• Home
  • Search
  • Particle-matrix debonding with Strength-Differential effects
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2023.105078Copy DOI Icon

Particle-matrix debonding with Strength-Differential effects

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

In this work the onset of failure caused by particle-matrix debonding in aluminum alloy 2090-T3 and magnesium alloy AZ31 under either overall uniaxial plane strain tension or compression load is studied numerically using a unit cell model. Especially for magnesium AZ31, experiments show a significant difference in the tensile-compressive yield stresses, the so-called Strength-Differential-effect (SD-effect). This SD-effect cannot be captured by any isotropic yield function and only by recent anisotropic yield functions. To accurately model AA 2090-T3 and magnesium AZ31 the general yield function by Yoon et al. (2014) is adopted in addition to the isotropic von Mises plasticity yield function and the anisotropic yield function of Hill (1948). The numerically predicted strain at which void nucleation initiates is generally found to be larger for magnesium AZ31 than for AA 2090-T3. However, depending on the orientation of the principal axes of plastic anisotropy this void nucleation strain varies significantly. This holds true for both materials, but the void nucleation strain of AA 2090-T3 in compression is numerically predicted to be practically identical whether or not isotropic or anisotropic plasticity is considered. In tension the void nucleation strain of AA 2090-T3 based on anisotropic plasticity is found to be more than double the strain obtained by von Mises plasticity. The numerically predicted void nucleation strain of magnesium AZ31 is significantly affected by the yield function adopted. For the von Mises yield function the value of the void nucleation strain is in between the predictions based on the anisotropic yield functions. For both tension and compression, the yield function of Yoon et al. (2014) results in the largest void nucleation strain, whereas the yield function of Hill results in the smallest strain value. This holds true for all five orientations of the principal axes of plastic anisotropy investigated.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations24

A generalized, computationally versatile plasticity model framework - Part II: Theory and verification focusing on shear anisotropy

  • Oct 28, 2024
  • International Journal of Plasticity
  • Yong Hou +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations130

Effect of anisotropic yield functions on the accuracy of hole expansion simulations

  • Nov 19, 2010
  • Journal of Materials Processing Technology
  • Toshihiko Kuwabara +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

Modeling of Anisotropic Deformation in Superplastic Sheet Metal Stretching

  • Jan 01, 2005
  • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
  • Fadi K Abu-Farha +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations58

On the implementation of rate-independent standard dissipative solids at finite strain – Variational constitutive updates

  • Aug 03, 2009
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • J Mosler +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations9

On the Parameter Identification of Polynomial Anisotropic Yield Functions

  • Mar 08, 2016
  • Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering
  • Wei Tong
  • Research Article
  • Citations62

An analysis of inclusion morphology effects on void nucleation

  • Feb 13, 2002
  • Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
  • M N Shabrov +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

A new macroscopically anisotropic pressure dependent yield function for metal matrix composite based on strain gradient plasticity for the microstructure

  • Jan 05, 2013
  • Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
  • Reza Azizi +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

Hole expansion simulation of high strength steel sheet

  • Apr 01, 2010
  • International Journal of Material Forming
  • K Hashimoto +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Extrapolation and Ce‐based implicit integration of anisotropic constitutive behavior

  • Mar 24, 2021
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
  • Pedro Areias +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Modeling of aluminum alloy sheets based on new anisotropic yield functions

  • Jun 15, 2006
  • Journal of Materials Processing Technology
  • J.W Yoon +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations60

Applications of a new plane stress yield function to orthotropic steel and aluminium sheet metals

  • Mar 12, 2004
  • Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
  • Holger Aretz
  • Research Article

Effect of crystallographic orientation in modelling of anisotropic plasticity with an analytical yield function

  • Nov 01, 2019
  • PAMM
  • Selina Neuhaus +3
  • Book Chapter

Finite Element Analysis of Plastic Yielding at a Circular Hole in a Laminated Composite Plate Based on Refined Plate Theory

  • Jan 01, 1995
  • Tasneem Pervez
  • Research Article

Prediction of forming limit diagram using Marciniak–Kuczynski and Swift-Hill models via yield criteria for TRIP800

  • Oct 02, 2015
  • Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies
  • Fahrettin Ozturk
  • Research Article
  • Citations221

Forming of AA5182-O and AA5754-O at elevated temperatures using coupled thermo-mechanical finite element models

  • Nov 28, 2006
  • International Journal of Plasticity
  • Nader Abedrabbo +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.