Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Dialyzability of Gadoquatrane in Patients With Impaired Renal Function

Dalfampridine extended release tablets (D-ER; prolonged-release fampridine in Europe) are available to improve walking in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). D-ER is mainly renally eliminated; the approved 10-mg twice daily dose is contraindicated in the United States in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. This study evaluated single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of a 7.5-mg dose of D-ER in healthy subjects (n = 13) and subjects with mild (n = 17) and moderate (n = 12) renal impairment. D-ER plasma concentrations were consistently higher in subjects with renal impairment relative to healthy individuals with a significant (P < .0001) inverse linear relationship between creatinine clearance and drug exposure. Steady-state AUC0–12 among healthy subjects, 167.0 ± 55.3 ng h/mL, increased 74% and 151% with mild and moderate renal impairment, respectively. The overall incidence of adverse events was 61.5%, 47.1%, and 33.3% in healthy subjects, and subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment, respectively, and for treatment-related adverse events the rates were 0%, 17.6%, and 8.3%, respectively. The most common adverse events were headache, dizziness, and arthralgia. The pharmacokinetics of D-ER 7.5-mg twice daily in subjects with mild renal impairment was comparable to 10-mg twice daily in patients with MS who had normal renal function. Exposure was significantly higher in moderate renal impairment.

HIV infection is a multiorgan disease with the kidney not spared. A variety of renal syndromes with varying clinical presentations has been reported amongst HIV infected patients. This study aims to highlight the spectrum of clinical presentations in HIV infected patients with renal disease. HIV infected patients presenting at University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH) Benin City were the study population. A total of 383 patients were studied. Their biodata, clinical presentations and laboratory investigations including serum urea, creatinine and albumin, urine protein and creatinine were assessed. Their glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and protein urine excretion were calculated using six equations of modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and protein: creatinine ratio respectively. Patients were stratified according to their renal functions into normal, mild, moderate and severe renal function impairment. The data was analysed using statistical software program SPSS Vs 15.0. 53.3% of 383 patients screened had renal function impairment, 40.2% mild, 37.7% moderate and 22.2% severe impairment. Mean age was 35.6±8.3, 36.0±9.9 and 36.3±8.3 years for mild, moderate and severe renal function impairment (RFI) respectively. Easy fatigability was the commonest symptoms occurring in 47.5%, 30.0%, 37.5% and 22.5% of control, mild RFI, moderate RFI and severe RFI subjects respectively (p = 0.568). Oliguria, facial and body swelling occurred more in patients with RFI especially in patients with severe renal impairment. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.046, 0.041, and 0.033 respectively). Pallor was the commonest clinical sign occurring in 32.5%, 50.0%, 35.0% and 62.5% of control and patients with mild, moderate, and severe RFI respectively; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.459). Ascites, facial puffiness and pedal oedema were commoner in patients with RFI especially those with severe RFI. The differences were statistically significant. (p = 0.048, 0.019, and 0.008 respectively). In conclusion spectrum of clinical presentations in HIV patients with renal impairment are many but few are specific to these patients.

Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Empagliflozin, a Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Purpose: To examine temporal trends in treatment and mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) depending on renal function at presentation. Methods: We studied 12087 patients admitted for MI to a coronary care unit from 1985 to 2008. In line with the Kidney Foundation practice guidelines patients were categorized into normal renal function (eGFR >90 ml/min), mild (60-89), moderate (30-59), and severe renal impairment (<30). A total of 8648 (72%) of the 12087 patients had mild to severe renal impairment. Results: Use of evidence-based care increased over time in all four groups according to renal function. Mortality rates fell over the period. Adjusted 30-day mortality fell (adjusted odds [2000-2008 vs. 1985-1990] 0.30 [95% CI 0.16-0.58] in patients with severe renal impairment, and 0.18 [95% CI 0.09-0.37] in those without renal impairment). Adjusted 10-year mortality improved similarly. There was no significant interaction between renal function and decade of admission. Overall, median survival was 20, 16, 8 and 1.6 years for patients with normal renal function, mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. ![Figure][1] Conclusions: During the past 25 years, treatment of patients with an MI improved substantially with a concomitant decline in both short- and long-term mortality that was similar for all stages of renal function, however, prognosis remains poor after severe renal impairment. [1]: pending:yes

