Ordinal scheduling problem and its asymptotically optimal algorithms on parallel machine system

Minimizing the total completion time on a parallel machine system with tool changes

In this paper, we investigate the problem of semi-on-line scheduling n jobs on m identical parallel machines under the assumption that the ordering of the jobs by processing time is known and the jobs have arbitrary release times. Our aim is to minimize the maximum completion time. An ordinal algorithm is investigated and its worst case ratio is analyzed.

We study the bicriteria scheduling of equal length jobs on uniform parallel machines. By introducing a new scheduling model, called single-machine scheduling with generated completion times (shortly, GCT-scheduling), we show that the scheduling of equal length jobs on uniform parallel machines can be polynomially transformed into the single-machine GCT-scheduling with a special setting of generated completion times. In the GCT-scheduling, a sequence of completion times is given in advance and the job scheduled at the i-th position will be assigned the i-th completion time. We present a comprehensive study on the complexities of the bicriteria single-machine GCT-scheduling problems with respect to various regular criteria. We then turn these complexity results into the forms of bicriteria scheduling of equal length jobs on uniform (or identical) parallel machines. Our research generalizes the existing results on bicriteria scheduling of equal length jobs in the literature. Particularly, one of our results solves the open problem posed by Sarin and Prakash (J Comb Optim 8:227–240, 2004), which asks for minimizing the total weighted completion time subject to the optimality of minimizing the total number of tardy jobs on identical parallel machines, and we show that this problem is solvable in polynomial time.

MILP models to minimise makespan in additive manufacturing machine scheduling problems

We consider the problem of scheduling orders on identical machines in parallel. Each order consists of one or more individual jobs. A job that belongs to an order can be processed by any one of the machines. Multiple machines can process the jobs of an order concurrently. No setup is required if a machine switches over from one job to another. Each order is released at time zero and has a positive weight. Preemptions are not allowed. The completion time of an order is the time at which all jobs of that order have been completed. The objective is to minimize the total weighted completion time of the orders. The problem is NP‐hard for any fixed number (≥2) of machines. Because of this, we focus our attention on two classes of heuristics, which we refer to as sequential two‐phase heuristics and dynamic two‐phase heuristics. We perform a worst case analysis as well as an empirical analysis of nine heuristics. Our analyses enable us to rank these heuristics according to their effectiveness, taking solution quality as well as running time into account. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2006

This paper addresses the problem of scheduling n jobs on a single machine and on m identical parallel machines to minimize the completion time variance of jobs. This problem of scheduling jobs on parallel machines is motivated by a case study in an automobile ancillary unit. First, a heuristic to solve the single-machine scheduling problem is proposed. The parallel-machine scheduling problem is solved in two phases: job-allocation phase and job-sequencing phase. Two heuristics are proposed in the job-allocation phase, whereas in the job-scheduling phase, the single-machine scheduling approach is used. In this paper, both versions of parallel-machine scheduling problem (restricted and unrestricted) are considered. A good upper bound is obtained using a genetic algorithm, to evaluate the performance of the proposed heuristics for the parallel-machine scheduling problem. An extensive computation evaluation of the proposed heuristics is presented for both single-machine scheduling problem and the parallel-machine scheduling problem (especially considering the case study), along with the comparison of performances with the existing heuristics in the literature.

A lower bound for randomized on-line scheduling algorithms

A common due-date assignment problem on parallel identical machines

This work is an extension of previous works [1], [2], [3] about scheduling jobs on identical parallel machines with constraints of unavailabilities to minimize the makespan. We are interested in this paper on the case with two identical parallel machines such that each machine is unavailable for one unavailability period such that the preemption of jobs is not allowed. We are divided this problem on five cases and for each of them we are proposed a heuristic to minimize the makespan. The obtained results, compared with those of Chien and Liao [13], show that our heuristics quit efficient in solving large problems.

