Predicting School Dropout Risk Using Machine Learning Models: A Comparative Study of Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Neural Network

Summary A meticulous interpretation of steady-state or unsteady-state relative permeability (Kr) experimental data is required to determine a complete set of Kr curves. In this work, different machine learning (ML) models were developed to assist in a faster estimation of these curves from steady-state drainage coreflooding experimental runs. These ML algorithms include gradient boosting (GB), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and deep neural network (DNN) with a main focus on and comparison of the two latter algorithms (XGB and DNN). Based on existing mathematical models, a leading-edge framework was developed where a large database of Kr and capillary pressure (Pc) curves were generated. This database was used to perform thousands of coreflood simulation runs representing oil-water drainage steady-state experiments. The results obtained from these simulation runs, mainly pressure drop along with other conventional core analysis data, were used to estimate analytical Kr curves based on Darcy’s law. These analytically estimated Kr curves along with the previously generated Pc curves were fed as features into the ML model. The entire data set was split into 80% for training and 20% for testing. The k-fold cross-validation technique was applied to increase the model’s accuracy by splitting 80% of the training data into 10 folds. In this manner, for each of the 10 experiments, nine folds were used for training and the remaining fold was used for model validation. Once the model was trained and validated, it was subjected to blind testing on the remaining 20% of the data set. The ML model learns to capture fluid flow behavior inside the core from the training data set. In terms of applicability of these ML models, two sets of experimental data were needed as input; the first was the analytically estimated Kr curves from the steady-state drainage coreflooding experiments, while the other was the Pc curves estimated from centrifuge or mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) measurements. The trained/tested model was then able to estimate Kr curves based on the experimental results fed as input. Furthermore, to test the performance of the ML model when only one set of experimental data is available to an end user, a recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithm was trained/tested to predict Kr curves in the absence of Pc curves as an input. The performance of the three developed models (XGB, DNN, and RNN) was assessed using the values of the coefficient of determination (R2) along with the loss calculated during training/validation of the model. The respective crossplots along with comparisons of ground truth vs. artificial intelligence (AI)-predicted curves indicated that the model is capable of making accurate predictions with an error percentage between 0.2% and 0.6% on history-matching experimental data for all three tested ML techniques. This implies that the AI-based model exhibits better efficiency and reliability in determining Kr curves when compared to conventional methods. The developed ML models by no means replace the need to conduct drainage coreflooding or centrifuge experiments but act as an alternative to existing commercial platforms that are used to interpret experimental data to predict Kr curves. The two main advantages of the developed ML models are their capability of predicting Kr curves within a matter of a few minutes as well as with limited intervention from the end user. The results also include a comparison between classical ML approaches, shallow neural networks, and DNNs in terms of accuracy in predicting the final Kr curves. The research presented here is an extension of the state-of-the-art framework proposed by Mathew et al. (2021). However, the two main aspects of the current study are the application of deep learning for the prediction of Kr curves and the application of feature engineering. The latter not only reduces the training/testing time for the ML models but also enables the end user to obtain the final predictions with the least set of experimental data. The various models discussed in this research work currently focus on the prediction of Kr curves for drainage steady-state experiments; however, the work can be extended to capture the imbibition cycle as well.

The prediction of wind energy generation is important to enhance the performance and dependability of renewable energy systems due to the rising demand for wind-generated electricity and advancements in wind energy technology competitiveness. This study leverages advanced machine learning (ML) and some other statistical and deep learning based time series forecasting models to enhance the accuracy of wind energy predictions. This comprehensive analysis includes nine ML models—Linear Regression, Random Forests (RF), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), Support Vector Machines (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), AdaBoost, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Neural Networks—as well as Four time-series forecasting models—ARIMA, Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and GRU. Each ML model underwent rigorous cross-validation to ensure optimal performance. The assessment criteria utilized here comprised the Mean Squared Error (MSE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and the R² Score. It was found that among the nine ML models, Random Forests, GBM and KNN consistently provided superior accuracy and robustness, making them the top choices for wind energy prediction whereas the performance of linear regression, SVM and SVR were very poor for the considered dataset. From the experiment, Random Forest, GBM, and KNN showed the best performance with low MSE values of 0.77, 1.95, and 1.51 respectively, while other models had MSEs above 7.5, with AdaBoost reaching 30. Their RMSEs (0.88, 1.40, 1.23) and MAEs (0.093, 0.73, 0.10) also indicate strong predictive accuracy compared to the rest.In this paper, time series forecasting, TCNs, LSTM and GRU networks showed strong capabilities in capturing temporal dependencies and trends within the wind energy data. Visualization techniques were employed to compare model performances comprehensively, providing clear insights into their predictive power. Therefore, this present study offers a robust framework for researchers and practitioners aiming to leverage machine learning and time series forecasting in the realm of renewable energy prediction.

