Reimagining Professional Development in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Real-World Surveillance of FDA-Cleared Artificial Intelligence Models: Rationale and Logistics.

Artificial Intelligence: The Future of Maxillofacial Prognosis and Diagnosis?

Quantum computing (QC) is not a futuristic notion in agriculture, though its full potential has yet to be realized. QC is an emerging field at the intersection of physics and computer science that holds immense potential to revolutionize various sectors, including agriculture production and artificial intelligence (AI) modeling. While QC is still in the early stages of development and practical applications within agriculture are not yet widespread, researchers are actively exploring its potential benefits in various agricultural domains, including crop optimization, livestock breeding, and environmental monitoring. QC harnesses the principles of quantum mechanics to perform computations using quantum bits or qubits, which can exist in multiple states simultaneously. Unlike classical computers, which rely on binary bits representing 0 or 1, quantum computers exploit phenomena such as superposition and entanglement to process information in parallel, potentially offering exponential speedup for certain types of problems. In agriculture production, particularly in animal science, QC offers promising avenues for optimizing processes and enhancing productivity. Quantum algorithms can analyze vast amounts of genomic data to improve breeding programs, leading to the development of more resilient and productive livestock breeds. Furthermore, QC can facilitate precision farming techniques by modeling complex environmental factors and animal behavior to optimize feeding strategies, disease management, and overall farm management practices. Moreover, QC can significantly benefit AI modeling by accelerating computations and enabling more efficient training of AI models. Quantum algorithms can enhance the performance of AI algorithms in various tasks, including pattern recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. By leveraging quantum-enhanced optimization algorithms, AI models can achieve better convergence and accuracy, leading to more effective decision-making and problem-solving capabilities. While hybrid intelligent models also represent a novel frontier in agriculture, QC has the potential to expedite the merging of mechanistic and AI modeling paradigms, facilitating a more holistic understanding of complex systems in agriculture and beyond. By integrating mechanistic models, which describe the underlying physical processes, with AI models, which learn patterns from data, quantum computing can enable comprehensive simulations and predictions of agricultural systems. This fusion of modeling paradigms can lead to more accurate and robust predictions of crop yields, livestock performance, and environmental impacts, facilitating informed decision-making for farmers and policymakers. The application of QC in agriculture, however, requires interdisciplinary collaborations between physicists, computer scientists, agronomists/animal scientists, and AI researchers. These collaborations can drive the development of quantum algorithms tailored to agricultural applications, the integration of quantum-enhanced AI techniques into existing modeling frameworks, and the deployment of QC resources in real-world agricultural systems. Ultimately, harnessing the power of QC holds the potential to revolutionize agriculture production practices, including regenerative agriculture, and advance AI modeling capabilities, paving the way for a more sustainable and efficient agricultural industry.

Solar energy-based technologies have developed rapidly in recent years, however, the inability to appropriately estimate solar energy resources is still a major drawback for these technologies. In this study, eight different artificial intelligence (AI) models namely; convolutional neural network (CNN), artificial neural network (ANN), long short-term memory recurrent model (LSTM), eXtreme gradient boost algorithm (XG Boost), multiple linear regression (MLR), polynomial regression (PLR), decision tree regression (DTR), and random forest regression (RFR) are designed and compared for solar irradiance prediction. Additionally, two hybrid deep neural network models (ANN-CNN and CNN-LSTM-ANN) are developed in this study for the same task. This study is novel as each of the AI models developed was used to estimate solar irradiance considering different timesteps (hourly, every minute, and daily average). Also, different solar irradiance datasets (from six countries in Africa) measured with various instruments were used to train/test the AI models. With the aim to check if there is a universal AI model for solar irradiance estimation in developing countries, the results of this study show that various AI models are suitable for different solar irradiance estimation tasks. However, XG boost has a consistently high performance for all the case studies and is the best model for 10 of the 13 case studies considered in this paper. The result of this study also shows that the prediction of hourly solar irradiance is more accurate for the models when compared to daily average and minutes timestep. The specific performance of each model for all the case studies is explicated in the paper.

