Rawls, Genealogy, History

The problem ofjustifying democracy arises when a society sees the need for cooperative, collective action. Collective action may be needed to solve coordination problems, public goods problems, Prisoner's Dilemmas, and other structural problems of human interaction or perhaps to realize common ideals of justice in concrete political institutions. Once the need for collective action is established, one must ask how the goals of a cooperative endeavor are to be secured. Cooperation requires that individuals, at least over a specified range of activity, pursue a joint strategy. To assure voluntary compliance in a joint venture, cooperation must be to each person's advantage. However, each person may have an incentive to induce others to cooperate and to defect from the joint strategy in the hope of enjoying the fruits of cooperation without incurring the opportunity costs of compliance. This is the essence of the Prisoner's Dilemma, and considerations of this sort suggest that if collective action is to succeed, policies or strategies formed collectively must be coercively enforceable. Coercion, however, requires justification. Because solving the problem of rational noncompliance requires that collective decisions be coercively enforceable, the rules by which collective decisions are reached require justification. Douglas Rae neatly puts the problem of justification that emerges when political solutions are coercively enforceable as follows: "Once a political community has decided which of its members are to participate directly in the making of collective policy, an important question remains: 'How many of them must agree before a policy is imposed on the community?"" This is essentially the question to which the principle of democratic rule provides an answer: by what process are collective decisions to be made? Answering Rae's question requires a normative framework. We could say that a procedure for making collective decisions is justified if and

About the Contributors

<i>Class Work: Vocational Schools and China’s Urban Youth</i>, by T. E. Woronov. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2016. viii+185 pp. US$25.95 (paper).