Optimisation and interpretation of machine and deep learning models for improved water quality management in Lake Loktak

ObjectivesTo develop and identify machine learning (ML) models using pretreatment 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]-FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)-based radiomic features to differentiate benign from malignant parotid gland diseases (PGDs).Materials and methodsThis retrospective study included 62 patients with 63 PGDs who underwent pretreatment [18F]-FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT). The lesions were assigned to the training (n = 44) and testing (n = 19) cohorts. In total, 49 [18F]-FDG-PET-based radiomic features were utilized to differentiate benign from malignant PGDs using five different conventional ML algorithmic models (random forest, neural network, k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, and support vector machine) and the deep learning (DL)-based ensemble ML model. In the training cohort, each conventional ML model was constructed using the five most important features selected by the recursive feature elimination method with the tenfold cross-validation and synthetic minority oversampling technique. The DL-based ensemble ML model was constructed using the five most important features of the bagging and multilayer stacking methods. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and accuracies were used to compare predictive performances.ResultsIn total, 24 benign and 39 malignant PGDs were identified. Metabolic tumor volume and four GLSZM features (GLSZM_ZSE, GLSZM_SZE, GLSZM_GLNU, and GLSZM_ZSNU) were the five most important radiomic features. All five features except GLSZM_SZE were significantly higher in malignant PGDs than in benign ones (each p < 0.05). The DL-based ensemble ML model had the best performing classifier in the training and testing cohorts (AUC = 1.000, accuracy = 1.000 vs AUC = 0.976, accuracy = 0.947).ConclusionsThe DL-based ensemble ML model using [18F]-FDG-PET-based radiomic features can be useful for differentiating benign from malignant PGDs.Second abstractThe DL-based ensemble ML model using [18F]-FDG-PET-based radiomic features can overcome the previously reported limitation of [18F]-FDG-PET/CT scan for differentiating benign from malignant PGDs. The DL-based ensemble ML approach using [18F]-FDG-PET-based radiomic features can provide useful information for managing PGD.

BackgroundDespite the interest in machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing real-world data (RWD) in healthcare, the use of ML in predicting time-to-event data, a common scenario in clinical practice, is less explored. ML models are capable of algorithmically learning from large, complex datasets and can offer advantages in predicting time-to-event data. We reviewed the recent applications of ML for survival analysis using RWD in healthcare.MethodsPUBMED and EMBASE were searched from database inception through March 2023 to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies of ML models for predicting time-to-event outcomes using the RWD. Two reviewers extracted information on the data source, patient population, survival outcome, ML algorithms, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC).ResultsOf 257 citations, 28 publications were included. Random survival forests (N = 16, 57%) and neural networks (N = 11, 39%) were the most popular ML algorithms. There was variability across AUC for these ML models (median 0.789, range 0.6–0.950). ML algorithms were predominately considered for predicting overall survival in oncology (N = 12, 43%). ML survival models were often used to predict disease prognosis or clinical events (N = 27, 96%) in the oncology, while less were used for treatment outcomes (N = 1, 4%).ConclusionsThe ML algorithms, random survival forests and neural networks, are mainly used for RWD to predict survival outcomes such as disease prognosis or clinical events in the oncology. This review shows that more opportunities remain to apply these ML algorithms to inform treatment decision-making in clinical practice. More methodological work is also needed to ensure the utility and applicability of ML models in survival outcomes.