This study evaluated if medical doctors could identify more hemorrhage events during chart review in a clinical setting when assisted by an artificial intelligence (AI) model and medical doctors' perception of using the AI model. To develop the AI model, sentences from 900 electronic health records were labeled as positive or negative for hemorrhage and categorized into one of 12 anatomical locations. The AI model was evaluated on a test cohort consisting of 566 admissions. Using eye-tracking technology, we investigated medical doctors' reading workflow during manual chart review. Moreover, we performed a clinical use study where medical doctors read two admissions with and without AI assistance to evaluate performance when using and perception of using the AI model. The AI model had a sensitivity of 93.7% and a specificity of 98.1% on the test cohort. In the use studies, we found that medical doctors missed more than 33% of relevant sentences when doing chart review without AI assistance. Hemorrhage events described in paragraphs were more often overlooked compared with bullet-pointed hemorrhage mentions. With AI-assisted chart review, medical doctors identified 48 and 49 percentage points more hemorrhage events than without assistance in two admissions, and they were generally positive toward using the AI model as a supporting tool. Medical doctors identified more hemorrhage events with AI-assisted chart review and they were generally positive toward using the AI model.

The pervasive deployment of Deep Learning models has recently prompted apprehensions regarding their ecological footprint, owing to the exorbitant levels of energy consumption necessitated by the training and inference processes. The term "Red AI" is employed to denote artificial intelligence (AI) models that undergo training using resource-intensive methodologies on very large datasets. This practice can engender substantial energy usage and emissions of carbon, thereby opposing "Green AI." The latter concept alludes to AI models designed for similar efficiency and reduced environmental impact. This objective is realized through the utilization of smaller datasets, less computationally intensive training techniques, or sustainable energy resources. While Red AI prioritizes accuracy and performance, Green AI emphasizes efficiency and sustainability. Given that both paradigms exhibit advantages and limitations, the debates around the topics have burgeoned in the scientific arena, delving into novel algorithms, hardware innovations, and improved data utilization techniques aimed at mitigating the ecological consequences of intricate applications such as GPT and BERT. Nevertheless, due to the relative novelty of this debate, not much effort has been dedicated yet to contextualizing the essence of Red AI and the prospects of Green AI in a coherent framework. Within this context, the present work contributes by meticulously delineating both domains through a multifaceted analysis of their causes and ramifications, described from the points of computer architectures, data structures, and algorithms. Additionally, the study reviews notable instances of study cases based on complex Red AI models. The primary contribution of this article encompasses a comprehensive survey of Red and Green AI, stemming from a selection of the literature performed by the authors, subsequently organized into distinct clusters. These clusters encompass i) articles that qualitatively or quantitatively address the issue of Red AI, identifying Green AI as a plausible remedy, ii) articles offering insights into the environmental impact associated with the deployment of extensive Deep Learning models, and iii) articles introducing the techniques underpinning Green AI, aiming at mitigating the cost of Red AI. The outcome emerging from the analysis performed by this work consists of a compromise between sustainability in contrast to the performance of AI tools. Unless the complex training and inference procedures of software models mitigate their environmental impact, it will be necessary to decrease the level of accuracy of production systems, inevitably conflicting with the objective of the major AI vendors. The outcomes of this work would be beneficial to scholars pursuing intricate Deep Learning architectures in scientific research, as well as AI enterprises struggling with the protracted training demands of commercial products within the realms of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing.

