P136 Comparison between primary care and secondary care spirometry

The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of office spirometry in primary care pediatric practices. Ten primary care pediatricians undertook a spirometry training program that was led by 2 pediatric pulmonologists from the Pediatric Department of the University of Padova. After the pediatricians' training, children with asthma or persistent cough underwent a spirometric test in the pediatrician's office and at a pulmonary function (PF) laboratory, in the same day in random order. Both spirometric tests were performed with a portable turbine flow sensor spirometer. We assessed the quality of the spirometric tests and compared a range of PF parameters obtained in the pediatricians' offices and in the PF laboratory according to the Bland and Altman method. A total of 109 children (mean age: 10.4 years; range: 6-15) were included in the study. Eighty-five (78%) of the spirometric tests that were performed in the pediatricians' offices met all of the acceptability and reproducibility criteria. The 24 unacceptable test results were attributable largely to a slow start and failure to satisfy end-of-test criteria. Only the 85 acceptable spirometric tests were considered for analysis. The agreement between the spirometric tests that were performed in the pediatrician's office and in the PF laboratory was good for the key parameters (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75%). The repeatability coefficient was 0.26 L for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (83 of 85 values fall within this range), 0.30 L for forced vital capacity (81 values fall within this range), and 0.58 L/s for forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (82 values fall within this range). In 79% of cases, the primary care pediatricians interpreted the spirometric tests correctly. It seems justifiable to perform spirometry in pediatric primary care, but an integrated approach involving both the primary care pediatrician and certified pediatric respiratory medicine centers is recommended because effective training and quality assurance are vital prerequisites for successful spirometry.

Intrapartum and neonatal mortality in primary midwife-led and secondary obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify important functional problems among individuals with shoulder pain using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and to investigate differences between individuals receiving primary care and individuals receiving secondary care.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study located in a primary and secondary care outpatient clinic, a total of 177 individuals seeking care for shoulder pain (84 from primary care and 93 from secondary care) were recruited. Background variables, pain, physical activity, and PSFS responses were collected using a questionnaire software package. Meaningful concepts were linked from the PSFS responses to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) according to established rules. Frequencies for the ICF categories were estimated separately for primary care and secondary care. Differences between primary care and secondary care were investigated by calculating CIs for the sample proportions at ICF chapter level.ResultsThe primary care sample reported functional problems linked to 226 ICF categories, whereas the secondary care sample reported functional problems linked to 337 ICF categories. Of the linked ICF categories, 87.7% belonged to the Activities and Participation component of the ICF. Seventeen categories were identified in >3% of the individuals; of those, the most frequent categories were recreation and leisure, lifting and carrying objects, doing housework, hand and arm use, and remunerative employment. Categories included in the ICF chapters of self-care and domestic life were significantly more frequent in the secondary care sample, whereas there was a trend that neuromusculoskeletal and movement-related functions were more frequent in primary care.ConclusionThe present findings indicate that individuals with shoulder pain report a wide range of functional problems, from basic functions related to mobility to activities related to work and leisure. This study also discovered differences between patients in primary care and secondary care. The large variation in the experiences between people supports the use of an individualized measure in assessments.ImpactThis study adds new knowledge about problems in functioning among people with shoulder pain and how the individual experience varies between primary care and secondary care settings. Moreover, the content analyses used in this study showed the full potential of the ICF classification and should have potential for further application.

