Relationship Between COVID-19 and Retinal Artery Occlusions.

Purpose: Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events such as ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, but whether different RAO subtypes such as central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) or branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) carry similar risk of these events is unclear. Our aim was to determine whether the risk of cardiovascular events differs between CRAO and BRAO. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included 131 patients hospitalized in our clinic in 2010–2020 with CRAO or BRAO confirmed by ophthalmic examination. Data on demographics, previous ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, comorbidities, the results of echocardiographic and ultrasound carotid artery examinations and laboratory tests were assessed. Data on ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality occurring after RAO were obtained from the Polish National Health Service, which collects data on all publicly funded hospitalizations. Using these data, Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard regression were performed. Results: Ischemic stroke occurred in 9.9% of patients after RAO: 10.6% in the CRAO group and 8.1% in the BRAO group (p = 0.662). Myocardial infarction occurred in 2.3% of patients after RAO: 2.1% in the CRAO group and 2.7% in the BRAO group (p = 0.843). All-cause mortality occurred in 22.9% of patients after RAO: 25.5% in the CRAO group and 16.2% in the BRAO group (p = 0.253). The composite endpoint of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality after RAO occurred in 28.2% of patients: 30.9% in the CRAO group and 21.6% in the BRAO group (p = 0.338). There was no difference between CRAO and BRAO in median time to ischemic stroke (32 vs. 76.4 months; p = 0.352), all-cause mortality (35.9 vs. 36.3 months; p = 0.876) or composite endpoint (37.5 vs. 41.5 months; p = 0.912) after RAO. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no differences between CRAO and BRAO in ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, or the composite endpoint; similar results were obtained in analyses of patients with and without cardiovascular events before RAO. Conclusions: The prognosis for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality is similar in patients with CRAO and BRAO. Ischemic strokes occur with a similar frequency before and after RAO. Myocardial infarctions are observed significantly more frequently before an episode of RAO than after. The results of our study indicate that both CRAO and BRAO require expanded diagnostics to assess the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events, especially ischemic strokes, to implement appropriate prophylaxis and reduce mortality.

Retinal Artery and Vein Occlusion Risks after Coronavirus Disease 2019 or Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination

This study analysed the treatment outcomes of patients that received hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) for retinal artery occlusion (RAO) at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital in Brisbane, Australia between 2015 and 2021. Retrospective study from patient records including 22 eyes from 22 patients that received HBOT for either central RAO (17 patients) or branch RAO (five patients). Patients received the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital RAO protocol for their HBOT. Analysis included best corrected visual acuity pre- and post-treatment, subjective improvements, side effects and patient risk factors were also recorded. Improvement in best corrected visual acuity was LogMAR -0.2 for central RAO on average with 8/17 (47%) experiencing objective improvement, 5/17 (29%) experienced no change and 4/22 (24%) experienced a reduction in best corrected visual acuity. Subjective improvement (colour perception or visual fields) was reported in an additional 4/17 patients, resulting in 12/17 (71%) reporting improvement either in visual acuity or subjectively. There was no improvement in the best corrected visual acuity of any of the five patients suffering from branch RAO. Cardiovascular risk factors present in the cohort included hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, previous cardiovascular events, cardiac disease and smoking. Limited side effects were experienced by this patient cohort with no recorded irreversible side effects. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment appears a safe, beneficial treatment for central RAO. No benefit was demonstrated in branch RAO although numbers were small. Increased awareness of HBOT for RAO resulting in streamlined referrals and transfers and greater uptake of this intervention may further improve patient outcomes.

Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is effective in protecting patients from severe COVID-19 infection. Disease flare-up following immunization in children with rheumatic disorders may result in patient reluctance to receive the vaccine. Underlying rheumatic diseases or the use of immunosuppressive drugs may influence the outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination and infection. We aimed to describe outcomes in children with rheumatic diseases following COVID-19 immunization and infection. This retrospective study was performed at two large academic centers in Thailand. During the COVID-19 pandemic, all patients were routinely queried about COVID-19-related conditions. We included patients with rheumatic diseases aged <18 years who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine or had a history of COVID-19 infection with more than 6 months of recorded follow-up after the last vaccine dose or COVID-19 illness. Demographic information and data on clinical symptoms, disease activity, treatment, outcomes, and COVID-19 vaccination and infection were collected. A total of 479 patients were included. Most (229; 47.81%) patients had juvenile idiopathic arthritis, followed by connective tissue diseases (189; 39.46%), vasculitis syndromes (42; 8.76%), and other rheumatic diseases (19; 3.97%). Approximately 90% of patients received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination, and half of the patients had COVID-19 infection. Among patients, 10.72% and 3.27% developed a flare after COVID-19 vaccination and COVID-19 illness, respectively. Flare severity after COVID immunization and infection was mainly mild to moderate. The predictor of flare after COVID-19 vaccination was the use of prednisolone ≥10 mg/day before vaccination (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-3.97, p = 0.037). Inactive disease before receiving the COVID-19 vaccination was a predictor of inactive status after a flare (hazard ratio: 2.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.04-8.40; p = 0.043). Overall, 3.36% and 1.61% of patients experienced a new onset of rheumatic disease after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and after COVID-19 infection, respectively. The COVID-19 vaccine is recommended for children with rheumatic disease, particularly those who are in stable condition. After COVID-19 vaccination, patients-especially those with active disease before vaccination or those receiving concurrent prednisolone doses of ≥10 mg/day-should be closely monitored.

Purpose: This article describes the characteristics, management, and etiology of retinal artery occlusions (RAOs) in young patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients &lt;50 years of age with ophthalmic and RAOs was conducted. Data were collected on demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory and imaging evaluation, management, and outcome. Results: Seventeen eyes of 15 patients younger than 50 (mean age, 34±8 years; 71% male, 29% female) with RAOs were identified. AOs included: 8 (47%) central RAOs (CRAOs), 5 (29%) branch RAOs (BRAOs), 3 (18%) ophthalmic AOs (OAOs), and 1 (6%) combined CRAO and vein occlusion (CRAO/CRVO). Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (VA) at presentation was 2.6±4 (Snellen range 20/15 to no light perception). Systemic diseases in patients with BRAO included Susac disease (n = 1), sickle cell disease (n = 2), patent foramen ovale (PFO) (n = 1), and HIV (n = 1). CRAO was diagnosed in 4 patients after invasive surgery (3 after neurosurgery and 1 after cardiac surgery). Other patients had hypertension (n = 3), hypercoagulability due to uterine cancer (n = 1), and PFO (n = 1). OAOs were noted in 1 patient with Saturday night retinopathy and in 1 with ruptured internal carotid aneurysm at the level of the ophthalmic artery. Two eyes with CRAO were treated with tissue plasminogen activator (1 intraophthalmic artery through catheterization and 1 intravenously) without any change in final VA. In these patients, VA remained poor (VA hand motions – counting fingers) at 6 months or greater follow-up visits. Conclusion: RAO in young patients is uncommon. In this series, one-fourth of occlusions were seen during the perioperative period. A significant number of patients had concurrent uncontrolled hypertension. Other associated systemic findings included PFO, hypercoagulability, sickle cell disease, Susac disease, and HIV.

PurposeTo investigate the ocular neovascularization (ONV) rate in eyes with a branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) or a central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), and to study factors that may influence the ONV rate secondary to CRAO.MethodsThis was a retrospective case series of consecutive patients (286 total eyes: 83 CRAOs and 203 BRAOs) who were diagnosed with a retinal artery occlusion from 1998 to 2013 at the Retina Consultants of Alabama and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the association between hypothesized risk factors and ONV development.ResultsTwelve (14.5%) of the 83 eyes with a CRAO developed ONV. Eleven of 12 eyes (91.7%) had iris neovascularization, ten of 12 eyes (83.3%) had neovascular glaucoma, and two of 12 eyes (16.7%) had neovascularization of the optic disc. The average time for ONV development secondary to CRAO was 30.7 days, ranging from the date of presentation to 137 days. Only two (<1.0%) of the 203 eyes with a BRAO developed iris neovascularization. Diabetes mellitus type 2 was a risk factor for ONV development following a CRAO with an adjusted odds ratio of 5.2 (95% confidence interval: 1.4–19.8) (P=0.02).ConclusionONV is an important complication of CRAO and is a less-frequent complication of BRAO. Patients with a CRAO, especially those with diabetes mellitus type 2, should be closely monitored for the first 6 months for ONV.