Previous articleNext article FreeNotes on ContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreLeora Dahan Katz is an assistant professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law. Her main areas of research include legal philosophy, normative ethics, and the philosophy of punishment, with special interest in blame and retribution. [email protected]Kyle G. Fritz is an assistant professor in the Department of Public Policy Leadership at the University of Mississippi. In addition to his work on moral standing and hypocrisy, he focuses on the consistent application of ethical principles in policy, including conscientious objection and punishment. [email protected]Nathan Robert Howard is an assistant professor in the Philosophy Department at Texas A&M University. He received his PhD from the University of Southern California in 2019. His main research interests concern the relation between virtue and reasons. Along with Mark Schroeder, he is the author of The Fundamentals of Reasons, under contract with Oxford University Press.Daniel J. Miller is a visiting assistant professor at West Virginia University. His research consists of work on blameworthiness and ignorance, the ethics of blame and forgiveness, and moral responsibility and control. More recently he has applied his research to several questions arising in health care ethics. [email protected]Kieran Oberman is a senior lecturer in the School of Social and Political Science at the University of Edinburgh. His research is in various areas of political philosophy, including war, poverty, and immigration.Daniel Telech is a postdoctoral fellow at the Polonsky Academy at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. His main areas of research are ethics, moral psychology, and philosophy of action. He is especially interested in issues of responsibility and agency that concern the nature and norms of our responses to persons qua blameworthy and praiseworthy agents. [email protected] Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 132, Number 4July 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/719507 © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Previous articleNext article No AccessReviewsSheep, Goats, and Roses Apolitical Politics: A Critique of Behavioralism. By Charles A. McCoy and John Playford Contemporary Political Science: Toward Empirical Theory. By Ithiel de Sola Pool Politics and Social Science. By W. J. M. Mackenzie Eugene J. MeehanEugene J. Meehan Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Polity Volume 1, Number 4Summer 1969 The Journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association Copyright 1969 PolityPDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Previous article FreeContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreYuqing Feng (冯煜清) is associate professor of law at the School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. His current research centers on legal consciousness and judicial reforms in China.Ivan Franceschini is a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow at the Australian National University’s Australian Center on China in the World and at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. His research focuses on labor and civil society in China and Cambodia. He is coeditor of the open access journal Made in China: A Quarterly on Chinese Labour, Civil Society, and Rights.Xin He (贺欣) is visiting professor of law (2017–18) at Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China, and professor of law at University of Hong Kong. His recent articles have appeared in American Journal of Sociology, Law & Society Review, China Quarterly, and American Journal of Comparative Law. His book Embedded Courts: Judicial Decision Making in China (with Kwai Ng) was published by Cambridge University Press (2017). His research interests include judicial reforms in China and Chinese family law.Shu Keng (耿曙) is University Research Fellow in the Department of Sociology and the Center for Local Government and Social Governance Studies, both at Zhejiang University. His research interests range from comparative political economy to organizational sociology, especially Chinese local governments, government-business relations, and cross-Strait trade relations.Xingmiu Liao (廖幸谬) is a PhD candidate in the Department of Political Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing. His main research is on Chinese politics and society, Chinese ethnic minorities, and the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front organization.Elisa Nesossi is an Australian Research Council Early Career Research Fellow at the Australian National University’s Australian Centre on China in the World. Her scholarship focuses on Chinese law, criminal justice, human rights, and civil society in contemporary China.Lynette H. Ong is an associate professor of political science at the University of Toronto. She is the author of Prosper or Perish: Credit and Fiscal Systems in Rural China (Cornell University Press, 2012) and of papers in Perspectives on Politics, Comparative Politics, The China Quarterly, Journal of Contemporary Asia, and Foreign Affairs, among others.Baoqing Pang (庞保庆) is assistant professor in the School of Sociology and Political Science and the Center for Social Governance and Public Policy, both at Shanghai University. His main research focuses on Chinese politics, especially the behavior of local governments.Edward Schwarck is a visiting research fellow at the Japan Institute of International Affairs in Tokyo. His research interests include political-military affairs in China.Munish Sharma is a consultant at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi, and a doctoral candidate at the Centre for East Asian Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. His research interests include cybersecurity, critical information infrastructure protection, space security, and defense technologies. He is the author of the monograph Securing Critical Information Infrastructure: Global Perspectives and Practices (2017) and coeditor of the book Securing Cyberspace: International and Asian Perspectives (2016).Wen-Hsuan Tsai (蔡文轩) is an associate research fellow at the Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan. His main research is on Chinese political development, comparative politics, and comparative authoritarian regimes. He has recently published in China Journal, China Quarterly, Journal of Contemporary China, Modern China, Asian Survey, and Problems of Post-Communism.Lingna Zhong (钟灵娜) is assistant professor in the School of Politics and International Studies and a Fellow at the Centre for Reforms in Rural China at Central China Normal University, Hubei. Her main research interests are China’s cadre management system and studies of Chinese local government. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The China Journal Volume 80July 2018 Published on behalf of the Australian Centre on China in the World at the Australian National University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/697399 Copyright 2018 by The Australian National University. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Previous article FreeContributors to This IssuePDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreAlexsia T. Chan is assistant professor of government at Hamilton College. Her research focuses on comparative politics, the political economy of development, and Chinese politics, and her interests include inequality, authoritarian rule, labor, public service provision, and social control.Xi Chen is associate professor in the Department of Government and Public Administration, Chinese University of Hong Kong. He is the author of Social Protest and Contentious Authoritarianism in China (2012) and is currently completing another book, Disempowering Contention: Restructuring, Resistance, and State Domination in China. He has also published articles in journals such as Comparative Politics, Comparative Political Studies, Politics and Society, China Quarterly, and Journal of Democracy.Wing-Chung Ho (何榮宗) is associate professor of sociology at City University of Hong Kong. He holds a PhD in anthropology from SOAS, University of London. Ho has published broadly on community studies and social problems in relation to subordinate people in Hong Kong and China in journals that include China Quarterly, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Journal of Contemporary China, Journal of Contemporary Asia, and China Review.Carsten A. Holz, an economist, is a professor in the Social Science Division at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. His research focuses on China’s reform-period economy, most recently on the quality of Chinese statistics, issues of economic growth, and economic development in underdeveloped regions of the PRC.Yu Huang (黄瑜) is a postdoctoral fellow in the Division of Social Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Her research interests include industrial automation and robotization, science and technology studies, labor studies, agrarian change and rural development in China.Tao-chiu Lam teaches at the College of Professional and Continuing Education, Hong Kong Polytechnic University. His research interests are local government and politics and governance issues in China.Carlos Wing-Hung Lo is professor and head of the Department of Government and Public Administration at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and director of the Centre for Business Sustainability in the Faculty of Business Administration. His main research interests are in the areas of law and government, environmental governance, public sector management, and corporate social and environmental responsibility.Jian Lu (陆健) is a postdoctoral research fellow at the School of Public Policy and Management of Tsinghua University in Beijing. His research interests include contentious politics, environmental governance, and environmental nongovernmental organizations in China.Kevin J. O’Brien is the Alan P. Bedford Professor of Asian Studies and Political Science and director of the Institute of East Asian Studies at the University of California, Berkeley. His research focuses on Chinese politics since 1978, and his interests include policy implementation, legislative politics, village elections, popular resistance and protest policing.Naubahar Sharif is associate professor in the Division of Social Science and the Division of Public Policy at Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. His current research is on the process of industrial automation, including robotics, unfolding in southern China. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The China Journal Volume 81January 2019 Published on behalf of the Australian Centre on China in the World at the Australian National University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/700669 Copyright 2019 by The Australian National University. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Political Cynicism: Measurement and Meaning

