-in-Time (JIT) compiler translates bytecodes to the native primitives of the particular machine and the machine executes the translated codes; and a Java processor executes bytecodes directly. The first two methods require no special hardware support for the execution of Java bytecodes and are widely used currently. The last method requires an embedded Java processor, picoJavaI or picoJavaII for instance. The picoJavaI and picoJavaII are simple pipelined processors with no ILP (instruction level parallelism) and TLP (thread level parallelism) supports. A so-called MAJC (microprocessor architecture for Java computing) design can exploit ILP and TLP by using a modified VLIW (very long instruction word) architecture and vertical multithreading technique, but it has its own instruction set and cannot execute Java bytecodes directly. In this paper, we investigate a processor architecture which can directly execute Java bytecodes meanwhile can exploit Java ILP and TLP simultaneously. The proposed processor consists of multiple slots implementing horizontal multithreading and multiple functional units shared by all threads executed in parallel. Our architectural simulation results show that the Java processor could achieve an average 20 IPC (instructions per cycle), or 7.33 EIPC (effective IPC), with 8 slots and a 4-instruction scheduling window for each slot. We also check other configurations and give the utilization of functional units as well as the performance improvement with various kinds of working loads.

Modern wide-issue superscalar processors tend to adopt deeper pipelines in order to attain high clock rates. This trend increases the number of on-the-fly instructions in processors and a mispredicted branch can result in substantial amounts of wasted work. In order to mitigate these wasted works, an accurate branch prediction is required for the high performance processors. In order to improve the prediction accuracy, we propose the bimode++ branch predictor. It is an enhanced version of the bimode branch predictor. Throughout execution from the start to the end of a program, some branch instructions have the same result at all times. These branches are defined as extremely biased branches. The bimode++ branch predictor is unique in predicting the output of an extremely biased branch with a simple hardware structure. In addition, the bimode++ branch predictor improves the accuracy using the refined indexing and a fusion function. Our experimental results with benchmarks from SpecFP, SpecINT, multi-media and server area show that the bimode++ branch predictor can reduce the misprediction rate by 13.2% to the bimode and by 32.5% to the gshare.

Current processors exploit out-of-order execution and branch prediction to improve instruction level parallelism. When a branch prediction is wrong, processors flush the pipeline and squash all the speculative work. However, control-flow independent instructions compute the same results when they re-enter the pipeline down the correct path. If these instructions are not squashed, branch misprediction penalty can significantly be reduced. In this paper we present a novel mechanism that detects control-flow independent instructions, executes them before the branch is resolved, and avoids their re-execution in the case of a branch misprediction. The mechanism can detect and exploit control-flow independence even for instructions that are far away from the corresponding branch and even out of the instruction window. Performance figures show that the proposed mechanism can exploit control-flow independence for nearly 50% of the mispredicted branches, which results in a performance improvement that ranges from 14% to 17,8% for realistic configurations of forthcoming microprocessors.

Branch prediction is one of the main hurdles in the roadmap towards deeper pipelines and higher clock frequencies. This work presents a new approach to enhancing current branch predictors: Selective Branch Prediction Reversal. The rationale behind this proposal is the fact that many branch mispredictions can be avoided if branch prediction is selectively reversed. We present a Branch Prediction Reversal Unit (BPRU) that selectively reverses branch predictions by correlating with the predicted values of the branch inputs, in addition to recent control flow. As a case study, we have included the BPRU in an already proposed branch predictor, the Branch Predictor through Value Prediction (BPVP). The effect is a reduction by half in its original misprediction rate. We have also measured the improvement when the BPRU engine is used in a hybrid scheme composed of a BPVP and a gshare predictor. Results using immediate updates show average reductions in misprediction rate ranging from 7% to 14%. Performance evaluation of the proposed BPRU in a 20-stage superscalar processor shows an IPC improvement of up to 9%.