This research aims to estimate the delivery time and energy cost of e-scooter vehicles for distributing mail or packages and to show the usage efficiency of e-scooter sharing services in postal service delivery in Turkey. The machine learning (ML) methods used to implement the prediction of delivery time and energy cost as output variables include random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), k-nearest neighbour (kNN), and neural network (NN) algorithms. Fifteen input variables under demographic, environmental, geographical, time, and meta-features are utilised in the ML algorithms. The correlation coefficient (R2) values of RF, GB, NN, and kNN algorithms were computed for delivery time as 0.816, 0.845, 0.821, and 0.786, respectively. The GB algorithm, which has a high R2 and the slightest margin of error, exhibited the best prediction performance for delivery time and energy cost. Regarding delivery time, the GB algorithm’s MSE, RMSE, and MAE values were calculated as 149.32, 12.22, and 6.08, respectively. The R2 values of RF, GB, NN, and kNN algorithms were computed for energy cost as 0.917, 0.953, 0.400, and 0.365, respectively. The MSE, RMSE, and MAE values of the GB algorithm were calculated as 0.001, 0.019, and 0.009, respectively. The average energy cost to complete a package or mail delivery process with e-scooter vehicles is calculated as 0.125 TL, and the required time is approximately computed as 11.21 min. The scientific innovation of the study shows that e-scooter delivery vehicles are better for the environment, cost, and energy than traditional delivery vehicles. At the same time, using e-scooters as the preferred way to deliver packages or mail has shown how well the delivery service works. Because of this, the results of this study will help in the development of ways to make the use of e-scooters in delivery service even more efficient.

Machine learning (ML) methods have shown great potential in predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. However, the ML models introduced thus far have mainly focused on binary outcomes and have not considered the time-to-event nature of this type of modeling. This study aims to evaluate the performance of ML approaches for modeling time-to-event survival data and develop transparent models for predicting CRC-specific survival. The data set used in this retrospective cohort study contains information on patients who were newly diagnosed with CRC between December 28, 2012, and December 27, 2019, at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. We assessed the performance of 6 representative ML models, including random survival forest (RSF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), DeepSurv, DeepHit, neural net-extended time-dependent Cox (or Cox-Time), and neural multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR) in predicting CRC-specific survival. Multiple imputation by chained equations method was applied to handle missing values in variables. Multivariable analysis and clinical experience were used to select significant features associated with CRC survival. Model performance was evaluated in stratified 5-fold cross-validation repeated 5 times by using the time-dependent concordance index, integrated Brier score, calibration curves, and decision curves. The SHapley Additive exPlanations method was applied to calculate feature importance. A total of 2157 patients with CRC were included in this study. Among the 6 time-to-event ML models, the DeepHit model exhibited the best discriminative ability (time-dependent concordance index 0.789, 95% CI 0.779-0.799) and the RSF model produced better-calibrated survival estimates (integrated Brier score 0.096, 95% CI 0.094-0.099), but these are not statistically significant. Additionally, the RSF, GBM, DeepSurv, Cox-Time, and N-MTLR models have comparable predictive accuracy to the Cox Proportional Hazards model in terms of discrimination and calibration. The calibration curves showed that all the ML models exhibited good 5-year survival calibration. The decision curves for CRC-specific survival at 5 years showed that all the ML models, especially RSF, had higher net benefits than default strategies of treating all or no patients at a range of clinically reasonable risk thresholds. The SHapley Additive exPlanations method revealed that R0 resection, tumor-node-metastasis staging, and the number of positive lymph nodes were important factors for 5-year CRC-specific survival. This study showed the potential of applying time-to-event ML predictive algorithms to help predict CRC-specific survival. The RSF, GBM, Cox-Time, and N-MTLR algorithms could provide nonparametric alternatives to the Cox Proportional Hazards model in estimating the survival probability of patients with CRC. The transparent time-to-event ML models help clinicians to more accurately predict the survival rate for these patients and improve patient outcomes by enabling personalized treatment plans that are informed by explainable ML models.

