Quantifying Informativeness in Knowledge Graph-Augmented In-Context Learning for Multiple Choice Query Answering

Multiple choice question answering (MCQA) is popular for LLM evaluation due to its simplicity and human-like testing, but we argue for its reform.We first reveal flaws in MCQA's format, as it struggles to: 1) test generation/subjectivity; 2) match LLM use cases; and 3) fully test knowledge.We instead advocate for generative formats based on human testing-where LLMs construct and explain answers-better capturing user needs and knowledge while remaining easy to score.We then show even when MCQA is a useful format, its datasets suffer from: leakage; unanswerability; shortcuts; and saturation.In each issue, we give fixes from education, like rubrics to guide MCQ writing; scoring methods to bridle guessing; and Item Response Theory to build harder MCQs.Lastly, we discuss LLM errors in MCQA-robustness, biases, and unfaithful explanations-showing how our prior solutions better measure or address these issues.While we do not need to desert MCQA, we encourage more efforts in refining the task based on educational testing, advancing evaluations. Questioning Multiple Choice QuestionsMultiple choice question answering (MCQA) is the standard for large language model (LLM) evaluations, prized for simplicity and similarity to human testing (Robinson and Wingate, 2023).When designing new benchmarks, MCQA seems easy to implement (Guo et al., 2023), and when selecting new LLMs to use, MCQA leaderboards inform our decisions (Fourrier et al., 2024).If you want to build a popular dataset, prove your LLM is smart, or even publish a position paper, it is hard to avoid MCQA.Standardized testing groups have long explored ways to better use MCQA for student testing (Angoff, 1971).But despite years of use in NLP (Turney et al., 2003), few have asked: 1) should MCQA be a standard model evaluation format; and 2) are its datasets well-designed?This position paper argues: Evaluating LLMs with MCQA has flaws Q1.What's wrong with MCQA's format?A) It doesn't apply to many tasks ( 3.1) B) It's misaligned with LLM use cases ( 3.2) C) It doesn't fully test knowledge ( 3.3) Q2.What's wrong with MCQA datasets?A) Test sets are contaminated ( 5.1) B) They have unanswerable questions ( 5.2) C) They contain shortcuts ( 5.3) D) They're too easy for LLMs ( 5.4) Q3.How do LLMs struggle with MCQA?A) They lack robustness ( 6.1) B) They exhibit biases ( 6.2) C) They give unfaithful explanations ( 6.3) Q4.How can insights from education improve MCQA?A) Improve knowledge testing via generative formats ( 4) B) Combat test set leakage with fresh questions ( 5.1) C) Write MCQs informed by educational rubrics ( 5.2) D) Use calibration scoring to curb guessing ( 5.3.1)E) Find harder MCQs with item response theory ( 5.4.1)7 gpt-3 has seen 45% of RACE's test set (Sainz et al., 2023).

Knowledge graphs (KGs) have transformed data management within the manufacturing industry, offering effective means for integrating disparate data sources through shared and structured conceptual schemas. However, harnessing the power of KGs can be daunting for non-experts, as it often requires formulating complex SPARQL queries to retrieve specific information. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), there is a growing potential to automatically translate natural language queries into the SPARQL format, thus bridging the gap between user-friendly interfaces and the sophisticated architecture of KGs. The challenge remains in adequately informing LLMs about the relevant context and structure of domain-specific KGs, e.g., in manufacturing, to improve the accuracy of generated queries. In this paper, we evaluate multiple strategies that use LLMs as mediators to facilitate information retrieval from KGs. We focus on the manufacturing domain, particularly on the Bosch Line Information System KG and the I40 Core Information Model. In our evaluation, we compare various approaches for feeding relevant context from the KG to the LLM and analyze their proficiency in transforming real-world questions into SPARQL queries. Our findings show that LLMs can significantly improve their performance on generating correct and complete queries when provided only the adequate context of the KG schema. Such context-aware prompting techniques help LLMs to focus on the relevant parts of the ontology and reduce the risk of hallucination. We anticipate that the proposed techniques help LLMs to democratize access to complex data repositories and empower informed decision-making in manufacturing settings.