Aim: The majority of machine learning (ML) models in healthcare are built on retrospective data, much of which is collected without explicit patient consent for use in artificial intelligence (AI) and ML applications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinicians and scientific researchers themselves consent to provide their own data for the training of ML models. Materials and Methods: This survey was conducted through an anonymous online survey, utilizing platforms such as Telegram, LinkedIn, and Viber. The target audience comprised specific international groups, primarily Russian, German, and English-speaking, of clinicians and scientific researchers. These participants ranged in their levels of expertise and experience, from beginners to veterans. The survey centered on a singular, pivotal question: “Do You Consent to the Use of Your Biological and Private Data for Training Machine Learning and AI Models?” Respondents had the option to choose from three responses: “Yes” and “No”. Results: The survey was conducted in January 2024. A total of 119 unique and verified individuals participated in the survey. The results revealed that only 50% of respondents (63 persons) expressed consent to provide their own data for the training of ML and AI models. Conclusion: In the development of ML and AI models, particularly open-source ones, it is crucial to ascertain whether participants are willing to provide their private data. While ML algorithms can transform the nature of data, it is important to remember that the primary owner of this data is the individual. Our findings show that in 50% of the cases, even participants from scientific research and clinical backgrounds – individuals typically accountable for ensuring data quality in AI and ML model development – do not consent to the use of their data in AI and ML settings. This highlights the need for more stringent consent processes and ethical considerations in the utilization of personal data in AI and ML research.

To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model able to perform both segmentation of hand joint ultrasound images for osteophytes, bone, and synovium and perform osteophyte severity scoring following the EULAR-OMERACT grading system (EOGS) for hand osteoarthritis (OA). One hundred sixty patients with pain or reduced function of the hands were included. Ultrasound images of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), distal interphalangeal (DIP), and first carpometacarpal (CMC1) joints were then manually segmented for bone, synovium and osteophytes and scored from 0 to 3 according to the EOGS for OA. Data was divided into a training, validation, and test set. The AI model was trained on the training data to perform bone, synovium, and osteophyte identification on the images. Based on the manually performed image segmentation, an AI was trained to classify the severity of osteophytes according to EOGS from 0 to 3. Percent Exact Agreement (PEA) and Percent Close Agreement (PCA) were assessed on individual joints and overall. PCA allows a difference of one EOGS grade between doctor assessment and AI. A total of 4615 ultrasound images were used for AI development and testing. The developed AI model scored on the test set for the MCP joints a PEA of 76% and PCA of 97%; for PIP, a PEA of 70% and PCA of 97%; for DIP, a PEA of 59% and PCA of 94%, and CMC a PEA of 50% and PCA of 82%. Combining all joints, we found a PEA between AI and doctor assessments of 68% and a PCA of 95%. The developed AI model can perform joint ultrasound image segmentation and severity scoring of osteophytes, according to the EOGS. As proof of concept, this first version of the AI model is successful, as the agreement performance is slightly higher than previously found agreements between experts when assessing osteophytes on hand OA ultrasound images. The segmentation of the image makes the AI explainable to the doctor, who can immediately see why the AI applies a given score. Future validation in hand OA cohorts is necessary though.

The secondary use of health data for training Artificial Intelligence (AI) models holds immense potential for advancing medical research and healthcare delivery. However, ensuring patient consent for such utilization is paramount to uphold ethical standards and data privacy. Patient informed consent means patients are fully informed about how their data will be collected, used, and protected, and they voluntarily agree to allow their data to be used for AI models. In addition to formal consent frameworks, establishing a social license is critical to foster public trust and societal acceptance for the secondary use of health data in AI systems. This study examines patient consent practices in this domain. In this scoping review, we searched Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. We included studies in English that addressed the core issues of interest, namely, privacy, security, legal, and ethical issues related to the secondary use of health data in AI models. Articles not addressing the core issues, as well as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, books, letters, conference abstracts, and study protocols were excluded. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, resolving disagreements with a third author. Data was extracted using a data extraction form. After screening 774 articles, a total of 38 articles were ultimately included in the review. Across these studies, a total of 178 barriers and 193 facilitators were identified. We consolidated similar codes and extracted 65 barriers and 101 facilitators, which we then categorized into four themes: "Structure," "People," "Physical system," and "Task." We identified notable emphasis on "Legal and Ethical Challenges" and "Interoperability and Data Governance." Key barriers included concerns over privacy and security breaches, inadequacies in informed consent processes, and unauthorized data sharing. Critical facilitators included enhancing patient consent procedures, improving data privacy through anonymization, and promoting ethical standards for data usage. Our study underscores the complexity of patient consent for the secondary use of health data in AI models, highlighting significant barriers and facilitators within legal, ethical, and technological domains. We recommend the development of specific guidelines and actionable strategies for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to improve informed consent, ensuring privacy, trust, and ethical use of data, thereby facilitating the responsible advancement of AI in healthcare.

