Outcomes of atherectomy in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularisation.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high prevalence of peripheral artery disease. How best to manage lower extremity peripheral artery disease remains unclear in this patient population. We therefore sought to compare the outcomes after endovascular versus surgical lower extremity revascularization among patients with CKD. We used data from Optum's de-identifed Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, a nationwide database of commercially insured persons in the United States to study patients with CKD who underwent lower extremity endovascular or surgical revascularization. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance covariates. We employed proportional hazard regression to study the primary outcome of major adverse limb events (MALE), defined as a repeat revascularization or amputation. We also studied each of these events separately and death from any cause. In our cohort, 60,057 patients underwent endovascular revascularization and 9,338 patients underwent surgical revascularization. Endovascular revascularization compared with surgical revascularization was associated with a higher adjusted hazard of MALE (hazard ratio (HR) 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-1.59). Endovascular revascularization was also associated with a higher adjusted hazard of repeat revascularization (HR 1.65; 95% CI 1.57-1.72) but a lower adjusted risk of amputation (HR 0.71; CI 0.73-0.89). Patients undergoing endovascular revascularization also had a lower adjusted hazard for death from any cause (0.85; CI 0.82-0.88). In this analysis of patients with CKD undergoing lower extremity revascularization, an endovascular approach was associated with a higher rate of repeated revascularization but a lower risk of subsequent amputation and death compared with surgical revascularization. Multiple factors must be considered when counseling patients with CKD, who have a high burden of comorbid conditions. Clinical trials should include more patients with kidney disease, who are often otherwise excluded from participation, to better understand the most effective treatment strategies for this vulnerable patient population.

BackgroundPositioning a patient on the catheterization table is important for proper cardiac or respiratory function during peripheral vascular interventions. Fowler’s position, where the patient’s head is a 45° angle, is more effective in reducing venous blood volume returning to the heart from the periphery compared with the supine position. The Terumo R2P system has been developed for transradial peripheral vascular interventions.Case presentationTwo patients with heart failure (a 75-year-old Japanese female and a 74-year-old Japanese male) underwent lower-extremity peripheral vascular interventions in Fowler’s position to prevent worsening heart failure. Because their head position was opposite the C-arm of the X-ray machine, the left radial artery was selected as the access site. The Terumo R2P system was used for transradial peripheral vascular intervention. We successfully treated superficial artery diseases with long shaft balloons and rapid-exchange Terumo R2P Misago stents.ConclusionsAlthough lower-extremity peripheral vascular intervention using Fowler’s position and the Terumo R2P system has several limitations, including device availability and technical complexity, it may be effective for particular patients who have higher risk of worsening heart failure in the supine position.

Revascularization Saves Limbs and Function in Frail Elderly

Objectives. This study evaluated angiographic success and in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with rotational atherectomy (RA) in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Design. Between January 2010 and March 2014, 272 consecutive patients with heavily calcified lesions underwent elective PCI with RA. Of these, 33 patients had LVEF ≤35% (low LVEF group), whereas 237 patients had LVEF >35% (preserved LVEF group). The primary endpoint was angiographic success and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE included death from any cause, postprocedure onset MI, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting, and target vessel revascularization. The secondary endpoints were MACE and the components within 30days after PCI. The components of MACE were evaluated. Results. Angiographic success, defined as <30% residual stenosis with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow 3 at final angiography, was achieved in all patients without fatal complications. Intra-aortic ballon pumping (IABP) was used significantly more frequently in the low LVEF group compared with the preserved LVEF group (15.2% vs. 2.1%, p = .003). There were no significant differences between groups regarding in-hospital and clinical outcomes within 30 days following PCI. Conclusion. If medications and mechanical support were appropriately performed, the angiographic success rate and in-hospital MACE rate of PCI with RA in patients with low LVEF could be expected to have good outcomes similar to those for patients with preserved LVEF.

The Effect of Clinical Care Location on Clinical Outcomes After Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Medicare Beneficiaries

Society for Vascular Surgery limb stage and patient risk correlate with outcomes in an amputation prevention program

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) revascularization can be performed by either endovascular or open surgical approach. Despite increasing use of endovascular revascularization, it is still uncertain which strategy yields better long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients hospitalized with PAD in Australia and New Zealand who underwent either endovascular or surgical revascularization between 2008 and 2015, and compared procedures using a propensity score-matched analysis. Hybrid interventions were excluded. The primary endpoint was mortality or major adverse limb events (MALE), defined as a composite endpoint of acute limb ischaemia, urgent surgical or endovascular reintervention, or major amputation, up to 8 years post-hospitalization using time-to-event analyses 75189 patients fulfilled eligibility (15239 surgery and 59950 endovascular), from whom 14339 matched pairs (mean ± SD age 71 ± 12 years, 73% male) with good covariate balance were identified. Endovascular revascularization was associated with an increase in combined MALE or mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.17, P < 0.001]. There was a similar risk of MALE (HR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.10, P = 0.15), and all-cause urgent rehospitalizations (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98-1.04, P = 0.57), but higher mortality (HR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11-1.21, P < 0.001) when endovascular repair was compared to surgery. In subgroup analysis, these findings were consistent for both claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischaemia presentations. Although the long-term risk of MALE was comparable for both approaches, enduring advantages of surgical revascularization included lower long-term mortality. This is at odds with some prior PAD studies and highlights contention in this space.