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and specifically Large Language Models (LLMs), are redefining how organizations operate, make decisions, and engage with customers. AI-driven technologies have become indispensable, providing businesses with powerful tools to streamline operations, derive actionable insights from vast data, and foster more meaningful customer interactions. For business leaders, scholars, and practitioners alike, understanding the transformative potential of AI isn’t just advantageous—it’s essential to staying competitive in an increasingly data-driven world.This editorial delves into recent scholarly advancements in LLM applications within business contexts, analyzing studies that explore AI’s potential across various domains, from decision support to creative industries. By introducing a structured framework, this editorial highlights key insights and contributions from recent studies, assessing their value to academia and industry. The following comparative analysis sheds light on how these innovations shape our understanding of AI’s role in business while pointing to future research directions.Puyt and Madsen's (2024) study stands out as a foundational exploration of LLM accuracy, assessing ChatGPT-4's ability to recount the history of the SWOT analysis-a vital business strategy tool. Their findings reveal that, while ChatGPT-4 effectively conveys general concepts, it struggles with detailed historical information, often producing inaccuracies or "hallucinations." This gap underscores the need for LLMs to be trained with verified academic data, particularly for strategic business applications that demand precision. This study not only contributes to the literature by proposing methods to evaluate AI accuracy in historical contexts but also highlights the importance of rigorous information vetting in industry settings where reliability is crucial.In contrast, Raikov et al. (2024) explore a hybrid intelligence model that combines LLM capabilities with explainable AI (XAI) principles to enhance human-machine collaboration. Their approach emphasizes cognitive semantics, improving transparency and decision-making efficiency. The hybrid model's real-time adaptability addresses the needs of complex, regulated industries such as finance and healthcare, where trust in AI decisions is paramount. Academically, this study provides a valuable addition to XAI literature by demonstrating how LLMs can bridge the gap between AI autonomy and human oversight, making it a model for future human-AI interactions in complex business environments.Another significant study by Mariotti and colleagues (2024) examines the integration of LLMs with enterprise knowledge graphs to enhance data-driven decision-making. By enabling organizations to leverage knowledge graphs for more accurate and scalable data retrieval, this research provides a robust framework for businesses seeking efficient knowledge management systems. The academic contribution here lies in advancing the dialogue between LLMs and knowledge graphs, emphasizing ethical data handling and quality standards essential for industry applications. For enterprises, the study offers practical solutions to achieve streamlined data management, balancing automation with privacy and security. 2024) take a different approach, investigating LLMs' role in creative industries, specifically within fashion design. They introduce a hybrid intelligence model that supports creative processes, allowing AI to complement rather than replace human ingenuity. While LLMs in this field demonstrate potential in automating repetitive design tasks and enhancing customer personalization, the study reveals limitations in AI's ability to handle spatial and stylistic nuances. This study's academic contribution lies in promoting human-AI co-creation, inspiring further research into AI applications across diverse creative sectors, including media and marketing.Collectively, these studies not only illuminate LLMs' transformative potential in business but also highlight critical ethical and operational considerations. Ensuring accuracy, transparency, and data privacy are vital to responsibly integrating AI into business workflows. Future research should focus on enhancing LLM accuracy, refining hybrid intelligence models, and exploring creative AI applications, all while maintaining ethical standards. As LLMs evolve, interdisciplinary collaborations will be essential to harness their full potential, making AI an ethical, effective, and innovative force in the business world.

