Ramsey Goes Visibly Pushdown

The complementation problem for nondeterministic word automata has numerous applications in formal verification. In particular, the language-containment problem, to which many verification problems is reduced, involves complementation. For automata on finite words, which correspond to safety properties, complementation involves determinization. The 2n blow-up that is caused by the subset construction is justified by a tight lower bound. For Büchi automata on infinite words, which are required for the modeling of liveness properties, optimal complementation constructions are quite complicated, as the subset construction is not sufficient. From a theoretical point of view, the problem is considered solved since 1988, when Safra came up with a determinization construction for Büchi automata, leading to a 2O(nlogn) complementation construction, and Michel came up with a matching lower bound. A careful analysis, however, of the exact blow-up in Safra’s and Michel’s bounds reveals an exponential gap in the constants hiding in the O() notations: while the upper bound on the number of states in Safra’s complementary automaton is n 2n, Michel’s lower bound involves only an n! blow up, which is roughly (n/e)n. The exponential gap exists also in more recent complementation constructions. In particular, the upper bound on the number of states in the complementation construction in [KV01], which avoids determinization, is (6n)n. This is in contrast with the case of automata on finite words, where the upper and lower bounds coincides. In this work we describe an improved complementation construction for nondeterministic Büchi automata and analyze its complexity. We show that the new construction results in an automaton with at most (1.06n)n states. While this leaves the problem about the exact blow up open, the gap is now exponentially smaller. From a practical point of view, our solution enjoys the simplicity of [KV01], and results in much smaller automata.

The complementation problem for nondeterministic word automata has numerous applications in formal verification. In particular, the language-containment problem, to which many verification problems is reduced, involves complementation. For automata on finite words, which correspond to safety properties, complementation involves determinization. The 2n blow-up that is caused by the subset construction is justified by a tight lower bound. For Büchi automata on infinite words, which are required for the modeling of liveness properties, optimal complementation constructions are quite complicated, as the subset construction is not sufficient. From a theoretical point of view, the problem is considered solved since 1988, when Safra came up with a determinization construction for Büchi automata, leading to a 2O(n log n) complementation construction, and Michel came up with a matching lower bound. A careful analysis, however, of the exact blow-up in Safra's and Michel's bounds reveals an exponential gap in the constants hiding in the O( ) notations: while the upper bound on the number of states in Safra's complementary automaton is n2n, Michel's lower bound involves only an n! blow up, which is roughly (n/e)n. The exponential gap exists also in more recent complementation constructions. In particular, the upper bound on the number of states in the complementation construction of Kupferman and Vardi, which avoids determinization, is (6n)n. This is in contrast with the case of automata on finite words, where the upper and lower bounds coincides. In this work we describe an improved complementation construction for nondeterministic Büchi automata and analyze its complexity. We show that the new construction results in an automaton with at most (0.96n)n states. While this leaves the problem about the exact blow up open, the gap is now exponentially smaller. From a practical point of view, our solution enjoys the simplicity of the construction of Kupferman and Vardi, and results in much smaller automata.

G. Fici proved that a finite word has a minimal suffix automaton if and only if all its left special factors occur as prefixes. He called LSP all finite and infinite words having this latter property. We characterize here infinite LSP words in terms of S-adicity. More precisely we provide a finite set of morphisms S and an automaton \(\mathcal{A}\) such that an infinite word is LSP if and only if it is S-adic and all its directive words are recognizable by \(\mathcal{A}\).

We consider two-variable first-order logic FO2 and its quantifier alternation hierarchies over both finite and infinite words. Our main results are forbidden patterns for deterministic automata (finite words) and for Carton-Michel automata (infinite words). In order to give concise patterns, we allow the use of subwords on paths in finite graphs. This concept is formalized as subword-patterns. For certain types of subword-patterns there exists a non-deterministic logspace algorithm to decide their presence or absence in a given automaton. In particular, this leads to NL algorithms for deciding the levels of the FO2 quantifier alternation hierarchies. This applies to both full and half levels, each over finite and infinite words. Moreover, we show that these problems are NL-hard and, hence, NL-complete.

This paper is concerned with the language inclusion problem for timed automata: given timed automata ${\mathcal A}$ and ${\mathcal B}$, is every word accepted by ${\mathcal B}$ also accepted by ${\mathcal A}$? Alur and Dill [3] showed that the language inclusion problem is decidable if ${\mathcal A}$ has no clocks and undecidable if ${\mathcal A}$ has two clocks (with no restriction on ${\mathcal B}$). However, the status of the problem when ${\mathcal A}$ has one clock is not determined by [3]. In this paper we close this gap for timed automata over infinite words by showing that the one-clock language inclusion problem is undecidable. For timed automata over finite words, building on our earlier paper [20], we show that the one-clock language inclusion problem is decidable with non-primitive recursive complexity. This reveals a surprising divergence between the theory of timed automata over finite words and over infinite words. Finally, we show that if e-transitions or non-singular postconditions are allowed, then the one-clock language inclusion problem is undecidable over both finite and infinite words.