The retina requires a large blood supply to cope with the metabolic demands of the tissue, so it is vulnerable to hypoxia when the arterial blood flow is obstructed. Retinal artery occlusions are not common, but they can cause severe vision loss and may be indicative of cardiovascular disorders, such as cerebral stroke and ischemic heart disease. The central retinal artery arises from the ophthalmic artery and its branches supply blood to the inner retina via the superficial capillary plexus. Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) is characterized by an obstruction to the central retinal artery that often presents with severe vision loss and a poor prognosis. Branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) is defined by a blockage of a branch of the central retinal artery, which typically has a good prognosis if visual acuity is 20/40 or better on presentation. Optical coherence tomography-angiography (OCT-A) is a rapid, highresolution imaging technique that can visualize the microvasculature of the retinal layers, including the superficial and deep capillary plexuses.&lt;br&gt;Therefore, it is possible to determine the microvascular changes that occur following retinal artery occlusions, and before and after potential therapies that are being actively researched. Therapies under investigation for the treatment of CRAO and BRAO include hyperbaric oxygen, fibrinolysis, and embolysis with laser therapy. In this chapter, the capabilities of OCT-A imaging to visualize and quantify retinal microvascular changes following CRAO and BRAO are assessed. Moreover, the use of OCT-A to understand the benefit of potential therapies is reviewed. &lt;br&gt;

Highlights of Selected Articles July 2020.

De Novo and Relapsing Glomerular Diseases After COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do We Know So Far?

In addition to its pulmonary effects, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has also been found to cause acute kidney injury (AKI), which has been linked to high mortality rates. In this review, we collected data from 20 clinical studies on post-COVID-19-related AKI and 97 cases of AKI associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Acute tubular injury was by far the most common finding in the kidneys of patients with COVID-19-related AKI. Among patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 34.0% developed AKI, of which 59.0%, 19.1% and 21.9% were Stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Though kidney disease and other adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination overall appear rare, case reports have accumulated suggesting that COVID-19 vaccination may be associated with a risk of subsequent kidney disease. Among the patients with post-vaccination AKI, the most common pathologic findings include crescentic glomerulonephritis (29.9%), acute tubular injury (23.7%), IgA nephropathy (18.6%), antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis (17.5%), minimal change disease (17.5%) and thrombotic microangiopathy (10.3%). It is important to note that crescentic glomerulonephritis appears to be more prevalent in patients who have newly diagnosed renal involvement. The proportions of patients with AKI Stages 1, 2 and 3 after COVID-19 vaccination in case reports were 30.9%, 22.7% and 46.4%, respectively. In general, clinical cases of new-onset and recurrent nephropathy with AKI after COVID-19 vaccination have a positive prognosis. In this article, we also explore the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of AKI associated with COVID-19 infection and its vaccination by describing key renal morphological and clinical features and prognostic findings.

Objectives: To combat the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the World Health Organization announced the emergency license for the usage of COVID-19 vaccinations. Various literature postulated a few cross-talks between autoimmune disease and COVID-19 vaccination. The molecular mimicry between autoimmune diseases as well as autoimmune antibodies and the antibodies against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 S proteins triggers the development of a severe form of autoimmune disease. The causal association between autoimmune disease and COVID-19 vaccinations is still under debate. Hence, in this study, we aim to analyze the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on patients with autoimmune diseases. Material and Methods: Patients were recruited from a nationwide survey throughout India from October 1, 2021, to December 30, 2021. All patients of autoimmune diseases enrolled in this study had received a diagnosis of COVID-19. A Google form was created in the English language with relevant items, including demographic variables, COVID-19 vaccination-related variables, and its impact on autoimmune disease. Association between the COVID-19 severity, vaccination status, and autoimmune disease status was analyzed. Results: Eight hundred and forty-two patients with autoimmune disease participated in the study with 86% of vaccination rate. We noted comparable infection rates among vaccinated (37.5%, n = 272) and non-vaccinated (33.3%, n = 39) respondents with autoimmune disease (P = 0.38). Although 22.5% (n = 163) of patients with autoimmune disease demonstrated deterioration following vaccination, 75.3% (n = 546) of patients did not show any change in disease profile. We noted a significant increase in the computed tomography (CT) severity score of COVID-19 infection among non-vaccinated individuals (odds ratio = 1.1,95% confidence interval [0.29, 2.29], P &lt; 0.001). Moreover, we also noted a significant increase in the need (P = 0.01) and length of hospitalization (P &lt; 0.001) among COVID-19 non-vaccinated individuals. We also noted vaccination significantly prevented an acute flare-up of auto-immune disease when infected with COVID-19 (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Although vaccination did not affect the incidence of disease among patients with auto-immune disease, it did significantly decrease the CT severity score, hospitalization rate, and length of stay following COVID-19 infection. Moreover, vaccination also prevented acute flare-ups of autoimmune disease following COVID-19 infection.