This paper investigates the impact of knowledge extraction methods on the effectiveness of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems that utilize knowledge graphs. It highlights that the quality of the knowledge graph, which is formed using various knowledge extraction methods, is crucial for overcoming limitations of large language models (LLMs), such as “hallucinations”. The paper analyzes the architectures of LightRAG and GraphRAG, emphasizing that the selection of an optimal knowledge extraction strategy depends on specific tasks and the subject area. LLMs have advanced significantly, but they have limitations, including generating factually incorrect information (“hallucinations”) and possessing “outdated knowledge”. RAG systems were proposed to address these issues by combining LLMs with external knowledge bases. This approach reduces hallucinations, ensures factual accuracy, solves the problem of outdated knowledge, and increases transparency. Knowledge graphs are powerful tools for structuring information, consisting of entities (nodes) and relations (edges). They enhance RAG systems by enabling more precise and contextually grounded retrieval compared to keyword-based searches. The quality of a knowledge graph depends on the knowledge extraction methods used, which include named entity recognition (NER), relation extraction (RE), entity linking (EL), and event extraction. Different methods, such as rule-based, classical machine learning, and deep learning approaches, have varying trade-offs in terms of accuracy, completeness, and scalability. Entity linking and knowledge graph completion are also crucial for accuracy and richness. LightRAG and GraphRAG are two main graph-based RAG systems. LightRAG uses the knowledge graph as a quick reference, requiring high precision in knowledge extraction to avoid noise degradation. GraphRAG uses the knowledge graph as a domain model, where completeness of extracted knowledge is more critical, though systematic errors are still harmful. Both systems rely on LLMs for knowledge extraction, which makes them dependent on the LLM’s quality and the size of document fragments processed. The theoretical analysis confirms that the effectiveness of RAG systems is critically dependent on knowledge extraction methods. The quality, completeness, and accuracy of the knowledge graph directly influence the RAG system’s ability to provide relevant, accurate, and truthful answers. Different RAG system architectures like LightRAG and GraphRAG have distinct requirements for knowledge graph characteristics, prioritizing either accuracy or completeness in knowledge extraction.

In the current development of large language models (LLMs), it is important to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the underlying data sources. LLMs are critical for various applications, but they often suffer from hallucinations and inaccuracies due to knowledge gaps in the training data. Knowledge graphs (KGs), as a powerful structural tool, could serve as a vital external information source to mitigate the aforementioned issues. By providing a structured and comprehensive understanding of real-world data, KGs enhance the performance and reliability of LLMs. However, it is common that errors exist in KGs while extracting triplets from unstructured data to construct KGs. This could lead to degraded performance in downstream tasks such as question-answering and recommender systems. Therefore, anomaly detection in KGs is essential to identify and correct these errors. This article presents an anomaly detection algorithm in knowledge graphs with dual-channel learning (ADKGD). ADKGD leverages a dual-channel learning approach to enhance representation learning from both the entity-view and triplet-view perspectives. Furthermore, using a cross-layer approach, our framework integrates internal information aggregation and context information aggregation. We introduce a kullback-leibler (KL)-loss component to improve the accuracy of the scoring function between the dual channels. To evaluate ADKGD’s performance, we conduct empirical studies on three real-world KGs: WN18RR, FB15K, and NELL-995. Experimental results demonstrate that ADKGD outperforms state-of-the-art anomaly detection algorithms. The source code and datasets are publicly available at https://github.com/csjywu1/ADKGD .

BackgroundIn recent years, large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in various domains, notably in biomedical sciences. However, their real-world application is often limited by issues like erroneous outputs and hallucinatory responses.ResultsWe developed the knowledge graph–based thought (KGT) framework, an innovative solution that integrates LLMs with knowledge graphs (KGs) to improve their initial responses by utilizing verifiable information from KGs, thus significantly reducing factual errors in reasoning. The KGT framework demonstrates strong adaptability and performs well across various open-source LLMs. Notably, KGT can facilitate the discovery of new uses for existing drugs through potential drug–cancer associations and can assist in predicting resistance by analyzing relevant biomarkers and genetic mechanisms. To evaluate the knowledge graph question answering task within biomedicine, we utilize a pan-cancer knowledge graph to develop a pan-cancer question answering benchmark, named pan-cancer question answering.ConclusionsThe KGT framework substantially improves the accuracy and utility of LLMs in the biomedical field. This study serves as a proof of concept, demonstrating its exceptional performance in biomedical question answering.