For effective management of water quantity and quality, it is absolutely essential to estimate the pollution level of the existing surface water. This case study aims to evaluate the performance of twelve machine learning (ML) models, including five boosting-based algorithms (adaptive boosting, gradient boosting, histogram-based gradient boosting, light gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting), three decision tree-based algorithms (decision tree, extra trees, and random forest), and four ANN-based algorithms (multilayer perceptron, radial basis function, deep feed-forward neural network, and convolutional neural network), in estimating the surface water quality of the La Buong River in Vietnam. Water quality data at four monitoring stations alongside the La Buong River for the period 2010–2017 were utilized to calculate the water quality index (WQI). Prediction performance of the ML models was evaluated by using two efficiency statistics (i.e., R2 and RMSE). The results indicated that all twelve ML models have good performance in predicting the WQI but that extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) has the best performance with the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.989 and RMSE = 0.107). The findings strengthen the argument that ML models, especially XGBoost, may be employed for WQI prediction with a high level of accuracy, which will further improve water quality management.

647 Background: The primary treatment of most mNSTC is chemotherapy followed by surgery if the residual disease (RD) is &gt;1 cm. However, conventional imaging lacks the specificity to characterize the tissue, often leading to overtreatment. This study hypothesizes that integrating CT-driven radiomics features with plasma miR371 and miR375 will enhance the predictive accuracy of Machine Learning (ML) models to predict teratoma, viable germ cell (vGCT) and fibrosis/necrosis (F/N) in mNSTC patients with RD. Methods: 111 lesions from52 patients, including residual teratoma (n=57), F/N (n=33), vGCT (n=10), and additional seminoma (n=11) for training purposes were included, split into training (N=78) and test cohorts (N=33). Lesions were lymph nodes (n=87), lung (n=21), and brain (n=3) with a median size of 1.6 cm (Q1-Q3 interval=1.2-2.73 cm). 3D Slicer version 5.6.1 was used to segment the RD &gt; 1 cm (short axis) and extract radiomics features. Plasma miRNA levels before resection were measured by RT-PCR. Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient Boosting (GB), and CatBoost (CB) ML models were evaluated to define the operating characteristics of radiomics alone (R-only) and in combination with miR371 (371) and/or miR375 (375) levels in predicting teratoma, vGCT and F/N. Results: For predicting teratoma, the best models were RF (R+375 and R+371+375), CB (R+371+375), and GB (R+371 and R+371+375). While adding miR371 or miR375 to R-only slightly improved AUC across models, the best results were achieved with the R+375+371 dataset. CB achieved AUCs ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 in training and 0.81 to 0.93 in test sets, with its highest AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78-0.97) on the R+375+371 dataset to differentiate all three classes. Similarly, GB demonstrated strong performance, achieving its highest AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96) on the R+375+371 dataset (Table). Conclusions: Integration of plasma miR371, miR375 and radiomics improved accuracy of predicting histologies across all ML models. These methods could be used to characterize the histology of RD in mNSTC patients to better inform treatment decisions. Further refinement, including incorporation of histological findings of the primary tumor, will be reported. AUC values of different ML algorithms on training and test sets. TRAINING SET TEST SET Model ±SD R R+375 R+371 R+375+371 Model (95% CI) R R+375 R+371 R+375+371 RF 0.93±0.05 0.95±0.04 0.95±0.03 0.96±0.04 RF 0.8(0.59-0.89) 0.85(0.72-0.93) 0.87(0.76-0.95) 0.91(0.78-0.95) SVM 0.84±0.06 0.84±0.09 0.89±0.11 0.89±0.09 SVM 0.72(0.54-0.80) 0.74(0.56-0.82) 0.83(0.69-0.92) 0.84(0.76-0.94) GB 0.94±0.04 0.91±0.08 0.95±0.05 0.97±0.03 GB 0.84(0.61-0.96) 0.89(0.77-0.97) 0.89(0.79-0.96) 0.93(0.79-0.96) CB 0.95±0.03 0.94±0.03 0.94±0.04 0.97±0.03 CB 0.81(0.6-0.93) 0.86(0.73-0.94) 0.89(0.78-0.97) 0.93(0.78-0.97)