Previous articleNext article FreeContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreLuciana de Souza Leão is assistant professor of sociology at the University of Michigan. She is a political and comparative sociologist with broad interests in knowledge-making processes, social inequalities, and the state.Pablo Gastón is assistant professor of sociology at the University of Michigan. His research focuses on changing forms of economic conflict in the American labor movement.Danya Lagos is assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. They specialize in the relationship between gender, social change, and demography.Grégoire Mallard is professor of anthropology and sociology and director of research at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva. His ERC grant (2017–22), titled “Bombs, Banks and Sanctions,” extends his prior work on transnational lawmaking and forms of economic exchange.Jin Sun is a Ph.D. candidate in anthropology and sociology at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, where he is a researcher in the Global Governance Centre. He passed the bar exam in Beijing, China, and directed studies at the Hague Academy of International Law. His research focuses on sanctions, global governance, and law and globalization.Emily Rauscher is associate professor of sociology at Brown University and a faculty affiliate of the Population Studies and Training Center and the Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Her work examines social returns to education, including when and how school funding improves equality of opportunity.Yifan Shen is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at Brown University. He studies family demography, education, and income inequality.Daniel Silver is professor of sociology at the University of Toronto Scarborough. He received his Ph.D. from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of ChicagoClayton Childress is associate professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Toronto. He is the author of Under the Cover: The Creation, Production, and Reception of a Novel (Princeton University Press, 2017), which won the 2018 Mary Douglas Prize for best book in the sociology of culture.Monica Lee is a Computational Social Science Director at Meta, where she leads the Political & Organizational Science team. She earned her Ph.D. in Sociology from the University of Chicago and has published works on quantitative methods for measuring culture, text mining, musical taste, graph mining, big data, and ethics.Adam Slez is assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Virginia. His recent book, The Making of the Populist Movement: State, Market, and Party on the Western Frontier (Oxford University Press, 2020), examines the origins of electoral populism in the United States during the late 19th century.Fabio Dias has an engineering degree and master’s from the University of Campinas, Brazil, with a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Université Paris-Est. After several postdoctoral fellowships in data analysis and visualization, including at the University of São Paulo, New York University, and the University of Toronto, he is now a cloud architect for StateStreet. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 128, Number 1July 2022 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/720956 Views: 518Total views on this site © 2022 The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

<i>Chaucer, Gower, and the Vernacular Rising: Poetry and the Problem of the Populace after 1381</i>. Lynn Arner. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2013. Pp. ix+198.