TCT-59 Prevalence, predictors and outcomes of bleeding complications in peripheral vascular interventions for lower extremities: Insights from the NCDR PVI registry

The outcome of endovascular intervention (EVI) compared vs. surgical revascularization in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to chronic total occlusion (CTO) is unknown. Using the National Inpatient Sample database between 2007 and 2014, we identified all PAD patients with CTO who had limb revascularization. Multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the odds of in-hospital mortality and adverse outcomes between both groups. A total of 168,420 patients who had peripheral CTO and underwent limb revascularization were identified. 99,279 underwent EVI, and 69,141 underwent surgical revascularization. The patients who underwent EVI were younger, more likely to be women and African American, and less likely to be white (p< 0.001 for all). EVI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs 1.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.59). The EVI group had higher vascular complications, major bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), and major amputation compared with surgical revascularization. A subgroup analysis on patients with critical limb ischemia showed lower mortality in the EVI group (1.4% vs. 1.9, aOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.50-0.63). Although there was no difference in the incidence of AKI or major amputation between the two groups, the EVI group had higher vascular complication rates and major bleeding events. EVI in PAD with CTO is associated with lower in-hospital mortality, likely due to the procedure's less-invasive nature; however, it is associated with higher postprocedural complications likely due to the CTO's complexity.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive, systemic atherosclerotic disease that is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and critical limb ischemia (CLI). CLI represents the most severe stage of PAD, characterized by progressive endothelial dysfunction and arterial narrowing. We hypothesized that the incidence of CLI and PAD would increase over the study period and that the rates of in-hospital mortality and major amputations among patients admitted with CLI would rise correspondingly. We utilized the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2021 using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification codes. Patients with primary or secondary diagnoses of PAD were initially selected, and subsequently hospitalization with CLI was appropriately identified. The Cochran Armitage test was used to describe the trend of outcomes across the years. All statistical analyses were conducted using the software Stata version 17.0. From 2016 to 2021, there were 2,930,639 admissions for CLI. Up to 65% of these patients were over the age of 60, and 35.8% of these patients were women. Most of these individuals were white (64.7%), followed by African Americans (15.8%) and Hispanics (12.6%). In-hospital mortality rates varied by revascularization method, with hybrid revascularization showing the highest rate at 2.6%, followed by endovascular revascularization at 1.8%, and surgical revascularization at 1.6%. Additionally, hospitalization costs were highest for patients undergoing hybrid revascularization ($46,257 ± $36,417), compared with endovascular ($36,924 ± $27,945) and surgical revascularization ($35,672 ± $27,127). Endovascular revascularization rates seemed to increase while surgical revascularization rates decreased during this time period. PAD is a progressive, systemic atherosclerotic disease that is associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and CLI. Our data showed that the rates of PAD and CLI hospitalizations have remained relatively stable from 2016 to 2021, but there seems to be a trend toward doing more revascularization via an endovascular approach as compared to a surgical approach.

Peripheral atherectomy practice patterns in the United States from the Vascular Quality Initiative

Racial Disparities in Treatment Indications and Outcomes for Limb Ischemia

BackgroundWe aimed to characterize the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events (MACE and MALE) among patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), as well as associated factors in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI).Methods and ResultsPatients undergoing PVI in the American College of Cardiology’s (ACC) National Cardiovascular Data Registry’s PVI Registry who could be linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were included. The primary outcomes were MACE, MALE, and readmission within 1 month and 1 year following index CLTI‐PVI or non‐CLTI‐PVI. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with the development of the primary outcomes among patients undergoing CLTI‐PVI. There were 1758 (49.7%) patients undergoing CLTI‐PVI and 1779 (50.3%) undergoing non‐CLTI‐PVI. By 1 year, MACE occurred in 29.5% of patients with CLTI (n=519), and MALE occurred in 34.0% of patients with CLTI (n=598). By 1 year, MACE occurred in 8.2% of patients with non‐CLTI (n=146), and MALE occurred in 26.1% of patients with non‐CLTI (n=465). Predictors of MACE at 1 year in CLTI‐PVI included end‐stage renal disease on hemodialysis, congestive heart failure, prior CABG, and severe lung disease. Predictors of MALE at 1 year in CLTI‐PVI included treatment of a prior bypass graft, profunda femoral artery treatment, end‐stage renal disease on hemodialysis, and treatment of a previously treated lesion.ConclusionsPatients ≥65 years old undergoing PVI experience high rates of MACE and MALE. A range of modifiable and non‐modifiable patient factors, procedural characteristics, and medications are associated with the occurrence of MACE and MALE following CLTI‐PVI.

Relation of Admission Blood Pressure to In-hospital and 90-Day Outcomes in Patients Presenting With Transient Ischemic Attack

Intravascular Ultrasound during Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Artery Disease, by Severity, Location, Device, and Procedure