Radiation Exposure and Operation Time in Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using Fluoroscopy-Based Navigation System

ObjectiveThe purpose of the present study was to discuss a new surgical strategy that combines percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) with percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) for L4/5 and L5/S1 two‐level disc herniation.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. A total of 19 patients with L4/5 and L5/S1 two‐level lumbar disc herniation (LDH) who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in our hospital from January 2015 to June 2016 were retrospectively examined. The average age of these 19 patients was 42.21 ± 14.88 years old, including 12 men and 7 women. One experienced surgeon who had carried out more than 3000 lumbar surgeries performed PELD for these patients. During the PELD surgery, the transforaminal approach was adopted for L4/5 level disc herniation and the interlaminar approach was adopted for L5/S1 level disc herniation. The demographic data, operation time (min), fluoroscopy times, hospital stay (days), and complications were recorded and analyzed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate the surgical outcomes. MRI was conducted to evaluate the radiographic improvement.ResultsAll patients underwent PELD via the transforaminal approach combined with the interlaminar approach successfully and achieved satisfactory efficacy. The follow‐up points were 3, 12, and 18 months. The average hospital stay (days) and the average follow up (months) were 3.32 ± 0.98 and 18.63 ± 3.84, respectively. The operation time and fluoroscopy times were 85.79 ± 12.90 min and 39.05 ± 4.59 times, respectively. The fluoroscopy times (frequency) for L4/5 and L5/S1 were 26.95 ± 6.41 and 12.11 ± 3.49 (t = 7.00, P < 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference for fluoroscopy times between male and female patients (t = 0.89, P = 0.99). The preoperative back pain (VAS‐Back) and the last follow‐up VAS‐Back were 5.58 ± 2.01 and 2.37 ± 1.01, respectively (t = 7.14, P < 0.05). The preoperative leg pain (VAS‐Leg) and the last follow‐up VAS‐Leg were 7.00 ± 1.56 and 1.63 ± 1.01, respectively (t = 20.97, P < 0.05). There were significant differences between preoperative VAS‐Back and the last follow‐up VAS‐Back in men (t = 4.61, P < 0.05) and women (t = 6.57, P < 0.05). In addition, there was significant differences between preoperative VAS‐Leg and the last follow‐up VAS‐Leg in men (t = 13.48, P < 0.05) and women (t = 26.87, P < 0.05). There were significant differences between preoperative ODI scores (44.84 ± 10.82%) and the last follow‐up ODI scores (11.12 ± 5.80%) (t = 10.92, P < 0.05). Preoperative ODI scores and the last follow‐up ODI scores were significantly different for men (t = 8.80, P < 0.05) and women (t = 6.63, P < 0.05). All patients received significant pain relief and functional improvement after the surgery. Except for two cases of postoperative dysesthesia and one dural tear, no severe complications occurred. The dysesthesia symptoms of these two patients disappeared within 1 week with the application of dexamethasone and neurotrophic drugs and the dural tear case also recovered well as the dural laceration was small. No poor results were reported and 89.47% of patients achieved excellent or good recovery.ConclusionPercutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the transforaminal approach combined with the interlaminar approach under epidural anesthesia can treat L4/5 and L5/S1 two‐level disc herniation safely and effectively.

Although it is well-recognized within the endoscopic spine community that a learning curve exists for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), it is less well understood how the learning curve impacts PELD clinical outcomes. This systematic literature review serves as the most comprehensive and up-to-date resource on this topic. Following a focused literature search, 21 articles on the learning curve for PELD were found, and from those articles, 21 unique clinical outcome metrics were identified. Operative time was the most commonly reported clinical outcome metric in this cohort, appearing in 17 studies. There were unanimous findings among the relevant studies that the following clinical outcomes are not affected by the learning curve for PELD: Oswestry Disability Index and herniation rate. Additionally, there were unanimous findings that the following clinical results are affected by the learning curve for PELD: cannula placement time, postoperative dural sac cross-sectional area; fluoroscopy time; and operative time. The purpose of this collection of findings in this systematic review is to positively inform current and future surgeons and trainees embarking on the learning curve for PELD.

