Pareto Optimal Approach for Contrast Adjustment in Gray Level Images Using IDS Algorithm

Image quality metrics have become more and more popular in the image processing community. However, so far, no one has been able to define an image quality metric well correlated with the percept for overall image quality. One of the causes is that image quality is multi-dimensional and complex. One approach to bridge the gap between perceived and calculated image quality is to reduce the complexity of image quality, by breaking the overall quality into a set of quality attributes. In our research we have presented a set of quality attributes built on existing attributes from the literature. The six proposed quality attributes are: sharpness, color, lightness, artifacts, contrast, and physical. This set keeps the dimensionality to a minimum. An experiment validated the quality attributes as suitable for image quality evaluation. The process of applying image quality metrics to printed images is not straightforward, because image quality metrics require a digital input. A framework has been developed for this process, which includes scanning the print to get a digital copy, image registration, and the application of image quality metrics. With quality attributes for the evaluation of image quality and a framework for applying image quality metrics, a selection of suitable image quality metrics for the different quality attributes has been carried out. Each of the quality attributes has been investigated, and an experimental analysis carried out to find the most suitable image quality metrics for the given quality attributes. For the sharpness attributes the Structural SIMilarity index (SSIM) by Wang et al. (2004) is the the most suitable, and for the other attributes further evaluation is required.

© IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.

Image quality metrics have been widely used in imaging systems to maintain and improve the quality of images being processed and transmitted. Due to the close relationship between image quality perception and the human visual system, the development of image quality metrics has been contributed to by both psychologists and computer scientists. In this paper, three novel image quality metrics are proposed by improving the well-known image quality metric structural similarity index (SSIM). In this new approach, images are not compared directly, but their feature maps are (preprocessing is incorporated to extract the corner, edge and symmetry maps). The similarity measured (by SSIM) between corner, edge and symmetry maps of images being compared is used as an indicator of image quality, and named C SSIM, E SSIM and S SSIM respectively. The experiments show that all the proposed image quality metrics have a better performance than SSIM, and E SSIM has the best performance among them.

Image enhancement is important in different application areas such as medical imaging, computer graphics, and military applications. In this paper, we introduce a dataset with enhanced images. The images have been enhanced by five end users, and these have been evaluated by observers in an online image quality experiment. The enhancement steps by the end users and subjective results are analysed in detail. Furthermore, 38 image quality metrics have been evaluated on the introduced dataset to reveal their suitability to measure image enhancement. The results show that the image quality metrics have low to average performance on the new dataset.

To assess the performance of routine cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) quality assurance (QA) at predicting and diagnosing clinically recognizable linac CBCT image quality issues. Monthly automated linac CBCT image quality QA data were acquired on eight Varian linacs (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) using the CATPHAN 500 series phantom (The Phantom Laboratory, Inc., Greenwich, NY) and Total QA software (Image Owl, Inc., Greenwich, NY) over 34months between July 2014 and May 2017. For each linac, the following image quality metrics were acquired: geometric distortion, spatial resolution, Hounsfield Unit (HU) constancy, uniformity, and noise. Quality control (QC) limits were determined by American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) expert consensus documents Task Group (TG-142 and TG-179) and the manufacturer acceptance testing procedure. Clinically recognizable CBCT issues were extracted from the in-house incident learning system (ILS) and service reports. The sensitivity and specificity of CATPHAN QA at predicting clinically recognizable image quality issues was investigated. Sensitivity was defined as the percentage of clinically recognizable CBCT image quality issues that followed a failing CATPHAN QA. Quality assurance results are categorized as failing if one or more image quality metrics are outside the QC limits. The specificity of CATPHAN QA was defined as one minus the fraction of failing CATPHAN QA results that did not have a clinically recognizable CBCT image quality issue in the subsequent month. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each image quality metric by plotting the true positive rate (TPR) against the false-positive rate (FPR). Over the study period, 18 image quality issues were discovered by clinicians while using CBCT to set up the patient and five were reported prior to x-ray tube repair. The incidents ranged from ring artifacts to uniformity problems. The sensitivity of the TG-142/179 limits was 17% (four of the prior monthly QC tests detected a clinically recognizable image quality issue). The area under the curve (AUC) calculated for each image quality metric ROC curve was: 0.85 for uniformity, 0.66 for spatial resolution, 0.51 for geometric distortion, 0.56 for noise, 0.73 for HU constancy, and 0.59 for contrast resolution. Automated monthly QA is not a good predictor of CBCT image quality issues. Of the available metrics, uniformity has the best predictive performance, but still has a high FPR and low sensitivity. The poor performance of CATPHAN QA as a predictor of image quality problems is partially due to its reliance on region-of-interest (ROI) based algorithms and a lack of a global algorithm such as correlation. The manner in which image quality issues occur (trending toward failure or random) is still not known and should be studied further. CBCT image quality QA should be adapted based on how CBCT is used clinically.

