• Home
  • Search
  • Predicting Positive Repeat Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Key Parameters and Optimal Algorithms.
  • Cite Icon2
  • https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237607.61Copy DOI Icon

Predicting Positive Repeat Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Key Parameters and Optimal Algorithms.

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Innovative strategies are necessary to enhance prostate cancer diagnosis whilst reducing unnecessary and invasive repeat biopsies. This study aimed to determine the significant parameters affecting repeat prostate biopsy outcomes and develop an optimal machine learning algorithm for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy results. We analysed data from 174 men who underwent repeated prostate biopsies between January 2008 and December 2022. Systematic multiple-core, ultrasound-targeted prostate biopsies were performed, each two samples from prostatic transitional zone and peripheral zone were obtained bilaterally. Clinical characteristics were collected, including patients' age, initial prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, free PSA (fPSA)/PSA ratio, biopsy core numbers, pathological result; The time interval between first and latest prostate biopsy; Latest PSA level, fPSA/PSA ratio, biopsy core numbers; And final pathological diagnosis. Six feature selection methods, namely, variable ranking, correlation matrix, random forest regression, recursive feature elimination, cross-validation and forward selection, were employed to identify key influencing factors for repeat biopsy outcomes. Subsequently, the performance of seven machine learning algorithms, namely, multivariable logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbour search (KNN), support vector classification (SVC), decision tree (DT), random forest classifier (RF), naïve Bayes classifier (NBC) and gradient booster tree (GB), was assessed based on accuracy, misclassification, recall, specificity, precision and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). About 70% of patients were used as the training dataset, meanwhile remaining 30% as validation dataset. 52 were ultimately diagnosed with prostate cancer following the final pathological examination. The remaining 122 patients were negative. Amongst six feature selection methods, the variable ranking emerged as the most effective method for identifying the essential factors influencing repeat biopsy results. Amongst the machine learning algorithms, SVC demonstrated superior accuracy (0.7365), low recall rate (0.2500) and low misclassification rate (0.2093) for both patients with cancer and healthy individuals. Meanwhile, the ROC curve of SVC showed a relatively high AUC (0.6871). We developed an SVC-based machine learning algorithm for predicting positive repeat prostate biopsy results. Our analysis revealed that initial and latest prostate volumes, initial and latest PSA levels, latest fPSA/PSA ratio and age are significant factors for this model.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations35

A Novel Nomogram to Predict the Probability of Prostate Cancer on Repeat Biopsy

  • May 15, 2008
  • Journal of Urology
  • Luigi Benecchi +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations54

PREDICTORS OF SUBSEQUENT PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH A PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN OF 2.6 TO 4.0 NG/ML AND AN INITIALLY NEGATIVE BIOPSY

  • Aug 01, 2005
  • Journal of Urology
  • Scott E Eggener +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

The meaning of sampling density in multiple repeat prostate biopsies

  • Jan 01, 2016
  • Central European Journal of Urology
  • Jan Hrbáček +6
  • Research Article

The effect of [-2]proPSA and prostate health index (phi) on the accuracy of the prediction of initial and repeat prostate biopsies compared to tPSA and percent fPSA in young men (age 65 or younger).

  • Feb 01, 2014
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Martin Boegemann +6
  • Research Article

PD46-11 LOW DOSE SPINAL SADDLE BLOCK ANESTHESIA IS ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED PATIENT TOLERANCE OF AND WILLINGNESS TO HAVE A REPEAT PROSTATE BIOPSY.

  • Apr 01, 2015
  • Journal of Urology
  • Anselm Obi +1
  • Discussion
  • Citations43

RE: THE EFFECT OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, FLEXIBLE CYSTOSCOPY AND PROSTATIC BIOPSY ON FREE AND TOTAL PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, AND THE FREE-TO-TOTAL PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RATIO IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

  • Apr 01, 1998
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Claus R Riedl +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations87

Usefulness of Prebiopsy Multifunctional and Morphologic MRI Combined With Free-to-Total Prostate-Specific Antigen Ratio in the Detection of Prostate Cancer

  • Jun 01, 2011
  • American Journal of Roentgenology
  • Joan C Vilanova +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations19

Clinical evaluation of free PSA/total PSA (prostate-specific antigen) ratio in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

  • Jul 01, 1997
  • European Journal of Cancer
  • X Filella +5
  • Discussion
  • Citations7

RE: THE FREE-TO-TOTAL PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RATIO IMPROVES THE SPECIFICITY OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER IN THE GENERAL POPULATION

  • Mar 01, 1998
  • The Journal of Urology
  • A.A Elgamal +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Optimal PSA density threshold for prostate biopsy in benign prostatic obstruction patients with elevated PSA levels but negative MRI findings

  • Mar 03, 2025
  • BMC Urology
  • Yiji Peng +10
  • Research Article
  • Citations34

The role of free prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

  • Jun 01, 1997
  • British journal of urology
  • A Akdas +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations61

Prostate specific antigen adjusted for transition zone volume: the most powerful method for detecting prostate carcinoma.

  • Aug 15, 2000
  • Cancer
  • Eiji Kikuchi +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations11

Diagnostic value of microRNAs in prostate cancer patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels between 2, and 10 ng/mL.

  • Jul 25, 2019
  • Urology Research and Practice
  • Serin Akbayir +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and PI-RADS version 2.0 for differentiating histologically benign prostate disease from prostate cancer in biopsies: A retrospective single-center comparison

  • Mar 20, 2021
  • Clinical Imaging
  • Mesude Tosun +1
  • Research Article

Multimodal urinary biomarker panel achieves superior prostate cancer detection accuracy and reduces unnecessary biopsies.

  • Jan 01, 2026
  • Translational oncology
  • Yasin Panahi +3
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.