Regulation of assisted reproductive technologies in the United States

This chapter reviews the current assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome analysis process in the United States to expand the reader's perspective and understanding of its complexity and explores progress toward meaningful collection, analysis, and interpretation of ART outcomes by clinician and patient in the future. The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), an affiliate organization of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), worked with the Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) as the initial purveyor of data collection and publication, representing reproductive specialists and the majority of domestic ART practices. Ovarian reserve, diagnosis-specific therapy, laboratory prowess, practice management philosophies, therapeutic access, and patient demographics play an intricately intertwined role in determining successful outcome. Patient selection/rejection is acknowledged as powerful influences of ART outcome but is practiced to different degrees by any individual physician/practice.

The playing field is changing…

Universal assisted reproductive technology coverage: a worthy cause that promotes safety

Position on reproductive donors and smallpox vaccine: a committee opinion

SOCIAL MEDIA IN THE TIME OF COVID-19: AN EVALUATION OF SOCIETY FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (SART) MEMBER CLINICS

Reassuring outcomes for single and coupled gay men using assisted reproductive technology

Reply of the Author

Genetic screening practices at oocyte donation programs

Protocols for tracking and witnessing samples and patients in assisted reproductive technology

What’s the Latest on Acrylamide?

To analyze the geographic distribution of REI fellowships and clinics across the USA and to strategize ways to improve patient access to care. Cross-sectional study using population data obtained from publicly available United States Census Bureau, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), and National Resident Matching Program websites. Outcomes include the number of REI clinics, REI fellowship-trained physicians, and REI fellowship programs. In 2020, there were 643 assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics reporting to SART and 1351 fellowship-trained REI physicians. Most clinics are located in the south (n = 209); however, the northeast has the highest density of REI clinics. Out of 301,316 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA in 2020, northeastern states initiated the most cycles (n = 93,565), and Midwestern states initiated the fewest cycles (n = 50,000). The northeast has the most REI physicians per million women aged 20-44 years (42.4) while the Midwest has the lowest ratio (19.5). There are fewer REI physicians per million women aged 20-44 years in states with a lower proportion of patients with health insurance (r = 0.56, 95% confidence interval ([CI] 0.34-0.73) and in states with a lower average income per resident (r = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.79). Most of the 49 accredited REI fellowship programs in the USA are in the northeast (n = 18), and there are fewest in the south (n = 10) and west (n = 10). Access to REI care has large geographic disparities from a clinic, physician, and training program perspective. Creative solutions are needed to remedy this problem.

After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Describe the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) for singleton, twin, and other multiple births. 2. Describe the role of fertility in adverse outcomes seen with ART births. 3. Review the association of birth defects with ART. 4. Delineate the association of disease of genomic imprinting with ART. 5. Describe the relationship between ART and the subsequent incidence of neurodevelopmental sequelae. In the 1977 ruling “Carey v. Population Services International,” the United States Supreme Court ruled that the decision to bear children is constitutionally protected. (1) Significant interest already had been shown in the development and improvements of in vitro fertilization (IVF) for infertile couples. The first human pregnancy and human birth using IVF were reported by Steptoe and Edwards in the United Kingdom. (2) Their work resulted in the first baby born via reproductive technologies, Louise Brown, born on July 25, 1978, at Oldham General Hospital in Oldham, United Kingdom. (3) She was born via a planned cesarean section, and her birthweight was 2.61 kg. The first successful viable IVF in the United States was performed by Jones and Seager-Jones in 1981 in Norfolk, Virginia. (4) Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have seen a recent surge in popularity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 122,872 cycles of ART were initiated in 2003, resulting in the delivery of 48,756 neonates, (5) accounting for approximately 1% of all neonates delivered in the United States. The percentage is higher in many countries, including Denmark, where it is estimated that 5% of all deliveries are with the assistance of ART. (6) Couples pursue ART for myriad reasons, including tubal transport factors, ovulatory dysfunction, uterine factors, endometriosis, male- and female-specific factors, and when a cause of infertility is unknown. (5) It would be very …

Defining assisted reproductive technology success

Moving from awareness to action on preventing patient exposure to toxic environmental chemicals

2002 guidelines for gamete and embryo donation: a practice committee report: Guidelines and minimum standards