The effect of renal impairment on colchicine pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been studied previously. We evaluated the effect of renal impairment on colchicine pharmacokinetics in patients with CKD. The pharmacokinetics and safety of a single, oral 0.6-mg dose of colchicine was evaluated in an open-label study in eight healthy subjects with normal renal function; eight subjects each with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; and eight subjects with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received a single dose prior to receiving, and again following, hemodialysis. Colchicine exposure was similar for subjects with normal renal function, mild impairment, or ESRD prior to and during hemodialysis (24.7-31.7 ng·h/mL), but was up to twofold higher in subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment (48.9 and 48.0 ng·h/mL, respectively). A very small amount of the colchicine dose (mean of 5.2 %) was recovered in dialysate. It appears that patients with mild or moderate renal impairment or those actively receiving hemodialysis do not show accumulation of colchicine, whereas those with severe renal impairment show a doubling of exposure. All patients with renal impairment taking colchicine should be closely monitored, especially as many patients taking colchicine often have other comorbidities and may be taking other medications.

Sugammadex rapidly reverses moderate and deep rocuronium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade at doses of 4 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg, respectively. Sugammadex is renally eliminated. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of sugammadex in subjects with renal impairment versus those with normal renal function. This open-label, two-part, phase 1 study included adults with moderate (creatinine clearance (CLcr) 30 - <50 mL/min) and severe (CLcr <30 mL/min) renal impairment and healthy controls (CLcr ≥80 mL/min). A single intravenous (IV) bolus injection of sugammadex 4 mg/kg was administered into a peripheral vein over 10 seconds directly by straight needle in part 1 (n = 24; 8/group), and via an IV catheter followed by a saline flush in part 2 (n = 18; 6/group). Plasma concentrations of sugammadex were collected after drug administration. Due to dosing issues in part 1, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for part 2 only. Safety was assessed throughout the study. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 18 subjects. Mean sugammadex exposure (AUC0-∞) in subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment was 2.42- and 5.42-times, respectively, that of healthy controls. Clearance decreased and apparent terminal half-life was prolonged with increasing renal dysfunction. Similar Cmax values were observed in subjects with renal impairment and healthy controls. There were no serious adverse events. Sugammadex exposure is increased in subjects with moderate and severe renal insufficiency due to progressively decreased clearance as a function of worsening renal function. Sugammadex 4 mg/kg was well tolerated in subjects with renal impairment, with a safety profile similar to that of healthy subjects. These results indicate that dose adjustment of sugammadex is not required in patients with moderate renal impairment; however, current safety experience is insufficient to support the use of sugammadex in patients with CLcr <30 mL/min. .

Nacubactam is a novel bicyclic non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor that acts as a penicillin-binding protein (PBP-2) active antibacterial, almost exclusively cleared by renal excretion. This study assessed the effect of renal function and hemodialysis on nacubactam pharmacokinetics following a single intravenous (IV) 1 g infusion. Part 1 included three subjects with normal renal function, and six each with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; Part 2 included eight subjects with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. We observed a strong linear relationship between renal function and both nacubactam total clearance and renal clearance. Compared with subjects with normal renal function, mean nacubactam total clearance was 49%, 73%, and 85% lower among subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively, and renal clearance was 42%, 70%, and 90% lower. Nacubactam systemic exposure was correspondingly greater in subjects with impaired renal function. Compared with the normal renal function group, AUC0-inf was 2-fold, 3.7-fold, and 6.6-fold higher in the mild, moderate, and severe impairment groups, respectively. Similar results were observed across four different methods of estimating renal clearance. Nacubactam was cleared by hemodialysis, with more than 60% of a single dose eliminated during a 4-h dialysis session. Renal impairment had no apparent effect on the safety profile of nacubactam, and a single 1 g dose was well tolerated in all groups. These data can be used to underwrite nacubactam dosing recommendations for patients with impaired renal function, including those receiving renal replacement therapy.CLINICAL TRIALSThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02975388.