To characterize the diagnostic yield of the spot sign in the diagnostic workup of acute arterial occlusions of the eye in elderly patients. Clinical characteristics of consecutive patients aged ≥ 50 years with acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) or anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) were recorded. Videos of transocular sonography were assessed for the presence of the spot sign by two blinded readers. Group comparisons were made between CRAO-patients with and without the spot sign. Two experienced cardiovascular physicians allocated CRAO-cases to a presumed aetiology, without and with knowledge on the presence/absence of the spot sign. One-hundred-twenty-three patients were included, 46 of whom suffered from CRAO. A spot sign was seen in 32 of 46 of patients with CRAO and in 7 of 23 patients with BRAO. Interobserver agreement was excellent (Cohen`s kappa 0.98). CRAO-patients with the spot sign significantly more frequently had a medical history of cardiovascular disease (62.8 vs. 21.4%, p = 0.03) and left heart valve pathologies (51.9 vs. 10%, p = 0.03). The spot sign was not found in any of the three patients with CRAO secondary to cranial giant cell arteritis. The assumed CRAO aetiology differed in 37% of cases between two cardiovascular physicians, regardless whether transocular sonography findings were known or not. The spot sign is a simple sonographic finding with excellent interobserver agreement, which proofs the embolic nature of CRAO, but does not allow exact attribution of the underlying aetiology.

PurposeTo characterize the diagnostic yield of the spot sign in the diagnostic workup of acute arterial occlusions of the eye in elderly patients.MethodsClinical characteristics of consecutive patients aged ≥ 50 years with acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), branch retinal artery occlusion (BRAO) or anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) were recorded. Videos of transocular sonography were assessed for the presence of the spot sign by two blinded readers. Group comparisons were made between CRAO-patients with and without the spot sign. Two experienced cardiovascular physicians allocated CRAO-cases to a presumed aetiology, without and with knowledge on the presence/absence of the spot sign.ResultsOne-hundred-twenty-three patients were included, 46 of whom suffered from CRAO. A spot sign was seen in 32 of 46 of patients with CRAO and in 7 of 23 patients with BRAO. Interobserver agreement was excellent (Cohen`s kappa 0.98). CRAO-patients with the spot sign significantly more frequently had a medical history of cardiovascular disease (62.8 vs. 21.4%, p = 0.03) and left heart valve pathologies (51.9 vs. 10%, p = 0.03). The spot sign was not found in any of the three patients with CRAO secondary to cranial giant cell arteritis. The assumed CRAO aetiology differed in 37% of cases between two cardiovascular physicians, regardless whether transocular sonography findings were known or not.ConclusionThe spot sign is a simple sonographic finding with excellent interobserver agreement, which proofs the embolic nature of CRAO, but does not allow exact attribution of the underlying aetiology.

Perioperative Cardiac Research Considerations During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

This study aimed to theoretically identify the vascular nature of the deep capillary plexus (DCP) by examining patients presenting with both paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) and prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM) sign and p-MLM sign alone in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). A retrospective review of the medical records of patients with retinal vein or artery occlusion from two tertiary medical centers was performed. Consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of all categories of retinal artery occlusion (RAO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) (branch or central and ischemic or non-ischemic) who had undergone SD-OCT imaging from January 2015 to May 2020 were recruited and their p-MLM signs and PAMM lesions were assessed. We included 118 patients who presented with p-MLM sign with or without PAMM lesions. Amon them, 40 were female and 78 were male, with a mean age of 61.1 years. Of the 109 patients with both p-MLM sign and PAMM lesions, 23 had branch RAO, two had branch RVO, 67 had central RAO, 13 had central RVO, and four had a combination of central RAO and central RVO. All nine patients with the p-MLM sign alone had central RVO accompanied by cystoid macular edema. In all the enrolled patients, the hyperreflective lines of the p-MLM sign were continuous, regardless of the type of PAMM lesions. In conclusion, when PAMM and p-MLM sign are examined together, further proof regarding the possible complete venous nature of the vasculature of the retinal DCP might be speculated.