Increasingly artificial intelligence (AI) has been cast in "god-like" roles (to name a few: film industry - Matrix, The Creator, Mission Impossible, Foundation, Dune etc.; literature - Children of Time, Permutation City, Neuromancer, I Have no Mouth and I Must Scream, Alphaville etc.). This trend has accelerated with the advent of sophisticated Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. For this phenomenon, where AI is perceived as divine, we use the term GPTheology, where ChatGPT and other AI models are treated as potential oracles of a semi-divine nature. This paper explores the emergence of GPTheology as a form of techno-religion, examining how narratives around AI echo traditional religious constructs. We draw on community narratives from online forums - Reddit - and recent projects - AI-powered Mazu Statue in Malaysia (Lu, 2025); "ShamAIn" Project in Korea (He-rim, 2025); AI Jesus in a Swiss Church (Kennedy, 2024). These examples show striking similarities to technological notions of the Singularity and the development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Additionally, we analyse how daily interactions with AI are acquiring ritualistic associations and how AI-centric ideologies clash with or are integrated into established religions. This study uses a dataset of Reddit posts discussing AI to identify recurring themes of salvation, prophecy, and demonization surrounding AI. Our findings suggest that new belief systems are developing around AI, and this carries both philosophical and sociotechnical implications. Our paper critically analyses the benefits and dangers, as well as the social, political and ethical challenges of this development. This transdisciplinary inquiry highlights how AI and religion are increasingly intertwined, prompting necessary questions about humanity's relationship with its creations and the future of belief.

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the talent cultivation model in higher education. As the main arena for cultivating innovative talents, universities are undergoing a profound transformation—from knowledge transmission to intelligent guidance, from standardized teaching to personalized learning, and from one-way instruction to multi-dimensional interaction. Based on the digital transformation of education empowered by AI, this paper systematically analyzes the current dilemmas in higher education talent cultivation, including insufficient digital literacy among teachers, weak personalized learning support for students, and lack of effective interaction and feedback mechanisms. It further explores the opportunities and ethical challenges brought by AI, and proposes transformation paths for building an intelligent talent cultivation system: enhancing teachers' AI-enabled teaching capacity, constructing intelligent learning support systems, and innovating educational governance mechanisms. The study provides theoretical and practical insights for universities to cope with educational transformation in the AI era.

Background: The topic of artificial Intelligence and its application in medicine has gained tremendous popularity, coinciding with advances in its technology. Breast cancer treatments vary, with surgery being one of them. In this review, we aim to evaluate artificial Intelligence’s ability to predict surgical outcomes, complications, and survival rates after breast cancer surgery by analyzing original research conducted over the last 5 years. Materials and Methods: A PubMed search was conducted by two authors from January 1, 2020, to April 13, 2025, using the keywords "Artificial Intelligence" and "Breast Surgery". After elimination, 14 of the 215 articles were full-text screened, and nine original articles were selected for inclusion in our review. Discussion: Artificial intelligence models and systems have had a significant impact on the medical field, and breast cancer surgery is no exception. Several original research studies have explored AI's ability to predict surgical outcomes and postoperative results. In this review, we focus on the postoperative aspects of breast cancer surgery and its application of artificial intelligence. Of the nine articles included in this paper, all reported multiple statistically significant results (p <0.05). Although no prospective research directly compares artificial intelligence with practicing physicians, artificial intelligence’s ability to accurately predict surgical outcomes, complications, and survival has shown higher accuracy and c-index than commonly used prediction methods, as reported in multiple studies. Conclusion: Artificial Intelligence can be a valuable asset in helping surgeons and medical doctors worldwide predict prognosis with improved systems and accuracy rates, even surpassing those of currently used conservative systems. There is a lack of information on PubMed regarding the comparison of these two aspects, particularly with larger sample sizes. More research should be conducted on this topic, particularly in comparing Artificial Intelligence systems and models with current systems and evaluation methods.