Extracting information from unstructured and semi-structured geoscience literature is a crucial step in conducting geological research. The traditional machine learning extraction paradigm requires a substantial amount of high-quality manually annotated data for model training, which is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and not easily transferable to new fields. Recently, large language models (LLMs) (e.g., ChatGPT, GPT-4, and LLaMA), have shown great performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, such as question answering, machine translation, and text generation. A substantial body of work has demonstrated that LLMs possess strong in-context learning (ICL) and even zero-shot learning capabilities to solve downstream tasks without specifically designed supervised fine-tuning. In this paper, we propose utilizing LLMs for geoscience literature information extraction. Specifically, we design a hierarchical PDF parsing pipeline and an automated knowledge extraction process, which can significantly reduce the need for manual data annotation, assisting geoscientists in literature data mining. For the hierarchical PDF parsing pipeline, firstly, a document layout detection model fine-tuned on geoscience literature is employed for layout detection, obtaining layout detection information for the document. Secondly, based on the document layout information, an optical character content parsing model is used for content parsing, obtaining the text structure and plain text corresponding to the content. Finally, the text structure and plain text are combined and reconstructed to ultimately obtain the parsed structured data. For the automated knowledge extraction process, firstly, the parsed long text is segmented into paragraphs to adapt to the input length limit of LLMs. Subsequently, a few-shot prompting method is employed for structured knowledge extraction, encompassing two tasks: attribute value extraction and triplet extraction. In attribute value extraction, prompts are generated automatically by the LLMs based on the subdomain and attribute names, facilitating the location and extraction of values related to subdomain attribute names in the text. For triplet extraction, the LLMs employ a procedural approach to entity extraction, entity type extraction, and relation extraction, following the knowledge graph structure pattern. Finally, the extracted structured knowledge is stored in the form of knowledge graphs, facilitating further analysis and integration of various types of knowledge from the literature. Our proposed approach turns out to be simple, flexible, and highly effective in geoscience literature information extraction. Demonstrations of information extraction in subdomains such as radiolarian fossils and fluvial facies have yielded satisfactory results. The extraction efficiency has significantly improved, and feedback from domain experts indicates a relatively high level of accuracy in the extraction process. The extracted results can be used to construct a foundational knowledge graph for geoscience literature, supporting the comprehensive construction and efficient application of a geoscience knowledge graph.

The increasing reliance on Large Language Models (LLMs) for health information seeking can pose severe risks due to the potential for misinformation and the complexity of these topics. This paper introduces KnowNet a visualization system that integrates LLMs with Knowledge Graphs (KG) to provide enhanced accuracy and structured exploration. Specifically, for enhanced accuracy, KnowNet extracts triples (e.g., entities and their relations) from LLM outputs and maps them into the validated information and supported evidence in external KGs. For structured exploration, KnowNet provides next-step recommendations based on the neighborhood of the currently explored entities in KGs, aiming to guide a comprehensive understanding without overlooking critical aspects. To enable reasoning with both the structured data in KGs and the unstructured outputs from LLMs, KnowNet conceptualizes the understanding of a subject as the gradual construction of graph visualization. A progressive graph visualization is introduced to monitor past inquiries, and bridge the current query with the exploration history and next-step recommendations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system via use cases and expert interviews.

Drug repurposing (DR) offers a promising alternative to the high cost and low success rate of traditional drug development, especially for complex diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (AD). This study addressed DR for AD from three key angles: (1) demonstrating how disease-specific knowledge graphs can improve DR performance, (2) evaluating the role of large language models (LLMs) in enhancing the usability and efficiency of these graphs, and (3) assessing whether Graph-of-Thoughts (GoT)-enhanced LLMs, when integrated with AD knowledge graphs, can outperform traditional machine learning and LLM-based approaches. We tested five distinct DR strategies (DR1–DR5) for AD: DR1, a machine learning method using TxGNN; DR2, a machine learning model leveraging the Alzheimer’s KnowledgeBase (AlzKB); DR3, an LLM-based chatbot built on AlzKB; DR4, our ESCARGOT framework combining GoT-enhanced LLMs with AlzKB; and DR5, a general reasoning-driven LLM approach. Results showed that AlzKB significantly improved DR outcomes. ESCARGOT further enhanced performance while reducing the need for coding or advanced expertise in knowledge graph analysis. Because the architecture of AlzKB is easily adaptable to other diseases and ESCARGOT can integrate with various knowledge graph platforms, this framework offers a broadly applicable, innovative tool for accelerating drug discovery through repurposing.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13040-025-00466-5.