In the phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial (NCT02070757), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) was noninferior to meropenem for treatment of Gram-negative ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (vHABP/VABP). Here, we report outcomes in participants from ASPECT-NP with renal impairment (RI). Participants were categorized by their baseline renal function as follows: normal renal function (NRF; creatinine clearance [CLCR], ≥80 ml/min), mild RI (CLCR, >50 to <80 ml/min), moderate RI (CLCR, ≥30 to ≤50 ml/min), and severe RI (CLCR, ≥15 to <30 ml/min). Dosing of both study drugs was adjusted based on renal function. The following C/T doses were administered every 8 h: NRF or mild RI, 3 g; moderate RI, 1.5 g; and severe RI, 0.75 g. The primary and key secondary endpoints were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM) and clinical response at the test-of-cure visit in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, respectively. In the ITT population, day 28 ACM rates for the C/T arm versus the meropenem arm were 17.6% versus 19.1% (NRF), 36.6% versus 28.6% (mild RI), 31.4% versus 38.5% (moderate RI), and 35.3% versus 61.9% (severe RI). Rates of clinical cure in the ITT population for the C/T arm versus the meropenem arm were 58.1% versus 58.5% (NRF), 54.9% versus 45.5% (mild RI), 37.1% versus 42.3% (moderate RI), and 41.2% versus 47.6% (severe RI). Small sample sizes in the RI groups resulted in large 95% confidence intervals (CIs), limiting conclusive interpretation of the analysis. Both drugs were well tolerated across all renal function groups. Overall, these results support the use of the study dosing regimens of C/T for treatment of vHABP/VABP in patients with RI. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02070757.).

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed to describe plasma concentrations of mirogabalin and lactam metabolite, obtained following a single oral dose of 5 mg mirogabalin to subjects with varying degrees of renal function.A 2-compartment model was used for both mirogabalin and lactam metabolite. Body weight was a significant covariate on volume of distribution of mirogabalin and lactam metabolite, whereas creatinine clearance significantly affected both renal and nonrenal clearance of mirogabalin. The total clearance of mirogabalin was decreased by 25%, 54%, and 76% in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively, relative to normal controls. Simulation results showed that in comparison with the normal renal function group receiving mirogabalin 15 mg once or twice daily, dose reduction by 50% or 75% in subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment would produce similar AUCss values, but 37%-43% or 28%-32% lower Cmax,ss of mirogabalin. Predicted mirogabalin AUCss was 26% higher, whereas Cmax,ss was similar in subjects with mild renal impairment compared with those having normal renal function taking the same dose. Results support a dose reduction by 50% or 75% in subjects with moderate or severe renal impairment. No dose adjustment seemed necessary for subjects with mild renal impairment.

To investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of PD 0200390 in healthy subjects and subjects with renal impairment (RI) and to examine the relationship between oral and renal PD 0200390 clearance and estimated creatinine clearance (CLcr). In this open-label study, 26 subjects were categorized into four groups based on renal function: no RI (CLcr >80 ml min(-1); n= 6); mild RI (CLcr 51 to < or =80 ml min(-1); n= 6); moderate RI (CLcr >30 to 50 ml min(-1); n= 6); and severe RI (CLcr < or =30 ml min(-1); n= 8). Subjects received a single, oral dose of PD 0200390 25 mg. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma and urine concentration-time data. PD 0200390 was rapidly absorbed; mean time to maximum plasma concentration was 1.66-3.24 h. Mean half-life in subjects with normal renal function was 5.36 h, and increased with worsening RI. Oral (CL/F) and renal (CL(R)) clearance rates decreased with deteriorating renal function, whereas area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) values increased by 56, 117 and 436% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe RI, respectively, indicating increased PD 0200390 exposure. Regression analysis demonstrated that CL/F and CL(R) correlated with CLcr (r= 0.953 and 0.961, respectively). PD 0200390 was well tolerated in subjects with mild, moderate or no RI. The most common adverse events were somnolence, dizziness and headache; these occurred with greatest intensity in the severe RI group. PD 0200390 pharmacokinetic parameters (CL/F, CL(R) and AUC(0-infinity)) vary predictably with decreases in renal function; therefore dose adjustment may be required in individuals with RI.