The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies across various industries and decision-making processes has undeniably transformed the way of approaching complex problems and tasks. AI systems have proven their prowess in areas such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems, revolutionizing how decisions are made. Nevertheless, this proliferation of AI has raised critical concerns regarding the transparency, accountability, and fairness of these systems, as many of the state-of-the-art AI models often resemble complex black boxes. These intricate models, particularly deep learning neural networks, harbor non-linear relationships that are difficult for human users to decipher, thereby raising concerns about bias, fairness, and overall trustworthiness in AI-driven decisions. The urgency of this issue is underscored by the realization that AI should not merely be accurate; it should also be interpretable. Explainable AI (XAI) has emerged as a vital field of research, emphasizing the development of models and techniques that render AI systems comprehensible and transparent in their decision-making processes. This paper investigates into the relevance and significance of XAI across various domains, including healthcare, finance, and autonomous systems, where the ability to understand the rationale behind AI decisions is paramount. In healthcare, where AI assists in diagnosis and treatment, the interpretability of AI models is crucial for clinicians to make informed decisions. In finance, applications like credit scoring and investment analysis demand transparent AI to ensure fairness and accountability. In the realm of autonomous systems, transparency is indispensable to guarantee safety and compliance with regulations. Moreover, government agencies in areas such as law enforcement and social services require interpretable AI to maintain ethical standards and accountability. This paper also highlights the diverse array of research efforts in the XAI domain, spanning from model-specific interpretability methods to more general approaches aimed at unveiling complex AI models. Interpretable models like decision trees and rule-based systems have gained attention for their inherent transparency, while integrating explanation layers into deep neural networks strives to balance accuracy with interpretability. The study emphasizes the significance of this burgeoning field in bridging the gap between AI's advanced capabilities and human users' need for comprehensible AI systems. It seeks to contribute to this field by exploring the design, development, and practical applications of interpretable AI models and techniques, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the trust and understanding of AI-driven decisions.

Browser-based Data Annotation, Active Learning, and Real-Time Distribution of Artificial Intelligence Models: From Tumor Tissue Microarrays to COVID-19 Radiology

Lung cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers worldwide, with survival rates significantly dependent on early detection. Traditional diagnostic methods, while effective, often identify lung cancer in advanced stages, limiting treatment options. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) models have gained attention for their potential to assist in early lung cancer diagnosis through radiological data, particularly computed tomography (CT) and X-ray imaging. This review examines recent advancements in AI and DL models specifically applied to early lung cancer detection, offering a comprehensive look at model architecture, data preprocessing techniques, and performance metrics. AI models, particularly those using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs), have shown significant promise in improving diagnostic accuracy. In studies published over the past two years, CNN-based models have achieved sensitivity rates upwards of 90% when applied to large datasets, such as the LIDC-IDRI, a publicly available database containing thousands of annotated lung scans. Furthermore, hybrid approaches combining AI models with radiologist expertise have demonstrated reduced false positives, a frequent challenge in automated image analysis. A critical factor in these advancements has been data quality and volume. Large, annotated datasets with high-resolution images have enabled more robust training and validation, essential for refining these models. However, challenges remain, particularly regarding the standardization of data across institutions, variations in scanner quality, and ethical concerns surrounding patient privacy. The review also highlights studies exploring multi-modal approaches, integrating radiological data with clinical records and genetic markers to create more personalized diagnostic tools. These multi-modal methods have the potential to improve predictive accuracy further, though they currently require more extensive validation. Overall, while AI and DL technologies offer transformative potential for early lung cancer detection, widespread implementation depends on continued research in model accuracy, data standardization, and ethical safeguards. This paper concludes by emphasizing the need for collaboration across disciplines—AI researchers, radiologists, and oncologists—to refine these models into reliable tools that can be integrated seamlessly into clinical workflows for timely and accurate lung cancer diagnosis.