SAT0354 Validity of Gout Diagnosis in Swedish Primary and Secondary Care

Global implementation of blood tests for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) would be facilitated by easily scalable, cost-effective and accurate tests. In the present study, we evaluated plasma phospho-tau217 (p-tau217) using predefined biomarker cutoffs. The study included 1,767 participants with cognitive symptoms from 4 independent secondary care cohorts in Malmö (Sweden, n = 337), Gothenburg (Sweden, n = 165), Barcelona (Spain, n = 487) and Brescia (Italy, n = 230), and a primary care cohort in Sweden (n = 548). Plasma p-tau217 was primarily measured using the fully automated, commercially available, Lumipulse immunoassay. The primary outcome was AD pathology defined as abnormal cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42:p-tau181. Plasma p-tau217 detected AD pathology with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.93–0.96. In secondary care, the accuracies were 89–91%, the positive predictive values 89–95% and the negative predictive values 77–90%. In primary care, the accuracy was 85%, the positive predictive values 82% and the negative predictive values 88%. Accuracy was lower in participants aged ≥80 years (83%), but was unaffected by chronic kidney disease, diabetes, sex, APOE genotype or cognitive stage. Using a two-cutoff approach, accuracies increased to 92–94% in secondary and primary care, excluding 12–17% with intermediate results. Using the plasma p-tau217:Aβ42 ratio did not improve accuracy but reduced intermediate test results (≤10%). Compared with a high-performing mass-spectrometry-based assay for percentage p-tau217, accuracies were comparable in secondary care. However, percentage p-tau217 had higher accuracy in primary care and was unaffected by age. In conclusion, this fully automated p-tau217 test demonstrates high accuracy for identifying AD pathology. A two-cutoff approach might be necessary to optimize performance across diverse settings and subpopulations.

Accuracy of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test vs FibroTest, Elastography, and Indirect Markers in Detection of Advanced Fibrosis in Patients With Alcoholic Liver Disease

Costs and Health Outcomes Associated With Primary vs Secondary Care After an Asthma-Related Hospitalization

ObjectivesStudies have shown that strong links between primary care GPs (General Practitioners) and secondary care providers (Paediatricians) are essential for delivering high- quality paediatric care,1 2 particularly in low-income areas.3...

Purpose: To monitor a new referral-appointment system for primary care physicians and patients.Context: Integration between the Turkish primary care and secondary care is deficient.There have been attempts of implementing a referral system and gate-keeping role for primary care physicians, both before Turkish Family Medicine Model and after the transition.Both obligatory and fee based referral systems were tried and all failed to put into practice but there are new affords for implementing a referral system. State of the art:Via a central appointment system a patient can schedule his/her appointment by using an online system or 182 call centre.Turkish patients can pick their own appointment date and can consult to any physicians they wish.Starting from June 2013 primary care physicians will have a new application to access this central appointment system, and will refer their patients to specialists.The Ministry of Health claims that this application will ease access to specialty care and empower primary care.The Turkish Association of Family Physicians, Family Medicine Centre Working Group will monitor this new implementation. Statements for debate:There are IT based solutions to increase communication between primary care and specialty care.The Turkish model seems the first of its kind and communication is primarily based on patient's dominance.We will monitor the physician's point of view, both in primary care and secondary care.Does this implementation increase communication between physicians?We will look for best practice cases and discuss it within primary care groups for implementation in primary care.

Use of spirometry and patterns of prescribing in COPD in primary care

Doctors’ opinions on clinical coordination between primary and secondary care in the Catalan healthcare system

BackgroundADHD in adults is a common and debilitating neurodevelopmental mental health condition. Yet, diagnosis, clinical management and monitoring are frequently constrained by scarce resources, low capacity in specialist services and limited awareness or training in both primary and secondary care. As a result, many people with ADHD experience serious barriers in accessing the care they need.MethodsProfessionals across primary, secondary, and tertiary care met to discuss adult ADHD clinical care in the United Kingdom. Discussions identified constraints in service provision, and service delivery models with potential to improve healthcare access and delivery. The group aimed to provide a roadmap for improving access to ADHD treatment, identifying avenues for improving provision under current constraints, and innovating provision in the longer-term. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines were used as a benchmark in discussions.ResultsThe group identified three interrelated constraints. First, inconsistent interpretation of what constitutes a ‘specialist’ in the context of delivering ADHD care. Second, restriction of service delivery to limited capacity secondary or tertiary care services. Third, financial limitations or conflicts which reduce capacity and render transfer of care between healthcare sectors difficult. The group recommended the development of ADHD specialism within primary care, along with the transfer of routine and straightforward treatment monitoring to primary care services. Longer term, ADHD care pathways should be brought into line with those for other common mental health disorders, including treatment initiation by appropriately qualified clinicians in primary care, and referral to secondary mental health or tertiary services for more complex cases. Long-term plans in the NHS for more joined up and flexible provision, using a primary care network approach, could invest in developing shared ADHD specialist resources.ConclusionsThe relegation of adult ADHD diagnosis, treatment and monitoring to specialist tertiary and secondary services is at odds with its high prevalence and chronic course. To enable the cost-effective and at-scale access to ADHD treatment that is needed, general adult mental health and primary care must be empowered to play a key role in the delivery of quality services for adults with ADHD.

