• Home
  • Search
  • Optimal Design and Sensitivity Analysis of welded structure and Support Vector Machine application Prediction
  • Cite Icon1
  • https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4518346/v1Copy DOI Icon

Optimal Design and Sensitivity Analysis of welded structure and Support Vector Machine application Prediction

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of welding design parameters and optimum cost design via Geometric Programming (GP) and the Lingo Program (LP). The first section begins with basic definitions and steps for transforming problems into the GP format, followed by comparing the GP and LP with several other optimization methods. This comparison demonstrates that GP is an effective, robust, and reliable method for optimizing linear and nonlinear problems, whereas Lingo is a simple and suitable program for locating optimal values and analyzing the solutions to engineering problems. The next part of the study concerned sensitivity analysis of the problem and determining the sensitivity of the optimal solution to certain changes in the original model. To perform sensitivity analysis, the optimal response and design parameters of the welded beam for a certain percentage of changes in P, L, бd, and τd values were evaluated and plotted as diagrams. Sensitivity analysis is a crucial component of optimization, as it determines the percentage of change at which the optimal response remains constant. To this end, the support vector machine (SVM) is trained using data from optimal design conditions. In this study, the SVM was utilized to predict the weld thickness variable (h), weld length variable (l), bar thickness (t), bar width (b), and objective function (FX). After successful testing, the model accurately predicted the parameters above, adhering to all design constraints.This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of welding design parameters and optimum cost design via Geometric Programming (GP) and the Lingo Program (LP). The first section begins with basic definitions and steps for transforming problems into the GP format, followed by comparing the GP and LP with several other optimization methods. This comparison demonstrates that GP is an effective, robust, and reliable method for optimizing linear and nonlinear problems, whereas Lingo is a simple and suitable program for locating optimal values and analyzing the solutions to engineering problems. The next part of the study concerned sensitivity analysis of the problem and determining the sensitivity of the optimal solution to certain changes in the original model. To perform sensitivity analysis, the optimal response and design parameters of the welded beam for a certain percentage of changes in P, L, бd, and τd values were evaluated and plotted as diagrams. Sensitivity analysis is a crucial component of optimization, as it determines the percentage of change at which the optimal response remains constant. To this end, the support vector machine (SVM) is trained using data from optimal design conditions. In this study, the SVM was utilized to predict the weld thickness variable (h), weld length variable (l), bar thickness (t), bar width (b), and objective function (FX). After successful testing, the model accurately predicted the parameters above, adhering to all design constraints.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Sensitivity analysis in geometric programming: Theory and computations

  • Dec 01, 1990
  • Annals of Operations Research
  • Jerzy Kyparisis
  • Research Article
  • Citations483

Optimal Design of a Class of Welded Structures Using Geometric Programming

  • Aug 01, 1976
  • Journal of Engineering for Industry
  • K M Ragsdell +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

A joint pricing and lot sizing models with discount: A geometric programming approach

  • Oct 28, 2007
  • ANZIAM Journal
  • Maryam Esmaeili +2
  • Book Chapter

Estimation of Shear Force Distribution in Two-Stage Open Channel Using SVM and ANFIS

  • Nov 29, 2022
  • B S Das +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Sensitivity Analysis in Generalized Polynomial Programming

  • Jun 01, 1974
  • A I I E Transactions
  • Don T Phillips
  • Research Article
  • Citations29

Entropy Maximization and Geometric Programming

  • Apr 01, 1977
  • Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
  • J J Dinkel +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations23

Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Accurate Prediction of Real-Time Stuck Pipe Incidents

  • Jul 17, 2020
  • Energies
  • Javed Akbar Khan +7
  • Preprint Article

A novel SVMþNDA model for classification with an application to face recognition

  • May 02, 2023
  • Naimul Khan +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

SVM 방법을 이용한 hERG 이온 채널 저해제 예측모델 개발

  • Dec 20, 2009
  • Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
  • Sin-Moon Gang +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations32

Optimal wire and transistor sizing for circuits with non-tree topology

  • Nov 13, 1997
  • Lieven Vandenberghe +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations197

A Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Gangwon Province, Korea

  • Jan 01, 2017
  • Sustainability
  • Saro Lee +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

Optimal Processes Control for a Failure Mechanism

  • Jan 11, 2003
  • Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
  • Su-Fenprofessor Yang
  • Research Article
  • Citations40

Analogue of Electromagnetically Induced Transparency in an S-Shaped All-Dielectric Metasurface

  • Jun 01, 2019
  • IEEE Photonics Journal
  • Jinyan Diao +5
  • Conference Article
  • Citations6

An improved SVM classifier based on multi-verse optimizer for fault diagnosis of autopilot

  • Oct 01, 2018
  • Yongqian Liu +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Dynamic Optimization Method on Electromechanical Coupling System by Exponential Inertia Weight Particle Swarm Algorithm

  • Jan 01, 2009
  • Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering
  • Qiang Li
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.