As large language models (LLMs) continue to grow in size, their abilities to tackle complex tasks have significantly improved. However, issues such as hallucination and the lack of up-to-date knowledge largely remain unresolved. Knowledge graphs (KGs), which serve as symbolic representations of real-world knowledge, offer a reliable source for enhancing reasoning. Integrating KG retrieval into LLMs can therefore strengthen their reasoning by providing dependable knowledge. Nevertheless, due to limited understanding of the underlying knowledge graph, LLMs may struggle with queries that have multiple interpretations. Additionally, the incompleteness and noise within knowledge graphs may result in retrieval failures. To address these challenges, we propose an embedding-based retrieval reasoning framework EMBRAG. In this approach, the model first generates multiple logical rules grounded in knowledge graphs based on the input query. These rules are then applied to reasoning in the embedding space, guided by the knowledge graph, ensuring more robust and accurate reasoning. A reranker model further interprets these rules and refines the results. Extensive experiments on two benchmark KGQA datasets demonstrate that our approach achieves the new state-of-the-art performance in KG reasoning tasks.

BackgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent chronic condition that affects maternal and fetal health outcomes worldwide, increasingly in underserved populations. While generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in health care, their application in GDM management remains underexplored.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether retrieval-augmented generation techniques, when combined with knowledge graphs (KGs), could improve the contextual relevance and accuracy of AI-driven clinical decision support. For this, we developed and validated a graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (GraphRAG)–enabled local LLM as a clinical support tool for GDM management, assessing its performance against open-source LLM tools.MethodsA prototype clinical AI assistant was developed using a GraphRAG constructed from 1212 peer-reviewed research articles on GDM interventions, retrieved from the Semantic Scholar API (2000‐2024). The GraphRAG prototype integrated entity extraction, KG construction using Neo4j, and retrieval-augmented response generation. The performance was evaluated in a simulated environment using clinical and layperson prompts, comparing the outputs of the systems against ChatGPT (OpenAI), Claude (Anthropic), and BioMistral models across 5 common natural language generation metrics.ResultsThe GraphRAG-enabled local LLM showed higher accuracy in generating clinically relevant responses. It achieved a bilingual evaluation understudy score of 0.99, Jaccard similarity of 0.98, and BERTScore of 0.98, outperforming the benchmark LLMs. The prototype also produced accurate, evidence-based recommendations for clinicians and patients, demonstrating its feasibility as a clinical support tool.ConclusionsGraphRAG-enabled local LLMs show much potential for improving personalized GDM care by integrating domain-specific evidence and contextual retrieval. Our prototype proof-of-concept serves two purposes: (1) the local LLM architecture gives practitioners from underserved locations access to state-of-the-art medical research in the treatment of chronic conditions and (2) the KG schema may be feasibly built on peer-reviewed, indexed publications, devoid of hallucinations and contextualized with patient data. We conclude that advanced AI techniques such as KGs, retrieval-augmented generation, and local LLMs improve GDM management decisions and other similar conditions and advance equitable health care delivery in resource-constrained health care environments.

