Optimal control of wave energy converters with non-integer order performance indices: A dynamic programming approach

Optimal causal control of a wave energy converter in a random sea

Wave Energy Control Systems: Robustness Issues

Model predictive control (MPC) has been considered as one important feed-forward optimal control strategy for ocean wave energy converter (WEC) targeted on power maximization. The capability of MPC to handle system constraints (ex. stroke, velocity, actuator limitations), and the availability to provide optimal solution for linear system provide potential for the implementation of such algorithm in the WEC control. However, currently, only active MPC control has been introduced for single and two-body WECs. Such control strategy may introduce negative power during the optimization process, since the power take-off (PTO) damping has no constraint. In this paper, we proposed a hybrid MPC strategy in limiting both the PTO damping force and PTO damping to avoid negative power generation during cost function minimization (negative power minimization) for the two-body WEC. The problem is formulated into a quadratic programming (QP) problem targeted at power maximization. However, the standard QP problem formulation cannot be directly applied to the semi-active control problem due to the PTO damping constraints. Therefore, the problem is reformulated as a Mixed-integer Quadratic Programming (MIQP) problem, which contains logical switch to select constraint matrices based on the sign of the relative velocity between the buoy and submerged body. The optimal solution is compared with those of the active MPC control strategy and the passive model with the same irregular wave input.

A EROSPACE engineering applications greatly stimulated the development of optimal control theory during the 1950s and 1960s, where the objective was to drive the system states in such a way that some defined cost was minimized. This turned out to have very useful applications in the design of regulators (where some steady state is to be maintained) and in tracking control strategies (where some predetermined state trajectory is to be followed). Among such applications was the problem of optimal flight trajectories for aircraft and space vehicles. Linear optimal control theory in particular has been very well documented and widely applied, where the plant that is controlled is assumed linear and the feedback controller is constrained to be linear with respect to its input. However, the availability of powerful low-cost microprocessors has spurred great advantages in the theory and applications of nonlinear control. The competitive era of rapid technological change, particularly in aerospace exploration, now demands stringent accuracy and cost requirements in nonlinear control systems. This has motivated the rapid development of nonlinear control theory for application to challenging, complex, dynamical real-world problems, particularly those that bear major practical significance in aerospace, marine, and defense industries. Infinite-time horizon nonlinear optimal control (ITHNOC) presents a viable option for synthesizing stabilizing controllers for nonlinear systems by making a state-input tradeoff, where the objective is to minimize the cost given by a performance index. The original theory of nonlinear optimal control dates from the 1960s. Various theoretical and practical aspects of the problem have been addressed in the literature over the decades since. In particular, the continuous-time nonlinear deterministic optimal control problem associated with autonomous (time-invariant) nonlinear regulator systems that are affine (linear) in the controls has been studied by many authors. The long-established theory of optimal control offers quite mature and well-documented techniques for solving this control-affine nonlinear optimization problem, based on dynamic programming or calculus of variations, but their application is generally a very tedious task. Bellman’s dynamic programming approach reduces to solving a nonlinear first-order partial differential equation (PDE), expressed by the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation. The solution to the HJB equation gives the optimal performance/cost value (or storage) function and determines an optimal control in feedback form under some smoothness assumptions. Alternatively, in the classical calculus of variations, optimal control problems can be characterized locally in terms of the Hamiltonian dynamics arising from Pontryagin’s minimum principle. These are the characteristic equations of the HJB PDE, which result in a nonlinear, constrained two-point boundary value problem (TPBVP) that, in general, can only be solved by successive approximation of the optimal control input using iterative numerical techniques for each set of initial conditions. Numerically, even though the nonlinear TPBVP is somewhat easier to solve than the HJBPDE, control signals can only be determined offline and are thus best suited for feedforward control of plants for which the state trajectories are known a priori. Therefore, contrary to the dynamic programming approach, the resultant control law is not generally in feedback form. Open-loop control, however, is sensitive to random disturbances and requires that the initial state be on the optimal trajectory. In contrast, nonlinear optimal feedback has inherent robustness properties (inherent in the sense that it is obtained by ignoring uncertainty and disturbances). The potential difficulty with the HJB approach is that no efficient algorithm is available to solve the PDE when it is nonlinear and the problem dimension is high, making it impossible to derive exact expressions for optimal controls for most nontrivial problems of interest. The optimal can only be computed in special cases, such as linear dynamics and quadratic cost, or very low-dimensional systems. In particular, if the plant is linear time invariant (LTI) and the (infinite-time) performance index is quadratic, then the corresponding HJB equation for this infamous linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) problem reduces to an algebraic Riccati equation (ARE). Contrary to the well-developed and widely applied theory and computational tools for theRiccati equation (for example, see [1]), theHJB equation is difficult, if not impossible, to solve for most practical applications. The exact solution for the optimal control policies is very complex

The aim of this work is to show that a significant increase of the efficiency of a Wave Energy Converter (WEC) can be achieved already at an early design stage, through the choice of a turbine and control regulation, by means of an accurate Wave-to-Wire (W2W) modeling that couples the hydrodynamic response calibrated in a wave flume to a Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) test bench with sizes and rates not matching those of the system under development. Information on this procedure is relevant to save time, because the acquisition, the installation, and the setup of a test rig are not quick and easy. Moreover, power electronics and electric machines to emulate turbines and electric generators matching the real systems are not low-cost equipment. The use of HIL is important in the development of WECs also because it allows the carrying out of tests in a controlled environment, and this is again time- and money-saving if compared to tests done on a real system installed at the sea. Furthermore, W2W modeling can be applied to several Power Take-Off (PTO) configurations to experiment different control strategies. The method here proposed, concerning a specific HIL for testing power electronics and control laws for a specific WECs, may have a more general validity.