Kidney mobility during supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPCNL) may negatively affect the accuracy of the approach and surgical efficacy. This study investigated the effects of kidney stabilization on surgical efficacy, stone-free rate (SFR), and complication profile. Eighty-five patients who underwent standard sPCNL for ≥ 2cm kidney stones between January and August 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: conventional sPCNL (Group C, n = 41) and sPCNL with external gel bag for kidney stabilization (Group F, n = 44). Demographic and stone characteristics, operative time, access time, fluoroscopy time, hemoglobin drop, transfusion rates, length of stay (LOS), complications, and SFR were compared. The groups were similar in terms of demographic and stone characteristics. In Group F, the operative time (74.7 ± 32.2 vs. 97.5 ± 38.0min, p = 0.004), access time, and fluoroscopy time were significantly shorter (p < 0.001 for both). LOS was shorter in Group F (2.3 vs. 3.1days, p = 0.001). Hemoglobin decline was less in Group F (1.20 ± 0.81 vs. 1.78 ± 1.31g/dL, p = 0.017). Transfusion and major complication rates were similar. SFR was significantly higher in Group F (88.6% vs. 70.7%, p = 0.030). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that kidney stabilization was an independent predictor of achieving stone-free status (p = 0.032). Kidney stabilization reduces mobility during sPCNL, thereby shortening operative and fluoroscopy times, reducing blood loss, and improving SFR. These retrospective findings suggest that this simple technique may enhance surgical efficiency; however, its clinical value should be confirmed in prospective studies.

Eight Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Pooling Evaluation

<title>Abstract</title> Purpose To systematically compare the clinical outcomes and learning curves of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in the treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 122 patients with FLLDH who underwent spinal endoscopic surgery between January 2022 and July 2024, including 62 cases in the PELD group and 60 cases in the UBE group. All procedures were performed by the same minimally invasive spine surgery team. Perioperative parameters (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, foraminal area, postoperative hospital stay, total cost), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified Macnab criteria were compared. Learning curves were analyzed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) with operative time as the core variable. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups ( <italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05). Both PELD and UBE significantly improved lumbar and leg pain ( <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). No significant differences were found in VAS or ODI scores between the two groups preoperatively, at 3 months, or at 12 months postoperatively ( <italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05). Only on postoperative day 1 did the PELD group show a lower VAS back pain score ( <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). The excellent/good rate based on modified Macnab criteria did not differ significantly ( <italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05). Perioperative indicators, including operative time, intraoperative and hidden blood loss, and total cost, were all significantly more favourable in the PELD group ( <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). No differences were observed in intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency or foraminal cross-sectional area ( <italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05). CUSUM analysis indicated that proficiency was achieved after 24 UBE cases and 38 PELD cases. All complications resolved with conservative treatment. Conclusion Both UBE and PELD are safe and effective for treating FLLDH. PELD offers advantages in perioperative minimally invasive characteristics and cost-efficacy, whereas UBE features a shorter learning curve, facilitating more rapid surgical mastery.

The purpose of this research was to investigate the outcomes between unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for the single L4/5-level lumbar disk herniation (sLDH). From January 2018 to January 2021, a total of 40 patients with sLDH were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All the patients had received spinal surgeries in Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University. Among them, 20 patients were treated with PELD (PELD group), and 20 patients were treated with UBE discectomy (UBE group). Postoperative length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, operation time, and clinical complications of the patients were compared between the two groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured before surgeries and 3days, 1, and 6months after surgeries. Compared with the UBE group, the PELD group had obviously less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay. The differences in the rate of complications were not statistically significant between the two groups. The VAS score and the ODI score of the two groups had a great reduction after operation. In addition, both the groups had satisfactory clinical outcome; the VAS score and ODI of the PELD group decreased more obviously. The UBE for sLDH yielded similar clinical outcomes to PELD as minimally invasive surgeries; however, PELD is superior to UBE in terms of intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospitalization, and short-term postoperative pain relief. The advantages and disadvantages of the two surgeries should be circumspectly balanced when evaluating a patient for a minimally invasive surgery for sLDH, selecting the most appropriate surgical method for patients.

Symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is widely treated using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). In the present PELD surgery, performing decompression under endoscope still takes a long time to explore the rupture site of annulus fibrosus, resulting in prolonged operation time and over‐invasion of the undegenerated annulus fibrosus. A wide range of intraoperative exploration also induces an iatrogenic injury of the normal annulus fibrosus, even aggravating intervertebral disc degeneration, which may lead to early postoperative recurrence in severe case. Hence, it is important to seek a precise decompression in PELD surgery. Under this kind of realization, more spinal surgeons possibly choose a disc staining before performing decompression. However, the classical disc staining technique still has its shortcomings. First of all, an appropriate dose of staining cannot be accurately mastered, even induces unqualified staining effect. Second, the duration of surgery and the times of fluoroscopy will be increased. Finally, what surgeons see under the endoscope is the staining result but not the staining process. Hence, this is accomplished more effectively by designing procedures that perform fully visible disc staining under spinal endoscope. There is no specific research to discuss the technique note of endoscopic staining in PELD surgery. We have come up with a new original technology of endoscopic staining with methylene blue injection in PELD for treatment of LDH.

Institutional review board-approved, prospective, multicenter, comparative study. To assess the accuracy and utility of a computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation method for percutaneous placement of lumbar pedicle screws compared with conventional fluoroscopic placement. Recent reports indicate that cortical breaches during percutaneous pedicle screw placement can exceed 15%. Computed tomography (CT)- and fluoroscopy-based navigation systems may facilitate increased placement accuracy with reduced radiation exposure and operative times. Patients were alternately assigned to either the Guidance or Control group. The Guidance group underwent lumbar pedicle screw placement using the oblique visualization technique and computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. The Control group underwent lumbar pedicle screw placement per standard percutaneous technique aided by fluoroscopy alone. Baseline demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and American Spinal Injury Association scores were obtained preoperatively and in the immediate postoperative period. Fluoroscopy times and guidewire insertion times were recorded intraoperatively. All postoperative CT scans were reviewed by an independent spine surgeon to grade screw placement accuracy. Forty-two patients (210 screws) were assigned to the Guidance group and 34 patients (152 screws) were assigned to the Control group. Use of Guidance resulted in reduced average fluoroscopy usage per pedicle [6.6 sec (SD = 5.1) vs. 9.6 sec (SD 6.2), P < 0.001] and more expedient placement of guidewires per pedicle [3.65 min (SD = 2.31) vs. 4.43 min (SD = 2.56), P = 0.003]. The Guidance group experienced less than half of the breach rate of the Control group (3.0% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.055) and reduced breach magnitudes. None of the breaches resulted in a corresponding neurological deficit or required revision. All patient-reported outcomes were significantly improved after surgery and there were no significant differences in average postoperative VAS scores between treatment groups. Use of Guidance reduces fluoroscopy and insertion times with increased accuracy compared with conventional fluoroscopic methods of percutaneous pedicle screw insertion.