Over finite words, languages of dot-depth one are expressively complete for alternation-free first-order logic. This fragment is also known as the Boolean closure of existential first-order logic. Here, the atomic formulas comprise order, successor, minimum, and maximum predicates. Knast (1983) has shown that it is decidable whether a language has dot-depth one. We extend Knast's result to infinite words. In particular, we describe the class of languages definable in alternation-free first-order logic over infinite words, and we give an effective characterization of this fragment. This characterization has two components. The first component is identical to Knast's algebraic property for finite words and the second component is a topological property, namely being a Boolean combination of Cantor sets. As an intermediate step we consider finite and infinite words simultaneously. We then obtain the results for infinite words as well as for finite words as special cases. In particular, we give a new proof of Knast's Theorem on languages of dot-depth one over finite words.

An infinite word is an infinite Lyndon word if it is smaller, with respect to the lexicographic order, than all its proper suffixes, or equivalently if it has infinitely many finite Lyndon words as prefixes. A characterization of binary endomorphisms generating Lyndon infinite words is provided.

Automata over infinite words provide a powerful framework to solve various decision problems. However, the mechanized reasoning with restricted classes of automata over infinite words is often simpler and more efficient. For instance, weak deterministic Büchi automata (wdbas) can be handled algorithmically almost as efficient as deterministic automata over finite words. In this paper, we show how and when the standard powerset construction for automata over finite words can be used to determinize automata over infinite words. An instance is the class of automata that accept wdba-recognizable languages. Furthermore, we present applications of this new determinization construction. Namely, we apply it to improve the automata-based approach for the mixed first-order linear arithmetic over the reals and the integers, and we utilize it to accelerate finite state model checking. We report on experimental results for these two applications.

Complementation of finite automata on infinite words is not only a fundamental problem in automata theory, but also serves as a cornerstone for solving numerous decision problems in mathematical logic, model-checking, program analysis and verification. For Streett complementation, a significant gap exists between the current lower bound 2^{Omega(n*log(n*k))} and upper bound 2^{O(n*k*log(n*k))}, where n is the state size, k is the number of Streett pairs, and k can be as large as 2^{n}. Determining the complexity of Streett complementation has been an open question since the late 80's. In this paper we show a complementation construction with upper bound 2^{O(n*log(n)+n*k*log(k))} for k=O(n) and 2^{O(n^{2}*log(n))} for k=Omega(n), which matches well the lower bound obtained in the paper arXiv:1102.2963. We also obtain a tight upper bound 2^{O(n*log(n))} for parity complementation.

Weighted automata and weighted MSO logics for average and long-time behaviors

In general, a nondeterministic automaton or machine (for example a finite automaton, pushdown automaton or Turing machine) is called unambiguous if each input is accepted by at most one run or computation. Each deterministic automaton is obviously unambiguous. However, in many settings, unambiguous automata are more expressive or admit more succinct automata than deterministic models, while preserving some good algorithmic properties. The aim of this talk is to survey some classical and some more recent results on unambiguous finite automata over different kind of input structures, namely finite words, infinite words, finite trees, and infinite trees.

On generating binary words palindromically

Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) is a prominent specification formalism for real-time systems. In this paper, we show that the satisfiability problem for MTL over finite timed words is decidable, with non-primitive recursive complexity. We also consider the model-checking problem for MTL: whether all words accepted by a given Alur-Dill timed automaton satisfy a given MTL formula. We show that this problem is decidable over finite words. Over infinite words, we show that model checking the safety fragment of MTL--which includes invariance and time-bounded response properties--is also decidable. These results are quite surprising in that they contradict various claims to the contrary that have appeared in the literature.

formula omitted]-Regular languages are testable with a constant number of queries

Automata on infinite words (ω-automata) have wide applications in formal language theory as well as in modeling and verifying reactive systems. Complementation of ω-automata is a crucial instrument in many these applications, and hence there have been great interests in determining the state complexity of the complementation problem. However, obtaining nontrivial lower bounds has been difficult. For the complementation of Rabin automata, a significant gap exists between the state-of-the-art lower bound 2^Ω(NlgN) and upper bound 2^O(kNlgN), where k, the number of Rabin pairs, can be as large as 2N. In this paper we introduce multidimensional rankings to the full automata technique. Using the improved technique we establish an almost tight lower bound for the complementation of Rabin automata. We also show that the same lower bound holds for the determinization of Rabin automata.