Parallel and distributed adaptive quadrilateral mesh generation

The efficiency and quality of the manufacturing industry are greatly influenced by production scheduling, which makes it a crucial aspect. A well-designed production scheduling scheme can significantly enhance manufacturing efficiency and reduce enterprise costs. This paper presents a tailored optimization model designed to address a more complex production scheduling problem that incorporates parallel machines and preventive maintenance. The proposed solutions aim to achieve a balance between job sequence and machine reliability, considering the minimum maintenance cost rate for determining maintenance cycles of deteriorating machines in real manufacturing scenarios. Furthermore, the objective of minimizing the maximum completion time guides machine assignment and job sequence based on maintenance constraints. The innovation lies in the introduction of a greedy algorithm that utilizes a water injection model to address this NP-hard integrated problem. A pre-distribution model is constructed using the water injection model, and its solution is utilized as input for constructing the production scheduling model, which aids in determining machine assignment and job sequence. This algorithm demonstrates remarkable effectiveness and efficiency, enabling the achievement of an optimal solution. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the computational process, accompanied by an extensive discussion of the results showcasing improved performance. Furthermore, the optimization model developed in this paper can be adapted to tackle the production scheduling problem with modifications tailored for parallel machines.

A heuristic algorithm is developed for the classical scheduling problem in which independent jobs are nonpreemptively scheduled on identical parallel machines with the objective of minimizing the makespan with load balancing. The algorithm uses iteratively the LPT procedure to be successful computational tools in many hard Combinatorial Optimization problems. We present an approximation algorithm based on balance the Hopfild with binary decision variables which are a kind of assignment variables for the classical deterministic scheduling problem of minimizing the makespan on identical machines. These problems are characterized by their complexity, known as NP-hard in most cases. Computational results indicate that the proposed algorithm is very competitive with respect to well-known constructive algorithms for a large number of benchmark.

Makespan minimization on identical machines is a fundamental problem in online scheduling. The goal is to assign a sequence of jobs to m identical parallel machines so as to minimize the maximum completion time of any job. Already in the 1960s, Graham showed that Greedy is (2-1/m)-competitive. The best deterministic online algorithm currently known achieves a competitive ratio of 1.9201. No deterministic online strategy can obtain a competitiveness smaller than 1.88. In this paper, we study online makespan minimization in the popular random-order model, where the jobs of a given input arrive as a random permutation. It is known that Greedy does not attain a competitive factor asymptotically smaller than 2 in this setting. We present the first improved performance guarantees. Specifically, we develop a deterministic online algorithm that achieves a competitive ratio of 1.8478. The result relies on a new analysis approach. We identify a set of properties that a random permutation of the input jobs satisfies with high probability. Then we conduct a worst-case analysis of our algorithm, for the respective class of permutations. The analysis implies that the stated competitiveness holds not only in expectation but with high probability. Moreover, it provides mathematical evidence that job sequences leading to higher performance ratios are extremely rare, pathological inputs. We complement the results by lower bounds, for the random-order model. We show that no deterministic online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio smaller than 4/3. Moreover, no deterministic online algorithm can attain a competitiveness smaller than 3/2 with high probability.

In Chapters 6 and 7, asymptotic optimal open-loop controls are constructed for stochastic dynamic flowshops and jobshops. While asymptotically optimal, these open-loop controls are not expected to perform well unless the transition rates among machine states are unrealistically large (i.e., εis very small). What is required, therefore, is a construction of asymptotic optimal feedback controls. Thus far, such constructions are available only for single or parallel machine systems (see Chapter 5), in which no state constraints are present. In such systems, either the Lipschitz property of optimal control for the corresponding deterministic systems or the monotonicity property of optimal control with respect to the state variables makes the proof of asymptotic optimality go through. Unfortunately, these properties are no longer available in the case of flowshops or jobshops.KeywordsFeedback ControlMachine StateState TrajectoryDeterministic ProblemAsymptotic OptimalityThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Scheduling batches on parallel machines with major and minor set-ups