Given the increasing importance of machine learning (ML) in our lives, several algorithmic fairness techniques have been proposed to mitigate biases in the outcomes of the ML models. However, most of these techniques are specialized to cater to a single family of ML models and a specific definition of fairness, limiting their adaptibility in practice. We introduce a general constrained Bayesian optimization (BO) framework to optimize the performance of any ML model while enforcing one or multiple fairness constraints. BO is a model-agnostic optimization method that has been successfully applied to automatically tune the hyperparameters of ML models. We apply BO with fairness constraints to a range of popular models, including random forests, gradient boosting, and neural networks, showing that we can obtain accurate and fair solutions by acting solely on the hyperparameters. We also show empirically that our approach is competitive with specialized techniques that enforce model-specific fairness constraints, and outperforms preprocessing methods that learn fair representations of the input data. Moreover, our method can be used in synergy with such specialized fairness techniques to tune their hyperparameters. Finally, we study the relationship between fairness and the hyperparameters selected by BO. We observe a correlation between regularization and unbiased models, explaining why acting on the hyperparameters leads to ML models that generalize well and are fair.

Objectives: This study aims to predict slope stability using machine learning algorithms, considering geotechnical and geometric variables to improve the accuracy of safety factor estimation and mitigate risks associated with slope failures. Theoretical Background: Traditional limit equilibrium methods, such as Bishop's method, present limitations when dealing with complex environmental conditions. Recent literature has highlighted the potential of machine learning techniques, such as Random Forest, Neural Networks, and XGBoost, in modeling nonlinear and highly variable systems, which are typical in geotechnical problems. Method: A parametric dataset with 1,520 observations generated through GeoSlope simulations was used, containing variables such as cohesion, internal friction angle, height, slope angle, and water level. Four algorithms were implemented: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Artificial Neural Networks, and XGBoost. Model performance was evaluated through cross-validation, hyperparameter tuning, and metrics including R², MSE, and RMSE. Results and Discussion: The XGBoost model achieved the best performance (R² = 0.9841; RMSE = 0.1419), followed by Gradient Boosting and Neural Networks. Variable importance analysis indicated that cohesion and internal friction angle are the primary factors influencing slope stability. Research Implications: The findings reinforce the applicability of machine learning models as decision-support tools in geotechnical engineering projects, offering greater precision and efficiency compared to traditional methods. Originality/Value: This study advances the field by integrating multiple modern algorithms within a replicable modeling framework, demonstrating superior performance over previous approaches and expanding the scope for practical applications in geotechnical engineering.