Motion-induced artifact detection has become a fixture in the assessment of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) quality control. However, the effects of other MR image quality (IQ) metrics on intrinsic connectivity brain networks are largely unexplored. Accordingly, we report herein the initial assessment of the effects of a comprehensive list of IQ metrics on resting state networks using a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) approach based on high-order spatial independent component analysis (ICA). Three categories of MR IQ metrics were considered: (1) metrics for artifacts including the AFNI outlier ratio and quality index, framewise displacement, and ghost to signal ratio, (2) metrics for the temporal quality of MRI data including the temporal framewise change in global BOLD signals (DVARS), global correlation of time-series, and temporal signal to noise ratio, (3) metrics for the structural quality of MRI data including the entropy focus criterion, foreground-background energy ratio, full-width half maximum smoothness, and static signal to noise ratio. After FDR-correction for multiple comparisons, results showed significant effects of the static and temporal signal to noise ratios on the spatial map intensities of the basal ganglia, default-mode and cerebellar networks. AFNI outlier ratio, framewise displacement and DVARS exhibited significant effects on the BOLD power spectra of sensorimotor networks. The global correlation of time-series displayed wide-spread modulation of the spectral power in most networks. Further investigations of the effect of IQ metrics on the characteristics of intrinsic connectivity brain networks allow more accurate interpretation of the fMRI results.

For practicing medical physicists, CT image quality assessment is, in general, limited to the ones required by ACR and based on the axial images, such as CT number uniformity, image noise, contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and high contrast resolution. However, with more advanced technologies introduced by CT vendors, just assessing these basic image quality metrics may not be enough. Noise power spectrum (NPS), characterizing the signal noise component at each spatial frequency, is a powerful tool to predict the CT performance related to lesion detectability and noise texture. The quality of coronal and sagittal reformatted images is, in a large part, determined by the slice profile. How to accurately assess the slice profile is important for clinical medical physicists but not well recognized.Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) has been adopted by major CT manufacturers, to maintain image quality across the scan range. The way how ATMC works varies significantly among vendors. A “standard” method is needed to evaluate the performance of this critical dose‐saving and image quality improvement technique. As dual energy CT becomes more readily available for routine clinical use, the need of image quality assessment metrics unique to the dual energy CT mode is becoming urgent.The session will facilitate the discussion of NPS and its application in the evaluation of FBP and iterative reconstruction. This session will also present the methods to measure the slice profile and characterize the performance of ATCM. The last part of this session will focus on the physics of CT dual energy mode, as well as unique image quality metrics to evaluate the performance of the dual energy mode.Learning Objectives: Be familiar with procedures on how to correctly compute CT noise power spectrum Understand why basic image quality metrics used for FBP may not be sufficient to characterize the performance of advanced iterative reconstruction Understand CT slice profile and how to accurately measure it Be familiar with ATCM from major CT vendors and how to evaluate its performance Understand different hardware approaches for dual energy CT Be familiar with image quality metrics relevant to dual energy mode Schmidt: Employee of Siemens HealthcareFan: Employee of GE Healthcare

For image quality assessment, the availability of diverse databases is vital for the development and evaluation of image quality metrics. Existing databases have played an important role in promoting the understanding of various types of distortion and in the evaluation of image quality metrics. However, a comprehensive representation of optical aberrations and their impact on image quality is lacking. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a novel image quality database that focuses on optical aberrations. We conduct a subjective experiment to capture human perceptual responses on a set of images with optical aberrations. We then test the performance of selected objective image quality metrics to assess these aberrations. This approach not only ensures the relevance of our database to real-world scenarios but also contributes to ensuring the performance of the selected image quality metrics. The database is available for download at https: // www. ntnu. edu/ colourlab/ software .

