Is prolonged wet cough underdiagnosed and improperly treated in preschool children?
Cough is one of the most common symptoms the children experience at the preschool age, and in most cases, cough associated with viral respiratory infection improves within 2-4 weeks. In preschool-aged children, prolonged cough is usually wet or productive due to mucus secretion. Although prolonged cough no doubt has an influence on the quality-of-life of both the children and families,1 the epidemiology of prolonged or wet cough is poorly known. Sørensen et al2 published in this issue of the journal their interesting findings on recurrent episodic or chronic wet cough in Norwegian preschool-aged children, with a special focus paid on presence of symptoms 5-7 years later. The study subjects were collected retrospectively from electronic files of an academic hospital and comprised patients admitted for chronic or prolonged respiratory symptoms like cough to the outpatient clinic during three years in 2010-2013 at younger than 3 years of age. The design was population-based in that sense that the study subjects, though representing severe cases, lived in a geographically defined area. In 2017-2018, questionnaires were sent to the parents of 840 identified patients, and 348 answered, and 291 cases were accepted for the final analyses.2 These cases were divided after retrospective chart review into two groups, those 171 with recurrent episodic and those 120 with chronic wet cough. The annual age-specific prevalence of recurrent episodic or chronic wet cough, estimated from these figures, was around 1.5% in younger than 3-year-old children. Children with chronic wet cough were younger, and their symptoms deputed earlier compared to those with recurrent episodic wet cough.2 The median age at onset of wet cough was six vs 10 months and on admission 16 vs 22 months, respectively. These figures fit well with those in the available literature.3-5 The symptoms had continued for 8-9 months before admission, which is a long time at this young age of less than 2 years on average. No doubt, such symptomatic time of more than half year decreases the quality-of-life in children and increases mental, social and economic burdens to the families.1 Antibiotics were prescribed to 21.6% of the children during 6 months before or at the first visit, the figure being higher, but only 33.3%, in those with chronic wet cough, compared to 13.3% in those with recurrent episodic wet cough.2 These observations may reflect an avoidance of antibiotic prescription to diminish side effects in children and to restrain emergence of antibiotic resistance, which, of course, are important aspects to be taken into account especially in preschool-aged children.6 Instead, asthma medicines were often used, the figures being 60.8% for beta2-agonists and 47.6% for inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) during the last 6 months before admission, without any substantial differences between the groups.2 The authors summarised that half of the children continued or were prescribed ICSs at the primary visit, although cough without wheezing should not be considered as asthma.2 A substantial proportion of included children were examined by young residents and not by paediatric pulmonologists or other specialists, which may have decreased the adherence to asthma guidelines.2 Obviously, the situation is similar in most teaching hospitals in different countries. At the follow-up at the median age of 6.8 years, over half of the study subjects reported of being without marked symptoms during the last year.2 However, 36.9% of children in the recurrent episodic and 23.5% in the chronic wet cough group had still received beta2-agonists during the last 6 months. The respective figures were 27.2% and 18.6% for the use of inhaled ICSs.2 The figures are rather high, but the design of the study did not allow to evaluate whether there was any over-use of asthma medications. The majority of preschool-aged children with recurrent episodic or chronic wet cough have protracted bacterial bronchitis (PBB), which is a distinct clinical entity defined by the presence of wet or productive cough for at least 4 weeks without evidence of an underlying illness.3, 4 Tracheo- and/or bronchomalacia and gastro-oesophageal reflux are common in young children with PBB5 and do not belong to the exclusion criteria.3 In the currently available guidelines, children with PBB should be treated with rather long antibiotic courses of 2-4 weeks.3, 4 Research-based evidence beyond this recommendation is scarce. Only three randomised controlled trials with varying treatment times have been published on antibiotics in children with wet cough.7 Understandable, many doctors are worried that such courses may lead to unnecessary consumption of antibiotics with known harmful effects. Current concepts on the occurrence, risk factors and outcomes of recurrent and chronic wet or productive cough are based on conclusions of expert panels set by medical societies.3, 4 Before the study of Sørensen et al,2 only short follow-ups of small patient groups were available.8, 9 In addition, clinical experience and the few available studies on PBB come from Australia and some Asian countries, such as China and Turkey.9 Probably, genetic susceptibilities to certain chronic pulmonary diseases, such as bronchiectasis with or without cystic fibrosis, differ between different populations. A whole-population study was done in 2017-2018 among Australian under 7 years old aboriginals, and the prevalence of chronic wet cough was as high as 13%.10 This is the only strictly population-based study made thus far on prolonged or chronic wet cough. The study of Sørensen et al2 is an important start for studies on recurrent or chronic wet cough in European children. The study was retrospective and hospital-based. The next step should be performance of population-based studies with both retrospective and prospective designs covering the whole spectrum of the disease. The treatment with antibiotics for 2-4 weeks has been effective in the selected group of children with PBB, but the challenges for the clinicians are how to recognise those children likely to benefit from treatment and how extensive differential diagnostics is needed before treatment. The author has no conflicts of interest to declare. Matti Korppi
Read more