To compare percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) and the microscopic tubular technique, and to evaluate the outcomes of surgery. We collected information through retrospective analysis of patients with far-lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH) from June 2015 to October 2018. Twenty-six patients underwent paraspinal muscle-splitting microscopicassisted discectomy (MD) and thirty patients underwent PELD surgery by the same surgical team. Data included the duration of the operation, duration of intraoperative radiation exposure, and average duration of hospitalization. Pre- and postoperative pain scores and neurological functions were recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Fifty-six patients remained in the study over the 12-24 months period. The mean operating time was 65.83 ± 16.64 min in the PELD group, mean duration of radiation exposure was 154.98 ± 64.26 mGy, and average of hospitalization was 3.43 days. The mean operating time was 44.96 ± 16.87 min in the MD group, duration of radiation exposure was 42.12 ± 17.28 mGy, and duration of hospitalization was 4.12 days. There were two patients with postoperative transient dysesthesia and one underwent reoperation seven months after surgery in the PELD group. One patient had postoperative transient dysesthesia in the MD group. Except low back pain at three months (p > 0.05), all patients in both groups showed significant improvement in VAS and ODI scores compared with pre-operation and until final follow-up (p < 0.05). Both techniques are minimally invasive, effective, and safe for treating FLLDH in selected patients. Compared with the PELD technique, the MD procedure offers a wider field of vision during operation, shorter operation time, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter learning curve.

Comparison of Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Young Adults: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

The use of non-fluoroscopic systems (NFS) to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is associated with lower radiation exposure. This study aimed to determine if NFS reduces fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and procedure time. We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing RFCA for SVT. NFS included EnSiteTM NavXTM or CARTO® mapping. We compared procedure and fluoroscopy times, and radiation exposure between NFS and conventional fluoroscopy (CF) cohorts. Procedural success, complications and one-year success rates were reported. A total of 200 patients over 27 months were included and RFCA was guided by NFS for 79 patients; those with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), left-sided atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and right-sided AVRT were included (n = 101, 63 and 36, respectively). Fluoroscopy times were significantly lower with NFS than with CF (10.8 ± 11.1 minutes vs. 32.0 ± 27.5 minutes; p < 0.001). The mean fluoroscopic dose area product was also significantly reduced with NFS (NSF: 5,382 ± 5,768 mGy*cm2 vs. CF: 21,070 ± 23,311 mGy*cm2; p < 0.001); for all SVT subtypes. There was no significant reduction in procedure time, except for left-sided AVRT ablation (NFS: 79.2 minutes vs. CF: 116.4 minutes; p = 0.001). Procedural success rates were comparable (NFS: 97.5% vs. CF: 98.3%) and at one-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rates (NFS: 5.2% vs. CF: 4.2%). No clinically significant complications were observed in both groups. The use of NFS for RFCA for SVT is safe, with significantly reduced radiation dose and fluoroscopy time.

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical features of and risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in our clinical practice.MethodsA total of 942 consecutive patients who underwent single-level PELD from January 2013 to August 2019 were included. Patients were divided into the recurrence group and the nonrecurrence group. Patient characteristics, radiographic parameters and surgical variables were compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis were adopted to determine the risk factors for recurrence after PELD.ResultsThe prevalence of rLDH was 6.05%. Age, sex, tobacco use, duration of low back pain, body mass index (BMI), occupational lifting, herniated disc type, facet joint degeneration, operation time and time to ambulation were significantly different between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that age (P < 0.001), sex (P = 0.019), BMI (P = 0.001), current smoking (P < 0.001), occupational lifting (P < 0.001), facet joint degeneration (P = 0.001), operation time (P = 0.002), and time to ambulation (P < 0.001) could be significantly associated with the incidence of rLDH after PELD. Multivariate analysis suggested that an older age (P < 0.001), the male sex (P = 0.017), a high BMI (P < 0.001), heavy work (P = 0.003), grade II facet joint degeneration (P < 0.001) and early ambulation (P < 0.001) were significantly related to rLDH after PELD.ConclusionsAn older age, the male sex, a higher BMI, heavy work, grade II facet joint degeneration, and early ambulation are independent significant risk factors for rLDH after PELD. Great importance should be attached to these risk factors to prevent rLDH. We suggest that patients control their weight, avoid heavy work, ambulate at an appropriate time, and perform strengthening rehabilitation exercises to reduce the incidence of rLDH.

