• Home
  • Search
  • Physics-Aware Learning for Environmental Systems: Surrogate Modeling and Constraint-Driven Machine Intelligence
  • https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu26-3804Copy DOI Icon

Physics-Aware Learning for Environmental Systems: Surrogate Modeling and Constraint-Driven Machine Intelligence

  • Mar 13, 2026
  • Sergey Oladyshkin
Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Understanding and predicting complex environmental and hydrosystem processes is a central challenge in Earth system science. These systems are governed by interacting physical mechanisms across scales, are only partially observed, and are often characterized by limited data and substantial uncertainty. As a result, machine learning (ML) has emerged along two complementary development paths for environmental modeling.In a first branch, physical process models remain the backbone of simulation, while ML is employed as a surrogate to approximate expensive numerical solvers. Surrogate modeling approaches based on Gaussian process emulators, polynomial chaos expansions, support vector regression, and related probabilistic representations are particularly well suited for data-poor settings. Neural networks are used more selectively in this context, as uncertainty-aware and sample-efficient methods are often preferred. In surrogate modeling, considerable effort is devoted to optimal sampling strategies, including active learning, which adaptively select informative simulations and help preserve scarce computational resources. These surrogate models enable efficient uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, and Bayesian inference, while preserving physical interpretability.A second, increasingly important branch emerges when physical models are incomplete, unavailable, or deliberately omitted, and ML models replace the governing equations altogether. This branch is most commonly based on neural network representations, but has recently also been explored using Gaussian processes and polynomial chaos–based learning concepts. In this setting, purely data-driven learning is insufficient, as unconstrained models tend to violate physical principles and extrapolate poorly. In this second branch, physical principles such as conservation laws or balance relations are embedded directly into learning architectures. Complementarily, constraint-driven learning strategies enforce physical laws, admissibility conditions, and structural consistency during training. By restricting the hypothesis space, these methods stabilize learning and support robust inference under incomplete physical knowledge.Taken together, surrogate modeling for physics-based simulations and physics-aware ML for equation-free learning represent two coherent and complementary branches of modern environmental machine learning. We observe a growing convergence between these two branches, as physics-based surrogate modeling and equation-free machine learning increasingly borrow concepts from each other. This convergence is not accidental, but a direct response to fundamental model limitations and the challenge of making reliable predictions under scarce data and knowledge constraints. By integrating physics, probabilistic reasoning and constraints, emerging approaches increasingly focus on robustness and interpretability rather than unconstrained expressive power.

Similar Papers
  • Conference Article

Predicting Transient Soot Emissions in Diesel Engines Using Physical and Machine Learning Models

  • Nov 03, 2025
  • SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series
  • Takahiro Kitamura +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations36

Hybrid systems using residual modeling for sea surface temperature forecasting

  • Jan 11, 2022
  • Scientific Reports
  • Paulo S G De Mattos Neto +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations26

Stream Temperature Predictions for River Basin Management in the Pacific Northwest and Mid-Atlantic Regions Using Machine Learning

  • Mar 24, 2022
  • Water
  • Helen Weierbach +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Forecasting of meteorological drought using ensemble and machine learning models

  • Sep 11, 2024
  • Environmental Sciences Europe
  • Chaitanya Baliram Pande +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

The application of support vector regression and virtual sample generation technique in the optimization design of transonic compressor

  • Aug 18, 2022
  • Aerospace Science and Technology
  • Handuo Hu +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations65

Surrogate models based on machine learning methods for parameter estimation of left ventricular myocardium.

  • Jan 13, 2021
  • Royal Society open science
  • Li Cai +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Adaptive AI-based surrogate modelling via transfer learning for DEM simulation of multi-component segregation

  • Nov 06, 2024
  • Scientific Reports
  • Ahmed Hadi +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Comparison of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models Performance in predicting wind energy

  • Jul 21, 2025
  • EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web
  • Saswati Rakshit +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations21

Rapid CFD Prediction Based on Machine Learning Surrogate Model in Built Environment: A Review

  • Jul 28, 2025
  • Fluids
  • Rui Mao +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

A numerical comparison of simplified Galerkin and machine learning reduced order models for vaginal deformations

  • Oct 25, 2023
  • Computers & Mathematics with Applications
  • William Snyder +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Refining Fuel Composition of RP-3 Chemical Surrogate Models by Reactive Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning

  • Aug 25, 2020
  • Energy & Fuels
  • Song Han +5
  • Conference Article

Polynomial chaos within the frame of non-destructive testing

  • Aug 28, 2021
  • Charles Boulitrop +2
  • Book Chapter

Fast flood modelling after dike breaches: Machine learning or conceptual models?

  • Apr 28, 2025
  • Leon S Besseling +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations20

Surrogate modelling of VLE: Integrating machine learning with thermodynamic constraints

  • Sep 17, 2020
  • Chemical Engineering Science: X
  • Andres Carranza-Abaid +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations41

A data-driven surrogate model to rapidly predict microstructure morphology during physical vapor deposition

  • Jul 10, 2020
  • Applied Mathematical Modelling
  • Elizabeth Herman +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.