Transistor budgets have been increasing at a very fast pace in the last years. This increasing transistor density will lead next generation processors to have a billion transistors available. It is the task of the computer architect to find the best way to use them.Out of order superscalar processors exploit parallelism at the finer grain, exploiting Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP). They issue multiple instructions per cycle, often in an order other than the specified by the programmer, using branch prediction and other speculative execution techniques in order to increase the available parallelism.Very Long Instruction Word (VLIW) processors also exploit parallelism at the instruction level, but they mostly rely on the compiler to detect the available parallelism. This increased compiler role allows a simpler design, and can be run at a faster clock rate, compensating for the loss of ILP.Chip Multiprocessors (CMP) join several narrow superscalar/VLIW components into a single processor, and mostly rely on the Thread Level Parallelism (TLP) for performance. The small and simple components can also run at a faster clock rate compensating for the loss of ILP, and significantly increasing throughput.Simultaneous Multithreaded (SMT) processors are based on wide superscalars, and exploit both ILP and TLP by issuing instructions from several different threads to the same pipeline, obtaining the benefits of TLP without sacrificing the ILP on single-threaded applications.For each of these options we will need to find the best balance between performance, design complexity, and power consumption among other factors. Also, the frontiers between them are not clear, and many intermediate design points can be found which leads to better/simpler/cheaper processors for the next generation of high performance computers.

When CPU enters the era of instruction level parallelism, the execution cycle of instructions has become shorter and shorter. Meanwhile, the processing speed of CPU has become faster and faster. However, only from the execution process of CPU instructions, there is a key factor that limits the speed of CPU processing instructions, namely, the branch instruction processing. The branch predictor is used to predict the execution result of the current branch instruction (taken/non-taken), which can make the program counter get the target instruction to continue to execute according to the prediction result before calculating the target jump address. If the prediction is correct, it will greatly improve the execution efficiency of CPU. This paper starts from the two basic categories of static branch prediction and dynamic branch prediction. Then analyse their prediction principle, prediction accuracy and component consumption used for prediction. For static branch predictor, its hardware consumption is less than that of dynamic branch predictor, and its accuracy is also lower than that of dynamic branch predictor. Moreover, their shortcomings are pointed out in this paper. At last, based on the original branch predictor, better branch predictors developed in recent years are introduced. In the future, considering the hardware consumption, I think the development of branch predictor will continue to optimize the branch predictor combining global history and local history, from the number of stored entries, the correlation between branch instructions and so on. On the premise of executing a large number of instructions, every little improvement in the efficiency of the predictor will bring huge benefits.

Code placement techniques have traditionally improved instruction fetch bandwidth by increasing instruction locality and decreasing the number of taken branches. However, traditional code placement techniques have less benefit in the presence of a trace cache that alters the placement of instructions in the instruction cache. Moreover, as pipelines have become deeper to accommodate increasing clock rates, branch misprediction penalties have become a significant impediment to performance. We evaluate pattern history table partitioning, a feedback directed code placement technique that explicitly places conditional branches so that they are less likely to interfere destructively with one another in branch prediction tables. On SPEC CPU benchmarks running on an Intel Pentium 4, branch mispredictions are reduced by up to 22% and 3.5% on average. This reduction yields a speedup of up to 16.0% and 4.5% on average. By contrast, branch alignment, a previous code placement technique, yields only up to a 4.7% speedup and less than 1% on average.

Unlike traditional superscalar processors, Simultaneous Multithreaded processors can explore both instruction level parallelism and thread level parallelism at the same time. With a same fetch width, SMT does not fetch instructions from a single thread as deeply as in traditional superscalar processors. Meanwhile, all the instructions from different threads share the same Function Units in SMT. All the characteristics make it possible to enhance the performance of SMT by reducing the branch mis-predictions. Based on the fact that about 15% of branch instructions directions can be definitely known at predicting cycle, a simple and effective bypass mechanism is proposed. This scheme doesn't depend on any existing branch predictors, and it can be used as an effective enhancement to any one of them. Execution-driven simulation results show that the branch miss prediction rates of our predictor decrease by more than 15% on average compared to a simple base line (g-share) predictor and improve the instruction throughput by about 2.5%.

Branch instructions are recognized as a major impediment to exploiting instruction level parallelism. Even with sophisticated branch prediction techniques, many frequently executed branches remain difficult to predict. An architecture supporting predicated execution may allow the compiler to remove many of these hard-to-predict branches, reducing the number of branch mispredictions and thereby improving performance. We present an in-depth analysis of the characteristics of those branches which are frequently mispredicted and examine the effectiveness of an advanced compiler to eliminate these branches. Over the benchmarks studied, an average of 27% of the dynamic branches and 56% of the dynamic branch mispredictions are eliminated with predicated execution support.