Prior research studies have shown that the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) is the most frequent watermarked image quality metric that is used for determining the levels of strength and weakness of watermarking algorithms. Conversely, normalised cross correlation (NCC) is the most common metric used after attacks were applied to a watermarked image to verify the strength of the algorithm used. Many researchers have used these approaches to evaluate their algorithms. These strategies have been used for a long time, however, which unfortunately limits the value of PSNR and NCC in reflecting the strength and weakness of the watermarking algorithms. This paper considers this issue to determine the threshold values of these two parameters in reflecting the amount of strength and weakness of the watermarking algorithms. We used our novel watermarking technique for embedding four watermarks in intermediate significant bits (ISB) of six image files one-by-one through replacing the image pixels with new pixels and, at the same time, keeping the new pixels very close to the original pixels. This approach gains an improved robustness based on the PSNR and NCC values that were gathered. A neural network model was built that uses the image quality metrics (PSNR and NCC) values obtained from the watermarking of six grey-scale images that use ISB as the desired output and that are trained for each watermarked image’s PSNR and NCC. The neural network predicts the watermarked image’s PSNR together with NCC after the attacks when a portion of the output of the same or different types of image quality metrics (PSNR and NCC) are obtained. The results indicate that the NCC metric fluctuates before the PSNR values deteriorate.

Image quality assessment is still an active field of research. The main objective of the developed image quality metric is to offer an index of quality that is consistent with the human subjective judgment of image quality. Despite the great number of developed metrics, there is still a need for image analysis tools that is able to extract the most perceptual relevant characteristics of an image. The goal of this work is then to propose a more advanced analysis and representation tools to extract more effective features that could be incorporated in the design of the image quality metric. In this paper, we propose a novel objective metric based on wave atoms transform. This new transform is half multiscale and half multi-directional. It offers a better representation of images containing oscillatory patterns and textures than the others known transforms. In this work, we propose a new full reference image quality metric based on wave atom transform and exploiting some properties of the human visual system. The consistency of the proposed metric with subjective evaluation is performed on LIVE database. The obtained correlation of this metric with the MOS provided by the database is better than other known metrics confirming thus the efficiency of this new image quality measure in predicting image quality.

Ultrasound (US) imaging application in medicine and other fields is enormous. It has several advantages over other medical imaging modalities. The use of US in diagnosis is well established because of its noninvasive nature, portable, accurate, low-cost imaging modality, capable of forming real-time imaging and continuing improvement in image quality. Medical images and satellite images are usually degraded by noise during image acquisition and transmission process. It is estimated that 1 out of every form medical diagnostic image studies in the world involves ultrasonic techniques. The objectives of this article are to give an overview of the types of speckle reduction techniques in US imaging, present a new technique of speckle reduction, and carry out a comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering based on image quality metrics. A new speckle suppression method and coherence enhancement of medical US image are proposed: 9 despeckled filtering techniques and 5 edge detection operators, with the result evaluated by image quality metrics. The best edge detection hybrid with best filter, quality evaluation metrics has been found that the proposed method performance better than all other methods, while the structural details and result preserving of small and important image feature that contain diagnostic information in a better way than other despeckling filter.

When an investigator is developing a new image-processing technique or manipulating an image-acquisition technique they are confronted with the question of whether the new technique will improve clinical diagnosis. A first approach is to look at individual physical properties of the image such as image contrast and resolution. Although these properties might be useful, it has long been known that the noise characteristics of the image system need to be taken into consideration to appropriately evaluate the quality of an image whether it will be used to detect, classify, and/ˆ•or estimate a signal (Cunningham and Shaw, 1999). One useful measure of the noise characteristics is the noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) that expresses the image noise in terms of the number of Poisson-distributed input photons per unit area at each spatial frequency (Wagner and Brown, 1985). The NEQ can be thought of as a measure inversely related to the amount of noise as a function of spatial frequency. However, when the diagnostic decision involves a human observer, medical image quality can be defined in terms of human performance in visual tasks that are relevant to clinical diagnosis (Barrett, 1993). In this context, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) studies are the standard method of evaluating the impact of a particular image manipulation on clinical diagnosis. In these studies, the physicians scrutinize a set of medical images (under the different image-acquisition or processing conditions) and rate their confidence about the presence of the lesion. The investigator infers from these ratings a measure of performance known as the area under the ROC curve. Often, the number of possible conditions is large and ROC studies become time consuming and costly because they require a large number of human observations. Other times, the investigator might want to optimize a parameter or a set of parameters. In such cases, the number of conditions suffers a combinatorial explosion, and therefore ROC studies become unfeasible. Thus it is desirable to develop a metric of image quality that could be used for fast evaluation and optimization of image quality but also would have the predictive power of ROC studies. Computer-model observers are algorithms that attempt to predict human visual performance in noisy images and might represent the desired metric of image quality when the diagnostic decision involves a human observer and a visual task. Development of models to predict human visual signal detection in noise goes back to work by Rose (1948) who studied the detectability of a flat-topped disk embedded in white noise (see Burgess, 1999a, for a review). In the last two decades, many studies have concentrated on finding a model observer that can predict human performance across many types of synthetic backgrounds. More recently, model observers have been applied to real medical-image backgrounds. The hope is that eventually model observers will become common metrics of task-based image quality for evaluation of medical-image quality as well as optimization of imaging systems.