Previous articleNext article No AccessIdeology and the Organization of Conflict: On the Relationship Between Political Thought and BehaviorSamuel H. BarnesSamuel H. Barnes Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 28, Number 3Aug., 1966 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2128155 Views: 48Total views on this site Citations: 21Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1966 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Arvid Lindh Public Support for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Welfare State: Evidence from Sweden, Scandinavian Political Studies 38, no.11 (Aug 2014): 75–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12035 Michael Hechter From Class to Culture Michael Hechter, American Journal of Sociology 110, no.22 (Jul 2015): 400–445.https://doi.org/10.1086/421357Paul Webb, Paul G. Lewis The lessons of comparative politics: Russian political parties as independent variables?, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 14, no.1-21-2 (Mar 1998): 253–264.https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279808415377John Gerring Ideology: A Definitional Analysis, Political Research Quarterly 50, no.44 (Jul 2016): 957–994.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000412Leonardo Morlino Consolidation and Party Government in Southern Europe, International Political Science Review 16, no.22 (Apr 1995): 145–167.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219501600203Cees P. Middendorp Models for Predicting the Dutch Vote along the Left-Right and the Libertarianism-Authoritarianism Dimensions, International Political Science Review 10, no.44 (Oct 1989): 279–308.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218901000401Aaron Wildavsky Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation, American Political Science Review 81, no.11 (Aug 2014): 3–21.https://doi.org/10.2307/1960776Diane Sainsbury The End of Ideology Debate Revisited: An Appraisal of Definitional and Theoretical Issues*, Scandinavian Political Studies 9, no.22 (Oct 2007): 111–128.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.1986.tb00340.x Peter McDonough , Samuel H. Barnes , and Antonio López Pina Authority and Association: Spanish Democracy in Comparative Perspective, The Journal of Politics 46, no.33 (Oct 2015): 652–688.https://doi.org/10.2307/2130851Peter McDonough, Antonio López Pina, Samuel H. Barnes The Spanish Public in Political Transition, British Journal of Political Science 11, no.11 (Jan 2009): 49–79.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002453Stephen Earl Bennett, Robert Oldendick, Alfred J. Tuchfarber, George F. Bishop Education and mass belief systems: An extension and some new questions, Political Behavior 1, no.11 (Jan 1979): 53–72.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988521Robert Leonardi OPINIONI POLITICHE DELLE CORRENTI DEMOCRISTIANE IN EMILIA-ROMAGNA, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 4, no.22 (Jun 2016): 387–407.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048840200011047Samuel Long, Ruth Long The Influence of Political Ideology on the Perception of the Socioculturally Disadvantaged, Education and Urban Society 6, no.11 (Nov 1973): 102–126.https://doi.org/10.1177/001312457300600106Ruth Long, Samuel Long Sociopolitical Ideology as a Correlate of Teacher-Candidates' Attitudes Concerning Poverty and the Disadvantaged, Urban Education 8, no.33 (Aug 2016): 249–270.https://doi.org/10.1177/004208597383005Jeff Fishel On the Transformation of Ideology in European Political Systems, Comparative Political Studies 4, no.44 (Jun 2016): 406–437.https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407200400402Giuseppe Di Palma CONFLITTO E ÉLITES NELLE SOCIETÀ INDUSTRIALI, Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 1, no.33 (Jun 2016): 481–513.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048840200013873Robert D. Putnam Studying Elite Political Culture: The Case of “Ideology”, American Political Science Review 65, no.33 (Aug 2014): 651–681.https://doi.org/10.2307/1955512D. W. Urwin Social Cleavages and Political Parties in Belgium: Problems of Institutionalization, Political Studies 18, no.33 (Sep 1970): 320–340.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1970.tb00437.xJoel D. Aberbach, Jack L. Walker The Meanings of Black Power: A Comparison of White and Black Interpretations of a Political Slogan, American Political Science Review 64, no.22 (Aug 2014): 367–388.https://doi.org/10.2307/1953839Frederic J. Fleron, Rita Mae Kelly Personality, behaviour and communist ideology, Soviet Studies 21, no.33 (Nov 2007): 297–313.https://doi.org/10.1080/09668137008410711Robert A. Schoenberger Conservatism, Personality and Political Extremism, American Political Science Review 62, no.0303 (Aug 2014): 868–877.https://doi.org/10.2307/1953436