Large Language Models (LLMs) in Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning enable highly personalized learning, yet raise significant challenges related to pedagogical grounding, data privacy, and instructional validity. Although Knowledge Graphs (KGs) and Federated Learning (FL) can mitigate these issues in isolation, evidence on systematic FL–KG–LLM integration for educational language learning remains limited. This scoping review maps the FL–KG–LLM convergence landscape. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched six databases and screened 51 papers (2019–2025) using automated extraction. Our findings indicate limited convergence: no papers integrate all three domains, and 58.8% of approaches remain confined to isolated technological silos. Reporting is also uneven across the corpus, with an average “Not Reported” (NR) rate of 84.5%, most notably for privacy mechanisms (92.2%), validation metrics (90.2%), and Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) alignment (88.2%). Domain-specific analysis reveals two distinct patterns: inter-domain gaps (disciplinary silos resulting in expected CEFR absence in single-domain papers) and intra-domain gaps (failure to report domain-critical variables, including 100% parameter NR in FL studies, 86.7% validation NR in KG studies, and 100% CEFR NR in convergence papers). Taken together, these gaps suggest that pedagogical grounding is treated as optional rather than structural. We therefore identify two pillars of pedagogical grounding: a Grounding Pillar, which constrains LLM outputs via Knowledge Graph rules, and a Validation Pillar, which concerns how authoritative frameworks (e.g., CEFR) are mapped onto Knowledge Graph schemas and evaluated. The near-universal absence of CEFR alignment and validation reporting suggests that this second pillar is currently missing, which we term the Integrity Gap—a systematic disconnection between technological innovation and pedagogical grounding inin Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Learning. By reframing the problem as upstream control and validation, this review informs the design of user-facing automated systems where trust, transparency, and human oversight are critical.

Entity alignment (EA) facilitates knowledge fusion by matching semantically identical entities in distinct knowledge graphs (KGs). Existing embedding-based methods rely solely on intrinsic KG facts and often struggle with long-tail entities due to insufficient information. Recently, large language models (LLMs), empowered by rich background knowledge and strong reasoning abilities, have shown promise for EA. However, most current LLM-enhanced approaches follow the in-context learning paradigm, requiring multi-round interactions with carefully designed prompts to perform additional auxiliary operations, which leads to substantial computational overhead. Moreover, they fail to fully exploit the complementary strengths of embedding-based small models and LLMs. To address these limitations, we propose HIEA, a novel hierarchical inference framework for entity alignment. By instruction-tuning a generative LLM with a unified and concise prompt and a knowledge adapter, HIEA produces alignment results with a single LLM invocation. Meanwhile, embedding-based small models not only generate candidate entities but also support the LLM through data augmentation and certainty-aware source entity classification, fostering deeper collaboration between small models and LLMs. Extensive experiments on both standard and highly heterogeneous benchmarks demonstrate that HIEA consistently outperforms existing embedding-based and LLM-enhanced methods, achieving absolute Hits@1 improvements of up to 5.6%, while significantly reducing inference cost.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge. Among available sources, knowledge graphs (KGs) offer a structured and reliable foundation for factual information, making them increasingly popular in efforts to improve reasoning faithfulness in RAG. Most existing KG-based RAG methods rely on LLMs to extract knowledge from KGs. However, these approaches often require costly fine-tuning and struggle to navigate deep graph structures, limiting their effectiveness in multi-hop reasoning tasks. To address these challenges, we propose Stepwise Contrastive Reasoning (SCR), a lightweight framework that integrates graph structure and textual context for efficient and interpretable RAG over KGs. SCR combines relational message passing layers to encode KG entities with a Transformer encoder for processing question text. It decomposes reasoning into a series of alignment steps. At each step, SCR compares the current topic entity and its neighbors with the question representation, selecting the most relevant entity as the next topic entity. The question is then updated with this entity's textual description. This process continues until the selected entity no longer changes, indicating that the answer entity has been reached. Through stepwise alignment, SCR enables compact models to perform faithful and interpretable reasoning over large-scale KGs. Extensive experiments on several widely used KGQA benchmarks demonstrate that SCR not only achieves state-of-the-art performance but also effectively boosts the capabilities of smaller language models to match those of LLMs.

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as Chat-GPT and GPT-4, has revolutionized natural language processing, opening avenues for advanced textual understanding.This study explores the application of LLMs in developing Knowledge graphs from textual data.Knowledge graphs offer a structured representation of information, facilitating enhanced comprehension and utilization of unstructured text.We intend to construct Knowledge graphs that capture relationships and entities within diverse textual datasets by harnessing LLMs' contextual understanding and language generation capabilities.The primary goal is to explore and understand how well LLMs can identify and extract relevant entities and relationships from textual data using prompt engineering while contributing to structured knowledge representation.