In recent years, with improved living standards, adolescent obesity has been increasingly studied. The incidence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in obese adolescents is increasing yearly. No clinical studies have reported the use of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in obese adolescent lumbar disc herniation (ALDH) patients. This study evaluated the preliminary surgical outcomes of PELD in obese ALDH patients. Fifty-one ALDH patients underwent single-level PELD surgery between January 2014 and January 2020. Patients were divided into an obese group and a normal group. Patient characteristics and surgical variables were compared between the two groups. The VAS, ODI, and SF-36 scales were used preoperatively and postoperatively to evaluate the clinical efficacy. In this study, 19 patients were included in the obese group, and 28 were included in the normal group. There was no significant difference in age, sex, duration of low back pain, duration of leg pain, or operative level between the obese and normal groups preoperatively. The obese group had a longer operative time (OT) (101.9 ± 9.0 min vs. 84.3 ± 11.0 min, P < 0.001), more fluoroscopy exposures (41.0 ± 5.8 vs. 31.6 ± 7.0, P < 0.001) and a longer time to ambulation (29.9 ± 4.0 vs. 25.0 ± 2.9, p < 0.001) than the normal group. The groups did not significantly differ in complications. The VAS score for back and leg pain and the ODI and SF-36 score for functional status improved significantly postoperatively. The PELD procedure is a safe and feasible method for treating LDH in obese adolescents. Obese ALDH patients require a longer OT, more fluoroscopy exposures and a longer time to get out of bed than normal ALDH patients. However, PELD yields similar clinical outcomes in obese and normal ALDH patients.

To present the positive impact of technique standardization on successful outcome, fluoroscopy, and total operating time (TOT) shortening in a prospective study. Six experienced endourologists participated. To assess whether the adaptation of standardized surgical steps improved their methodology with time, 253 patients were prospectively divided in three consecutive 1-month groups. Patients underwent stent placement and exchange and total operating and fluoroscopy times (FTs) were recorded. All surgeons were unaware of their mean recorded results until the end of the study. At the end of the third month, we evaluated if the suggested technique standardization established a decrease for both FT and TOT. Statistical significance was set to p < 0.05. Total operating and FTs were significantly reduced with time between all groups of patients. For stent placement, TOT showed significant reduction between Groups A and C (p < 0.001), while between other group comparisons did not reach significance. FT showed a significant reduction (p < 0.001) in all group comparisons. For stent exchange, TOT reached significant improvement (p = 0.003) between Groups A and C, whereas between other groups was insignificant. FT improvement was significant between Groups A and C (p < 0.001) and Groups B and C (p < 0.001), but insignificant between Groups A and B. Even in experienced hands, the adaptation of technique standardization results in significant decrease of total operating and FTs and it is independent from feedback regarding their time performance.

To compare the outcomes of miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of 10-20mm, non-lower pole, renal stones. This prospective randomised double-arm trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Egypt from February to December 2020. Adult patients with single, non-lower pole, high-density (≥1000HU) renal stones were randomised to receive mini-PCNL or ESWL. The stone-free rate (SFR); operative, fluoroscopy and hospitalisation times; blood loss; auxiliary procedures; retreatment; unscheduled hospital readmission; and complications were compared between the groups. The primary analysis included 34 patients in the mini-PCNL group and 33 in the ESWL group. Overall, the SFR was 97.1% in the mini-PCNL group vs 30.3% in the ESWL group (P<0.001). All patients in the ESWL group required retreatment, and none of them were stone-free after the first ESWL session. None of the patients in the mini-PCNL group required retreatment. The overall operative time, fluoroscopy time, auxiliary procedure, retreatment, and unscheduled hospital readmission were significantly higher in the ESWL group. The hospital stay and decrease in the haemoglobin level were significantly higher in the mini-PCNL group. The groups were comparable for the overall complication rate. Mini-PCNL is more effective than ESWL for treating 10-20mm, high-density, non-lower pole renal stones. Mini-PCNL has the advantages of a high SFR and abolishing the need for retreatment and re-hospitalisation.