No AccessThe New Institutionalism in the Study of Authoritarian RegimesAndreas SchedlerAndreas SchedlerSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:Apr 2014https://doi.org/10.13109/tode.2009.6.2.323SectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail About Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byLaos7 December 2022Work for the Nation, Obey the State, Praise the Ummah: Turkey’s Government-oriented Youth Organizations in Cultivating a New Nation17 October 2019 | Ethnopolitics, Vol. 20, No. 4The Politics of Co-optation: Ethnopolitical Minority Organizations and Authoritarian Elections in the Middle East11 January 2021 | Ethnopolitics, Vol. 20, No. 2Mobilizing in a hybrid political system: the Artvin case in Turkey20 January 2020 | Democratization, Vol. 27, No. 4Toward a Theory of Political Repression3 January 2020Data-Driven Authoritarianism: Non-democracies and Big Data10 November 2018Brunei Darussalam: Malay Islamic Monarchy and Rentier State28 December 2017Lawmaking in Authoritarian Regimes: Spain and Argentina in Comparative PerspectiveSSRN Electronic JournalIntroduction30 April 2016Gender Politics, Authoritarian Regime Resilience, and the Role of Civil Society in Algeria and MozambiqueSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. 9Why Do Military Regimes Institutionalize? Constitution-making and Elections as Political Survival Strategy in MyanmarAsian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 21, No. 2Frameworks of Political System Development'Informal Politics' and 'Informal Institutions': Conceptual Foundations, Analytical Foci and Challenges for the Study of Authoritarian and Other Political RegimesSSRN Electronic JournalCivil Society and Competitive Authoritarianism in MalaysiaJournal of Civil Society, Vol. 7, No. 1Democratic enclaves in authoritarian regimes11 May 2010 | Democratization, Vol. 17, No. 3Mexican Monetary Policy (1980-2010): Objectives, Instruments and Results (Objetivos, Instrumentos Y Resultados De Política Monetaria, México 1980-2010)SSRN Electronic Journal Download book coverVolume 6Issue 2December 2009 ISSN: 1612-9008eISSN: 2196-8276HistoryPublished online:April 2014 PDF download

