Optimal automatic table layout

Cell formation deals with grouping of machines and parts in manufacturing systems according to their compatibility. Manufacturing processes are surrounded with an abundance of complex constraints which should be considered carefully and represented clearly for obtaining high efficiency and productivity. Constraint programming is a new approach to combinatorial optimization and provides a rich language to represent complex constraints easily. However, the cell formation problems are well suited to be solved by constraint programming approach since the problem has many constraints such as part-machine requirements, availabilities in the system in terms of capacity, machine and worker abilities. In this study, the cell formation problem is modeled using machine, part processing and worker flexibilities via resource element–based representation. Resource elements define the processing requirements of parts and processing capabilities of machines and workers, which are resource-independent capability units. A total of 12 case problems are generated, and different search phases of constraint programming are defined for the solution procedure. The cell formation problem is modeled in both constraint programming and integer programming, and a comparative analysis of constraint programming and integer programming model solutions is done. The results indicate that both the models are effective and efficient in the solution of the cell formation problem.

Collaborative robots are progressively employed to support human workers in assembly tasks or independently assigned to one station to complete assembly tasks in U-shaped assembly lines. This study develops two exact methods, based on constraint programming (CP) model and Combinatorial Benders’ decomposition algorithm (CBDA), to tackle the U-shaped assembly line balancing problem with collaborative robots. The CBDA is based on distinct decomposition strategies that address the master problem and the subproblem, formulated by a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model and a CP model, which is designed to obtain a real objective value and generate cuts that refine the master problem. Additionally, MILP-based and CP-based local search techniques are proposed to improve the algorithm's performance. The computational study demonstrates that both the proposed methods, namely CP and CBDA, outperform the current state-of-the-art methods (the MILP model and simulated annealing algorithm). Furthermore, the CP outperforms the CBDA in terms of the number of optimal solutions, achieving the optimal solutions for 574 out of 1500 test instances, and might be regarded as the new state-of-the-art methodology.

Using mixed integer programming and constraint programming for operating rooms scheduling with modified block strategy

We solve the flexible job shop scheduling problems (F-JSSPs) to minimize makespan. First, we compare the constraint programming (CP) model with the mixed-integer programming (MIP) model for F-JSSPs. Second, we exploit the decomposable structure within the models and develop an efficient CP–logic-based Benders decomposition (CP-LBBD) technique that combines the complementary strengths of MIP and CP models. Using 193 instances from the literature, we demonstrate that MIP, CP, and CP-LBBD achieve average optimality gaps of 25.50%, 13.46%, and 0.37% and find optima in 49, 112, and 156 instances of the problem, respectively. We also compare the performance of the CP-LBBD with an efficient Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP) algorithm, which has been appraised for finding 125 optima on 178 instances. CP-LBBD finds 143 optima on the same set of instances. We further examine the performance of the algorithms on 96 newly (and much larger) generated instances and demonstrate that the average optimality gap of the CP increases to 47.26%, whereas the average optimality of CP-LBBD remains around 1.44%. Finally, we conduct analytics on the performance of our models and algorithms and counterintuitively find out that as flexibility increases in data sets the performance CP-LBBD ameliorates, whereas that of the CP and MIP significantly deteriorates.

It may be very difficult to achieve the optimal shift schedule in call centers which have highly uncertain and peaked demand during short time periods. Overlapping shift systems are usually designed for such cases. This paper studies shift scheduling and rostering problems for inbound call centers where overlapping shift systems are used. An integer programming model that determines which shifts to be opened and how many operators to be assigned to these shifts is proposed for the shift scheduling problem. For the rostering problem both integer programming and constraint programming models are developed to determine assignments of operators to all shifts, weekly days-off, and meal and relief break times of the operators. The proposed models are tested on real data supplied by an outsource call center and optimal results are found in an acceptable computation time. An improvement of 15% in the objective function compared to the current situation is observed with the proposed model for the shift scheduling problem. The computational performances of the proposed integer and constraint programming models for the rostering problem are compared using real data observed at a call center and simulated test instances. In addition, benchmark instances are used to compare our Constraint Programming (CP) approach with the existing models. The results of the comprehensive computational study indicate that the constraint programming model runs more efficiently than the integer programming model for the rostering problem. The originality of this research can be attributed to two contributions: (a) a model for shift scheduling problem and two models for rostering problem are presented in detail and compared using real data and (b) the rostering problem is considered as a task-resource allocation and considerably shorter computation times are obtained by modeling this new problem via CP.

p-Hub location-allocation problem is one of the most interesting subjects in the location theory. Hubs act as switching points to reduce the transportation cost. In this study, two new solution methods, a constraint programming (CP) based model and a hybrid of k-means and genetic algorithm (KGA), are developed to generate exact and approximate solutions, respectively. The proposed CP formulation is more understandable and straightforward in comparison with the MIP model. The experimental results indicate that the CP model uses the memory of the computer (RAM) more efficiently, which enables us to solve the medium size problems. But, in terms of run time, this method cannot be superior to the MIP model. The CP formulation is also extended for the multi allocation p-hub location problem. K-means algorithm, a well-known algorithm for clustering data, is used to generate initial solutions of GA. Furthermore, a new adaptive crossover operator, which is based on the k-means algorithm, is proposed. The experimental results indicate that the KGA algorithm is superior to the GA, regarding time, objective value, and quality of solution measures.