We evaluate the effects of guarded (or conditional, or predicated) execution on the performance of an instruction level parallel processor employing dynamic branch prediction. First, we assess the utility of guarded execution, both qualitatively and quantitatively, using a variety of application programs. Our assessment shows that guarded execution significantly increases the opportunities, for both compiler and dynamic hardware, to extract and exploit parallelism. However, existing methods of specifying guarded execution have several drawbacks that limit its use. Second, we study the interaction of guarded execution and dynamic branch prediction and show that the use of guarded execution significantly increases the number of instructions between mispredicted branches. Third, we propose a new method of specifying guarded execution. The proposed method uses special GUARD instructions, which can be used to incorporate guarded execution into existing instruction sets. GUARD instructions realize the full power of guarded execution, without the drawbacks of existing methods of specifying guarded execution.

The need for modern processors is based on fast and precise branch predictors to improve the execution of instructions in the pipeline. In a parallel processor, the pipeline cannot execute the conditional instructions with the next clock cycle, leading to a pipeline stall. To address this issue, this paper suggests a variety of branch prediction techniques for improving the execution speed of conditional instructions. Firstly, a simple branch prediction and a dynamic branch prediction are applied to the trace files using saturating counters. Among these two, dynamic branch prediction provides better results by enhancing the accuracy rate of 2.01% than the static branch prediction. Further, the perceptron branch predictor predicts the implementation by using a table of perceptron and train function. This prediction scheme reduces the difficulties in dynamic branch predictor schemes such as reduces the complexity in history length table and improves the accuracy rate by 5.36%. For accuracy, a novel model based on global perceptron branch predictor is developed, which uses both global and per branch information. Trace-driven simulations have been performed by varying the range of hardware budget, traces file size, and the length of history register to increase the accuracy rate of each branch prediction technique. The obtained results suggest that the proposed global perceptron branch predictor provides an increased accuracy rate of 10.47% at 4 kb hardware budget and 8.06% at 4-bit history length than the perceptron branch predictor.

Many aspects of speculative multithreading have been under constant and crucial research in the recent times with the increased importance in exploiting parallelism in single thread applications. One of the important architectural optimizations that is very pertinent in this scenario is branch prediction. Branch Prediction assumes increased importance for multi-threading systems that execute threads speculatively, since wrong predictions can be much costlier here, in terms of threads, than a few instructions that occupy the pipeline in a uni-processor. Conventional branch prediction techniques have provided increasingly better prediction accuracies for uni-core processing. But the branch prediction itself takes on a whole new dimension when applied to multi-core architectures based on Speculative Multithreading. Dependence on global branch history has helped branch predictors to achieve high prediction accuracy in single thread applications. The discontinuity of global history created at the thread boundaries cripple the performance of branch predictors in a multi-threaded environment. Many studies in the past have tried to address the branch history problem to improve the prediction accuracy. Most of these have been found either to be architecture specific or complex in terms of the hardware needed to recreate or approximate the right history to be given to the threads when they start executing out of order. This hardware overhead increases as the number and size of threads increase thereby limiting the scalability of the algorithms proposed so far. The current thesis takes a different direction and proposes a simple and scalable solution to effectively reduce the misprediction rates in Speculative Multithreaded systems. This is accomplished by making use of a synergistic interaction between threads to boost the inherent biased nature of branches and using less complex hardware to reduce aliasing between branches in the threads. The study proposes a new scheme called the Global Broadcast Buffer scheme to effectively reduce branch mispredictions in Speculative Multithreaded architectures.

Branch misprediction is one of the important causes of performance degradation in superpipelined and superscalar processors. Most of the existing branch predictors, based on the exploiting of branch history, suffer from prediction accuracy decrease caused by frequent context switches. The goal of this research is to reduce misprediction rate (MPR) when the context switches are frequent, and not to increase the MPR when the context switches are relatively rare. We propose two independent, but closely related modifications of global adaptive prediction mechanisms: first, to flush only the branch history register (BHR) at context switch, instead of reinitialization of the whole predictor, and second, to use two separated BHRs, one for user and one for kernel branches, instead of one global history register. We have evaluated the ideas by measurements on real traces from IBS (Instruction Benchmark Set), and have shown that both modifications reduce MPR at negligible hardware cost.