• Home
  • Search
  • Reassessing Machine Learning Techniques for Electrocatalyst Design: A Call for Robust Methodologies
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/idm2.70009Copy DOI Icon

Reassessing Machine Learning Techniques for Electrocatalyst Design: A Call for Robust Methodologies

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Gu et al. conducted a comprehensive survey on the design and application of electrocatalysts powered by machine learning techniques [1]. They presented a novel approach that utilizes Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) in conjunction with the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method to optimize membrane electrode assemblies. The ANN model demonstrated high accuracy in predicting key performance metrics, achieving root mean square error (RMSE) values of 43.536 mW cm−2 for power density and 0.070 gPt kW−1 for platinum utilization. Additionally, the SHAP method was employed to identify the most influential features affecting the target outputs, providing valuable insights into the optimization process [1]. However, this paper raises significant theoretical and empirical concerns regarding the use of ANN in conjunction with SHAP due to the model-specific nature of these techniques, which can lead to erroneous interpretations. It appears that Gu et al. may not fully grasp the fundamental principles underlying machine learning. In supervised machine learning models like ANN, two types of accuracy are crucial: target prediction accuracy and feature importance reliability. While target prediction accuracy can be validated against known ground truth values, the derived feature importances from models lack equivalent ground truth for validation. As a result, achieving high target prediction accuracy does not ensure that the feature importances are also reliable, since there are no established ground truth values for these features. The function call “explain = SHAP(model)” further indicates that SHAP may inherit and potentially amplify any biases present in the feature importances derived from the underlying model (ANN), leading to misleading interpretations of the results [2-5]. This highlights the importance of critically evaluating both the predictions and the interpretability provided by model-agnostic methods like SHAP. In light of these concerns, the paper advocates for a more robust and multifaceted approach utilizing unsupervised machine learning techniques, such as Feature Agglomeration (FA) and Highly Variable Gene Selection (HVGS). FA is a dimensionality reduction technique that aggregates similar features, thereby simplifying the data set and reducing noise, which can enhance the interpretability of the model and the reliability of its predictions. HVGS focuses on selecting a subset of features that exhibit significant variability across samples, ensuring that only the most informative features are retained for further analysis. Following the feature selection process, the authors suggest employing nonlinear nonparametric statistical methods, such as Spearman's correlation, to assess the relationships between features and outcomes. Spearman's correlation evaluates the strength and direction of the association between ranked variables, making it particularly useful in identifying monotonic relationships that do not necessarily follow a linear pattern. The accompanying p-values provide a measure of statistical significance, offering insights into the reliability of these correlations. By leveraging these advanced methods, researchers can achieve a deeper understanding of the key factors influencing electrocatalyst performance, while also mitigating the risks associated with relying solely on model-specific interpretations. Yoshiyasu Takefuji completed this study and wrote this article. The author has nothing to report. The author has nothing to report. The author declares no conflicts of interest. The author has nothing to report.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations15

Development of prediction models for interlayer shear strength in asphalt pavement using machine learning and SHAP techniques

  • Nov 03, 2023
  • Road Materials and Pavement Design
  • Rabea Al-Jarazi +4
  • Preprint Article

Enhancing Stress Identification Using Machine Learning: Revealing Key Factors with SHAP- Driven Explainable AI

  • Sep 27, 2024
  • Preprints.org
  • Akhil Chintalapati +4
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations56

Application of ANN, XGBoost, and Other ML Methods to Forecast Air Quality in Macau

  • Mar 17, 2023
  • Sustainability
  • Thomas M T Lei +2
  • Research Article

Machine Learning‐Assisted Modeling and Optimization of Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Production From Brown Macroalgae

  • Jan 01, 2025
  • International Journal of Energy Research
  • Thi Pham Phan +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Improving Machine Learning Classification Predictions through SHAP and Features Analysis Interpretation.

  • Oct 20, 2025
  • Journal of chemical information and modeling
  • Leonardo Bernal +2
  • Research Article

IMPROVING ROAD SAFETY: SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING CRASH SEVERITY

  • Jun 01, 2025
  • Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport
  • Khanh Giang Le
  • Research Article

A data-driven approach for rail temperature estimation from air temperature, solar irradiation, and land surface temperature

  • Jun 01, 2026
  • Sustainable Cities and Society: Advances
  • Minseo Cho +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

The effects of business ethics and corporate social responsibility practices on financial performance: a machine learning prediction and model interpretability approach

  • Jul 30, 2025
  • International Journal of Ethics and Systems
  • Bilel Souissi +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations2

Analyzing the impact of weather conditions on energy efficiency in residential buildings using machine learning techniques with explainable artificial intelligence

  • Jul 09, 2025
  • Advances in Building Energy Research
  • Shamaila Iram +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations6

Machine learning assisted axial strength prediction models for concrete filled stainless steel tubular columns

  • Mar 01, 2025
  • Structures
  • Deeptarka Roy +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations7

Determining the Major Contributing Features to Predict Breast Cancer Imposing ML Algorithms with LIME and SHAP

  • Nov 16, 2023
  • Prakash Paudel +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations27

Interpreted machine learning in fluid dynamics: explaining relaminarisation events in wall-bounded shear flows

  • May 13, 2022
  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • Martin Lellep +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Geospatial SHAP interpretability for urban road collapse susceptibility assessment: a case study in Hangzhou, China

  • Apr 15, 2025
  • Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
  • Bofan Yu +7
  • Research Article
  • Citations13

Explainable artificial intelligence-machine learning models to estimate overall scores in tertiary preparatory general science course

  • Nov 20, 2024
  • Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
  • Sujan Ghimire +9
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Identification of Using Obesity Factors Hybrid Artificial Neural Network Approach and SHapley Additive exPlanations

  • Jul 01, 2025
  • Journal of Information Engineering and Educational Technology
  • Esti Yogiyanti Esti +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.