In this study, the U-type assembly line balancing problem (UALBP) with assignment restrictions (AR-UALBP) is considered. Linked and incompatible distance and station restrictions are taken into account. New mathematical programming (MP) and constraint programming (CP) models are proposed. The objective function of the models is minimizing the cycle time for a given number of workstations. In addition to this objective, line efficiency and CPU time are also considered as other performance measurements. Numerical experiments on some problems from the literature are performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed models. The results are compared with the results of the CP model of the straight ALBP with assignment restrictions and also the results from MP and CP models are compared with each other. The numerical results indicate that the proposed CP and MP models are more effective in obtaining better and optimal results when solving the AR-UALBP.

Traditional vehicle routing problems implicitly assume that only one crew operates a vehicle for the entirety of its journey. However, this assumption is violated in many applications arising in humanitarian and military logistics. This paper considers a joint vehicle and crew routing and scheduling problem in which crews are able to interchange vehicles, resulting in space and time interdependencies between vehicle routes and crew routes. The problem is formulated as a mixed integer programming (MIP) model and a constraint programming (CP) model that overlay crew routing constraints over a standard vehicle routing problem. The constraint program uses a novel optimization constraint to detect infeasibility and to bound crew objectives. This paper also explores methods using large neighborhood search over the MIP and CP models. Experimental results indicate that modeling the vehicle and crew routing problems jointly and supporting vehicle interchanges for crews may bring significant benefits in cost reduction compared with a method that sequentializes these decisions.

Bike sharing systems need to be properly rebalanced to meet the demand of users and to operate successfully. However, the problem of Balancing Bike Sharing Systems (BBSS) is a demanding task: it requires the design of optimal tours and operating instructions for relocating bikes among stations to maximally comply with the expected future bike demands. In this paper, we tackle the BBSS problem by means of Constraint Programming (CP). First, we introduce two different CP models for the BBSS problem including two custom branching strategies that focus on the most promising routes. Second, we incorporate both models in a Large Neighborhood Search (LNS) approach that is adapted to the respective CP model. Third, we perform an experimental evaluation of our approaches on three different benchmark sets of instances derived from real-world bike sharing systems. We show that our CP models can be easily adapted to the different benchmark problem setups, demonstrating the benefit of using Constraint Programming to address the BBSS problem. Furthermore, in our experimental evaluation, we see that the pure CP (branch & bound) approach outperforms the state-of-the-art MILP on large instances and that the LNS approach is competitive with other existing approaches.

In this paper a constraint programming (CP) approach for calculating release dates for lots within a supply chain environment is investigated. The lot start times are verified by a simulation model using different dispatching rules focusing on tardiness. To test the presented CP approach a simple fab model is constructed. The fab model consists of parallel batch machines as well as work centers and single machines. The investigated objectives are tardiness, earliness and cycle time. Due to the high complexity decomposition methods for the CP approach are tested. The results from the CP method are lot start dates which are verified by a downstream simulation run. The results show that the presented CP approach could outperform the simulation for all objectives. The content of this paper could be used as a first investigation for new scheduling methods within a supply chain management.

A constraint programming approach for resource-constrained flexible assembly flow shop scheduling problem with batch direct delivery

The peptide-protein docking problem is an important problem in structural biology that facilitates rational and efficient drug design. In this work, we explore modeling and solving this problem with the quantum-amenable quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) formalism. Our work extends recent efforts by incorporating the objectives and constraints associated with peptide cyclization and peptide-protein docking in the two-particle model on a tetrahedral lattice. We propose a “resource efficient” QUBO encoding for this problem, and baseline its performance with a novel constraint programming (CP) approach. We implement an end-to-end framework that enables the evaluation of our methods on instances from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Our results show that the QUBO approach, using a classical simulated annealing solver, is able to find feasible conformations for problems with up to 6 peptide residues and 34 target protein residues (PDB 3WNE, 5LSO), but has trouble scaling beyond this problem size. In contrast, the CP approach can solve the largest instance in our test set, containing 11 peptide residues and 49 target protein residues (PDB 2F58). We conclude that while QUBO can be used to successfully tackle this problem, its scaling limitations and the strong performance of the CP method suggest that it may not be the best choice.

This paper addresses the integrated flexible job shop and operators scheduling problem, introducing shift-based constraints on operators. We investigate how the advanced modeling and solution techniques, specifically, Mixed-Integer Programming (MIP) and Constraint Programming (CP) perform on this intricate scheduling problem. We test the effectiveness of both the MIP and CP models on an illustrative example as well as on a set of larger instances and draw conclusions, which indicate the need to integrate these two models into some approximation scheme to tackle large-scale instances for this complex problem.

Constraint programming for solving various assembly line balancing problems

TDRS (Tracking and Data Relay Satellite) can be seen as a bridge between user spacecrafts and ground station. The TDRSS (Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System) single access link scheduling problem is an important application field of TDRSS. The important character of the scheduling problem lies in that there is time windows constraint between TDRS and user spacecrafts. Tasks can be completed only within given time windows. The paper builds the CP (constraint programming) model of the scheduling problem based on reasonable assumption. The CP model is solved with improved GA (genetic algorithm) based on path representation of valid genes. Computational experiments indicate that it is quite good to solve the scheduling problem by building the CP model and solving it with improved GA