Ground-based solar observations are severely affected by Earth’s turbulent atmosphere. As a consequence, observed image quality and prevailing seeing conditions are closely related. Partial correction of image degradation is nowadays provided in real time by adaptive optics (AO) systems. In this study, different metrics of image quality are compared with parameters characterizing the prevailing seeing conditions, i.e. Median Filter Gradient Similarity (MFGS), Median Filter Laplacian Similarity (MFLS), Helmli–Scherer mean, granular rms-contrast, differential image motion, and Fried-parameter \(r_{0}\). The quiet-Sun observations at disk center were carried out at the Vacuum Tower Telescope (VTT), Observatorio del Teide (OT), Izaña, Tenerife, Spain. In July and August 2016, time series of short-exposure images were recorded with the High-resolution Fast Imager (HiFI) at various wavelengths in the visible and near-infrared parts of the spectrum. Correlation analysis yields the wavelength dependence of the image quality metrics and seeing parameters, and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) is employed to characterize the seeing on a particular observing day. In addition, the image quality metrics and seeing parameters are used to determine the field dependence of the correction provided by the AO system. Management of high-resolution imaging data from large-aperture, ground-based telescopes demands reliable image quality metrics and meaningful characterization of prevailing seeing conditions and AO performance. The present study offers guidance on how retrieving such information ex post facto.

To investigate the repeatability of a combined Dual-Scheimpflug placido disc corneal tomographer/topographer (Ziemer Galilei G4) with respect to keratometric indices used to monitor progression of keratoconus (KCN). Patients with KCN were prospectively enrolled. For each eye lacking history of corneal surgery, 5 measurements were taken in succession. Eyes in which 3 or more measurements could be obtained (defined by the device's 4 image quality metrics) were included in the analysis. The repeatability limits (RL) and interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for various parameters. Thirty-two eyes from 25 patients met all image quality metrics, and 54 eyes from 38 patients met at least 3/4 criteria (all except the placido image quality metric). RLs for key parameters when 4/4 or ≥3/4 image quality metrics were met included: 0.37 and 0.77 diopters (D) for steep simulated keratometry, 0.79 and 1.65 D for maximum keratometry, 13.80 and 13.88 degrees for astigmatism axis, 0.64 and 0.56µm for vertical coma magnitude, and 3.76 and 3.84µm for thinnest pachymetry, respectively. The ICCs for all parameters were excellent (above 0.87) except for spherical aberration (0.77), which was still considered good. The dual-Scheimpflug placido disc corneal tomographer/topographer is highly repeatable in quantifying parameters used in monitoring KCN. Excellent placido images are difficult to capture in eyes with KCN, but when available, increase the reliability of the measurements. When clinicians find that a topographic index changes by more than the RLs defined herein, they can have confidence that this represents real change and may appropriately recommend interventions such as corneal cross-linking or intrastromal corneal ring segments.

Ultrasound image quality is of utmost importance for a clinician to reach a correct diagnosis. Conventionally, image quality is evaluated using metrics to determine the contrast and resolution. These metrics require localization of specific regions and targets in the image such as a region of interest (ROI), a background region, and/or a point scatterer. Such objects can all be difficult to identify in in-vivo images, especially for automatic evaluation of image quality in large amounts of data. Using a matrix array probe, we have recorded a Very Large cardiac Channel data Database (VLCD) to evaluate coherence as an in vivo image quality metric. The VLCD consists of 33280 individual image frames from 538 recordings of 106 patients. We also introduce a global image coherence (GIC), an in vivo image quality metric that does not require any identified ROI since it is defined as an average coherence value calculated from all the data pixels used to form the image, below a preselected range. The GIC is shown to be a quantitative metric for in vivo image quality when applied to the VLCD. We demonstrate, on a subset of the dataset, that the GIC correlates well with the conventional metrics contrast ratio (CR) and the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) with R = 0.74 ( ) and R = 0.62 ( ), respectively. There exist multiple methods to estimate the coherence of the received signal across the ultrasound array. We further show that all coherence measures investigated in this study are highly correlated ( 0.9 and ) when applied to the VLCD. Thus, even though there are differences in the implementation of coherence measures, all quantify the similarity of the signal across the array and can be averaged into a GIC to evaluate image quality automatically and quantitatively.