Purpose: This open-label, nonrandomized, parallel-group study was conducted to explore the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of maraviroc in renally impaired subjects.Methods: Subjects with normal renal function; mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n = 6 per group) were enrolled. Subjects with normal function (period 1), severe impairment, and ESRD received a single 300 mg dose of maraviroc. Subjects with normal function (period 2), mild impairment, and moderate impairment received 150 mg for 7 days at adjusted intervals of twice daily, once daily, and every 48 hours, respectively, with saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/r). Maraviroc was quantified in plasma, urine, and dialysate by tandem high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.Results: With SQV/r, geometric mean steady-state maraviroc area under the plasma concentration-time curve for the dosing interval (AUCtau) was 5,341 (coefficient of variation [CV], 27%), 8,119 (35%), and 6,193 (27%) h•ng/mL, in normal function, mild, and moderate impairment groups, respectively. Without SQV/r, 2% to 3% of the maraviroc dose was recovered in urine versus 15% to 25% of steady-state dose when given with SQV/r. Moderate to high intersubject variability in exposure was noted. AUC from zero to infinity (AUCinf) was similar to historical single-dose data in subjects with ESRD: low in those with normal function, and high in those with severe impairment. Dialysis did not influence maraviroc exposure. Maraviroc was well tolerated.Conclusions: The data suggest that no dosing interval adjustments are required in subjects with renal impairment when maraviroc is administered alone. However, maraviroc dosing intervaladjustment is warranted in renally impaired patients receiving potent CYP3A4 inhibitors. Reference to local prescribing information is recommended, because dose recommendations in renally impaired patients may differ between regions.

Background and aimChronic kidney disease (CKD) is frequent in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and therapeutic management of diabetes is more challenging in patients with renal impairment (RI). The place of metformin is of particular interest since most scientific societies now recommend using half the dosage in moderate RI and abstaining from use in severe RI, while the classic contraindication with RI has not been removed from the label. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic management, in particular the use of metformin, of T2DM patients with CKD in real life.MethodsThis was a French cross-sectional observational study: 3,704 patients with T2DM diagnosed for over 1 year and pharmacologically treated were recruited in two cohorts (two-thirds were considered to have renal disease [CKD patients] and one-third were not [non-CKD patients]) by 968 physicians (81% general practitioners) in 2012.ResultsCKD versus non-CKD patients were significantly older with longer diabetes history, more diabetic complications, and less strict glycemic control (mean glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.5% versus 7.1%; 25% of CKD patients had HbA1c ≥8% versus 15% of non-CKD patients). Fifteen percent of CKD patients had severe RI, and 66% moderate RI. Therapeutic management of T2DM was clearly distinct in CKD, with less use of metformin (62% versus 86%) but at similar mean daily doses (~2 g/d). Of patients with severe RI, 33% were still treated with metformin, at similar doses. For other oral anti-diabetics, a distinct pattern of use was seen across renal function (RF): use of sulfonylureas (32%, 31%, and 20% in normal RF, moderate RI, and severe RI, respectively) and DPP4-i (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) (41%, 36%, and 25%, respectively) decreased with RF, while that of glinides increased (8%, 14%, and 18%, respectively). CKD patients were more frequently treated with insulin (40% versus 16% of non-CKD patients), and use of insulin increased with deterioration of RF (19%, 39%, and 61% of patients with normal RF, moderate RI, and severe RI, respectively). Treatment was modified at the end of the study-visit in 34% of CKD patients, primarily to stop or reduce metformin. However, metformin was stopped in only 40% of the severe RI patients.ConclusionDespite a fairly good detection of CKD in patients with T2DM, RI was insufficiently taken into account for adjusting anti-diabetic treatment.

Linagliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor with a primarily nonrenal route of excretion. Consequently, renal impairment should not substantially affect drug exposure. This analysis was undertaken to compare steady-state trough concentrations of linagliptin among patients with type-2 diabetes receiving linagliptin 5 mg in phase 3 studies. Data were pooled from 3 randomized studies from the global phase 3 program of linagliptin (5 mg daily in each) in patients with type-2 diabetes. These studies were selected for their inclusion of pharmacokinetic data. Linagliptin plasma concentrations were available for 969 patients who were determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate to have normal renal function (n = 438), mild renal impairment (RI) (n = 429), moderate RI (n = 44), or severe RI (n = 58). In patients with normal renal function, the geometric mean linagliptin trough concentration (coefficient of variation) was 5.93 nmol/L (56.3%); in patients with mild, moderate, or severe RI, geometric mean concentrations were 6.07 nmol/L (62.9%), 7.34 nmol/L (58.6%), and 8.13 nmol/L (49.8%), respectively. In patients with type-2 diabetes, RI had a minor effect on linagliptin exposure. Therefore, neither dose-adjustment nor drug-related monitoring of estimated glomerular filtration rate is necessary for patients with RI.

IntroductionThe direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban is partially eliminated by the kidneys but is still prescribed at fixed doses without therapeutic drug monitoring across varying levels of renal function. If apixaban accumulates due to renal impairment, this may translate into safety concerns, e.g. the risk for bleeding. The purpose of this study was to measure apixaban trough concentrations in patients with different stages of renal function/renal impairment. MethodsApixaban trough concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS in patients with atrial fibrillation, having normal renal function (apixaban 5 mg BID, n=39), moderate renal impairment (apixaban 5 mg BID, n=40) and severe renal impairment (apixaban 2.5 mg BID, n=6). The median (min-max) relative eGFR values were 84.8 (71.7–111.4), 51.4 (31.3–67.2) and 23.0 (21.9–28.4) mL/min/1.73 m², in the three groups, respectively. ResultsPatients with moderate renal impairment had significantly higher apixaban trough concentrations than patients with normal renal function. The median (min-max) trough concentrations were 59.8 ng/mL (15.5–170.9) for normal renal function, 128.9 ng/mL (41.4–295.4) for moderate renal impairment and 81.7 ng/mL (61.8–109.0) for severe renal impairment. The trough concentrations correlated significantly with renal function measured as relative/absolute eGFR creatinine/cystatin C. ConclusionsThe standard dosing regimen of 5 mg apixaban BID renders exposure that is roughly twice as high in patients with moderately reduced renal function compared to patients with normal renal function. We suggest that patients with moderately reduced renal function ought to be monitored. Possibly, a dose reduction may be considered to achieve similar exposure as in patients with normal renal function.

IntroductionCeftolozane/tazobactam is an antibacterial agent with potent in vitro activity against Gram-negative pathogens, including many extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Because ceftolozane/tazobactam is primarily excreted renally, appropriate dose adjustments are needed for patients with renal impairment. Monte Carlo simulations were used to determine the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment for patients with varying degrees of renal function, including augmented renal clearance (ARC) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with hemodialysis.MethodsMonte Carlo simulations were conducted for 1000 patients with ARC and normal renal function, mild renal impairment, moderate renal impairment, or severe renal impairment, and for 5000 patients with ESRD. Simulated dosing regimens were based on approved doses for each renal function category. Attainment targets for ceftolozane were 24.8% (bacteriostasis), 32.2% (1-log kill; bactericidal), and 40% (2-log kill) fT > minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The target for tazobactam was to achieve a 20% fT > minimum effective concentration (MEC) at an MEC of 1 mg/L, which was derived from a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model and was confirmed by efficacy data from clinical studies for complicated intraabdominal infections and complicated urinary tract infections.ResultsIn patients with ARC or normal renal function, ≥91% achieved bactericidal activity (32.2% fT > MIC) up to an MIC of 4 mg/L with a 1000-mg ceftolozane dose. In patients with renal impairment (mild, moderate, severe, ESRD), ≥93% achieved bactericidal activity up to an MIC of 8 mg/L. In patients of all renal function categories, the approved dosing regimens of tazobactam achieved ≥91% target attainment against a target of 20% fT > MEC.ConclusionsAt the approved dosing regimens for ceftolozane/tazobactam, ≥91% of patients in all renal function categories, including ARC (up to 200 mL/min) and ESRD, reached target attainment for bactericidal activity at MICs that correspond to susceptibility breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.