• Home
  • Search
  • Prediction of Lumbar Drainage-Related Meningitis Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms
  • Cite Icon5
  • https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.910479Copy DOI Icon

Prediction of Lumbar Drainage-Related Meningitis Based on Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms

Show More
  • Abstract
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

BackgroundLumbar drainage is widely used in the clinic; however, forecasting lumbar drainage-related meningitis (LDRM) is limited. We aimed to establish prediction models using supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms.MethodsWe utilized a cohort of 273 eligible lumbar drainage cases. Data were preprocessed and split into training and testing sets. Optimal hyper-parameters were archived by 10-fold cross-validation and grid search. The support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) were adopted for model training. The area under the operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and precision-recall curve (AUPRC), true positive ratio (TPR), true negative ratio (TNR), specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and kappa coefficient were used for model evaluation. All trained models were internally validated. The importance of features was also analyzed.ResultsIn the training set, all the models had AUROC exceeding 0.8. SVM and the RF models had an AUPRC of more than 0.6, but the ANN model had an unexpectedly low AUPRC (0.380). The RF and ANN models revealed similar TPR, whereas the ANN model had a higher TNR and demonstrated better specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and kappa efficiency. In the testing set, most performance indicators of established models decreased. However, the RF and AVM models maintained adequate AUROC (0.828 vs. 0.719) and AUPRC (0.413 vs. 0.520), and the RF model also had better TPR, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, and kappa efficiency. Site leakage showed the most considerable mean decrease in accuracy.ConclusionsThe RF and SVM models could predict LDRM, in which the RF model owned the best performance, and site leakage was the most meaningful predictor.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Comparative study of different machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment: A case study of Conghua District, Guangzhou, China

  • Jan 01, 2024
  • China Geology
  • Ao Zhang +10
  • Research Article
  • Citations115

Developing machine learning models with multi-source environmental data to predict wheat yield in China

  • Mar 01, 2022
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • Linchao Li +14
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Predicting the timing of LC after PTGBD in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: a machine learning approach with a web-based calculator

  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
  • Wei Zhang +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

Comparison of machine learning methods for prediction of osteoradionecrosis incidence in patients with head and neck cancer

  • Mar 18, 2021
  • The British Journal of Radiology
  • Laia Humbert-Vidan +4
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Prediction of potential geographic distribution of Oncomelania hupensis in Yunnan Province using random forest and maximum entropy models

  • Dec 12, 2024
  • Zhongguo xue xi chong bing fang zhi za zhi = Chinese journal of schistosomiasis control
  • Z Zhang +17
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Clinical study of different prediction models in predicting diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

  • Jan 15, 2024
  • World Journal of Diabetes
  • Sha-Sha Cai +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations233

GIS-based mineral prospectivity mapping using machine learning methods: A case study from Tongling ore district, eastern China

  • Apr 08, 2019
  • Ore Geology Reviews
  • Tao Sun +4
  • Research Article

Construction and preliminary validation of machine learning predictive models for cervical cancer screening based on human DNA methylation

  • Feb 23, 2025
  • Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology]
  • Y Yang +9
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations32

The Machine Learning Model for Distinguishing Pathological Subtypes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

  • May 26, 2022
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • Hongyue Zhao +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

A machine learning model for non-invasive prediction of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • American journal of translational research
  • Jingwei Song
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms

  • Apr 01, 2024
  • Zhonghua wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue
  • Zheng Xie +7
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations105

A Google Earth Engine Approach for Wildfire Susceptibility Prediction Fusion with Remote Sensing Data of Different Spatial Resolutions

  • Jan 30, 2022
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sepideh Tavakkoli Piralilou +6
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Quantitative structure-property relationship of glass transition temperatures for organic compounds

  • Oct 09, 2024
  • Molecular Physics
  • Xinliang Yu
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Application of an interpretable machine learning method to predict the risk of death during hospitalization in patients with acute myocardial infarction combined with diabetes mellitus

  • Apr 07, 2025
  • Acta Cardiologica
  • Zhijun Bu +12
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Distinguishing lymphoma from benign lymph node diseases in fever of unknown origin using PET/CT radiomics

  • Nov 13, 2024
  • EJNMMI Research
  • Xinchao Zhang +11
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.