&lt;sec&gt;This study aims to predict the thermodynamic stability of rare-earth compounds by using machine learning (ML) models, providing crucial data support for designing advanced materials and facilitating the discovery of new rare-earth compounds.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;In terms of methods, this study is based on a dataset consisting of 280569 compounds. The formation energies of these compounds are calculated by density functional theory (DFT). A system consisting of 145 feature descriptors is constructed, covering stoichiometric properties, statistical properties of elements, electronic structure properties, and properties of ionic compounds, comprehensively describing the characteristics of rare-earth compounds. Two ML models, i.e. random forest (RF) and neural network (NN), are selected to perform classification and regression tasks respectively. The 5-fold cross-validation is used to improve the reliability of the models. The min-max scaling technique is used for preprocessing data, and an ensemble learning architecture is constructed to address the limitations of single model.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;In the classification task, the RF and NN algorithms perform remarkably well. With 5-fold cross-validation, the accuracy reaches approximately 0.97, and the F1 score is around 0.98, enabling the precise classification of compounds into stable or unstable categories. In the regression task, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of the formation energy predictions by the RF and NN models are 0.055 eV/atom and 0.071 eV/atom, respectively. This indicates that the model predictions are highly accurate and can replace complete DFT calculations to a certain extent. In the predictive analysis of system outside the test set, six representative components are selected from the material project database, covering binary, ternary, and quaternary systems. The prediction errors of all compositions are controlled within 0.5 eV/atom, with an error percentage of lower than 25%, indicating that the model has strong ability of extrapolation and prediction. When predicting the binary phase diagrams of rare-earth compounds La-Al and Ce-H by using the trained models, the convex hull phase diagrams constructed through the ensemble learning architecture, which combines the prediction results of the RF and NN models, are highly consistent with those constructed from the open quantum materials database. The models successfully capture several metastable phases that are not present in multiple databases. Moreover, the convex hull distances of the predicted phases are mostly less than 0.1 eV/atom, with the maximum not exceeding 0.2 eV/atom.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;In conclusion, this study successfully uses ML models to predict the thermodynamic stability of rare-earth compounds. The constructed models demonstrate strong capabilities in classification and regression tasks. The ensemble learning architecture effectively improves the model performance, providing a promising tool for discovering materials in the field of rare-earth science, contributing to the research and development of new rare-earth compounds, and designing advanced materials.&lt;/sec&gt;

Introduction Spine trauma represents a major cause of disability and substantial healthcare costs. Despite classification systems and risk scores, outcome prediction following spine trauma remains challenging. Machine learning (ML) approaches offer multidimensionality but vary widely in methodology, performance, and clinical application. This systematic review aims to characterize the use of ML for outcome prediction and prognostication in spine trauma. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was performed for publications from January 2015 to May 2025. Studies reporting ML for predicting clinical outcomes in spine trauma patients were identified using pre-defined criteria. Primary outcomes were types and performance metrics of ML models for spine trauma prognostication. Secondary outcomes included cost-effectiveness, clinical utility and implementation feasibility. Results Twenty-seven studies were included, of which 26 were published from 2020 onwards. Only one study was prospective, while the rest were retrospective. Commonly used ML algorithms for spine trauma prognosis were logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and support vector machine (SVM). Outcomes predicted include mortality, neurological function or recovery, ambulation and walking, self-care and independence, complications, treatment failure, length of stay, and discharge destination. Most studies employed internal testing and validation; only four reported external validation. Seven studies reported direct comparison with non-ML models or risk scores, demonstrating comparable or superior performance of ML models. Performance metrics include area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, Brier score, and others. The highest AUC was reported by a nomogram constructed using consensus clustering to predict postoperative pulmonary infection in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury (internal validation; AUC 0.993; 95% CI 0.981–1.000). Quality of evidence varied between studies, but risk of bias was a concern. Conclusions Existing evidence on ML for spine trauma prognosis is characterized by retrospective study designs, homogeneous cohorts, and lack of external validation, limiting their generalizability and real-world application. While ML approaches demonstrate encouraging predictive performance for spine trauma outcomes, their clinical adoption is limited by methodological heterogeneity. More robust validation, standardized reporting, and comparison with traditional tools are needed before ML models can reliably inform clinical decision-making.

Predicting traditional Chinese medicine constitutions in adults aged ≥ 65 years: A machine learning approach.

The objective of this document is to identify the most accurate machine learning (ML) models for predicting the value of a real estate property, based on a systematic literature review (SLR). It was conducted on research published between 2022 and 2023 that analyzed the accuracy of ML models in real estate valuation. Information was extracted regarding the ML models used, the databases employed, and the models highlighted for their accuracy. A variety of ML models used in real estate valuation were identified, including Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Linear Regression (LR), and Lasso Regression. RF and LR models stood out as the most accurate in the analyzed research, showing that the accuracy of ML models varies depending on the database, property characteristics, and valuation context. It was concluded that ML models like RF and LR are promising tools for improving the accuracy of real estate valuation. Additionally, the choice of the best ML model depends on factors such as the database, property characteristics, and specific valuation objectives. Further research is needed on the application of ML in real estate valuation, considering aspects such as model interpretability and the real estate market context.