Notes on Contributors

Previous articleNext article No AccessIntelligence and Sense of Political Efficacy in ChildrenElliott S. WhiteElliott S. White Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 30, Number 3Aug., 1968 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2128802 Views: 11Total views on this site Citations: 20Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1968 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ming-Lun Chung, Ken Ka-wo Fung, Eric MP Chiu, Chao-Lung Liu Toward a Rational Civil Society: Deliberative Thinking, Civic Participation, and Self-Efficacy among Taiwanese Young Adults, Political Studies Review 12 (Jul 2021): 147892992110244.https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211024440Lene Aarøe, Vivek Appadurai, Kasper M. Hansen, Andrew J. Schork, Thomas Werge, Ole Mors, Anders D. Børglum, David M. Hougaard, Merete Nordentoft, Preben B. Mortensen, Wesley Kurt Thompson, Alfonso Buil, Esben Agerbo, Michael Bang Petersen Genetic predictors of educational attainment and intelligence test performance predict voter turnout, Nature Human Behaviour 5, no.22 (Nov 2020): 281–291.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00952-2JOHN B. HOLBEIN Childhood Skill Development and Adult Political Participation, American Political Science Review 111, no.0303 (Jun 2017): 572–583.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000119Daniel Laurison Social Class and Political Engagement in the United States, Sociology Compass 10, no.88 (Aug 2016): 684–697.https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12390Daniel Laurison The Willingness to State an Opinion: Inequality, Don't Know Responses, and Political Participation, Sociological Forum 30, no.44 (Sep 2015): 925–948.https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12202Katharine E. Scott, James A. Graham Service-Learning, Journal of Experiential Education 38, no.44 (Dec 2015): 354–372.https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915592889 Bibliographie, (Mar 2014): 213–231.https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.djean.2014.01.0213Brett L.M. Levy, Michaela T. Zint Toward fostering environmental political participation: framing an agenda for environmental education research, Environmental Education Research 19, no.55 (Sep 2012): 553–576.https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.717218Lee H. Ehman The American School in the Political Socialization Process, Review of Educational Research 50, no.11 (Jun 2016): 99–119.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050001099Devon J. Metzger, Robert D. Barr The Impact of School Political Systems on Student Political Attitudes, Theory & Research in Social Education 6, no.22 (Jun 1978): 48–79.https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1978.10506029Jong Oh Ra, Robert M. Bourdeaux Intelligence, Creativity, and Political Socialization: A Theoretical Model, Youth & Society 9, no.11 (Aug 2016): 3–28.https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X7700900105Michael C. Stentz, H. David Lambert An Empirical Reformulation of Political Efficacy, Theory & Research in Social Education 5, no.11 (Apr 1977): 61–85.https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1977.10505998Marsha Brauen, Kathryn Newcomer Harmon Political Socialization, Youth & Society 8, no.33 (Mar 1977): 299–320.https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X7700800304David Nachmias A Temporal Sequence of Adolescent Political Participation: Some Israeli Data, British Journal of Political Science 7, no.11 (Jan 2009): 71–83.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003975 Yoshimitsu Takei , and Michael Kleiman Participation and Feelings of Political Efficacy: An Examination of the Transference Model, Comparative Education Review 20, no.33 (Oct 2015): 381–399.https://doi.org/10.1086/445908Brij B. Khare Political Awareness and Learning Environments, Teaching Political Science 2, no.33 (Apr 1975): 321–337.https://doi.org/10.1080/00922013.1975.10740055Richard G. Remy, James A. Nathan The future of political systems, Futures 6, no.66 (Dec 1974): 463–476.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(74)90030-5 Elliott White Genetic Diversity and Political Life: Toward a Populational-Interaction Paradigm, The Journal of Politics 34, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1203–1242.https://doi.org/10.2307/2128933Richard M. Merelman The Development of Policy Thinking in Adolescence, American Political Science Review 65, no.44 (Aug 2014): 1033–1047.https://doi.org/10.2307/1953496John B. Simeone Catalogue of Documents, (Jan 1968): 1–233.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5280-6_1

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Reapportionment Decisions: A Return to Dogma?A. Spencer HillA. Spencer Hill Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 31, Number 1Feb., 1969 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2128566 Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 4Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1969 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article: Gary J. Jacobsohn The "Pragmatic Dogma" of the Political Thicket: The Jurisprudential Paradox of "One Man, One Vote", Polity 9, no.33 (Nov 2016): 279–301.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234224Robert G. Dixon Who is Listening? Political Science Research in Public Law, PS: Political Science & Politics 4, no.0101 (Sep 2013): 19–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500002523Robert G. Dixon Who is Listening? Political Science Research in Public Law, PS 4, no.11 (Nov 2022): 19–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030826900602886Robert G. Dixon Who is Listening? Political Science Research in Public Law, PS 4, no.11 (Nov 2022): 19–26.https://doi.org/10.2307/418570