• Home
  • Search
  • Rationality of Fuzzy Choice Functions under an S-Implication–S-Residuum Framework
  • https://doi.org/10.9734/arjom/2026/v22i31056Copy DOI Icon

Rationality of Fuzzy Choice Functions under an S-Implication–S-Residuum Framework

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Classically, formal individual choice and rationality are framed using precise preference relations. Individual preference relations and hence the rationality of choice are generally not precise, and this necessitates the studies under vague preference relations. Until now, available studies of rationality have done by utilizing R-implications in the associated continuous t-norm. However, another class of fuzzy implications, S-implications, which represent behavioral interpretation, i.e., lenience and non-satisfaction of criteria, have not yet been used for the study of rationality. We validated that S-implication with continuous t-norm fails to satisfy key results of rationality and hence introduced an operator called S-residuum, which logically represents the minimal degree required to hold the implication against the joint degree of satisfaction of the implication by t-norm. This happens due to failure of adjointness, the law of identity and the boundary condition in this structure. This S-implication-S-residuum framework is introduced and exploited to develop logical interrelations among rationality axioms built on vague preferences for the first time. This leads to reformulating the well-known rationality axioms, namely S-FWARP, S-FSARP, S-FWCA and S-FSCA. The main results are : S-FSCA ⇒ S-FWCA ⇒ S-FSWCA and S-FSARP ⇒ S-FWARP ⇒ S-SFWARP. Furthermore, we characterize regularity of fuzzy preference relation in terms of FCF satisfying S-FWCA and hence S-SFCA. We concluded that this new framework offers a behaviorally meaningful and logically coherent foundation for the study of vague choice and rationality.

Similar Papers
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations1

Designing Representative Bodies When the Voter Preferences Are Fuzzy

  • Jun 18, 2007
  • Hannu Nurmi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations43

Fuzzy preferences and Arrow-type problems in social choice

  • Apr 01, 1994
  • Social Choice and Welfare
  • Asis Banerjee
  • Research Article
  • Citations59

A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model by associating technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution with relative preference relation

  • Jan 24, 2014
  • Information Sciences
  • Yu-Jie Wang
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations6

From Preference Relations to Fuzzy Choice Functions

  • Jan 01, 2011
  • Davide Martinetti +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1000

Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations

  • Apr 01, 2004
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • E Herrera-Viedma +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations1

The satisfactory consistency of fuzzy preference relations

  • Jul 01, 2008
  • Gang Qian +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations30

Study on Assessment Level of Experts based on Difference Preference Information

  • Feb 01, 2007
  • Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice
  • Xia Chen +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations2

A Goal Programming Approach for Group Decision Making with Four Incomplete Preference Relations

  • Sep 01, 2016
  • Ben Cheng +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations93

Logarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations

  • May 21, 2012
  • Applied Mathematical Modelling
  • Yejun Xu +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations8

A Method Adjusting Consistency and Consensus for Group Decision‐Making Problems with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations Based on Discrete Fuzzy Numbers

  • Jan 01, 2018
  • Complexity
  • Meng Zhao +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

The breaking of additively reciprocal property of fuzzy preference relations and its implication to decision making under uncertainty

  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Information Sciences
  • Fang Liu +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

An Interactive Consensus Model in Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Hesitant Preference Relations

  • Sep 29, 2022
  • Axioms
  • Yongming Song
  • Research Article
  • Citations5

Decomposition and Intersection of Two Fuzzy Numbers for Fuzzy Preference Relations

  • Oct 14, 2017
  • Symmetry
  • Hui-Chin Tang
  • Book Chapter

Interval-Valued Fuzzy Preference Relations and Their Properties

  • Jan 01, 2015
  • Urszula Bentkowska
  • Book Chapter

Relevant Theories of Reciprocal Preference and Fuzzy Preference Relations

  • Jan 01, 2013
  • Zaiwu Gong +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.