Environmental-Sensing and adaptive optimization of wave energy converter based on deep reinforcement learning and computational fluid dynamics

1 A Survey on Computational Optimal Control.- Issues in the Direct Transcription of Optimal Control Problems to Sparse Nonlinear Programs.- Optimization in Control of Robots.- Large-scale SQP Methods and their Application in Trajectory Optimization.- Solving Optimal Control and Pursuit-Evasion Game Problems of High Complexity.- 2 Theoretical Aspects of Optimal Control and Nonlinear Programming.- Continuation Methods In Boundary Value Problems.- Second Order Optimality Conditions for Singular Extremals.- Synthesis of Adaptive Optimal Controls for Linear Dynamic Systems.- Control Applications of Reduced SQP Methods.- Time Optimal Control of Mechanical Systems.- 3 Algorithms for Optimal Control Calculations.- Second Order Algorithm for Time Optimal Control of a Linear System.- An SQP-type Solution Method for Constrained Discrete-Time Optimal Control Problems.- Numerical Methods for Solving Differential Games, Prospective Applications to Technical Problems.- Construction of the Optimal Feedback Controller for Constrained Optimal Control Problems with Unknown Disturbances.- Repetitive Optimization for Predictive Control of Dynamic Systems under Uncertainty.- Optimal Control of Multistage Systems Described by High-Index Differential-Algebraic Equations.- A New Class of a High Order Interior Point Method for the Solution of Convex Semiinfinite Optimization Problems.- A Structured Interior Point SQP Method for Nonlinear Optimal Control Problems.- 4 Software for Optimal Control Calculations.- Automated Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Systems.- ANDECS: A Computation Environment for Control Applications of Optimization.- Application of Automatic Differentiation to Optimal Control Problems.- OCCAL: A mixed symbolic-numeric Optimal Control CALculator.- 5 Applications of Optimal Control.- A Robotic Satellite with Simplified Design.- Nonlinear Control under Constraints of a Biological System.- An Object-Oriented Approach to Optimally Describe and Specify a SCADA System Applied to a Power Network.- Near-Optimal Flight Trajectories Generated by Neural Networks.- Performance of a Feedback Method with Respect to Changes in the Air-Density during the Ascent of a Two-Stage-To-Orbit Vehicle.- Linear Optimal Control for Reentry Flight.- Steady-State Modelling of Turbine Engine with Controllers.- Shortest Paths for Satellite Mounted Robot Manipulators.- Optimal Control of the Industrial Robot Manutec r3.

A novel discrete control for wave energy converters with a hydraulic power take-off system

An efficiency-aware continuous adaptive proportional-integral velocity-feedback control for wave energy converters

Optimal yaw moment control law for improved vehicle handling

The control logic of a Wave Energy Converter (WECs) usually aims to increase the energy converted from waves. For optimal energy conversion, most WEC control methods require reactive power; that is a power flow from the WEC to the ocean, at times, in order to increase the overall harvested energy over a period of time. The power take off (PTO) unit that has the capability of providing reactive power is usually expensive and complex. In this work, an optimal control analysis is presented in which the objective of the optimal control problem is to maximize the harvested energy while constraining the power flow to be only in the positive direction; that is adding a constraint of no reactive power. The optimal control derivation is presented for the case of a solo WEC. Low fidelity numerical simulations are presented comparing the proposed control to the known Bang-Bang (BB) control and the Bang-Singular-Bang (BSB) control.

In this paper, we present an optimal control approach using Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs) for trajectory tracking control of a three-wheeled omnidirectional mobile robot in the presence of external disturbances on the robot's actuators and noise in the robot's sensor measurements. First, a state-space representation of the omnidirectional robot dynamics is derived using a point-mass dynamic model. Then, we propose an LMI-based full-state feedback H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -optimal controller for the tracking problem. The robot's tracking performance with the H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -optimal controller is compared to its performance with a classical full-state feedback tracking controller in simulations with circular and bowtie-shaped reference trajectories. In order to evaluate our proposed controller in practice, we also implement the H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -optimal and classical controllers for these reference trajectories on a three-wheeled omnidirectional robot. The H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -optimal controller guarantees stabilization of the robot motion and attenuates the effects of frictional disturbances and measurement noise on the robot's tracking performance. Using the H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -optimal controller, the robot is able to track the reference trajectories with up to a 47.8% and 45.8% decrease in the maximum pose and twist errors, respectively, over a full cycle of the trajectory compared to the classical controller. The simulation and experimental results show that our LMI-based H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">∞</sub> -optimal controller is robust to undesired effects of disturbances and noise on the dynamic behavior of the robot during trajectory tracking and can outperform the classical controller in attenuating their effects.

Power capture performance of an oscillating-body WEC with nonlinear snap through PTO systems in irregular waves

Enhanced energy harvesting of wave energy converters in site-specific wave climates: A hybrid approach by geometric shape optimization and power take-off control

In this paper, the nonlinear optimal control problem is investigated for spacecraft formation flying with collision avoidance. Based on a nonlinear model of formation flying, two optimal tracking control laws are proposed to ensure the formation pattern converges to the predetermined configuration. The first optimal control law which combines Lyapunov optimizing control with a trajectory-following optimization technique is developed to solve the finite-time nonlinear optimal control problem. For the second controller, an extended [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] method is applied to design a closed-form feedback control scheme for nonlinear control problem of spacecraft formation flying with non-standard cost functions. By taking into account the flying safety, a repulsive control scheme is incorporated in the optimal controller to ensure collision avoidance and minimize the performance index. Finally, a numerical example is performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.