BackgroundAbnormal spirometry results are a leading cause of referral to secondary care in the UK. Spirometry performed in GP practices is often supervised by nursing staff and in secondary care...

BackgroundSpirometry is the recommended method of evaluating pulmonary function when respiratory disease is suspected in smokers. Nonetheless, no evidence exists of the usefulness of information obtained from this test as a motivational strategy for smoking cessation. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a motivational intervention based on spirometry results in achieving long-term smoking cessation.Methods/DesignWe propose a multicenter randomized clinical trial in the primary care setting. Study subjects: We will recruit active smokers of both sexes, aged 35-70 years, with a cumulated smoking habit exceeding 10 packs/year and who consult for any reason with their primary care physician in the 20 health centers in the province of Tarragona (Spain). Patients with a history of lung disease or who have undergone exploratory measures of pulmonary function in the preceding 12 months will be excluded. All patients who agree to participate will provide signed informed consent prior to their inclusion. A total of 1000 smokers will be consecutively randomized to a control or intervention group (1:1). Intervention: Participants in both groups will receive brief (5-minute) health counseling, in accordance with usual clinical practice. In a consultation lasting about 15 minutes, participants in the intervention group will also receive detailed, personalized information about the results of a spirometry test and about their lung age compared with their chronological age. Both groups will be followed up for 12 months. Main variables and analysis: The main variable will be sustained smoking abstinence at 12 months after the intervention, as confirmed by CO breath testing and urine cotinine test. Results will be analyzed based on intention to treat, using the chi-square test and logistical regression if necessary to adjust for confounding variables.DiscussionWe expect the rate of prolonged smoking abstinence in the intervention group will be at least 5 % higher than in the control group. If this strategy proves effective, it could easily be included in the health promotion activities offered in primary care settings.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02153047. Registered on 28/05/2014

Background:People diagnosed with cancer following emergency presentation have poorer short-term survival. To what extent this signifies a missed opportunity for earlier diagnosis in primary care remains unclear as little detailed data exist on the patient/general practitioner interaction beforehand.Methods:Analysis of primary care and regional data for 1802 cancer patients from Northeast Scotland. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for patient and GP practice predictors of emergency presentation. Qualitative context coding of primary care interaction before emergency presentation.Results:Emergency presentations equalled 20% (n=365). Twenty-eight per cent had no relevant prior GP contact. Of those with prior GP contact 30% were admitted while waiting to be seen in secondary care, and 19% were missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis. Associated predictors: no prior GP contact (OR=3.89; CI 95% 2.14–7.09); having lung (OR=23.24; 95% CI 7.92–68.21), colorectal (OR=18.49; CI 95% 6.60–51.82) and upper GI cancer (OR=18.97; CI 95% 6.08–59.23); ethnicity (OR=2.78; CI 95% 1.27–6.06).Conclusions:Our novel approach has revealed that emergency cancer presentation is more complex than previously thought. Patient delay, prolonged referral pathways and missed opportunities by GPs all contribute, but emergency presentation can also represent effective care. Resources should be used proportionately to raise public and GP awareness and improve post-referral pathways.